Welcome to Current TV
Why League of Women Voters calls presidential debates "frauds" !
This article from 2007 is really quite revealing and explains the takeover in 1988 of another piece of our freedom to decide!
I'm listening to the CNN-Youtube GOP debate right now and I'm pretty disgusted. This is not a debate, this is a media sham. How did we get here, I wondered. What happened to the tough debates hosted by the League of Women Voters?
Apparently, LWV saw this coming a mile away. Check out their press release from 1988 explaning why they bowed out of the process (bolded emphasis mine):
October 3, 1988
LEAGUE REFUSES TO "HELP PERPETRATE A FRAUD"
WITHDRAWS SUPPORT FROM FINAL PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE
WASHINGTON, DC —"The League of Women Voters is withdrawing its sponsorship of the presidential debate scheduled for mid-October because the demands of the two campaign organizations would perpetrate a fraud on the American voter," League President Nancy M. Neuman said today.
"It has become clear to us that the candidates' organizations aim to add debates to their list of campaign-trail charades devoid of substance, spontaneity and honest answers to tough questions," Neuman said. "The League has no intention of becoming an accessory to the hoodwinking of the American public."
Neuman said that the campaigns presented the League with their debate agreement on September 28, two weeks before the scheduled debate. The campaigns' agreement was negotiated "behind closed doors" and vas presented to the League as "a done deal," she said, its 16 pages of conditions not subject to negotiation.
Most objectionable to the League, Neuman said, were conditions in the agreement that gave the campaigns unprecedented control over the proceedings. Neuman called "outrageous" the campaigns' demands that they control the selection of questioners, the composition of the audience, hall access for the press and other issues.
"The campaigns' agreement is a closed-door masterpiece," Neuman said. "Never in the history of the League of Women Voters have two candidates' organizations come to us with such stringent, unyielding and self-serving demands."
Neuman said she and the League regretted that the American people have had no real opportunities to judge the presidential nominees outside of campaign-controlled environments.
"On the threshold of a new millenium, this country remains the brightest hope for all who cherish free speech and open debate," Neuman said. "Americans deserve to see and hear the men who would be president face each other in a debate on the hard and complex issues critical to our progress into the next century."
Neuman issued a final challenge to both Vice President Bush and Governor Dukakis to "rise above your handlers and agree to join us in presenting the fair and full discussion the American public expects of a League of Women Voters debate."
Source: League of Women Voters
It's me again. This problem is obviously not specific to the Republicans. Anyone following the Dem's debates will see the same "controlled" conditions.
So with the 3 Presidential Debated looming and 1 VP Debate still to come, realize these
debates are nothing like a real debate, just more Kabuki Theatre!
- Community, News and Politics, WTF, US Politics, Progressive America, Collective Journalism, Humanism, Educating America, Orwellian Nightmare, War On Intelligent Thought, Progressives United, Community Spotlight, Election 2012, Cannabis Culture, Citizen Journalism, Healthcare, Civil Liberties, Exposing the Wrongs, (MSM)Mainstream Misinformation, The 4,000 Club, When The Revolution Comes, Liberty, Corporate Greed, Zombies, NEOCapitalism, Social and Political Sciences, Labor Party, Doublethink and Newspeak 24 more
more from Community:
from the community