Community | February 21, 2012 | 11 comments

Pat Buchanan Avoids 9/11 Truth, Gets Fired Anyway

source: http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/02/20/pat-buchanan-avoids-911-truth-gets-fired-anyway/

maasanova

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/02/20/pat-buchanan-avoids-911-truth...

A few months ago, I offered Pat Buchanan a golden opportunity to speak out for 9/11 truth. Pat didn’t rise to the occasion. I asked Paul Craig Roberts, a friend of Pat’s, to bring Pat up to speed.

Dear Paul Craig Roberts,

I interviewed Pat Buchanan yesterday and brought up your excellent review of his book. He said you’re a friend of his. So when the conversation turned to 9/11, and we strongly disagreed, I urged him to talk to you about it.

Here is my report on the interview, with the interview itself embedded.

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/11/03/cheneys-1-doctrine-revisited-or-why-pat-...

In the unlikely event Pat calls you up to ask about 9/11, I’m sure you’ll acquit yourself well.

Best,
Kevin

Dr. Roberts replied:

"Pat can’t take a different stance on 9/11 from the official one and remain a TV pundit. He has all the controversial positions he can bear. I don’t know what he really thinks about 9/11, but there is no point in trying to have him commit suicide.
I see the point.

Paul Craig Roberts"

I see the point. But now Pat’s been fired anyway. Judge Napolitano too.

Buchanan at least has had the decency to oppose those wars, and point out that they were never even meant to be in the US national interest.

His opposition to the Zionist takeover of America – not his controversial positions on race, or his support for the traditional Catholic positions on homosexuality and abortion – is undoubtedly what got him fired.

The moral: If you’re going to get fired for telling even half of the truth, why not tell the whole truth.

Memo to Paul Craig Roberts: Even if it’s “suicide” to speak out for 9/11 truth, we’re all going to die some day anyway.
  1. groups:
    Community,   News and Politics,   Politics
  2. tags:
    Religion,  Television,  Israel,  Terrorism,  9 more
  3.     
    |

11 comments // Pat Buchanan Avoids 9/11 Truth, Gets Fired Anyway // Video

  • mybodymyright
  • mybodymyright
    • 0
      mybodymyright  

    • Response to Albury Smith RE Building 7

      He knows full well the 47 storied 81 vertically columned steel framed high rise WTC7 took 6.5 + seconds to come straight down into its own footprint during its FINAL global collapse phase, described by eyewitness reports as ‘In the manner of Controlled Demolition”.

      He also knows 2.25 seconds of that was at FREE FALL speed and has to rely on the ‘new phenomenon’ magic bolt hypothesis of Pinocchio Sunder, leader of creatioNIST Agnotology, to explain the complete removal of the 81 vertical columns all at once to allow observed NO RESISTANT FREE FALL.

      The hypothesis is coming apart. We already know NIST WTC7 “Normal Office Furnishings Fires’ is a computer program. A construct. An ‘animation’. Un-tested and secret, not based on forensic study nor eyewitness testimony.
      We know that in this untested theory ‘critical collapse initiation’ began with fires already out on ONE floor [12] somehow heating 4 major beams enough to axially expand them in ONE direction, without SAG, breaking 3/4? shear studs@22? centers,’walking’ the massive girder between columns 44 and 79 off its ONE seat, thus, in NIST La La, creating a ‘cascade collapse’ somehow spreading within split seconds throughout the super strong infrastructure
      http://www.nytimes.com/1989/02/19/realestate/commercial-property-salomon-solutio...
      and dropping it at FREE FALL, all concrete pulverized to nanothermate ridden DUST, 6.5seconds + later.
      We know that no steel framed high rise has EVER fallen in such manner due to fire. We KNOW that serious experts contested the breaking of shear studs http://uwaterloo911.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/david-proe-and-ianthomas-wtc7-co...
      and that NIST engineers themselves doubted the methods being used compiling the report http://uwaterloo911.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/fire-engineering-fmr-nist-cheif-...
      We know that major fire studies by Cardington institute with fires burning hotter and much longer produced NO such differential stresses breaking the shear studs.
      Yet NIST said that’s what happened.
      An NISTs ENTIRE theory rests upon those shear stud breaks.

      Recent studies presented
      http://www.911blogger.com/news/2012-03-10/tangled-webs-nist-and-wtc7#comment-256...
      based on study of WTC7 plans have utterly refuted the possibility of the axial expansion as presented by NIST, showing the strength of connection at column 79 seat and the skewed parameters of modeling data preclude seat failure.
      [NIST equations done on UNrestrained steel][Plates securing both sides of vertical girder flange to column,TWO lines of shear studs on internal girders], a presentation adding to the excellent work done by AE911truth researchers and definitive WTC7 ‘Mysterious Collapse’ book by D R Griffin, which identifies just HOW the differential stresses were CREATED in the model to crack the critical shear stud NCSTAR1-9:352 “No thermal Expansion or material degradation was considered for the concrete slab, as the slab was not heated in this analysis.

      Author - rogermorris

      http://wemustknow.net/2012/04/we-are-all-conspiracy-theorists-now-the-mainstream...

      http://disquietreservations.blogspot.com.au/2012/04/collapsing-mythology-death-o...

      A Collapsing Mythology: The Death of The 9/11 Myth And War on Terror Consensus

    • 1 year ago
  • mybodymyright
  • albury
    • 0
      albury  

    • It's possible that Ol' "Jihad" Kevin's transparent mendacity and hostile outbursts toward sane and rational people were finally more than his employers could tolerate, "genius," but what proof of that do you have? What does the above memo to Paul Roberts, stating that "we’re all going to die some day anyway" suggest to you? Please note from the link I posted here that this soi disant 9/11 "truth" aficionado has no problem at all threatening to execute people who expose his absurd nonsense for what it really is. Try disagreeing with him on his web sites, and watch the outpouring of respect he has for the opinions of others.

    • 1 year ago
  • maasanova
    • 0
      maasanova  
    • albury:

      I'm not a fan of half the people on your list, but I didn't see any facts on your blog. Seems like just a bunch of personal attacks and nonsense. Carry on though.

    • 1 year ago
  • albury
  • maasanova
    • 0
      maasanova  
    • albury:

      Sorry but the original link you posted is just a bunch of personal attacks.

      "Debunking" from the JREF crowd is ALWAYS heavily laced with personal attacks and bitchy name-calling, no matter how many years in steel structual design they have.

      Your baloney aint gonna fly. Take care though...

    • 1 year ago
  • albury
  • albury
  • maasanova
    • 0
      maasanova  
    • albury:

      Barret meant career suicide genius. As in Buchannan would speak about things like race, religion and abortion, but steered away from 9/11 because that would have cost him his job.

      Losing your job for pointing out that 9/11 was a huge fraud should be the first indicator to anyone that it was a fraud.

    • 1 year ago
  • Abbynrml
    • 0
      Abbynrml  

    • Buchanan is a racist, a bigot, a chaufenist, and a homophobe like the rest of the republican party has become. They used to clost their views and speak it only in their circles. For some reason they feel free to voice their white only agenda yearning to take away all the freedoms and advancements made to take our country to true equality for all. Sadly, I missed the memo of the white spremisist journal as someone(the evengelical far right) has annointed them to take back the country from that muslim loving socialist ni**er who wasn't born here. This is political suicide but they seem to think we all our supportive of it. All of the republican primary participants are going this far and they are trying to one up each other. Now they have brought Satan into it and clain he has already controls academia and the protestant movement. I just watched Keith use the "Church Lady' to make this point. Quite appropriate.

    • 1 year ago
more from Community:
from the community

top videos