Al Gore Sued By Over 30,000 Scientists For Global Warming Fraud!

Jan is in love with Al, Al is in love with beef.

Hell, yeah, I think I predicted this months ago, correct me if I'm wrong, JanforGore.

THIS GUY IS THE FRAUD ! ! !

Global warming is the biggest hoax in the history of mankind. There will be a lawsuit before it's over and AlGore will lose.

Now I know where Inholf is getting his ideas from.

LOL.
He's pretending he knows sicentists. So funny.

Sounds like he's in for an inconvenient truth.

funny!

Oh, well, now, this convinces me that global warming is a fraud! After all, if a bunch of random scientists, hardly a fraction of which actually study climate or have PhD's are suing Al Gore...! huh. Well, maybe not.

I did not learn about global warming from Al Gore. I learned about it in or around Grade 1. If you learned about global warming from Al Gore, sorry you're so late to the game. Do a little more research.

Global warming won't disappear if Al Gore is sued to the ends of the universe. It will still be here. Surprised? Do a little more research.

Al Gore isn't the spokesperson for global warming anyway. Suing him will not stop scientists from doing more research on global warming.

Please visit a local university and listen to talks by ACTUAL scientists about global warming.

PLEASE do a little more research.

@everybody who thinks that there is a real lawsuit. THERE IS NOT A REAL LAWSUIT.

Some of the people on here never read the stories or watch the videos, they merely talk out their sphincters.

Can money and profits survive Free Energy machines (cars, power)? Yes it can! but not the same percentages as now. There would need to be a two-direction shift. Profits would be lowered is true but people's expenses for living would also be lowered. I think this lowering of numbers instills and inspires great fear in industrialists who only know increasing numbers.

Let's say people had fuelless cars and electricity from wind & sun. On the surface that looks like a total wipeout of all oil-related jobs, coal mining, nuclear plants, appearing to be a devastating reduction in incomes and tax monies reaching the Federal coffers. And then taking it a bit further as in the case of my own car engine design... which should run w/out repairs or much maintenance about 75-125 YEARS before needing replacement (if then) well, there goes all your auto mechanics jobs right?

That's downright scary! or is it? Well, if people weren't slaving 40-70 hours a week and more to pay for all the engine breakdown planned obsolescence and energy costs including their homes then hhmmm, how much would it hurt to lose your job? In today's world and standards losing your job and being unemployed is a massive burden but if you had all that energy under the hood and never stopping at a fuel pump again.... and your lights & heating/cooling was piping in all day long year in year out and no cost associated with it, then you could work 15-20-25 hours a week combined you and the Mrs and be living quite well.

What about the US Government though? Reductions like these sound like a scenario from the Devil himself right? Yep, unless you start adding up and deducting the cost of EPA cleanups that would no longer be needed, and all the other gov't agencies that hound the population to make sure we stay in compliance with air pollution standards.

Once you start deducting the costs of oil tanker ruptures aground and spills it begins to become right clear that free energy is quite survivable and would in fact introduce a much improved across-the-board standard of living, and Planet Dirt would transform back into rich loamy healthy soil => Planet Earth. Ocean life would rebound with a ferociously fast increase of restored seafood catches.

However, another Big Fear comes from the fact that people would slow down, gear down into a less rushed state and enjoy their children as they grow up instead of shipped into other people's hands to enjoy (and program, and manipulate). In such a new situation it is FEARED that people would all turn into UNCLE TOMs fishing the day away on the Mississippi River bank.

Would that happen? Well yes, as a matter of fact it would, but only a relative few would do so to the extreme. Most people would bore quickly and start reading more, learning new skills, studying into deep matters like Physics and Astronomy. I've been on full disability since March 27 1989 from an awesome and painful accident that crushed parts of me on the outside and also beat the stuffings out of every organ inside.

When I was able to I did go fishing but I also began inventing new ways of spending my days writing on the new Internet bulletin boards and even inventing new energy source systems. I've worked harder in the last 20 years than at any time in my life but I haven't drawn a paycheck is all. Had I had free car fuel and free electricity my disability check that now doesn't look so large WHEW I would've been socking money away and drawing interest.

Money is a fluid that comes and goes Time is a fluid that only goes.
They need to switch places on the priority list. It's time for a paradigm shift.

There is one Constant that invariably prevails => those with the fattest wallet wins. Al Gore, Richard Branscom and a few others have a very thick wallet. However, due to price gouging American gasoline consumers the oil companies gave themselves also an extremely fat wallet.

There are two possible outcomes 1. a very prolonged battle or 2. The Gore ticket convinces the oil companies to switch sides and morph~transform themselves into the Good Guy, begin pouring their combined wallets into new green energy technologies.

Which outcome will prevail?
Which outcome will prevail?
Which outcome will prevail?

Up til recently the oil companies have been winning, very much by employing mass media brainwashing techniques using repetition of cable advertising playing on widespread ignorance about Energy. Then some whistleblowers blew the whistle on over-estimated world oil reserves. I rather expect the oil companies to alter their business model or face prosecution and prison time.

Making big money from green technologies beats heck out of a poorly-heated jail cell... where you may or may not be allowed conjugal visits depending on how the judge feels on the day of sentencing. That prospect sucks rotten eggs.

Hey thanks! I was looking for that! And oh yes, I could see how actually helping developing nations would be troublesome to those who are selfish and have an aversion to those whose skin is darker then theirs. It's only ok to blow their countries up. Right?

The more you make it about just Al Gore the more you out your true motives. Roger Revelle was charting CO2 long before Al Gore ever mentioned it in his books. Matter of fact, it goes back to the 1800s when the corrolation between Co2 and temperature was noted. But keep going. You prove with every post what you are really all about, and it isn't about giving a damn about this Earth.

(continued)

Page 122, Item 17 is quite troubling.

15. [Developed country Parties [shall][should] provide support to developing country Parties, particularly those specified in Articles 4.8 and 4.9 of the Convention, in order to allow developing country Parties to address issues related to social and environmental development, economic diversification, risk assessment, modelling and insurance to prevent the adverse effects of the spillover effects.] Alternative to paragraph 15:
[In the implementation of paragraphs 11 (c)11 and 11 (d)12 above (159.1 and 159.2 in FCCC/AWGLCA/2009/INF.1) , through the provision of financial resources, including for access, development and transfer of technology, at agreed full incremental costs in accordance with Article 4.3 of the Convention;
Recognizing that there are ways and means to reduce or avoid such impacts through careful and informed selection of policies and measures, to evaluate the effectiveness of existing tools, and to consider new ones, in order to assist developing country Parties in addressing these impacts.]
16. [Adverse economic and social consequences of response measures [shall][should] be addressed by proper economic, social and environmental actions, including promoting and supporting economic diversification and the development and dissemination of win-win technologies in the affected countries, paying particular attention to the needs and concerns of the poorest and most vulnerable developing country Parties.]
Alternative to paragraph 16:
[Adverse economic and social consequences of response measures shall be addressed by various means, including but not limited to promoting, supporting and enabling economic diversification, funding, insurance and the development, transfer and dissemination of win-win technologies in the affected countries, such as cleaner fossil fuel technologies, gas flaring reduction, and carbon capture and storage technologies.]
17. [[Developed [and developing] countries] [Developed and developing country Parties] [All Parties] [shall] [should]:]
(a) Compensate for damage to the LDCs’ economy and also compensate for lost opportunities, resources, lives, land and dignity, as many will become environmental refugees;
(b) Africa, in the context of environmental justice, should be equitably compensated for environmental, social and economic losses arising from the implementation of response measures.

The Copenhagen Climate Change Treaty

Page 62:

33. Each Party’s national schedule shall include:
(a) A long-term national greenhouse gas emissions limitation or reduction pathway;
(b) A country-driven nationally appropriate mitigation strategy, differentiated in terms of the ambition, timing and scope of its mitigation commitments or actions, which could be, inter alia, project-based, sectoral or economy-wide.
(c) Each Party’s nationally appropriate mitigation strategy shall include:
(i) Except for the least developed countries and small island developing States,
quantified emissions limitation or reduction commitments for 2020, consistent
with its long-term national greenhouse gas emissions limitations or reduction
pathway, subject to regular review; and
(ii) Measurable, reportable and verifiable mitigation policies and measures to meet its quantified emissions limitation or reduction commitments for 2020, as appropriate, and to support its national greenhouse gas emissions limitations or reduction pathway, subject to regular review.
34. All countries prepare low emission development strategies. Note that further paragraphs would be required to describe in more detail their function and relationship to the national schedules described above and a potential facilitative/matching platform.
35. All Parties shall develop and regularly update and submit information relating to the implementation of their nationally appropriate mitigation strategies. Such information shall be reviewed and verified according to agreed rules and guidelines.
36. All Parties, except for the least developed countries and small island developing States, shall develop and regularly update and submit a national inventory of anthropogenic emissions by sources and removals by sinks of all gases not controlled by the Montreal Protocol.
37. National inventories shall be:
(a) Undertaken in accordance with the latest agreed Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories; and
(b) Submitted, reviewed and verified according to agreed frequencies, rules and guidelines.

hey, just get over it, and lets try and be nicer to our earth, regardless of weather or not its going to bring about apocalypse or not. how's that for an idea eh?

Excerpt from above:
The Oregon Petition, sponsored by the OISM, was circulated in April 1998 in a bulk mailing to tens of thousands of U.S. scientists. In addition to the petition, the mailing included what appeared to be a reprint of a scientific paper. Authored by OISM's Arthur B. Robinson, Sallie L. Baliunas, Willie Soon, and Zachary W. Robinson, the paper was titled "Environmental Effects of Increased Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide" and was printed in the same typeface and format as the official Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Also included was a reprint of a December 1997, Wall Street Journal editorial, "Science Has Spoken: Global Warming Is a Myth", by Arthur and Zachary Robinson. A cover note signed "Frederick Seitz/Past President, National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A./President Emeritus, Rockefeller University", may have given some persons the impression that Robinson's paper was an official publication of the academy's peer-reviewed journal. The blatant editorializing in the pseudopaper, however, was uncharacteristic of scientific papers.

Robinson's paper claimed to show that pumping carbon dioxide into the atmosphere is actually a good thing. "As atmospheric CO2 increases," it stated, "plant growth rates increase. Also, leaves lose less water as CO2 increases, so that plants are able to grow under drier conditions. Animal life, which depends upon plant life for food, increases proportionally." As a result, Robinson concluded, industrial activities can be counted on to encourage greater species biodiversity and a greener planet:

As coal, oil, and natural gas are used to feed and lift from poverty vast numbers of people across the globe, more CO2 will be released into the atmosphere. This will help to maintain and improve the health, longevity, prosperity, and productivity of all people. Human activities are believed to be responsible for the rise in CO2 level of the atmosphere. Mankind is moving the carbon in coal, oil, and natural gas from below ground to the atmosphere and surface, where it is available for conversion into living things. We are living in an increasingly lush environment of plants and animals as a result of the CO2 increase. Our children will enjoy an Earth with far more plant and animal life as [sic] that with which we now are blessed. This is a wonderful and unexpected gift from the Industrial Revolution.

In reality, neither Robinson's paper nor OISM's petition drive had anything to do with the National Academy of Sciences, which first heard about the petition when its members began calling to ask if the NAS had taken a stand against the Kyoto treaty. Robinson was not even a climate scientist. He was a biochemist with no published research in the field of climatology, and his paper had never been subjected to peer review by anyone with training in the field. In fact, the paper had never been accepted for publication anywhere, let alone in the NAS Proceedings. It was self-published by Robinson, who did the typesetting himself on his own computer. (It was subsequently published as a "review" in Climate Research, which contributed to an editorial scandal at that publication.)

None of the coauthors of "Environmental Effects of Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide" had any more standing than Robinson himself as a climate change researcher. They included Robinson's 22-year-old son, Zachary, along with astrophysicists Sallie L. Baliunas and Willie Soon. Both Baliunas and Soon worked with Frederick Seitz at the George C. Marshall Institute, a Washington, D.C., think tank where Seitz served as executive director. Funded by a number of right-wing foundations, including Scaife and Bradley, the George C. Marshall Institute does not conduct any original research. It is a conservative think tank that was initially founded during the years of the Reagan administration to advocate funding for Reagan's Strategic Defense Initiative--the "Star Wars" weapons program.

I see many people here asking for TRUE, REAL facts.
Instead of just looking at theses super numerous graphs that we can hardly say which one lies and which one dosen't.. I can clearly see the warmingit where I live.

I do not know how many of you are from my region( Canada Near Montreal), I remember, about 10 years ago the winters where sooo long! with tons and tons of snow. But in theses earlier years the winter is starting much later (it is now end november and there is NO SNOW) I couldn't enven do trick and treat (oct 31st) without snowboots because there was allways snow 1 month earlier.

And the winter doesn't even end later since it started later, we get such hot days at least a month before we were used to. I can't tell it is global warming for 100%, but something wrong is happening!

Please let me know what you think about this

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Oregon_Institute_of_Science_and_Medic...

More phony BS like the fake Oregon Petition and the Leipzig Declaration where most of the signors were either not credentialed, or weathermen, or didn't even know their names were on it. This has classic RW think tank written all over it.

ITS ABOUT TIME SOMEONE, IF THIS IS FOR REAL, STOOD UP AND SUED THIS FRAUDANT INDIVIDUAL AND MAKE HIM SPEND SOME OF THE MILLIONS HE HAS MADE OFF "GLOBAL WARMING".

I said credible, not desperate.

Legitimate news sites don't put u in the air because ur full of crap. if people do they're research they'll probably find that those signatures are full of crap and that there are islands being taken over by rising see levels and ice is clearly receding and u people are dooming our world because you want the freedom to pollute the hell out of God's Earth.

“MANBEARPIG”=

MAN=ANTHROPOGENIC (CAUSED BY MAN) GLOBAL WARMING HOAX
BEAR= AS IN “BEAR MARKET” CRASHING ECONOMIC SYSTEM
PIG= OBVIOUSLY “SWINE FLU”

ALL TOGETHER = “MAN BEAR BIG” A SYMBOLIC REPRESENTATION OF THE ENEMY/HOLY TRINITY PYRAMID THAT THE ENTIRE CONSTRUCTION OF THE WORLD GOVERNMENT RESTS ON…MAN…THOSE GUYS AT SOUTH PARK ARE DEEP!!!

From: Phil Jones
To: "Michael E. Mann"
Subject: IPCC & FOI
Date: Thu May 29 11:04:11 2008

Mike,

Can you delete any emails you may have had with Keith re AR4?
Keith will do likewise. He's not in at the moment - minor family crisis.
Can you also email Gene and get him to do the same? I don't
have his new email address.
We will be getting Caspar to do likewise.
I see that CA claim they discovered the 1945 problem in the Nature paper!!
Cheers
Phil

Prof. Phil Jones
Climatic Research Unit Telephone +44 (0) 1603 592090
School of Environmental Sciences Fax +44 (0) 1603 507784
University of East Anglia
Norwich Email p.jones@xxxxxxxxx.xxx
NR4 7TJ
UK
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

CRU Email - 1212073451.txt (for those who downloaded the original files this is the one to look for)

Al Gore is only a "prophet" in your obsessed mind. This is about understanding and agreeing with the reality of what we are doing to this planet through our actions and respecting that he has the guts to bring that awareness to people who would otherwise not have it. And for that he will always have my utmost respect. So when all of you skeptics spread your "lawsuit" out to cover every scientist on the planet who has a peer reviewed article in consensus with AGW and can actually back it up, then you all may look credible and not like rightwing lunatics looking to appease a political grudge.

To all of you people that worship the "Prophet" Al Gore:
You remind me that scene in "Forest Gump" where one day he decides he wants to run,,,doesnt know why...he just feels like it...and there you go one by one...without even knowing why you running, you just follow....run run run ....run run run....one day he stops....he says: "I´m really tired, i´m going home" and "you" say: " What are we suppose to do now??" (same thing applies to the Monty Python movie "Life of Brian" wher he says "Stop following me! I´m not the messiah!"
He´s a fraud....you were wrong...DEAL WITH IT!
Well my advice to you: Stop following and start leading! I believe all of you, i don't believe just one of you! If each of you makes a difference you dont have to follow none.

"Be the change you want to see in the world"
Gandhi

i dont even know who to believe anymore....but i know one thing is true. whether or not the earth is heating up we're still polluting our planet.

Al is a liar,He's betrayed this country! He played on our fears!!

http://bit.ly/ARTOFWAR48

If the 3000 minutes that were spent watching this video were used to apply the GTD flowchart http://bit.ly.com/GTDflowchart2 and http://bit.ly.com/TWoBTP2 for permaculture logistics sustainabilty fair trade technology transfer immersive augmented reality ethics education working on the project so that none of the peices being put together in the tasks of the project were not repeated... teams of fifth graders could work out the free plan B 4.0 book online. i am at http://globalcide.livejournal.com and http://T4BP.com/Globalcide and http://TradeSkillsLLC.blogspot.com Matthew Lane Tripp at 1572 East Blackstock Rd. Moore SC 29369. The livejournal globalcide is a flyer you can set the maximum margins and grey font and size 9 font for a one page flyer. With book groups listed somewhere to torrents of the audiobooks and sheetfed scanners to make text files of all the needed books... so that it only takes a group of 5 people buying a copy of the book to cut off the spine and put through sheetfed scanner... and retired, elderly, and disabled can read books aloud to create free audiobooks to link the chapters to the wiki for each book and be able to see the sociology subject index link map overlay to each chapter of each book with the segmented audio immersive ethics augmented reality UI with the head tracking and VR gloves.

John Coleman is a television personality. Not a scientist. Founder of the Weather Channel is not a credential for participating in the global warming discussion. He is an expert on getting on the news and has always been closely associated with Fox. Form your own opinion but consider the source.

This guy must conveniently be missing the photos of receding ice caps and the fact that there are places in Europe now that are just building boat houses now because the water levels are raising too high for anyone to build a home reliably on soil that will stay dry.

i can't believe i read this nonsense. I need to go somewhere else for the sake of my brain, Copenhagen is sounding good right now...

i think the democrat sheeple are more blind then the bush ones, both need to stop playin follow the leaders

Hooray for disingenuous republican outrage! It's what "America" is ALL about, dontcha know...

Hooray for disingenuous republican outrage! It's what "America" is ALL about, dontcha know...

So long ago, so true today, White Hats RULE !

dosnt mean we shouldnt still conserve and recycle

CO2 does not equal water vapor... dumbass. And, hypothetically, if Al Gore is wrong about global warming, what's wrong with getting people to be more environmentally friendly?

haha, i like the argument that CO2 is natural and therefore putting more into the atmosphere is totally fine.
These arguments only work if you assume some very crude things that arent even widely held to be true, this guy assumes that you can't have too much of a good thing, which is clearly not the case.

Thank you Saladin for providing this informative video. It shows that It's not a matter of which scientist is lying. I think very few would actually lie about it. It's a matter of whose research is the most accurate. Whose evaluations are closest too reality. As non scientist we are not in a position to make qualified decisions on the subject. We have too rely on our scientists too identify and attempt too solve the problem as we do in other areas. But any information or evidence that can be provided too us non scientists to help us better understand what is actually occurring is vital to our comprehension of the subject. So thank you Saladin for helping too shed some light on the subject for the rest of us.

The man made global warming scam is finally coming apart at the seams, a lot of us have known for years it was a scam, but finally the masses are waking up to the complete lies we have been fed in the purpose of further transferring more wealth from the middle class to the elite via a carbon tax scheme that is one of the most ridiculous ideas in human history.

as much as i hate the Chanel its on...

And New ZEaland has warnings because melting glaciers from Anartica are drifting close and are a danger to shippijng. No global warming. HOpe some of those corporate scientists are on the ships near the dangerous glaciers that are falling apart and drifting.

Leaving Fox News out of it (the mere mention of which seems to send some people into hysterics) The recent leakage of documentatry evidence of collusion and suppression of opposition views by pro-GW scientists makes the entire global-warming hypothesis highly suspect. The global-warming data has been shown to be fatally tainted, and the scientists involved in promoting the GW hypothesis have serious conflicts of interest that are clearly in the realm of scientific and academic malpractice.

Y'all just been Fauxed! Here's the break down. Way back in 1998 some petition got the signatures of over 30,000 people with at least a bachelors in science (you know like a degree in computer engineering, psychology or any of the other fields that make you instant experts on climate study) all saying they were not in support of the current (in 1998) theory of global warming.

This petition (over 10 years old at this point) is not linked in anyway with any people supporting legal recourse against Al Gore and so pretty much it's just this one crazy guy (best news source faux gets) holding a piece of paper with random names on it saying "These people are all my friends".

Of course, what else would you expect from Rupert?

Fox news is entertainment, not news.

The continued targeting of Al Gore is a specific tactic by the right.

They purposefully don't go after scientists, because they can't possibly make their case with them because they're bullshit peddlers. The right can't even decide on what lies to agree on, whether or not they believe the earth is actually warming and of course it could never be man-made and if it is it's "natural" and therefore somehow not a problem.

Al Gore is just some politician, brighter than most but never allowed to properly defend himself. And by obsessing over him rather than the science, they can continue to discredit legitimate science.

It's real simple folks, NO ONE at this point disagrees with the fact that the earth is warming. Man-made or not, wouldn't it at least be prudent to stem off of costly fossil fuels anyway? Is it really such a bad thing to try and save water and not be wasteful?

This is a hoax. The guy has been making the claim for over a year, but nothing has ever come of it. There is no 30,000 scientist list, no suit has ever been filed, and even if he somehow eventually convinces some people to join him in his deluded attempt to file a suit, there's no standing to sue.

I dunno. Most of the variables that caused global warming to happen are still in place. Can Al Gore be sued for causing sunspot activity to stop dead cold? The disaster was fully cranked up then the sun cooled. We were given a very revealing decade-long glimpse at what we were doing wrong. Returning to business as usual doesn't seem a very smart idea. If the sun can turn itself DOWN that quickly what happens if it turns back ON again and we didn't make any changes?

Something Cosmic is in evidence here. Someone else has pulled up a seat to the card table.

can't we all just get along - yes - the globe is warming - everyone agrees this point ...just a matter *why* that is the dilemma (or the money maker - which ever you choose)

If we say yes to the *cause* being Co2 then multi-billion $ corps pushing for Green Energy get to run Big Oil off the tracks!

If the cause is merely a natural occurrence then, well, the digging prevails....the Bush admin. wanted nothing to do with the global warming - hmm I wonder why...

Either way coorps are making big ones.
What I do not understand is why the oil companies do not change over to the green energy (if that is where the money is) maybe it is like a bad relationship - spent too much time, energy and money in supporting it and it is too late to back out now.

Also, it's fox news.

Is every one of these "scientists" and "PHDs" climatologists?

prosecute al gore and his climate criminals

I'm a scientist! No, I'm a scientist! No, over here... I'm a scientist!

... No surprise. Fox Self-Referential Hate Machine tripe.