Entertainment | August 14, 2008 | 70 comments

Tarantino takes on Hitler and WWII Germany

Image
sgirgis72
The script to Tarantino's next film "Inglorious Bastards" has allegedly leaked and is stirring up controversy due to it's aggressive and violent content aimed at Germany circa WWII.

I'm curious, is this a subject that is appropriate to be interpreted via pop culture? Should there be any limits or boundaries as to what and how a filmmaker approaches sensitive subjects like this?
  1. groups:
    Entertainment,   Current News US,   Movie
  2. tags:
    Entertainment Movie Current News US Showdown 2 more
  3.     
    |

70 comments // Tarantino takes on Hitler and WWII Germany

  • Hendrix_Is_God
    • 0
      Hendrix_Is_God  
    • Nazi's people, they're taking the piss out of nazi's bring it on!!!

      P.s Larznero, fall out of your high chair of almighty, pulp fiction is a classic, one of the greats. Never diss the pulp.

    • 3 years ago
  • chalwa
    • 0
      chalwa  
    • After all the violence Hollywood has put together, this is news?
      It's a remake for Goshsakes! Where was the outcry the first time this movie came out?

    • 3 years ago
  • diode
  • LarzNero
    • 0
      LarzNero  
    • Pulp Fiction was really boring crap. I suspect a lot of people claim they like it because that's what everyone else is doing. I haven't been able to watch any Quentin stuff since.

    • 3 years ago
  • tillytill99
    • 0
      tillytill99  
    • forget the film, I'm amazed about how much this subject of this movie has stirred everyones thoughts and ideas about it. Movies are mostly about entertainment and emotion. But sometimes they invoke deep feelings and thought. Tarantino does not just make a movie without putting lots of thought into it, including bad ass camera shots.

    • 3 years ago
  • HeroMAY
  • Mr_Costello
    • 0
      Mr_Costello  
    • With the recent highly stylized "revenge flicks" and endless references to far easter traditions; it'll be nice to see him focus on something different.

      To my absolute disappointment. It was recently rumored that he was casting for a remake of 1965's Faster Pussycat! Kill! Kill!, and wanted Britney Spears as the female lead! As lesbian killer! - it has been proven tabloidic spin.

    • 3 years ago
  • Ayahuasca2012
  • abbym0308
    • 0
      abbym0308  
    • I think sensitive subjects should absolutely be addressed in pop culture, so long as it's done responsibly. I wouldn't allow any old director to take on such a project, but I bet Tarantino will deliver something amazing. Plus, now that this story has been circulated among the masses, the pressure is on to create the kind of film we know he is capable of.

    • 3 years ago
  • CleftAsunder
  • thesaurusrex
    • 0
      thesaurusrex  
    • There should be no controversy here. Quentin is an amazing director, hundreds of movies have been made concerning the nazis as characters, and clearly he is not trying to make a historically accurate account of world war II, or Nazi Germany. I have no idea why this is news worthy.

    • 3 years ago
  • jimenagamio
  • Emil_G
    • 0
      Emil_G  
    • "I'm curious, is this a subject that is appropriate to be interpreted via pop culture?"

      -I guess you've never seen Hogan's Heroes?

      I agree with you though, it's a sensetive subject.

    • 3 years ago
  • furryjenn
    • 0
      furryjenn  
    • his last film ....grindhouse/that other one with that other director sucked. i hope he makes this one as good as his older films....ie reservoir dogs and pulp fiction

    • 3 years ago
  • kacarlson
    • 0
      kacarlson  
    • I think all of history is fair game for movie fodder, but honestly, it needs to be done right. My german exchange family has a great perspective on the third reich: it was another group of people in another generation, we are different people now. They just get peeved about the constant Nazi references in pop culture when the german people are concerned. I agree with Kniebe when he says that the outcome of this is unpredictable. T will be walking a fine line with this one. I agree with you, bruceabeal, he needs to present it as realistic as possible to the ignorant masses, but i don't mean blood and gore necessarily. If he can give those in the audience that sinking feeling i got when i passed through the crematorium at Dachau, when i saw the shooting range, now eerily covered in vines and flowers, he's doing his job right. It may be a horrible thing, but it happened and people should know about it.

    • 3 years ago
  • crazykatlady
  • xbuckyx
  • IndieArtist
  • laveyN
  • frenik_86
  • xbuckyx
  • samantharobin
  • curiousG
  • Soap
  • JoshAmbrose
    • 0
      JoshAmbrose  
    • Yes tarantino is strange to some, but i must say, each of his films has been breathtaking in there own unique way, and im sure this one will live up to the expectations!

    • 3 years ago
  • Dut
    • 0
      Dut  
    • why have limits?
      there should be no subjects in film that are taboo/morally incorrect. Every filmmaker tries to send a message through their work of art, and it is up to the consumer to interpret that message, because like a portrait, a movie can be seen in two different lights.

    • 3 years ago
  • Kylsport
    • 0
      Kylsport  
    • I have always liked Tarantino's films, they are excellent productions. It will be interesting to see him make a movie with George Clooney's BUTT BROTHER-Brad Pit.

    • 3 years ago
  • mario_a
    • 0
      mario_a  
    • I've read it...passed from a friend in the business back in early July. Totally fascinating and way over the top. I really like the Cinema Paradiso touches, and yes, it is violent as all get out. The funniest part of the script is the seemingly intentional misspellings -- the "bastards" in question are repeatedly referred to as "Basterds" except when the narrator steps in, and Hitler is referred to as "'mine Fuhrur."

      For what it's worth, I feel better after reading this than I did after reading Kill Bill back before that was in production. Kill Bill had a feeling of "impossible" to it, but he pulled that off in some ways. Still missed the Yuki's Revenge chapter though.

      If Pitt "brings the crazy" it will be an interesting casting choice. Adam Sandler is also rumored, not sure if he's been cast yet.

    • 3 years ago
  • damnneargenius
  • mario_a
    • 0
      mario_a  
    • mario_a:

      @damnneargenius -- I should clarify, the narrator doesn't physically step in, there is voice over narration at points, and during those segments grammar and spelling are legitimate.

    • 3 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • SDLN
  • JanaPokana
    • 0
      JanaPokana  
    • I cannot wait to see this movie and I think Brad Pitt is going to do a great job. His recent films (Jesse James, Burn After Reading ...) are really quite good.

    • 3 years ago
  • malathion
  • curiousG
  • argyle_kitten
    • 0
      argyle_kitten  
    • I do not believe this is an attack upon the Germans or any such thing. Tarantino is simply using the WWII setting has an excuse for massive amounts of violence--the depiction of which is his only goal, of course.

    • 3 years ago
  • r_pack
  • Azucena
    • 0
      Azucena  
    • This should be interesting!! I love both their work and enjoy the creative outlook Tarantino has! This may work out better then some people think.

    • 3 years ago
  • AxeRFJ
  • PatrioticAstronaut
  • hollyg
    • 0
      hollyg  
    • Who would set those limits and boundaries? Why would that person or entity be allowed to do so? Why put limits on art and what artists are allowed to do? Art is one way that society processes its horrors and tragedies...to suppress that is to prolong it, even if it is considered offensive or insensitive by some.

    • 3 years ago
  • curiousG
  • NaCl
    • 0
      NaCl  
    • All tarantino movies are somewhat contraversial in some way. But, he makes very good movies that have a beautifully defined plot and intllectual conversations in the midst of pure bloody chaos....I know i'm watching it.....

    • 3 years ago
  • Swiyyah
  • damnneargenius
    • 0
      damnneargenius  
    • It would be funnier if Monty Python took on the Hilter regime.

      Time heals all wounds, and this is just opening them up again.

      I think it's in poor taste and will stir up sentiment that has long been forgotten for good reason.

      WWII is too far in the past for Tarantino's audience to remember it first hand, and it sounds like it's going to make Americans as well as Germans and Jews look bad.

      Hopefully it won't be as bad as it sounds.

    • 3 years ago
  • Godzilla555
    • 0
      Godzilla555  
    • Tarantino can make movies about whatever he wants. If it's a good movie then who cares, it's gonna piss off some people no matter what it's about.

    • 3 years ago
  • Pattyhax
    • 0
      Pattyhax  
    • Well no one seemed to have a problem when Uma Thurman's character slayed countless Japanese henchman in Kill Bill Vol 1. Now Tarantino wants to kill Nazi henchman and suddenly it's an atrocity? It's Hollywood people, bloodbaths make money and if you've got a problem with the film, don't buy a ticket.

    • 3 years ago
  • itdango
  • xbuckyx
  • Nythology
    • 0
      Nythology  
    • Revolting. Uncivilized. Barbaric.

      Why don't people put out films about the truth anymore? Why don't they tell stories of the Germans who fought, NOT for Hitler and the Nazis, but to protect their homeland? Why not tell the tale of how these valiant defenders lost to the onslaught of American and Russian troops, and how, because they failed, over 90% of German women where raped, often repeatidly. Why not tell of how the German people where made literal slaves after World War I? Why not tell of how Germany is so defeated and shamed in this modern age that the national Anthem isn't even played in it's entirety?

      You may love to hate Germans, buy we are people too. Not every citizen of Germany supported the Holocaust, and many didn't even know about it. If you really think about it, it's kind of like how America is today. You live your lives in comfort over here, oblivious and non-caring to the attrocities perpetrated by your own government in the Middle East.

      I'm loosing my faith in Humanity.

    • 3 years ago
  • Ekopii2
  • ClayCreature
    • 0
      ClayCreature  
    • Nythology:

      When the body count in the Middle East gets into the 10s of millions, I'll be more inclined to accept that opinion. For now, the comparison is a real stretch.

      And I think you over-emphasize our attitude towards Germans. For example, in many places of the media, attaching the word "French" to anything, is an automatic arguement winner. I can't even really think of any main-stream anti-German setiment.

    • 3 years ago
  • monkeypaw
    • 0
      monkeypaw  
    • Nythology:

      Are you insane? How can you say they were just defending their homeland when they were the freaking INVADERS!!!? The poor Nazis! The Americans and Russians wouldn't have been there in the first place if the Nazi's hadn't attempted to conquer the world! The German women were raped? Sad. What about the TRAGEDY of the MILLIONS who were KILLED by the Nazis? Boo Hoo! The Germans reaped what the fuck they sowed. Deal with it. Tee Hee..............

    • 3 years ago
  • iloveravi
    • 0
      iloveravi  
    • Nythology:

      clay:

      "When the body count in the Middle East gets into the 10s of millions, I'll be more inclined to accept that opinion. For now, the comparison is a real stretch. "

      A million dead iraqis is not enough for you?

    • 3 years ago
  • hiphopcoolboy
    • 0
      hiphopcoolboy  
    • Nythology:

      How dare you compare the United States with Nazi Germany. To do so is completely ignorant and insensitive to all which this country stands for, democracy, freedom of religion, free speech to name a few. It is perfectly fine to attack Nazi Germany for what it was. It stands as one of the symbols of intolerance, hate and all that is evil in humanity. Nazi Germany instills fear and sorrow not only for people of color or different religious backgrounds but for all people in the world. It is an example of how any ounce of human decency in common people could be destroyed by a prophet of hate. Although some Germans might not of agreed with the Nazi's in Germany during WWII , a majority of Germans went along with crimes against humanity, with disregard to conscience or sympathy. Many Americans today will acknowledge the fact that America has very unpopular policies throughout the world, but the difference is that many Americans are the biggest advocates against our own policies, and the important thing is that we have the right to speak out against unjust policies against humanity, it is a democracy. Such freedom was completely absent in Nazi Germany.
      And speaking in general terms, Americans and more genuinely the world does not see modern Germany as the Nazi Germany in the past. Most reasonable people can acknowledge that the Germans today are a hardworking and moral country deeply shamed by their ugly history. Without this perception, Germany would not be one of the biggest financial powers in the world today. Every country has a certain level of shame about their history. The Japanese raped and killed millions of Chinese throughout history, The Americans single handedly wiped out almost all of the native populations of America, the English, Spanish, Portugese and French killed millions in their quest for colonial power, and almost every country's history is blemished with some form of slavery.
      So no, I do not sympathize with your victimization of the German people. Most people think it's fine to criticize America for it's unpopular policies throughout the world (including Americans), so it should be fine to criticize possibly one of the ugliest eras in human history. Such criticism reminds the world how easy it is for ordinary people to lose the type of human decency many Germans lost during Hitler's rule, and if the consequence of such a lapse in humanity is a stain on German history, so be it. That is a burden you should and must bare throughout history.

    • 3 years ago
  • frenik_86
    • 0
      frenik_86  
    • Nythology:

      not to sound like a jerk, but do any of you even really know what happen between the start of ww1 and the formation of the nazi regime. this is the kind of stuff that you have to leave your bias behind and just try to look at the cold hard facts.
      if any one really knows what really happend and can leave there bias behind, please contact me.

    • 3 years ago
  • xbuckyx
    • 0
      xbuckyx  
    • Nythology:

      Everyone has to carm down. It is only a film. It would but a little different if it was a book right?

      This film will be realised and people aren't going to change their opinions of Germans or Nazi's. Because it is ONLY a film.

      If it's not your idea of a good film don't go see it. No one is forcing you.

    • 3 years ago
  • ClayCreature
  • Tradiggy
    • 0
      Tradiggy  
    • He always makes a good movie,and I don't thinthat this will be any different. The Nazis did horrible things to people, so what is the problem.

      But with the days we are living in, the setting should be Africa!

    • 3 years ago
  • curiousG
  • Ekopii2
  • xbuckyx
  • MissAmanda
  • JordanRoth
  • ChieftanMews
    • 0
      ChieftanMews  
    • Exciting!! And no, the topic of senseless human aggression should not be taboo for filmmakers, even if it involves zealotry on a nazi level. Commentary from pop culture is inescapable..not to mention I'm quite sure the holocaust museum in D.C. could offer you much more disturbing things than even gore-master Tarantino might provide.

    • 3 years ago
  • Phonoballoons
  • ClayCreature
  • joshuaheller
more from Entertainment:

top videos