10 Filthy-Rich, Tax-Dodging Hypocrites Pushing Disastrous Austerity on America
source: http://www.alternet.org/economy/10-filthy-rich-tax-dodging-hypocrites-pushing-disastrous-aus...
-
-
- Vic_Romano
- added this
http://www.alternet.org/economy/10-filthy-rich-tax-dodging-hypocrites...
By Sarah Anderson, Scott KlingerBrace yourself for one of the most aggressive corporate lobbying campaigns of all time. And one of the most hypocritical.
“Fix the Debt ” is a coalition of more than 80 CEOs who claim they know best how to deal with our nation’s fiscal challenges. The group boasts a $60 million budget just for the initial phase of a massive media and lobbying campaign.
The irony is that CEOs in the coalition’s leadership have been major contributors to the national debt they now claim to know how to fix. These are guys who’ve mastered every tax-dodging trick in the book. And now that they’ve boosted their corporate profits by draining the public treasury, how do they propose we put our fiscal house back in order? By squeezing programs for the poor and elderly, including Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid.
Fix the Debt claims their agenda is not just about spending cuts. But when it comes to their tax proposals, they use the slippery term “pro-growth reform” to push for cuts in deductions that are likely to include credits for working families and — you guessed it — more corporate tax breaks. Chief among these is a proposal to switch to a territorial system under which corporate foreign earnings would be permanently exempted (instead of being taxed when they are returned to America).
This idea, also supported by the Bowles-Simpson deficit commission, would make it even more profitable for big corporations to use accounting tricks to disguise U.S. profits as income earned in tax havens. Citizens for Tax Justice estimates that such tax haven abuse will cost the Treasury more than $1 trillion over the next decade.
So who are the CEOs who are telling the rest of us to be responsible and tighten our belts after they’ve spent decades stiffing the U.S. Treasury? Of the 80 members of Fix the Debt’s CEO Fiscal Leadership Council, here are 10 that stand out as the biggest hypocrites:
Continues
http://www.alternet.org/economy/10-filthy-rich-tax-dodging-hypocrites-pushing-di...
-
- tags:
- Corruption, Greed, Pigs, Austerity Measures
-
-
letsliveinpeace
-
I remember this article, great post.
- 6 months ago
-
letsliveinpeace
-
-
Argon18
-
-
letsliveinpeace:
You would think that the Democrats could use that report as leverage in the debate about tax policy, wouldn't you? But I haven't heard much mention about it, although they seem to be pushing back on other things.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/11/29/1165748/-White-House-Fights-Back-Boehne...
"White House press secretary Jay Carney responded to Speaker John A. Boehner’s (R-Ohio) demand that any increase in the debt ceiling as part of a ”fiscal cliff” deal be matched by equivalent cuts in spending.
“Asking that a political price be paid in order for Congress to do its job to ensure that the United States of America pays its bills and does not default for the first time in its history is deeply irresponsible,” Carney said in Thursday’s press briefing.
“It was deeply irresponsible in the summer of 2011 and it would be deeply irresponsible to see that approach taken again. The president expects Congress to do its job.”
- 6 months ago
-
Argon18
-
-
remanns
-
yepper. +^d
- 6 months ago
-
remanns
-
-
Milieu
-
Good article, thanks ^+
- 6 months ago
-
Milieu
-
-
WagonMaster
-
Yeh, what's up with that shit. Austerity the hell out of the "lower" classes and live it up in the Caymens.
- 7 months ago
-
WagonMaster
-
-
Mark701
-
Does it get any more bizarre than this? Top corporate tax evaders telling the poor and disabled that the only way to help the economy is for THEM to accept even less than they already get. There are no words powerful enough to condemn the hypocrisy of these idiots.
- 7 months ago
-
Mark701
-
-
Leen61
-
Mark701:
You said it all, Mark.
- 7 months ago
-
Leen61
-
-
alexandrekBack
-
Mark701:
you can't blame them, the people is stupid enough to vote for them, it's too easy!
- 7 months ago
-
alexandrekBack
-
-
Steamed_N_More
-
2007 IRS report. Bottom 20% income under reported by 1%. Top 20% by 57%. With tax breaks and incentives, why does the national debt climb? Guess! Business failures is in each of their portfolios. And they profited by them. So, should these people run the country? Only if you enjoy living with corruption!
- 7 months ago
-
Steamed_N_More
-
-
Argon18
-
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L8q63EpQUr0
But this report should "cut them off at the knees" and provide evidence that their justifications for tax cuts are worthless because “pro-growth reform” are shown to be false.
http://www.dpcc.senate.gov/files/documents/CRSTaxesandtheEconomy%20Top%20Rates.p...
It certainly gives legislators a lot facts to provide leverage and change the votes in Congress about tax policy.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/11/03/1154629/-The-Report-the-GOP-doesn-t-wan...
"Back in September when we were all focused on Mitt Romney's many daily gaffes, not the least of which was the 47% tape, Republicans in Congress asked the non-partisan Congressional Research Service to analyze the connection between lower tax rates on so-called "job creators" and economic growth. They were no doubt hoping this non-partisan, highly respected group which congress has pretty much always depended on for hard facts and figures, would come back with solid evidence that cutting taxes on the super rich is good for the economy.
Turns out facts are stubborn things. From the report:
"The fitted values seem to suggest that higher tax rates are associated with slightly higher real per capita GDP growth rates. The top marginal tax rate in the 1950s was over 90%, and the real GDP growth rate averaged 4.2% and real per capita GDP increased annually by 2.4% in the 1950s. In the 2000s, the top marginal tax rate was 35% while the average real GDP growth rate was 1.7% and real per capita GDP increased annually by less than 1%.
These results are generally consistent with previous research on tax cuts. Some studies find that a broad based tax rate reduction has a small to modest, positive effect on economic growth.25 Other studies have found that a broad based tax reduction, such as the Bush tax cuts, has no effect on economic growth.26 It would be reasonable to assume that a tax rate change limited to a small group of taxpayers at the top of the income distribution would have a negligible effect on economic growth."
"The results of the analysis suggest that changes over the past 65 years in the top marginal tax rate and the top capital gains tax rate do not appear correlated with economic growth. The reduction in the top tax rates appears to be uncorrelated with saving, investment, and productivity growth. The top tax rates appear to have little or no relation to the size of the economic pie. However, the top tax rate reductions appear to be associated with the increasing concentration of income at the top of the income distribution. As measured by IRS data, the share of income accruing to the top 0.1% of U.S. families increased from 4.2% in 1945 to 12.3% by 2007 before falling to 9.2% due to the 2007-2009 recession. At the same time, the average tax rate paid by the top 0.1% fell from over 50% in 1945 to about 25% in 2009. Tax policy could have a relation to low the economic pie is sliced—lower top tax rates may be associated with greater income disparities."
So lower taxes do not equal more economic growth, but it does lead to a larger gap between the rich and the poor. To be fair this report does not go the extra step of asserting economic growth can be increased by raising taxes.
It simply states that cutting taxes doesn't work."
- 7 months ago
-
Argon18
-
-
letsliveinpeace
-
This is why willard is so critical. To complete their plan they need a dupe. One so stupid as to believe he is doing the right thing. If he is elected he will be the worst thing to happen to this country since the founding. If anything will spark another revolution in this country, we're looking at it.
- 7 months ago
-
letsliveinpeace
-
-
VoyagerFilms
-
Thanks for posting this!
- 7 months ago
-
VoyagerFilms
-
-
kennymotown
-
Fucking PIGS!
- 7 months ago
-
kennymotown
-
-
Vic_Romano
-
kennymotown:
All I can say is to not let the outcome of the election (I'm pretty confident that Obama is going to win) lull you into some sort of sense of complacency. Congress will be back in session looking to avert this coming "fiscal cliff."
I'm not completely in the know as to what course of action they may pursue, but I can say that the big money players are already lobbying for more tax breaks for themselves and spending cuts that will most likely affect the poorest and most vulnerable among us. Heaven forbid they even think about cutting the defense budget.
You do a good job posting information here, and I hope you keep it up. We're all going to have to hold our elected representatives' feet to the fire on this. There's just too much at stake.
I expect to hear more from Senator Sanders in the coming weeks, but you can rest assured that he's going to be fired up.
http://www.sanders.senate.gov/newsroom/news/?id=9d15c4d6-189a-41d6-848b-f07b523c...
- 7 months ago
-
Vic_Romano
-
-
PressCore
-
The only sober, responsible method of " fixing the debt " is to
eliminate the debt machine creating the debt by the full force
& effect of law. The Federal Reserve's insanely corrupt 100
year Corporate Bank charter is coming up for it's next insanely
corrupt 100 year lease renewal in 2013. Yet in all this insanity
of allowing debt based Monopoly parlor game currency to be
counterfeited in place of debt free U.S.Treasury Notes, these
Banksters have never one been audited. There's only been
one exception to this atrocity. That was Senator Sanders' 1 time
audit of the Fed as a condition of the 2008 Bank bailout. That
audit showed the Fed secretly, without Treasury permission,
printed $16-17 Trillion to bailout it's Rothschild owner's foreign
banks, and a few domestic tax deadbeat Corporations to their
benefit, at the detriment of the 99.99% of all tax paying Americans.My point(s) are these: The same international Banksters whose
infamous elder claimed if he was given control of a nation's
money supply he'd be above the law...The same Bankster
dynasty that engineered the Euro to fail so that they could
profit as their predator partner in crime Goldman Sachs has...
These Organized Crime elements put in charge of the USA's
currency printing have victimized us with their Ponzi Scheme
of Fraudulent Conversion. Eliot Spitzer, our former Attorney
General calls them a Ponzi Scheme. THEY OWN THE LION"S
SHARE OF THE NATIONAL DEBT.The Federal Reserve was created to feed Corporations, not
people. Because of the Fed, Corporations have so horribly
dominated & corrupted our political system with Bribery that
they virtualy control Government. Think not ? Well get this:
The entire national debt of REAL money was $13 Billion which
had accumulated from 1776-1913, when the Fed Trojan Horse
was imported. Now in 2012, the Congress lavishes $13 Billion
of essentialy counterfeit currency on it self every year as they
are the 1%. They've been so badly compromised with the kind
of conflict of interest that would get laywers disbarred that the
1st regular Fed Audit in 100 years is being considered only now.Iceland is the only country in the world with the kind of direct
Democracy that has held the Banksters liable for their crimes.
Greece, which has a similar extremely corrupt system as the USA
is saddled with, has contended rightfuly that they owe no legal
debt because it was imposed on them by the Fed's Goldman
Sach's arm to cause them to default so as to forfeit it's national
treasures. I've studied the way the Fed operates for 4 and 1/2
years now. And I know that again, the only way to " fix the debt "
is to end the Fed debt machine...To repudiate the national debt
as a Ponzi Scheme...To repeal the Federal Reserve Act... To
nationalize all the fraudulently converted Fed assets, liquidate
them, distribute them equaly amongst all 300+ Million Americans.
And to restore the Treasury which is an office held in trust by the
American people who produce American money by their work
product and ltd lifetime. Long live the 99% ! Long live the Occupy
Movement. Long live American Liberty ! - 7 months ago
-
PressCore
-
-
figgdimension
-
egads these people are the creme' de la creme' of bankster scum
- 7 months ago
-
figgdimension
-
-
MSII
-
The rogues gallery of 1%er-SCUM!
- 7 months ago
-
MSII
-
-
Vic_Romano
-
MSII:
Scum of the earth....filth of all creation....cockroaches actually do this world more good than these psychopaths.
- 7 months ago
-
Vic_Romano
-
-
MSII
-
Vic_Romano:
no doubt! (and I hate roaches, foul dirty disgusting things!)
- 7 months ago
-
MSII
-
-
MSII
-
Had to save that pic, it sums it up perfectly!
- 7 months ago
-
MSII
-
-
Vic_Romano
-
1. Jeffrey Immelt, General Electric
Perhaps no tax-dodging U.S. corporation has done more to drain the U.S. Treasury than General Electric. Over the last 10 years GE reported more than $80 billion in U.S. pre-tax profits and yet paid a federal corporate income tax rate of just 2.3% .
One of GE’s favorite tricks is the “Active Financing Exception.” U.S. corporations are supposed to pay U.S. taxes on interest income earned anywhere in the world. But GE enjoys this special exception for companies that have “captive” foreign finance subsidiaries, such as their credit card arm. The measure was repealed as part of fair taxation reforms in 1986, but GE led a successful lobbying effort to bring it back in 1997. Although the exception was supposed to be temporary, Congress has renewed it six times. And, despite all the public hand-wringing over the deficit, lawmakers are seriously considering extending this and other corporate loopholes before the end of the year.
2. Jim McNerney, Boeing
Last year, Boeing was one of 25 major U.S. firms that paid their CEO more than they paid Uncle Sam in corporate income taxes, according to an Institute for Policy Studies report . The aerospace giant enjoyed a $605 million tax refund in 2011, despite reporting more than $5 billion in U.S. pre-tax profits. CEO Jim McNerney made $18.4 million in personal compensation. In fact, Boeing is a serial tax dodger , having paid federal corporate income taxes in only two of the last 10 years.
One of the ways Boeing avoids paying taxes is by taking advantage of the Research and Experimentation Tax Credit, which saved the $137 million last year alone. Government investment in basic research is not a bad idea, but current R&D credits are structured in a way that primarily benefits large, well-resourced high-tech firms like Boeing that would probably do the research anyway. CEO McNerney also chairs the Business Roundtable, which aggressively lobbies for more corporate tax breaks.
- 7 months ago
-
Vic_Romano
-
-
Vic_Romano
-
Vic_Romano:
3. Lloyd Blankfein, Goldman Sachs
Few corporations have been as dependent on U.S. taxpayers for their very existence as Goldman Sachs. The 2008 bailout of American International Group and the steady stream of low- and non-interest loans for the financial sector have kept the company alive.
CEO Blankfein says he’d accept a small increase in individual taxes for the wealthy in exchange for a comprehensive budget deal. But his corporate tax proposals would wipe out the revenue gains from rolling back the Bush tax cuts for top earners. Blankfein is a big supporter of the territorial tax system explained above. This is hardly a surprise, since Goldman Sachs already operates 37 subsidiaries in tax havens .
Blankfein has also used his position at the helm of the Financial Services Forum, a club for the CEOs of 20 top banks, to oppose financial transaction taxes -- small levies on trades of stock, derivatives, and other financial instruments. Goldman Sachs has made as much as $300 million per year from the volatile high-frequency trading strategies that would be hardest hit by such a transaction tax. In early October, 11 European governments announced a plan to implement such taxes, with expected revenues in the neighborhood of $ 75 billion per year . But Goldman Sachs and other Wall Street firms have blocked U.S. progress on this major revenue-raiser.
4. Brian T. Moynihan, Bank of America
After a decade of risky and reckless mortgage lending, Bank of America survived the 2008 financial crash with the help of a $45 billion bailout. Today, Bank of America sits on $128 billion in cash — $18 billion of it is overseas —and much of that is sitting in the company’s 115 tax haven subsidiaries .
Last year, after investors saw their stock price decline 58 percent and 30,000 Bank of America employees lost their jobs to layoffs, CEO Brian Moynihan saw his compensation quadruple to more than $8 million. His predecessor, Ken Lewis, raked in more than $50 million in the two years before the housing bubble that Bank of America had help inflate burst in 2008.
- 7 months ago
-
Vic_Romano
-
-
Vic_Romano
-
Vic_Romano:
5. David Cote, Honeywell Corporation
Over the last three years, Honeywell received more than $2.7 billion in federal defense contracts and reported more than $2.5 billion in U.S. pre-tax profits. And yet thanks to corporate deductions, tax subsidies, and loopholes, Honeywell has claimed $377 million in federal tax refunds during this period.
Honeywell CEO David Cote has been a fixture at Congressional hearings calling for a territorial tax system for corporations. He is also Vice-Chair of the Business Roundtable, a club for big business CEOs that has called for an extension of all the Bush tax cuts, including those for millionaires and billionaires, as well as the tax cuts on unearned income from capital gains and dividends. These combined measures would add $1.5 trillion to the debt over the next ten years.
6. Randall Stephenson, AT&T
AT&T is another firm that paid its CEO more last year than they paid in federal corporate income taxes. CEO Randall Stephenson made $18.7 million , while the firm enjoyed a $420 million refund from Uncle Sam.
AT&T is a major beneficiary of “accelerated depreciation” rules that allow companies to turbo-charge tax deductions in the early years of the life of an asset. A 2009 accelerated depreciation rule saved the company $5.2 billion on their 2011 taxes, according to the firm’s 10-K report. Although touted as a way to jumpstart spending in a downturn, such tax breaks often result in taxpayers bearing a substantial portion of the cost of investments firms would’ve made anyway.
7. Arne Sorenson, Marriott International
In 2009, the U.S. Department of Justice prosecuted Marriott International for using an illegal tax shelter swindle dubbed “ Son of Boss .” The scam involved setting up a series of complex paper transactions between company subsidiaries to create $70 million in fake losses that could be offset against Marriott’s real profits. Presidential candidate Mitt Romney, a long-time friend of the Marriott family and named after Marriott’s patriarch J. Willard Marriott, was the head of the hotel giant’s audit committee in 1994 at the time the board first approved the Son of Boss transaction. According to Bloomberg, Marriott has also shifted profits to a Luxembourg shell company and avoided hundreds of millions of dollars in taxes through one federal tax credit for so-called synthetic fuel that Senator John McCain dubbed an “expensive hoax.”
8. Alexander Cutler, Eaton Corporation
Less than two years after accepting $90 million in taxpayer-financed subsidies to locate a new world headquarters in the suburbs of Cleveland, Eaton Corporation announced that it would be moving its headquarters and reincorporating as an Irish company. The move is part of a merger deal with Cooper Industries, another Fix the Debt coalition member. The two companies boast that Eaton’s departure after 100 years in Cleveland will cut their tax bill by $160 million . Meanwhile, Eaton is fighting a $75 million bill from the IRS for back taxes and penalties related to alleged violations of transfer pricing agreements.
9. Lowell McAdam, Verizon
Verizon is one of 30 companies identified by Citizens for Tax Justice as having paid “less than nothing” in federal income taxes over the entire 2008-10 period. Despite earning $32.5 billion in profits during these three years, the firm got so much in tax subsidies that they wound up with a net tax refund of $951 million. That works out to a tax rate of negative 2.9%. In effect, every Verizon phone customer paid more in federal telephone excise taxes than Verizon paid in federal income taxes.
10. Steve Ballmer, Microsoft
A recent Senate investigation exposed how Microsoft has used Olympic class accounting acrobatics to avoid paying taxes. Specifically, the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations charged that the software giant had devised a complicated transfer pricing agreement with a subsidiary in Puerto Rico to lower its tax bill on goods sold in the U.S. market by as much as $4.5 billion from 2009 to 2011. The investigation also accused Microsoft of avoiding billions in U.S. corporate income taxes by shifting royalty revenue to low-tax jurisdictions. Subcommittee Chair Carl Levin described Microsoft’s strategies as “tax alchemy, featuring structures and transactions that require a suspension of disbelief to be accepted.” Such alchemy, while not illegal, is a major contributor to the national debt.
- 7 months ago
-
Vic_Romano
