Community | July 22, 2012 | 130 comments

US poverty on track to rise to highest since 1960s !

Image
kennymotown
Really? Who'd have thunk, right?

WASHINGTON — The ranks of America's poor are on track to climb to levels unseen in nearly half a century, erasing gains from the war on poverty in the 1960s amid a weak economy and fraying government safety net.

Census figures for 2011 will be released this fall in the critical weeks ahead of the November elections.

The Associated Press surveyed more than a dozen economists, think tanks and academics, both nonpartisan and those with known liberal or conservative leanings, and found a broad consensus: The official poverty rate will rise from 15.1 percent in 2010, climbing as high as 15.7 percent. Several predicted a more modest gain, but even a 0.1 percentage point increase would put poverty at the highest level since 1965.

Poverty is spreading at record levels across many groups, from underemployed workers and suburban families to the poorest poor. More discouraged workers are giving up on the job market, leaving them vulnerable as unemployment aid begins to run out. Suburbs are seeing increases in poverty, including in such political battlegrounds as Colorado, Florida and Nevada, where voters are coping with a new norm of living hand to mouth.

"I grew up going to Hawaii every summer. Now I'm here, applying for assistance because it's hard to make ends meet. It's very hard to adjust," said Laura Fritz, 27, of Wheat Ridge, Colo., describing her slide from rich to poor as she filled out aid forms at a county center. Since 2000, large swaths of Jefferson County just outside Denver have seen poverty nearly double.

Fritz says she grew up wealthy in the Denver suburb of Highlands Ranch, but fortunes turned after her parents lost a significant amount of money in the housing bust. Stuck in a half-million dollar house, her parents began living off food stamps and Fritz's college money evaporated. She tried joining the Army but was injured during basic training.

Now she's living on disability, with an infant daughter and a boyfriend, Garrett Goudeseune, 25, who can't find work as a landscaper. They are struggling to pay their $650 rent on his unemployment checks and don't know how they would get by without the extra help as they hope for the job market to improve.

In an election year dominated by discussion of the middle class, Fritz's case highlights a dim reality for the growing group in poverty. Millions could fall through the cracks as government aid from unemployment insurance, Medicaid, welfare and food stamps diminishes.

"The issues aren't just with public benefits. We have some deep problems in the economy," said Peter Edelman, director of the Georgetown Center on Poverty, Inequality and Public Policy.

He pointed to the recent recession but also longer-term changes in the economy such as globalization, automation, outsourcing, immigration, and less unionization that have pushed median household income lower. Even after strong economic growth in the 1990s, poverty never fell below a 1973 low of 11.1 percent. That low point came after President Lyndon Johnson's war on poverty, launched in 1964, that created Medicaid, Medicare and other social welfare programs.

"I'm reluctant to say that we've gone back to where we were in the 1960s. The programs we enacted make a big difference. The problem is that the tidal wave of low-wage jobs is dragging us down and the wage problem is not going to go away anytime soon," Edelman said.

Stacey Mazer of the National Association of State Budget Officers said states will be watching for poverty increases when figures are released in September as they make decisions about the Medicaid expansion. Most states generally assume poverty levels will hold mostly steady and they will hesitate if the findings show otherwise. "It's a constant tension in the budget," she said.

For the rest of the article go to the link provided:
  1. groups:
    Community,   News and Politics,   WTF,   US Politics,   26 more
  2. tags:
    slashing the safety net Rich Getting Richer
  3.     
    |

130 comments // US poverty on track to rise to highest since 1960s !

  • youngdebater
  • JessMag
  • jackhole
  • Leen61
  • jackhole
  • bailey78
  • mrpuma2u
  • jackhole
  • nursediesel
    • +3
      nursediesel  
    • The banks and our government officials are in bed together. Until we stop this kind of fraternizing it won't get better.
      We will return to the feudal stage. The land owning rich and the other poor bastards kowtowing to the government elite.
      We no longer can look forward to the American dream of freedom and property.
      We will all be on the government dole in one way or another. My kids, your kids and grand kids won't be able to pay the government to keep all the people receiving free benefits.
      And if we keep having to do our paychecks by automatic deposit and banks keep illegally charging the patrons we will no longer own anything. It's a constant stream of money into the bank and the government.....we get what's left.
      Like I said Government/Banks, in bed together.

    • 10 months ago
  • ilikeike
  • ilikeike
  • Mishima
  • rerushg
    • +1
      rerushg  
    • Mishima:

      "No, Jesus was not a [class] 'warrior'" No? How about some Old Testament?
      in Amos 6:
      "Alas for those who lie on beds of ivory, and lounge on their couches, and eat lambs from the flock, and calves from the stall; who sing idle songs to the sound of the harp, and like David improvise on instruments of music; who drink wine from bowls, and anoint themselves with the finest oils, but are not grieved over the ruin of Joseph! Therefore they shall now be the first to go into exile, and the revelry of the loungers shall pass away."

      New Testament? in 1 Timothy 6:
      "As for those who in the present age are rich, command them not to be haughty, or to set their hopes on the uncertainty of riches, but rather on God who richly provides us with everything for our enjoyment. They are to do good, to be rich in good works, generous, and ready to share, thus storing up for themselves the treasure of a good foundation for the future, so that they may take hold of the life that really is life."

      More new Testament? Too lengthy for here but I recommend Luke 16:19-31.

      Now I'm not particularly religious but I really like that, "...take hold of life that really is life."

      I think we can accurately conclude that the Bible has liberal bias and Jesus was a socialist.

      Done here.

    • 10 months ago
  • Mishima
    • -1
      Mishima [removed]  
    • rerushg:

      Yes, it is exactly as I wrote. Money per se is not condemned, but the attitude and use of it, namely, putting the acquisition of money before the spirit is sinful. Any human being would agree with this in its essence.

      To think that it is somehow moral to get the government to forcefully take wealth from these people is the exact opposite of this. The opposite. Morality is an individual decision; it is not FORCING others to do what one decrees is "moral." That is IMMORALITY. If you make a decision to help your neighbor with your time or you donate clothes, that is moral. If a government agent MAKES you spend time and you do, you have not made any moral choice. And that government agent cannot make you be moral. Jesus said that the poor will always be among us, but you think that we can refute this by getting the government confiscate the property of others: This goes against the teachings of Christ.

    • 10 months ago
  • rerushg
  • Mishima
  • Mishima
  • MSII
    • +1
      MSII  
    • Mishima:

      Oh! now you're a theologian! Going to teach us the true-path as "revealed" by holy saint-reagan-the-paranoid-dementia-riddled in "prosperity gospel" scripture?

    • 10 months ago
  • MSII
    • +3
      MSII  
    • Mishima:

      ...your masters are the creators and maintainers of the REAL and ongoing class warfare all for them your 1%er masters against the actual TRUE american CITIZENS, real PEOPLE -NOT- false "corporate people"...

    • 10 months ago
  • Paratus
    • 0
      Paratus  
    • Well it seems we are not doing any better in the War on Poverty than we are doing in the War on Drugs. I think it is time the government stopped all the social engineering, reduced taxes, made it easier to set up and run a business.

    • 10 months ago
  • Mishima
    • -1
      Mishima [removed]  
    • Paratus:

      The War on Poverty should have been called the UNGRATEFUL Society. It actually resulted in higher rates of poverty, welfare expansion, single parenthood, increase drug use, the destruction of inner cities, and even higher rates of venereal diseases!

    • 10 months ago
  • rerushg
    • +1
      rerushg  
    • Mishima:

      Hardly. Present wealth inequality is directly the result of theft by your handlers; even during wartime when Americans should pull together. It is clear in which direction you pull.

    • 10 months ago
  • Mishima
    • -3
      Mishima [removed]  
    • rerushg:

      For the TWENTY-SECOND time: This putative "discrepancy" was larger in a period of incredible growth in our country when prosperity was spreading among the masses.

      There is no "theft." It is the Left that would confiscate the property of others. It is the Left that is trying to foment class warfare, and the people are not buying it.

    • 10 months ago
  • rerushg
    • +3
      rerushg  
    • Mishima:

      No doubt your infatuation with counting is because you have well exceeded the number of repetitions necessary for indoctrination on the Far-Right. You may continue to count if you like.
      Their is clear and obvious theft. It is only a matter of investigation, discovery, documentation, appropriate legal process, and recovery. It is common. Drug related crimes, for example.
      As for class warfare. That was begun by your handlers. We are only carrying out the process described above.

    • 10 months ago
  • Mishima
    • -3
      Mishima [removed]  
    • rerushg:

      There is no theft. Why do you think that the local grocer or shoe salesman went out of business? Was it because Walmart was evil in building a store in the area? Or was it because the local people left their fellow store owners and went to Walmart and bought Chinese-made goods because they were cheaper and Walmart shopping was more convenient?

    • 10 months ago
  • Mishima
  • rerushg
  • bailey78
  • rerushg
    • +1
      rerushg  
    • Mishima:

      "Show me that person who had a gun to his head...."
      Interesting image you present. So anything less than that is not "forcing"?
      I would remind you of a comment you made earlier in which you used the term "create desire" in reference to the practices of corporate capitalism.

      This gets tiresome. We're all aware of your purpose her. Others may chose to continue. I am done here. The point is made over and over.

    • 10 months ago
  • Mishima
    • -4
      Mishima [removed]  
    • rerushg:

      {I would remind you of a comment you made earlier in which you used the term "create desire" in reference to the practices of corporate capitalism.}

      It is not specific to what you think is evil. We try to create desire in children to learn, in someone we romance, in trying to convince someone that our service is needed or helpful. You would restrict this to only those products and services that you deem "worthy," and that is FASCISM AND TYRANNY.

      True freedom is letting the people decide what they want, and also RESPECTING that they are in control of their lives.

      Think of it seriously: If you really believe that people are not in control of their desires but only reacting how the "wealthy" want them to react, that means that some entity must be set up to insure that they have the "correct" information because they are incapable of sorting it out for themselves. You really need to think through what you propose. Do you realize what you are really advocating? It is to have micromanagement of virtually everything by experts who know what is best for us.

    • 10 months ago
  • MSII
    • +3
      MSII  
    • Mishima:

      ...your masters are the creators and maintainers of the REAL and ongoing class warfare all for them your 1%er masters against the actual TRUE american CITIZENS, real PEOPLE -NOT- "corporate" entities masquerading as people!

    • 10 months ago
  • MSII
  • cmc101
    • 0
      cmc101  
    • rerushg:

      WE ARE NOT fighting A WAR FOR THE PEOPLE JUST FOR THE RICH
      we will pay for looking for weapons of mass destruction by taxing the poor and claiming we are broke as you have said Shame shame on those that have not made the right (YOUR) choice

    • 10 months ago
  • cmc101
  • cmc101
  • cmc101
  • Mishima
  • Paratus
  • Mishima
  • warman1138
  • cmc101
  • Mishima
    • -3
      Mishima [removed]  
    • cmc101:

      "the land of opportunity. only for Billionaires"

      Still plenty of opportunity. I know that putting out any information will result in the Left-wingers using it to attack in vicious and uncouth manners, but your post deserves such a response: My son just opened a small business and it is thriving! He doesn't listen to the news; maybe that is the main reason he is successful.

    • 10 months ago
  • rerushg
  • ilikeike
    • +3
      ilikeike  
    • rerushg:

      He's not here to convince anyone, just to provide a sample of stupid ideology so we can get upset at how obtuse people can be and provide more posts. He must work for the site, i've been watching him for years.

    • 10 months ago
  • rerushg
    • +1
      rerushg  
    • ilikeike:

      Thanks! (nice userID) Who's upset? It's the view from the Extreme-Right here for us to observe. His rationale is obvious. We're far beyond being angry at this stuff.

    • 10 months ago
  • Mishima
  • cmc101
    • +1
      cmc101  
    • Mishima:

      I spent 49 plus years working with small business and watch some rise and others fall but I also heard that time has change "the fittest survive in a jungle"
      But what I witness factories in small towns bankrupt by high interest loans while large corporations receiving very low interest loans I witness the cancer of unemployment turn strong giants into unrecognizable imps carrying SHAME and INGRATITUDE expounded by his employer and civic leaders that walk away with pockets of money
      many of laboring folks had retirements that were better nest eggs better than any social security had their funds pillage and raped by the very people you brag about and support today . If and when convicted and committed still proclaim their innocence and and you still want to call me a thief . Keep wearing your rose color sun glasses

    • 10 months ago
  • Mishima
    • -1
      Mishima [removed]  
    • cmc101:

      "factories in small towns bankrupt by high interest loans while large corporations receiving very low interest loans"

      Government interference.

      " the cancer of unemployment "

      Caused in part by the minimum wage and extortionist unions.

      "many of laboring folks had retirements that were better nest eggs better than any social security had their funds pillage and raped by the very people you brag about and support today "

      You are lying about me. I support the free market, not government collusion with it.

    • 10 months ago
  • MSII
  • MSII
  • MSII
  • MSII
    • +1
      MSII  
    • Mishima:

      you are an obvious supporter of right-wing-corporate-FASCIST-party "trickle-down" crony-capitalism. Your military-industrial-crony-contractors are direct FASCIST "collusion" with da gubermint.

    • 10 months ago
  • MSII
  • Leen61
  • cmc101
    • 0
      cmc101  
    • Mishima:

      what year was you born
      that stuff that you spew I have heard from every anti-government pervert that wanted to blame others while stealing from the poor
      I remember when you had to use roller skates to out run the price changers at the grocery store

    • 10 months ago
  • cmc101
  • cmc101
  • MSII
    • 0
      MSII  
    • cmc101:

      "I owe my soul to the company store"

      I used to live in the PA. coal-region where it wasn't that long ago there still were the "company towns" that pretty much owned their "employees", the endless evil of the 1%er corporate-scum! A song for the ages!

    • 10 months ago
  • cmc101
  • Mishima
    • -1
      Mishima [removed]  
    • cmc101:

      No blame of "others"; that is what the Left-wingers do. Conservatives want government to stay away; Liberals want more, more, more, more from government. Liberals blame the rich for their own failures. Liberals claim the rich are "greedy" while it is the Leftists that ooze ENVY.

    • 10 months ago
  • Mishima
  • cmc101
  • Mishima
  • cztheday
    • +5
      cztheday  
    • I realize that I will raise a degree of ire in certain quarters with the following observations, but damn the torpedoes:

      1. The problem of poverty cannot be addressed by government alone. In fact, under our current economic system, the private sector must shoulder most of the burden. We must find creative ways of reducing the private sector's natural incentive to outsource labor to countries with lower labor costs. I know that is easy to say and extremely difficult to do, but it has to be done.

      2. Government must nonetheless play a significant role, but our annual budgetary deficits have been unsustainable since the early years of the Bush II administration. A simple pie chart of federal spending can be understood by virtually any American. Even a casual glance at such a chart reveals two things: there are a very limited number of programs that are sufficiently large that cuts would reduce our deficits to a significant degree, and there is no combination of spending cuts that will ever come close to eliminating those deficits altogether. Increased revenues MUST be a part of the solution.

      3. We cannot sustain defense spending equal to the total defense spending of the next 26 countries with the highest defense spending combined...especially when 25 of them are our allies. We also cannot sustain social security and medicare at their projected levels when life expectancy has lengthened so greatly and the age at which people become eligible for benefits has increased so very little. It is time to increase the eligibility age to 70.

      4. Taxation is not equitable for the highest earning citizens of this country. While I do not think that people should be punished for earning good money, a top tax rate closer to 50% is not unfair, given the benefits high earners have gained from being citizens.

    • 10 months ago
  • cmc101
  • Mishima
  • ilikeike
    • +2
      ilikeike  
    • cztheday:

      We certainly don't need the military to protect the poor peoples shit. I think it's the rich that should pay for it since they are the ones trying to protect their hoards of swag.

    • 10 months ago
  • ilikeike
  • Mishima
  • bailey78
  • Mishima
    • -2
      Mishima [removed]  
    • bailey78:

      In the short run, government spending creates jobs but it hurts in the long run.

      There are many reasons. First of all, from where does the government get the money to pay these workers? It gets it from taxing and borrowing. Taxing takes money out of the paychecks of people, thus reducing their spending power.

      Borrowing takes money out of that available for private businesses, it raises interest rates, and it increases inflation (which essentially reduces buying power and the savings of the people).

      The other reason is more difficult to understand and requires effort: If the public is not demanding something enough to want to pay for it themselves, and the government funds or creates it, it has been inflated and harms the economy.

      Another reason takes quite a bit of concentration to understand. There is the "seen" and the "unseen." Take a local town. The town agrees to tax the residents in order to create jobs and they do it through expanding a park. People have jobs and some unemployed get jobs, right? On a superficial level, this appears to be a great thing. After all, in this locale of about 500,000 people, it only costs about $10-$20 per person.

      So, what is "seen" is the expanse of the park, and the people working.

      What is "unseen" and is destructive in an insidious manner is that each resident - on average - has $10-$20 less to spend. One less meal at McDonalds, one less CD from the local store, one less meal for a family of four. All those mount up and destroy those respective businesses, but they cannot be pinpointed because the losses are spread around, all over the area.

      If you would like to respond to these in a mature and reasonable fashion, please do so. Otherwise, please do not respond at all. Thank you.

    • 10 months ago
  • bailey78
  • bailey78
  • Mishima
  • bailey78
  • Mishima
  • Leen61
  • MSII
  • cmc101
  • trut
  • kennymotown
  • MSII
  • rerushg
  • MSII
  • Mishima
    • -5
      Mishima [removed]  
    • rerushg:

      Bill Moyers is quite the hypocrite. He tried to get Goldwater declared "insane" by psychiatrists, for example.

      Moyers was the hunter of "suspected homosexuals" in LBJ's White House.

      And in the Goldwater camp.

      He helped Edgar Hoover in the bugging of Martin Luther King.

      And Moyers "planted" questions in advance to reporters for LBJ's press conferences.

      Moyers was nominated as one of the 50 most influential Progressives by Nation magazine.

      Moyers’ jeremiads are outrageous. He claimed that Bush and Cheney were "feeding on the corpse of war."

      Moyers compared people who wear American flag pins to people who adored the Little Red Book of the mass-murderer Mao.

      Moyers asserted that the Republicans retaking the Senate in 2002 would unite D.C. behind "eviscerating" our environment. He hints that the rich, as a class have never really held jobs of any kind. Moyers also bemoans opinionated broadcasters who use florid language instead of dry recitation.
      His hypocrisy knows no limits. Billybob Moyers denounced relationships between conservative foundations and conservative policy experts, while, at the same time, this miscreant was head of the Schumann Foundation. Moyers not only funded all his favorite left-wing institutions, he paraded them all across his programs that American taxpayer paid for!

      Moyers denounces people for eating at the public trough in secret deals, but he specializes in profiting off PBS Home Video and other products he merchandises. Remember Moyer’s program "The Power of Myth," with new-age guy Joseph Campbell? There was an interesting program entitled "PBS: Behind the Screen." It exposed Moyers: He had entered into a secret kickback deal granting him a cut of the book proceeds to Campbell's book. It was one of many such deals Billy has made to “profit” from “NONprofit” television.
      Moyers continues to funnel millions of bucks to ultra-leftist causes via his foundation. Moyers will certainly continue to lecture conservative parts of the country about their greedy desire for tax cuts, broadcast from his gorgeous apartment in chic section of Manhattan.

    • 10 months ago
  • Leen61
  • kennymotown
  • MSII
    • +3
      MSII  
    • Mishima:

      more of the same, endless Faux Noise propaganda lies. right-wing-corporate-fascist-party spin.

      "comparing people who wear American flag pins to people who adored the Little Red Book of the mass-murderer Mao."
      - sounds correct, the same fanatical worshipful devotion to lunatic meaningless symbols.

    • 10 months ago
  • rerushg
  • rerushg
    • +1
      rerushg  
    • Mishima:

      Nice job, Mishima. What? You're present job is running dry and you're lobbying to be Moyer's press agent?
      As for Goldwater: He WAS borderline. Many believe that had he prevailed we'd now be only 50 years into the several thousand year half-life of plutonium scattered all over the planet.
      As for J. Edgar: Yes. Assisting him in digging his own grave must have been irresistible.

      Keep trying.

    • 10 months ago
  • cmc101
  • Mishima
  • MSII
    • +1
      MSII  
    • cmc101:

      Yes the right-wingers and their mad-saints, somebody really needs to rip open all the cursed graves and pound some wooden stakes into their chests, you know - just to be certain.

    • 10 months ago
  • rerushg
  • kennymotown
  • Leen61
    • +5
      Leen61  
    • It's so sad to see that this country is going backwards with more austerity measures on the way. Thanks to the theft of this country's treasury, beginning with the Bush years. We need to get back to the drawing board.

    • 10 months ago
  • SIBob
  • Leen61
  • ilikeike
  • Leen61
    • +2
      Leen61  
    • ilikeike:

      I know sometimes it's hard not to talk back to him/her, but we will all be better off if we ignore him/her. That person is here to drop turds in the pond and nothing else.

    • 10 months ago
1 - 100 of 130

top videos