Andrew Breitbart Loses It At Occupy Protesters - YouTube

Ha ! THAT , is some very interesting commenting methods - good catch The_wanderer_kansas . I have not seen the likes of this before ! Andrew Breitbart has some truly dedicated lovers !

Stop lying. I correct a spelling error that someone pointed out. Why are you so obsessed with me? What kind of projection is going on?

You corrected spelling, changed the point of several statements and added an image of someone who supposedly commited acts of public indecency among MANY other changes Mr. Agendist. If your gonna edit something you should mark it as edited so people can see the truth about you sir.

Projection? Are you kidding me? Ask around I mark my edits!

No, I did not. I never changed the content of anything. You are lying. I once saw a negative that would have changed the intended meaning and eliminated that to be sure my meaning was understood. I never changed any meaning.

You obsession is getting creepy. You are reading my posts and comparing them to see if there are changes. That is something an obsessive stalker would do.

listen to a GOP crowd support GOP gibberish um no thanks

I guess you simply want to be comfortable in your preconceived notions. Change and considering differences of opinion can be demanding and tiring. I understand....

More inside the bubble-echo-chamber, exactly.

You are REALLY obsessed with this guy ! You are trying to make something right , that can never BE right . He is NOT WELL in the mind or heart , and the more he is seen , it gets more and more clear !

No, if I were very interested, I would readily admit it. I really do not know much about him except that he helped the patriotic Tea Party and publishes the truth about the Left sometimes.

This is rediculous, shut up

If you weren't VERY INTERESTED you wouldn't still be in this thread Agendist, polluter and despoiler of honest thought!

No, only a bit interested.

No, righteous anger. Has something to do with "free speech" and all. The OWSers don't believe in it, so Breitbart got a bit testy.

Selfrighteous indignation, and idiotically portayed. Again I would love to know why you think those who are excercising their freedom of speech are against it? You really make no sense here!

schrieking the same hysteria over and over is your idea of free speech?...turn your computer off,you have the opinion of a four year old.

Left-wingers shout down dissent. As Ann Coulter said, "For Liberals, free speech means throwing food."

ROFL like the GOP and it's lackeys don't shout down dissent, or philibuster past it. Who the hell cares what Coulter says, shes one of the most hate filled people I have ever met.

Ann Coulter is the crux of your argument? Poor little man ... you need a nice long rest.

the wrong-wingers are incapable of sane rational thought. It's the basis of their particular mental illness. They need to see things simple, black&white (in so many ways), they are incapable of dealing with the pace of the changing modern world.

The Republicans follow protocol. If a Democrat philibusters, do you see the Republicans screaming to drown him out? Why not be honest for a change?

Have to admit that she is funny sometimes!

I don't find her support of Romney to be funny.

How do you find it, then?

I find her support to be hypocritical. She claims to be a conservative but she is promoting the least conservative candidate in the race. The notion that Romney is not Obama is not a good enough reason (for me) to vote for him.

And the right medication ...

Yes, Coulter sometimes contradicts herself, and she often goes over the top.

I think she has a place, however, for a couple of reasons. First, she lends comic relief to Liberalism. If we kept taking Liberals too seriously, we would become despondent. We need to lighten up. Next, Ann does provide a voice for how angry people are at Liberals. She says the "politically incorrect" stuff that many of us would like to say sometimes, not because we are hate-filled or whatever, but simply to tell Liberals we are not going to follow their speech codes, they can go....themselves.

And, her quips are funny. Liberals should laugh at themselves sometimes. A sample:

"Liberals are in a constant state of outrage."

"Irritating as Liberals are, I'd just as soon have them waste their energy attacking me than burning the flag."

"In general, I'm against big government, but I'd support a massive emergency federal program to teach logic to Liberals."

"If a Democrat philibusters, do you see the Republicans screaming to drown him out?" it a phillibuster you twit, no one can scream anyone down during a philibuster, and thats the damned problem in a nutshell, besides the left can't phillibuster at the moment now can they?

Ann Coulter is never funny, she makes SOME people laugh with her hateful, bigoted, self loathing, racist, and closedminded statement, but we don't let those people out the padded cells much.

Oh I know, I am just makin sure it's well documented so other people don't fall for the idiocy.

Sounds like she is misreading what she sees in the mirror, the il-logical people she dislikes are obviously her own party.

You (or some Liberal) tried to present a rationale for the screaming and shouting of the OWSers by referring to Republicans filibustering. I did not present that, of course. Now that I mention that the Democrats have done it also, you are distorting what was written, and claiming I am comparing philibustering to screaming. It was you or some leftist, not I.

Yes, Coulter's quips are great sometimes.

"When did that enter public debate - that someone is 'mean'?"

Another good one by Ann:

"'Controversial' means telling the truth about Liberals."

One more from Ann"

"For Liberals, words like 'diverse,' 'tolerance,' 'free speech' mean nothing but 'shut up, we win.'"

What is interesting is that we all know that things are funny when they have the element of truth to them....

In a sane society she'd be in the institution where she can get the mental health care she so obviously is in desperate need of. but their holy-saint-reagan-the mad closed down the institutions and put the people in need of that care out on the streets, now they live under bridges in large appliance boxes. Maybe it was by design, to get more people that thought like him out on the streets? hmmm....

The insane being on the streets is a result of Left-winger policies.

He could also be pulling a fast one on people. Gaining attention by attacking the occupy movement with erroneous and extraneous comments which are also perpetrated in conservative media like fox TV and the New York post newspaper. He might be appealing to the emotions of the people who follow these as their sources for information. Engaging the group and and conveying the message that the movement is involved with rapes is crazy talk. It's the same crap you hear on fox about them being jobless hippies, or thieves, or bullies, or crazy commies, or antisemitic, or even rapist. A lot of people are very gullible and buy all of this. Like cartoon artist Ral Boomer said, "There's some rancorous, vituperative, bile-infused loathing directed at Occupy Wall Street. It's the same way the protest movement against the Vietnam War was portrayed. Wake up people and don't be a slut to this mindfucking that bombards the masses.Think critically and for yourself. the facts are there, find them and make up your mind about everything..... Sorry i kinda went on a rant there =)

Doesn't work on zombies.

Thanks for my morning chuckle!

LOL. My humor's better before the caffeine kicks in hard. Still brain dead.
Kinda like, say, golf? If you try to "think through the swing" it's probably gonna turn out ugly. Just do it.

.is that why my index has gone up 10 strokes.. : (

Could be. :)

Because he did not throw rocks at the police, scream the foulest of obscenities at them, spit in their faces or throw firebombs at them.

Explain to me then why the circle of protestors for OWS had multiple cans of pepperspray doused on them while they sat peacefully, not throwing rocks, shouting obsceneties, spitting or hurling firebombs? Your new name here is Agendist, as that is clearly what you are.

These degenerates blocked the only way out for the police. My God! I showed you over FOUR HUNDRED (400+) incidents of OWS property destruction, rape, and assaults, and you people milk a non-event into trying to claim it was fascism by hired police. In-credible.

how many have you seen...your posts are fabricated bullshit.

Yes, they were blocking the police. And you and your Comrades will milk it for every drop you can, while ignoring the over FOUR HUNDRED (400++) incidents to which I provided a partial list, with each incident verifiable by well-established sources.

No, each one is verifiable. I provided the list.

No, I am NOT a socialist.

Well said!

The studentsin Cali peppersprayed with nearly two gallons of peppers spray WERE NOT BLOCKING ANYTHING let alone police, get out of your fantasy world.

You are so right -- he comes in and turns a valid story with valid comments into sh!t and takes it so far off to the right that we all lose track of what the story was really about. And yet he does/says nothing that we can flag him for so we just have to go away shaking our heads. It's sad.

actually he has said and done plenty that are flaggable offenses here i just never flag anyone except people that post advertisements as news stories. But he is as far as I am concerned guilty of breaches of the following "Guidelines" Spam, Starting Fires,Harrassment, Personal Attacks, Being a Hater, Being a Creep, Creating Multiple Accounts, Overflagging. Additionally in direct violation of the TOS article V D 1 on the counts of fraudulent, defamatory, harassing, abuseful, hateful, or "objectionable" in any other way.

I have seen far worse cases of all of these breaches, but if you want to be litigious about it he is guilty of those charges, but most of the rest of us could be pointed out as making personal attacks and being a hater (of other things).

441 comments as of 2/17...just sayin'...i try to avoid that troll

You may very well be spot on with that.

I am going with overwhelming guilt about rape because he is very unattractive. ;)

What ever it is , it is dangerous to the public .

That is what i want to know !

He was reacting because they were against free speech. He tried to talk. Left-wingers are against free speech. Ask Arthur Jensen, Charles Murray, David Horowitz. Horowitz actually has to have a bodyguard with him when he talks about freedom.

Yeah right! He was out of his element.

You who yell marxist at the rest of us are in support of David Horowitz who ABSOLUTELY was a marxist, and probably still is in the evil "let's control the people" sort of way. Again I cannot believe that you are stating that the group excercising their own right to free speech is actually against free speech. Where do ever get such ideas?

I have read lots of what this actual Marxist has said concerning lots of things and it is obvious his only real concern is his wallet. Great that he gets shouted down by OWS, wanna know why? Because he and his ilk have long been squelshing their voices and their rights... this man is as much a commiter of crime against humanity as those he conjols with.

Big stinking deal, a body guard, I would almost be willing to bet he some on his payroll before OWS even came into existance. This man didn't change parties, he followed his greed to new taskmasters who paid better it really is that simple. And you call liberals marxists while you seem to idolize one.

I see. Horowitz should not be allowed to speak on campuses, even though there are people who want to hear him. He should be summarily shut down.

Welcome to Leftist-Land!

Horowitz is an ex-Marxist, and you do not even know why he gave it up. You claim to understand his hidden motives and can analyze exactly why he does what he does.

Please tell me where you learned to read minds. Thanks.

I didn't say that now did I? Nope sure didn't. I said these people were absolutely right to express their freedom of speech in this fashion. IF the right out numbers them 2-1 how come they haven't stood up to stop them? Because the people of this country who are here experiencing this can see the truth. Why if they are all so outraged by the OWS "mic checks", chants, and heckling why are there so few chanting and heckling back? I would support them in their excercise of freespeech as well, but they haven't. Why do you avoid answering so many of my questions?

"Utter contempt for black people on the part of the left" -- 1) this guy is nuts, 2) he put one LIE on a field of truth and that one lie made it all look true ... it is NOT the left that has contempt for black people, rather, it is the lower IQ portion of the right that has contempt for blacks. And finally, this speech was in 2006 -- nothing he said has ANY relevance today!

Pwr 2 the true American 99%! FREE Bradley Manning AND Julian Assange!

Excellent point that "bodyguard" in the video from 06 is in no way related to the actions of OWS

He was one of two white members of the Black Panther Party.

He did change parties. He became a Republican and voted for Reagan.

Oh get over yourself pal on both of your comments. Firstly his being a Black Panther is supposed to mean something good for him? My bald multi-cultural ass would love to differ!
Secondly yeah he changed parties (which I myself had already admited to) because marxism was a dirty word in this country and that label prevented him to follow his one true love, GREED. Reagan ran on a moderate platform and attracked voters from both sides thats how he won, so was he voting for the party, or for his real purpose, or for his marxist ideals you cannot prove any more then you can prove who that man actually voted for and not just the sound bite he gave a radio journallist to make himself look good.

1, I do dialogue, not personal invective or debate

2. Both comments I made are true

3. The comments imply nothing else beyond those facts.

The reality is that Conservatives are concerned primarily with family, work, church and community. They do not "protest" in such fashions. When the gatherings were purposeful and peaceful, they did gather and actually changed something. All one has to do is see what the Tea Party did with Congress.

" why are there so few chanting and heckling back? I would support them in their excercise of freespeech as well, but they haven't."

Because that is the juvenile way to go about things, screaming on the streets and advocating a tearing down of the "system." It really is the impulse to "revolution," and that is the destructive impulse among these OWS people.

Why not consider the truth. Here is part of what Horowitz wrote about "greed," a term Left-wingers like to use to attack capitalism:

"When I say greed, I am not talking about fraud, theft, dishonesty, lobbying for special privileges from government or other forms of despicable behavior. I’m talking about people trying to get as much as they can for themselves. Let’s look at it.

This winter, Texas ranchers may have to fight the cold of night, perhaps blizzards, to run down, feed and care for stray cattle. They make the personal sacrifice of caring for their animals to ensure that New Yorkers can enjoy beef. Last summer, Idaho potato farmers toiled in blazing sun, in dust and dirt, and maybe being bitten by insects to ensure that New Yorkers had potatoes to go with their beef.

Here’s my question: Do you think that Texas ranchers and Idaho potato farmers make these personal sacrifices because they love or care about the well-being of New Yorkers?"

In the free market, people CANNOT - repeat, CANNOT - possibly make a profit unless they are providing something that others want, and others VOLUNTARILY CHOOSE. A socialist state takes away much of this choice, and the government arbitrarily decides what is to be valued, not free citizens. In a free market society, the citizens can decide what car will be the popular one, what TV programs will be shown, and whether sushi restaurants will proliferate or fail. Not the government. And the only way an evil capitalist can feed his "greed" is to PROVIDE WHAT OTHERS WANT.

2006 is not long ago.

Yes, there are racists who are stupid. But the racism of the left is insidious.

Let me specify how Left-wingers show their deep-seated racism:

The Left-winger, by virtue of his saying any “minorities” need special help is implying that they are inferior.

The Left-winger is refusing to look at the individual and instead looks at people as members of groups defined by skin color; that is what racists do. Their very ideology and psyche virtually necessitates their looking at people as part of some category.

The Left-winger, by revising history, assumes certain races and ethnicities want more representation. Again, he assumes – by virtue of race – that people of certain skin colors must feel inferior because, the

Left-winger assumes again, they need to have history revised to raise their self-esteem. This is about as condescending as one can be. How would you like someone to assume you feel inferior to the “rest of us?”

The Left-winger is actually destroying lives of people whom he teaches are victims or oppressed. When a person becomes convinced he is a victim or a member of an “oppressed” class, it permanently changes him – for the worse.

The Left-winger is using various groups to enhance his own status and sense of superiority. By claiming he knows what is best for Group X, the Left-winger attempts to elevate his status as both an authority and a savior of an inferior group in need of help.

The Left-winger undermines Rule of Law by not treating people as individuals. The law is not perfect, but to change it to meet outcomes or treat members of a group differently is to pervert the law and seize the rights of others.