Polanski is nothing like Savile - yes, he had consensual sex with a girl who was underage but looked eighteen. That is the only time he did anything like that. Polanski is not a pedophile, he never was. Pederasty is just another word for homosexuality, a rather outdated word. Pedophilia is a condition in which the offender is exclusively attracted to pre-pubescent children and generally psychologically unable to have sex with an adult, and most pedophiles were sexually abused when they were children.

Perhaps you are counfusing Polanski's consensual sexual relationship with Natsha Kinski who according to Wikipedia began that relationship with Polanski when she was 15 (FIFTEEN) and he was 43.

Now I know that this is probably legal and socially acceptable in Europe especially back in the 80's, but it does show that Polanski likely did have a penchant for what we legally refer to as underaged females here in the states

And you may also be confused about the idea that Samantha Geimer consented to Polanski, or that she may have even been in any state to consent.

http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/roman-polanski/story?id=8705958

There's an interesting back story on that as well as all may have not been as portrayed in that documentary.

But this is what I would expect from the Hollywood establishment who wishes to prop up someone to whom they have bestowed so many honors, awards and so much prestige.

The Hollywood Establishment had absolutely no hand whatsoever in the making of that documentary. As for your mysterious back story, why don't you buy and watch the documentary before issuing judgments.

I thought you might find this interesting and informative too:

http://www.romanpolanskiwantedanddesired.com/the-case/

Well I wouldn't buy something that I already think Im going to disagree with, but I found "Polanski: Wanted and Desired" in my city library's catalogue so I went ahead and checked it out.

I will watch it and perhaps let you know what I think afterwords.

That documentary being nothing but documented facts, how do you already think you're going to disagree with it unless you know you disagree with facts? At any rate, I commend your decision to watch it and look forward to your thoughts about it after you've watched it.

The elites are wickedly corrupt. They've got the money and resources to get all the women, men they wanted. But their appetites know no bounds. They are jaded and sick of adults, so the elites prey on children.

There is never just one of them.They're usually organized into pedo rings. It's whole system.

And they are the rich and powerful.

The Franklin scandal reached all the way into Washington DC....

So true. I know of a large one here that's being denied to high heaven. Involves lawyers and judges, also some parliamentarians. I personally know the lawyer who's "outing" the whole thing, used to work for him way back when - before he was "run out" of the profession. I can't say much here, have a family member who's working on this, but here's a link:
http://rense.com/general81/rxk.htm

The predators are many, and we and our kids are at their mercy. My friend "the lawyer" is a broken man because he stood up to "the power."

Here's a couple of paragraphs written by a former United Church Minister - run out of the Church - when he began to talk about Residential Schools and children who were murdered. We're very involved in this case.

"Another man to watch is Kevin Annett (http:// www.hiddenfromhistory.org), a United Church (Methodist-Presbyterian) minister who was kicked out of the church for investigating systemic murder of Native children in church-run residential schools. He is leading a crusade to force the Canadian government and churches to acknowledge genocide. Canadians are outspoken about recognizing other nations' genocides.
"If genocide can happen to to Indian people today, it can happen to you tomorrow," Annett writes in his book, "Love and Death in the Valley." "Especially if you rely on the government and corporate system that has robbed them for so long." "

Polanski was not protected by anyone.

I agree....in a sense.... First what is a 13 year old girl doing at a grown man's house? Did he ask her for ID? Doubtful considering, if it were me....she looks young but not that young. The girl should have been at home and not doing what women do with grown men. You act like an adult alot of times you should expect to get treated like one.

If a 13 year old boy punches an adult outside a night club....does the person ask for ID before retaliating? No....the boy is old enough to be out at an adult "place" doing what other adults in the vicinity are doing. Polanski did not find this girl in a playground or anything close to that.....

I have 2 nieces and neither would have even been anywhere near any man's house that old with out me or their mom with them....no if ands or buts.

The Daily Mail is no reference. If you actually knew all that happened, you would know that he did his full time to which he was sentenced, and only escaped after the corrupt judge went back on the sentence and wanted to jail him for decades. The other point is that Polanski did this only once, he is not a serial abuser or rapist. I am done with you on that subject, you know nothing about it and only believe what you want to believe.

Her mother sent her to Polanski and told her to seduce him, in the hope that he would give her a starring role in a film.