Comedy | October 10, 2009 | 58 comments

Ron Paul On Obama Winning The Nobel Peace Prize

source: http://www.peacefreedomprosperity.com/?p=2686

Image
shanklinmike
Dr Ron Paul reports from Campaign For Liberty regarding Obama’s Nobel Peace Prize

***This article has been chosen as a discussion topic on PFP Movement Radio, http://www.blogtalkradio.com/pfpmovementradio Friday night at 6pm-8pm. Please Call In To The Show, 347-633-9636. COMMENTS will be included in the show so feel free to discuss or ask questions here on current.com as they will be addressed during the show. This article will also air on Freedom Hour Saturday at 9pm-10pm on Movement TV http://www.peacefreedomprosperity.com/?page_id=36***
  1. groups:
    Community,   Comedy,   Current Tonight,   Right Wing Nuts
  2. tags:
    News,  News and Politics,  Politics,  Current TV,  9 more
  3.     
    |

58 comments // Ron Paul On Obama Winning The Nobel Peace Prize

  • TasteHi
    • 0
      TasteHi  

    • Politicians can't differ from eachother rmann.

      It would be paradoxical to say there are politicians that will never make a bad decision.

    • 2 years ago
  • rmann0581
    • 0
      rmann0581  

    • I forgot to mention that Obama supported immunity for phone companies that illegally wiretapped on American people's phones. Tell me, how are democrats much different than the republicans?

    • 2 years ago
  • JollyGoodFelon
    • 0
      JollyGoodFelon  
    • rmann0581:

      How do you spell New world order? Republicrats!
      I doubt we will be able to wake up the sheeple. They are way to intoxicated by their left-right media hypnosis. And too busy "knowing it all" to realize they have been duped.

    • 2 years ago
  • rmann0581
    • 0
      rmann0581  

    • Both democrats and republicans support bailouts for the bankers starting with the first one in 2008. Obama supports renewing the anti-civil liberties "Patriot Act." I put "Patriot Act" in quotes because if politicians were honest it would be called the 1984 act or something like that. So tell me, since neither party supports civil liberties and both parties support bailing out big businesses, How are the democrats much different than the republicans?

    • 2 years ago
  • bullpcp
  • JollyGoodFelon
    • 0
      JollyGoodFelon  

    • Maybe it can work out for good, maybe Obama will feel a need to "live up" to something he has been paid for in advance.... The guy who invented the Lobotomy to cure such ailments as homosexuality etc was awarded the Nobel Peace prize too. Good company?

    • 2 years ago
  • bullpcp
    • 0
      bullpcp  

    • regjoeschmo

      Well written. I just don't understand how anyone who reads about the others nominated for the award can seriously write that Obama somehow deserved it more. He risked and sacrificed less and has so far accomplished nothing. I find this award extremely insulting to others more deserving, almost all others nominated.

    • 2 years ago
  • regjoeschmo
    • 0
      regjoeschmo  

    • So i guess Obama deserves the nobel peace prize for sitting in the white house pretending to be at war for "human rights" while this is one of the people who was overlooked this year....

      Sima Samar, women’s rights activist in Afghanistan: “With dogged persistence and at great personal risk, she kept her schools and clinics open in Afghanistan even during the most repressive days of the Taliban regime, whose laws prohibited the education of girls past the age of eight. When the Taliban fell, Samar returned to Kabul and accepted the post of Minister for Women’s Affairs.”

      To say we are in Afghanistan for human rights is like saying we are in Iraq for WMDs.... dont be a fucking hypocrite.......

    • 2 years ago
  • royulery
    • 0
      royulery  

    • iv'e had a frighting thought for a few days. what if obama is the worlds hero but america's enemy. in the mid 80's i worked for u.n. seminars, brainstorming the greatest problem the future holds. how to stop the u.s.a. from eradicating the 3rd world when the resources run out. how indeed.
      america won't give up it's grip on the lion's share of earth's carcass, not without a fight. the most dangerous standing military (for 5% of the world) against the world, what a fight it would be. unless our military is broken on the field of battle that has broken so many before. hmmmm.
      just my paranoia, couldn't be true because bush would have to be involved too.

    • 2 years ago
  • shanklinmike
    • 0
      shanklinmike  
    • royulery:

      Never forget, Africa is in abject poverty because of economic slavery, not free market capitalism. The U.S. is also statist in nature and uses forms of corporatism ( a central planned economy/anti-free market) to give big business protectionism and to help reduce competitive pressures on industry. This also happens in 3rd world countries where International government bodies like the IMF back DICTATORS that enslave their populations into tribal totalitarianism. Africa could be much more prosperous with civil liberties and economic freedom versus the slavery corporatist state the government has built up around the world! What we need to do is place competitive pressures on the rich and stop subsidizing failure by encouraging perverse incentive structures by oligarchs.....or you can continue on with or declining status quo republicans and democrats.....the choice is yours.

    • 2 years ago
  • ocanada
  • shanklinmike
    • 0
      shanklinmike  
    • ocanada:

      Yes, someone did place this in comedy....

      but it was not me.....

      I should thank them for all the extra hits it helped us receive.....educating hundreds of more people to Obama/Bush slavery!

    • 2 years ago
  • ocanada
  • rmann0581
    • 0
      rmann0581  

    • It's time for the United States to stay out of everybody else's business. There is no doubt that bad things happen to women in other countries such as Afghanistan, but it's unconstitutional for the United States to be the world's police. All of this government spending is slowly collapsing the US dollar. For those who want single payer health care, how do you expect to be able to afford it with all of this foreign spending? Money doesn't grow on trees. Of course, the Federal Reserve acts like it does and that's why the US dollar is losing value all of the time.

    • 2 years ago
  • TasteHi
    • 0
      TasteHi  

    • you know......there was a time when our presidents, didn't agree with the rest of the world, about the US being the worst and most arrogant thing that ever happened to it.
      Even if it meant giving up a shiny prize. Or being called a bully by another nation.
      Presidents were proud to be leaders of the leading nation.
      But I suppose we're now a generation of crowd pleasers, spin doctors, and unpatriotic citizens. I mean heck people show more loyalty towards an athlete than a president now-a-days. Is it because our presidents aren't presidents anymore?
      There are only politicians and head politicians?

      Kennedy was right to fear a future rife with unpatriotic civilians. We might as well just throw our hands up in the air, and allow every other nation in the world to devide and consume our states.

    • 2 years ago
  • AngloZombie
    • 0
      AngloZombie  
    • TasteHi:

      so your suggesting that we do what we want for our intrest and just say fuck it to what the rest of the world thinks? That this idea of yours to be proud of what ever policy we think up, no matter what the cost to others, is something to be proud of? How is that suppose to work exactly? you know what happens to countries in this world that do that? there is only so far you can push people around before they hate you and once they do they start sceaming to tear you apart. I think you forget we may have nukes and fancy weapons but what we dont have is a vast population and we actually cant take on the rest of the world, so yeah we should care about our standing in the world.

    • 2 years ago
  • shanklinmike
  • metalcookiesxy70
    • 0
      metalcookiesxy70  

    • Mhmm..

      I'd say, its purposing we should support Ron Paul, but its not exactly supporting the people, the people are true ones are in power.....

      Yes, why Ron Paul? Websites? He makes money? That is his blog, after all...

    • 2 years ago
  • DeliaTheArtist
    • 0
      DeliaTheArtist  

    • Shanklinmike, level with us for a minute. Why all these Ron Paul posts all the time? Why do they all link back to the same website? It's one thing to post a few blogs here or there but seriously, do you make money from people visiting your site or you just really love Ron that much?

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • DeliaTheArtist
  • J_Jammer
  • DeliaTheArtist
  • J_Jammer
  • DeliaTheArtist
  • regjoeschmo
  • DeliaTheArtist
  • J_Jammer
  • regjoeschmo
  • shanklinmike
    • 0
      shanklinmike  
    • DeliaTheArtist:

      I have made no money off of this. Current.com asks everyone to NOT place all the info in the current article so that people can travel to the various sites. I am simply following protocol.

      and if you would like to know, it is not about money nor Dr Paul....it is about the message of individual rights, something most people seem to ignore for slavery....

    • 2 years ago
  • bullpcp
    • 0
      bullpcp  

    • Whether you like Obama or not, the fact that he was nominated 12 days into office was a little premature to say the least. That he won after 9 months in office over many who ACTUALLY accomplished a great deal in the area of peace over decades because he gave eloquent speeches and set a better tone is mind boggling. At least wait until he actually accomplishes something.

    • 2 years ago
  • MKGruswitz
  • shanklinmike
  • MKGruswitz
    • 0
      MKGruswitz  
    • MKGruswitz:

      Why bother with facts? They seem irrelevant to you. When have you ever shared anything but opinion (your's or Ron's)? I'm sorry to descend into immature rants, but your posts are ridiculous and infuriating.

    • 2 years ago
  • unimatrix0
  • unimatrix0
    • 0
      unimatrix0  

    • Code Pink represents the faction of those who support the war on human rights grounds.

      While the Taliban may or may not be a threat to the US, they are a definite threat to women.

      There is a human rights argument for staying in Afghanistan, aside from the terrorism argument.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • DeliaTheArtist
    • 0
      DeliaTheArtist  
    • unimatrix0:

      Yes, the justification argument being made by Code Pink and many other women's activists is that Afghanistan is violating human rights with their treatment of women. For examples (via Afghan-web.com):

      Every 30 minutes, an Afghan woman dies during childbirth

      87 percent of Afghan women are illiterate

      30 percent of girls have access to education in Afghanistan

      1 in every 3 Afghan women experience physical, psychological or sexual violence

      44 years is the average life expectancy rate for women in Afghanistan

      70 to 80 percent of women face forced marriages in Afghanistan.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • kaseyrae
    • 0
      kaseyrae  
    • unimatrix0:

      So lets just cause some death to prevent some death, sounds like the whole freedom isn't free speech. I don't have an answer for the Afghanistan women, but I do know more war and more killing is not the answer, it just doesn't work. The means doesn't justify the cause. Peace doesn't mean killing for peace! Gandhi didn't have to kill anyone....

    • 2 years ago
  • DeliaTheArtist
    • 0
      DeliaTheArtist  
    • unimatrix0:

      I don't have a definite answer either; I never claimed to be for the war in Afghanistan. At this point I'm not really sure where I stand on it; I'd have to do a lot more research into our options.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • shanklinmike
    • 0
      shanklinmike  
    • unimatrix0:

      unimatrix is a warmonger and rejects a noninterventionist foreign policy.

      To think that our military will free the women of Afghanistan is not only unrealistic, it's also very childish.

      Those who back-up Obama are warmongers, just like the neocons who backed up Bush's "Iraqi Freedom"....

      What a load of crock......warmongers, nothing else.

      Nation building, unconstitutional, warmongering, partisan blinded.......and irrational....sounds like the standard interventionist/enslaver.....

    • 2 years ago
  • regjoeschmo
  • unimatrix0
    • 0
      unimatrix0  
    • unimatrix0:

      @Mike

      I am not at all certain it is right to stay in Afghanistan. I actually lean towards pulling out. I was only pointing out why Code Pink and others might favor staying in Afghanistan.

      However, the cult of Ron Paul tactic claiminging Bush and Obama, Republicans and Democrats, are the same, is naive and disingenuous.

    • 2 years ago
  • JollyGoodFelon
    • 0
      JollyGoodFelon  
    • unimatrix0:

      When the native people say "no" whats the difference between these wars and rape? I thought the word "no" was pretty easy to understand. Neither Iraq nor Afghanistan wants our "democracy" shoved up their poop chutes.

    • 2 years ago
  • regjoeschmo
    • 0
      regjoeschmo  
    • unimatrix0:

      Looking at how both dems and reps screw us all in their actions based on the same political landscape and polarize us through hedgemony to keep us from noticing is more disingenuous than pointing out that fact..... the differences are trivial compared to the similarities... if we ever want true constitutional change it will never come from either party.....

    • 2 years ago
  • regjoeschmo
    • 0
      regjoeschmo  

    • I stood next to code pink during a protest in DC, they werent so bad, but the cops felt the need to push the smallest and oldest which prompted me to ask him how he felt if someone did that to his mother, and he stopped.... unfortunately their dissent was partisan, and are now supportive of the war.... people need to look beyond labels....

    • 2 years ago
  • shanklinmike
  • J_Jammer
  • J_Jammer
  • hunzedog
  • samthesixth
  • unimatrix0
  • bombastinator
  • shanklinmike
    • 0
      shanklinmike  
    • hunzedog:

      Wow, are you guys really this clueless?!?

      For the 188291748192741928471290384th time

      Current.com asks you to NOT put the direct link in the article on the "add article" submission form because they want to drive traffic to the various sites.

      If you want to catch me doing something underhanded, please try....

      but trying to make it sound like I am profiting off of this due to your own lack of research is seriously disappointing and only shows your lack of knowledge....especially when current informs us to operate in this fashion you so despise.

    • 2 years ago
  • GlenBradley
  • regjoeschmo
    • 0
      regjoeschmo  

    • Again such blunt truthfullness..... There is definately a reason behind giving Obama such an award so early.... and to ignore the truth of his foreign policy as well.... outright propaganda.....

    • 2 years ago
more from Comedy:
from the community

top videos