Rachel Maddow is a prevaricator, anti-capitalist, anti-American, deceiver and distorter. Every single time I watch her for more than 10-15 minutes, I see deliberate prevarications, dissembling and deceit.

Yes, Ms. Maddow, when the occasion calls for it, is well known for her ability to prevaricate, dissemble and deceive with the best political opponents in business. They cower from her show into the Right-Wing darkness in fear that they might actually have to answer a question, or worse, the dreaded "follow-up question" unknownst to both Fox and inside-beltway media. Right-Wingers typically slink away in the fear of her. It's a fun time for all. And it's free!

Or, you can cruise over to the AIM link and have the opportunity to pay money for the privilege of being entertained by the delightful Ms. Gabriel who, as you might detect from her cover photo, has a tiny bit of attitude about Muslims. No charge for that!
All brought to you by your friends at Accuracy in Media, with the words "fair" and "balanced" in their banner. Yes! The words you've come to trust! How could you expect anything less than the best in ultra-Right reading pleasure. Experience the thrill of the only group, uhh.. person, in America who make the rest of the Hard-Right look like commies.

For additional information (highly recommended!) see here:
http://web.archive.org/web/20090414141948/http://mediamatters.org/items/20051210...

No, Madcow is a prevaricator and liar. She is a joke.

Yes! We know! And her jokes are funny!

Glad you know that Rachel is a prevaricator.

I have no idea what a prevaricator is. Who cares? Her jokes are funny!

I have no idea what a prevaricator is. Who cares? Her jokes are funny!

"I have no idea what a prevaricator is."

Why not look it up? It fits Rachel MadCow quite perfectly.

I like that word. Here ya go:

prevaricate [prɪˈværɪˌkeɪt]
vb
(intr) to speak or act falsely or evasively with intent to deceive
[from Latin praevāricārī to walk crookedly, from prae beyond

Emphasis on INTENT TO DECEIVE. Rachel!

Thanks! You're a pal!
Gotta run. Just DL'd her podcast and the popcorn's done!
I shall use my new word as soon as can.

There's that word again.....
Great illustration!

Yes. Islam and its war-like desire to take over the world and render infidels (all non-Muslims) as second-class citizens to be sometimes "tolerated" but reduced to the level of dogs, or to execute, according to their Koran, any apostates and to oppose all freedom of religion and of speech, has been on its murderous and tyrannical rampage for around 1,400 years.

You do know that Salmon is an Indian Muslem?

"You do know that Salmon is an Indian Muslem?"

....therefore?

Nothing...What they like to do. Salmon is a Muslim too.

"What they like to do. Salmon is a Muslim too."

Yes, that makes it worse. According to their freakin' koran, infidels are not to be summarily executed on the spot but only treated as dogs and second-class citizens. However, any Muslim who gave up on Islam (an apostate) is to be EXECUTED. Yes, like rats they turn on their own kind.

Accuracy in media is a conservative rag devoid in everything but mostly in Accuracy---we've been dome this road before, that site is as accurate as Fox is balanced.

There's probably more Accuracy and truth in S&M sites----certainly more Conservative Right-wingers.

Thanks but no thanks I will never read that pack of lies.

There's more! Call the toll-free number now and we'll throw in Ronnie Raygun! Yes! That's right! Ronnie singing his best stuff from way back including the old favorites, "I Wish Jimmy Was Here", "Zoom-Zoom, Look at Those Star Wars", and the classic: "Facts Are Stupid, Thank Heaven I Don't Know Any!"

Hurry! Call now! If the phone rings and it's Karl Rove, hang up!... we got here first!

No, it is a good alternative to Media Matters, and I have an email subscription to both. I like to know what the Left-wingers are "thinking."

When you find some Left-wingers let me know what they say.

{When you find some Left-wingers let me know what they say.}

OK

After September 11, the Left-wingers started the blame and excoriations of America. Following is a small sample:
University of Massachusetts journalism professor Bill Israel said “[the attack was] the predictable result of American policy.”

In Marquette University, students were banned from having a moment of silence around an American flag; it was feared it could alienate foreign students.

At Florida Gulf Coast University, a librarian banned students from wearing “I’m proud to be an American” badges, ostensibly in the name of “tolerance and civility.”

At Central Michigan State, flags or pictures that were pro-American had to be taken down.

At San Diego State University, when an Ethiopian student reported that he heard Arabic speaking students praising Osama bin Laden for killing Americans, he was put on “warning.”

At Arizona State University, students were banned from hanging an American flag in the cafeteria.

John Hopkins professor Charles Fairbanks openly supported our war on terrorism; this resulted in his being fired from his position in an institute.

In New York, a professor lost a friend on the terrorist flight and she wanted to hang a flag in his honor. The dean himself took it down after she refused to do so.

Yale university professor Paul Kennedy said that American culture had provoked the hatred that was behind the attacks.

In discussions of the attack at Brown University, professors were required to ask students why they thought America was hated.

At the University of Wisconsin students broke into singing “The Star Spangled Banner,” but protestors cut them off with an Iraqi song.

But not all indictments of America after September 11 came from the universities. Susan Sontag, still an icon of Modern Liberals, said that September 11 was “not a ‘cowardly’ attack on ‘civilization’ or ‘liberty’ or ‘humanity’ or ‘the free world,’ but it was an attack on the world’s self-proclaimed superpower, undertaken as a consequence of specific American alliances and actions…[The terrorists] were not cowards.”

Playwright Harold Pinter said that September 11 was “a predictable and inevitable act of retaliation against the constant and systematic manifestation of state terrorism on the part of the United States.”

In Berkeley, an omphalos for Modern Liberalism activism centered at the University of California, fire fighters were ordered to remove American flags from their trucks; the department feared locals would attack and damage the vehicles.

David Westin, president of ABC News, told the newscasters not to wear American flag pins on camera because that would be “taking sides.”

Soon after the strike on our country, Michael Moore wrote in the San Francisco Chronicle how “the American flag stands for intimidation, censorship, violence, bigotry, sexism, homophobia…Who are we calling terrorists here?”