US Foreign Policy Debate - Islamic Terrorists On The US Payroll
source: http://www.rys2sense.com/anti-neocons/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=29219
-
-
- maasanova
- added this
http://www.rys2sense.com/anti-neocons/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=29219
Real Islamic terrorists, not the fake ones that the FBI rounds up in these provacatuered "domestic terror sting operations."http://www.rys2sense.com/anti-neocons/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=29219
Terrorism is OK so long as your on OUR payroll and terrorize the targets WE don't like.
Examples the US backs or has backed
The Zia ul-Haq in Pakistan,
The Mujahideen of Afghanistan,
Abu Qurah in Jordan,
The Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt
MEK (Mujahadeen e-Kalk) in Iraq/Iran
Jundullah South Pakistan
Salafi Jihadist, FSA in Syria and this is a number of groups with GCC and NATO sponsors
And then the US supports the government in the Republic of Yemen despite its election only having one name on the ballot.
Hadi North Yemen, the US claims to be supporting the government in a fight against "al qaeda" the reality this is still the unresolved conflict between North and South Yemen from their civil war from 94. There was even a secession movement as recently as 2007 but all of that history you see is ignored. Why acknowledge the civil war (almost exclusively fought in the South) or a secession movement when it's much easier to just scream Al Qaeda and support the puppets. They love the simplistic GI Joe narrative of we are good they are bad, its us vs Al Qaeda.
After a nearly two year battle led by numerous Republican and Democratic officials, the MEK has been taken off the US State Department’s list of terrorist organizations under the Hillary Clinton and Obama Administration. According to the September 21, 2012 article in the Guardian UK:
“The US secretary of state, Hillary Clinton, is expected to notify Congress that the MEK will be removed from the terrorism list in the coming days.
-
-
artemis6
-
Good post , something to think about .
- 7 months ago
-
artemis6
-
-
maasanova
-
artemis6:
Thirty years ago, something like this would have potentially unseated a president or at least brought up a major investigation into the parties involved.
These days it's no big deal and presented in mainstream news like the weather.
- 7 months ago
-
maasanova
