Comedy | August 20, 2009 | 17 comments

Health Care Explained On The Back Of A Napkin (SLIDESHOW)

macfan
Dan Roam explains things, usually on the back of napkins. He does it so much that he wrote a book about it, and now runs a blog about it. In his latest effort to employ visual understanding and couple it with humor, he's come up with a guide to understanding health care reform (or insurance reform as he calls it).
  1. groups:
    Community,   News and Politics,   Comedy,   Current Tonight,   8 more
  2. tags:
    News News and Politics Health Obama 5 more
  3.     
    |

17 comments // Health Care Explained On The Back Of A Napkin (SLIDESHOW)

  • transfire
    • 0
      transfire  
    • There is another option that is not on the table... an options that somehow people can't even see.

      Get rid of so called "insurance".

      You see it's isn't really insurance. The insurance companies have us a duped b/c they've manged to mix health insurance in with pre-payment plans. And that is the heart of the problem. Let me pay my doctor
      for service rendered. Period. But right now I can;t do that, b/c a non-insured patient is charge 10x what an insured patient is. These prices are so high so to give provides room to negotiate with insurance companies. Insurance companies claim they drive proves down through negotiation, but it is just the opposite, b/c the providers have already jacked them up before hand. Thus the non-insured can't afford just to go to the doctor anymore.

      So the solution is simple. Simply pass a law that requires providers to charge the same rate to all their payers, whether individual or insurance company. That's it. Do that and all our issues will vanish.

    • 2 years ago
  • ajiacoysancocho
  • Sumbodyswatchin
    • 0
      Sumbodyswatchin  
    • ajiacoysancocho:

      They shouldn't. However because insurance compaines are going to loose big money once legislation gets passed, they are doing their damnest to make sure that it's watered-down, or doesnt happen at all. Propoganda is an excellent way of applying political pressure. Just watch Faux News sometime.

    • 2 years ago
  • neocongo
    • 0
      neocongo  
    • I didn't see him describe the fact that while there will be taxes in one form or another to pay for a public option, that public option will create competition and bring down the cost of EVERYONE elses' insurance or otherwise make their insurance more attractive than the public option.

      I like how he separated the problem into essentially, access and providers. Getting medical costs, (of providers of medicine) manageable is a separate pill to swallow.

    • 2 years ago
  • jawnybnsc
    • 0
      jawnybnsc  
    • neocongo:

      Tell me how you know this? How will private plans compete with the government? What about language in HR 3200 that prohibits certain types of coverage and mandates what must be covered? Do you assume that all private insurance companies will be able to provide those plans without losing money? What do you base that assumption on? What about the CBO and OMB analysis of this plan that says it doesn't do anything at all to bend the cost curve? Are they just a bunch of crazy egg head economists? Why should I prefer government rationing of care to rationing by private companies?

    • 2 years ago
  • cztheday
    • 0
      cztheday  
    • What a clever medium! The explanation was a little TOO basic at some points, but I would have no problem recommending it as a primer for those who have a very limited understanding of the various legislative proposals. Unfortunately, the harpies descending on the town meetings haven't the slightest interest in understanding the proposals. They are in a state of near-constant orgasm at the thought of defending themselves from the government's attempts to deprive them of their civil liberties. For its part, "The Government" would prefer that these people crawl back under the rocks, bridges, etc from whence they came.

    • 2 years ago
  • ProjectBat
    • 0
      ProjectBat  
    • That was a nice explanation. Too bad no one will discuss the "freedom" option where we might get a little competition going again...there's the real way to lower it all and avoid paying more.

    • 2 years ago
  • T5vZZ
    • 0
      T5vZZ  
    • easy, and surprisingly fun to follow. i need to look into the issue of co-op/exchanges though..cause ive got no clue ..unfoundedly sounds like a way to strangle those with pre-existings. page 46 was way over my head too. efficiency in the provider end sounds like the meat of proposal for me. wish we could evaluate the impacts or extend projection results to the options. that would probably quell alotta the contention in the debates. the second-less restrictive option could level the most broadened evaluation of the cost issues amongst providers, before next phasing. im wishing really hard that the provider job market can boom - cause more hands make workloads lighter and arguably more efficient. maybe in place of the gov insurance, they could make the education fields on the provider side drastically cheaper to compensate?

    • 2 years ago
  • hunzedog
  • hell0everything
  • akamaial
    • 0
      akamaial [removed]  
    • ~The government is already bankrupt, or hadn't you noticed?
      ~Because the Fed printed more money and "lent" it the treasury, you think we are not more in debt?
      ~So let's take on more debt to pay for health care that we already can't pay for, because why?......Oh yeah, we're bankrupt, that's why.

    • 2 years ago
  • kovadose
    • 0
      kovadose  
    • Can someone explain how health care costs are already bankrupting us? More specifically, how can health care costs bankrupt the government when as far as I know the government currently spends $0 on health care?

    • 2 years ago
  • Jessica_Sarsgaard
  • pandapaws
  • boywhocould
  • stevieuk
  • Addias_Mervin
more from Comedy:

top videos