Comedy | December 23, 2009 | 123 comments

The Prince of Persia, Ya know that white guy...

Image
maurajriordan
So, prince of persia obviously had a lot of time and money put into it. Jake Gyllenhaal I didn't know you were Persian! Oh what's that... You're not. . . hm... Too bad people will go to see it anyways, but I hope not. I was under the impression we got past the days of having white people play everyone in movies. I guess not.
  1. groups:
    Entertainment,   Comedy,   Movies,   Gaming
  2. tags:
    Prince of Persia The Sands of Time
  3.     
    |

123 comments // The Prince of Persia, Ya know that white guy...

  • Bajules
    • 0
      Bajules  
    • I'm not sure what the big deal is with the Prince of Persia being played by a white guy. I mean if people want to be annoyed that he doesn't look exactly like the video game character that's one thing. But to be annoyed that someone white is playing a Persian is kind of ridiculous. Anyone who is Persian or who has been to Iran knows that Persians can be anywhere from dark to really light. Yes as light as Jake Gyllenhaal. The Prince of Persia could have been played by a white guy or someone darker. It really makes no difference.

    • 1 year ago
  • Nephwrack
  • dainjdc
  • life_4_rent
    • 0
      life_4_rent [removed]  
    • I must admit that I also had my doubts, when I learned about him in the title role, but… COME ON! Who else could you picture playing the Prince of Persia?! He doesn’t look EXACTLY like him, but the movie itself won’t be a beat-to-beat adaptation of the game, so I think he is as close to the “perfect choice” as it could get. STOP WITH THE HATIN’!

    • 2 years ago
  • Weepowopo
    • 0
      Weepowopo  
    • Image
    • I'm not sure but I think more than half of the people in this thread do not realize that the movie "Prince of Persia" is based off the video game "Prince of Persia".

      The reason that the fact that that dude is white is a problem is because in the game the main character was a brown persian.

      The movie is also off in respect to the amount of blood and gore in the game aswell as to the amount of visible female skin. And also where is the fucking Dahaka?

      This movie should have been made by Twisted Pictures not FUCKING Disney and their PG13 BULLSHIT.

    • 2 years ago
  • remanns
    • 0
      remanns  
    • I am addressing this,...not because I think the main article is particularly interesting, but because the ENDLESS responses are. I am afraid that discussions of "race" in this country are fundamentally useless; you start from your general frame of reference,....and end there. AND THIS IS FROM NON "Haters n Racists". For instance , when I think about "whiteness",.....I supply "Aryan",.....basically all those original folk who used some form of Indo-European before they moved all over the place.
      For me,...."Whiteness" is of only limited value to discuss,...especially the "American" notion of "whiteness",..... as it changes and expands CONSTANTLY,....within mere decades,...and is a highly transitory construct,....and thus TO ME, is basically of little interest in discussing history and what I consider to be the MORE enduring nuances of,...........hmmmmmmm,....lets call it tribal legacy.
      If your in the group of folk who have "whiteness" solidly loaded into your "current events" values sets,....well,....ALL YOU REALLY CARE ABOUT in regards to the term is the 'modern' ramifications, and the whole "Aryan" label/term (unless it reads 'skinhead-racist- Nazi- KKK') is academic fluff and intellectualism.

      For me, an Iranian is just about as much of a "Persian" as an Englishman is a "Celt" or "Roman".
      But the respective subsets are both sure as hell " those white guys, Aryans,..with that funky ass language structure and symbolism THEY favor".
      Guys sure as hell aren't Mandarin.
      For me,....a "pretend Persian,..from a fantasy Persia" can sure as hell be played by anyone who wants to pretend.
      And yeah,.....you might want to get a "white" guy",.....assuming the rest of your "pretend Persian" cast isn't Asiatic, Polynesian,...whatever the director thinks is fun.

      But I'm not a "black" guy trying to get cast in Hollywood. But hey,....thats NOT where MY head is at,....and there is nothing wrong with that. If I couldn't see the issue,....there would be a problem.

    • 2 years ago
  • bking74
  • RoBot_rOcKer
    • 0
      RoBot_rOcKer  
    • how come zachary quinto and leonard nimoy can play spock? they aren't vulcans.
      james earl jones isn't from zamunda so why does he play their king?

      jake had to get into amazing shape to be able to do this movie going as far as to be able to run on walls without wire

      i say hes earned the part.

      besides lots of persians look white

    • 2 years ago
  • bking74
    • 0
      bking74  
    • Image
    • I actually think Jake Gyllenhaal is a great actor (Brothers, Jarhead, etc.) but why not go with an Middle Eastern or more accurate actor such as Naveen Andrews. He has the ability and range to play the Prince of Persia. In fact it seems as the role was written for him. Not quite sure why he was overlooked?

    • 2 years ago
  • flyingkick
  • flyingkick
    • 0
      flyingkick  
    • Ienhart,

      Race does exist, and you're right, it has little to do with DNA, but it is very real. It is invented by society. And it affects everyone.

      My point with racial profiling is relevant to what we're talking about, which is this: Persians may identify with being White, but the reality is that in the American consciousness (as racist as it is) they are not White, especially after 911. Let me be clear, White, as I'm discussing it, is a social construct, and it does not mean one group is superior to another in any way. Let me explain-

      A friend of mine is Persian, and she does not consider herself White. Her father experienced racism when he first came to the US 40 years ago, and again after 911.
      The type of violence and hate against Persians and Arabs, although they are considered White by the US census and geographic boarders, is said to be racially motivated or racial hate crimes by the US media and by US racial hate crime laws. This shows that many White Americans of European Ancestry do not consider Persians to be White.

      Now, as you said, just because Persians are profiled as non-White does not necessarily mean they are non-White. After all, how can one person assign a racial identity to another person? On the other hand, assigning yourself a racial identity is not as easy as simply identifying with that race. For example, I have another friend who's mother is Japanese and who's father is Irish. She identifies much more with her Japanese side, and she looks more Japanese than Irish. But when she goes to Japan, she is not considered Japanese, she is a Gaijin, a foreigner.

      My point is that calling Persians White in America is complicated. If you have Persian friends who identify with being White, I certainly can't tell them they are wrong. But the reality is that most Americans do not consider Persians to be White. I also know a family of Persians who do not consider themselves White. In my personal opinion, a person is whatever they identify with and whatever culture they embody.

    • 2 years ago
  • lenhart
    • 0
      lenhart  
    • Re: "Also, the issue of racial profiling Persians at airports would not exist if Persians were white."

      Some say profiling itself is a bigoted action. Who gets profiled, often for political reasons, is irrelevant and does nto mean a thing.

      It is completely irrelevant.

    • 2 years ago
  • Vierotchka
  • Vierotchka
  • Vierotchka
  • Vierotchka
  • JaneBond007
  • artemis6
    • 0
      artemis6  
    • I would like to bitch about something more important and closer to my heart . It is criminal , the amount of clothing that man is wearing . History be damned - it has to go !

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • ocanada
    • 0
      ocanada  
    • And to V. Why is it if the people of the Cuacuses could be considered caucasian despite living in the Asian continent, why do they face discrimination in Russia as not Russian, not white? Of course this isn't so wholesale but to deny that it has occured would be foolish. Where does this perception of othernes come from? It isn't simply nationalistic feelings and while feelings don't generate truth they can generate discrimination.

      One undeniable anthropological fact, is that because Humans are so simmilar sharing 98 percent of the same DNA, each minuite difference is amplified in our eyes in part as a need to preserve genetic diversity and a sense of individuality on a primal level, we see established norms in our daily lives. For some of us normal is a diverse swath and for some they look into a sea of peoples and can see only the face of the other rather than the thread of human commonality. That may not change anytime soon, not acknowledging that perception doesn't make it vanish, it empowers it for the moment.

    • 2 years ago
  • Vierotchka
  • ocanada
    • 0
      ocanada  
    • Image
    • While true that Persia is a diverse region, its modern interpretation at least for most Americans perhaps due to geopolitical context is that of the peoples of Iran and admitedly American may have a preconception of what an Iranian looks like based on images of the religous and political establishment. They saw different faces this year in the flowering of both young and old in protesting political persecution, and the dubious election results throught the year. Young and old, and varied, and full of passion. In such a year I think few Americans think of Jake Gyllenhall when picturing a Persian either in this or any year.

      Like Turkey and much of the mediteranian it is a mix of eastern and western peoples in both a mingling of genes and cultural cognates transfered from a strain of empires and united peoples like Rome, Bizantium, Macedonia, The Ottoman Turks, the Persians themselves, The Mommalouks, and many more. Race, and ethnic identity are often more complex than Americans care to discuss admit or analyze.

      I blame the harm of the old southern doctrines we are still coming out of, a litteral black and white interpretation of race and the labeling of people as simply "of color" There was a time when the rule was, one drop is a drop to many, and a persons couldn't be listed as ethnically white or treated as ethnically white if they had any ancestors who were not of western Europeon descent. That would strike me today and I'm white.

      It was as simple as white or off color but as we all know thats an over generalization, both that I have made about southern attitudes and about the actual racial heritedge of America. We have one of the most rich and complex mingling of peoples ever assembled. I'm writing this as a person with hondouran cousins, a chinese aunt, and as a person who is a descendent of both freed slaves and native americans. My father self identifies as caucasian, he wouldn't fit the old model of a drop will do, he resembles his creek grreat grandmother and grandfather than he does his father.

      While Persian shouldn't simply bring up a color scheme as if you were choosing paint for a wall, a certain feeling and charachter is withdrawn from the film, and a message is sent that there aren't Persians who were capable of fitting the role in Hollywood Today. Shohreh Aghdashloo for instance, is both an Academy award nominee and Emmy winner. It would be nice to see her not playing a terrorist or a member of a dictators family, despite how she humanized those roles despite the tokenism in the role, she made them more, I'd love to see what she could have done in the film.

      Where I think umbrage comes and I think rightly so is that casting directors do aproach films with a color wheel as if they were out picking paint for a bedroom rather than making a movie. Not many other professions can legaly have Caucuasians Only in hiring language, but its on casting calls and call sheets accross the industry. We're looking for a young caucasian, we're looking for a caucasian baby, cuacasian, caucasian, caucasian. Actually you couldn't legally do that in other professions. I'm not suggesting that whites shouldn't be cast but I think they shouldn't get first billing for nearly 100 percent of leading roles accross the board. Just bringing up a point of fact in the indudstry that highlights a disparity. When contemporary Persian actors are often relegated to the roles of villains, it would have been more than appropriate to offer the chance to a Persian Actor to shine in a heroic role based albeit loosely on their own culture. White actors have rarely been pushed aside and had their ethnic or racial identities removed from the context of a story for the sake of a mintority actor. The few instances where this has happened are the exception that proves the rule.
      Ideally there would be more minorities in roles that don't have a racial or ethnic context, where they are simply allowed to act, but to get to that seemingly rational point you have to have a climate where people beleive that they can at least plausibly attempt to make acting a profession. If the only people who look like you onscreen are playing terrorists, comedic relief, or extras it takes alot more faith to put the serious time and commitment thats required to become a professional actor. Its a cycle perpetuated by years of negative media stereotypes, and it can do more than make a person not want to be an actor, it can cause real offense or pain when repeated over and over again. You can laugh but it can be a bit like like life resembling a caveman in a geico comercial.

    • 2 years ago
  • DeliaTheArtist
    • 0
      DeliaTheArtist  
    • Image
    • He looks pretty white to me. Actually, Jake Gyllenhaal looks pretty much just like him. What are the chances that this movie is even going to be decent enough to care about?

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • During the underground railroad black people help other blacks escape the South. How could someone who looks like a slave be able to help a slave? Because those black people were WHITE enough to pass as white people and therefore were able to help their people escape.

      Color only matters to those that believe it matters....it doesn't matter to those that are more about who the person is than how they look.

    • 2 years ago
  • mr_tibbles
    • 0
      mr_tibbles  
    • Stop your bitching. The character in the original game looked white(despite being Persian), and he even had blue eyes. Therefore, if the producers are trying to stay true to the game then Gyllenhal is not a bad choice for this role.

    • 2 years ago
  • Vierotchka
  • lenhart
    • 0
      lenhart  
    • mr_tibbles:

      The idea that BECAUSE someone is racially profile 'proves' that he/she is 'black' is STUPID, fallacious and wrong.

      I repeat: 'Persians' are caucasians and caucasions are --by definition --WHITE! PERIOD.

      Citiing 'profiling' as evidence to the contrary is blatantly fallacious and, in an empircal sense, simply UNTRUE!

      i repeat fo the slow witted: PERSIANS i.e, Iranians are WHITE.

      Live with it!

    • 2 years ago
  • mr_tibbles
    • 0
      mr_tibbles  
    • mr_tibbles:

      A person can be Caucasian and still not be white. Caucasian simply refers to someone of the Caucasus region which includes Europe, northern Africa, western Asia, and India. Part of the definition of Caucasian is "Of or being a human racial classification distinguished especially by very light to brown skin pigmentation and straight to wavy or curly hair." So yes, Persians are certainly Caucasian, but they are not considered "white".

      So I reiterate, stop your bitching and to quote you lenhart - LIVE WITH IT

    • 2 years ago
  • lenhart
    • 0
      lenhart  
    • Re: "Racial profiling and hate crimes against Persians are committed by white people. How can Persians be white if this happens."

      That has got to be the most OBVIOUS and the most RIDICULOUS non sequitur I have ever seen.

      Simply, if White folk are profiling other WHITE folk (Persians) then it is because they are as IGNORANT as you with regard to 'race' --a dubious concept in any case.

      The differences in Human DNA from one so-called 'race' to another are ESSENTIALLY NEGLIGIBLE !!

      END RACISM NOW!

    • 2 years ago
  • flyingkick
    • 0
      flyingkick  
    • lenhart:

      Ienhart,

      Race does exist, and you're right, it has little to do with DNA, but it is very real. It is invented by society. And it affects everyone.

      My point with racial profiling is relevant to what we're talking about, which is this: Persians may identify with being White, but the reality is that in the American consciousness (as racist as it is) they are not White, especially after 911. Let me be clear, White, as I'm discussing it, is a social construct, and it does not mean one group is superior to another in any way. Let me explain-

      A friend of mine is Persian, and she does not consider herself White. Her father experienced racism when he first came to the US 40 years ago, and again after 911.
      The type of violence and hate against Persians and Arabs, although they are considered White by the US census and geographic boarders, is said to be racially motivated or racial hate crimes by the US media and by US racial hate crime laws. This shows that many White Americans of European Ancestry do not consider Persians to be White.

      Now, as you said, just because Persians are profiled as non-White does not necessarily mean they are non-White. After all, how can one person assign a racial identity to another person? On the other hand, assigning yourself a racial identity is not as easy as simply identifying with that race. For example, I have another friend who's mother is Japanese and who's father is Irish. She identifies much more with her Japanese side, and she looks more Japanese than Irish. But when she goes to Japan, she is not considered Japanese, she is a Gaijin, a foreigner.

      Calling Persians White in America is complicated. If you have Persian friends who identify with being White, I certainly can't tell them they are wrong. But the reality is that most Americans do not consider Persians to be White. I also know a family of Persians who do not consider themselves White. In my personal opinion, a person is whatever they identify with and whatever culture they embody.

    • 2 years ago
  • lenhart
    • 0
      lenhart  
    • Re: "True Caucasians ain't white. You don't have to believe ME--ask any Russian skinhead. "

      I don't care what 'any' Russian skinhead says or what any 'skinhead' of any country sez.

      Cuacasian equals white; white equals caucasian.

      Having a fair complexion (white) is a part of the definition of 'White'. moreover, ALL of the Persians I have ever known in my life were WHITE and some of the fairer in complexion than me.

    • 2 years ago
  • lenhart
    • 0
      lenhart  
    • Re: ". If Persians are white, can you explain to me how the racial profiling of Persians exists in America? "

      I could profile anyone at any time. It DOES NOT change what they are. Nor does it define it.

      Racial profiling of Persians DOES NOT define them as being of any race whatsoever. 'Profiling' does NOT DEFINE anyone.

      Hitler 'profiled' people and he did so because he was a bigot.

      that some one is PROFILED for whatever reason does not make them or turn them into something that they are not.

    • 2 years ago
  • Vierotchka
    • 0
      Vierotchka  
    • Image
    • http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6a/Huxley_whites.png

      Huxley's map of racial categories from On the Geographical Distribution of the Chief Modifications of Mankind (1870). [17] Huxley's Xanthochroi or "light whites" are shown in red. They gradually blend into the category of Melanochroi or "dark whites" (shown in pink) in Southern Europe and North Africa, and into the Mongoloids B category (light brown) in Eastern Europe and Scandinavia. Blending of all three types mentioned is indicated for the Balkans, Anatolia, the Levant, Persia and Northern India.

    • 2 years ago
  • Vierotchka
    • 0
      Vierotchka  
    • White people (in American English also Caucasian) is a term which usually refers to human beings characterized, at least in part, by the light pigmentation of their skin. Rather than a straightforward description of skin color, the term white also functions as a color terminology for race, often referring narrowly to people claiming ancestry exclusively from Europe.

      The definition of a 'white person' differs according to geographical and historical context, and various social constructions of whiteness have had implications in terms of national identity, consanguinity, public policy, religion, population statistics, racial segregation/affirmative action, eugenics, racial marginalization and racial quotas. The concept has been applied with varying degrees of formality and internal consistency in disciplines including: sociology, politics, genetics, biology, medicine, biomedicine, language, culture, and law.

      A common definition of a 'white person' is a person of primarily, or wholly, European ancestry.[1] However, the term is sometimes used more broadly, so that it becomes similar to the concept of the Caucasian race or Caucasoid people, which includes people with ancestry from the Middle East, North Africa, and parts of Central, and South Asia, who share certain physiological characteristics and genetics with Europeans beyond skin colour.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_people

    • 2 years ago
  • maurajriordan
    • 0
      maurajriordan  
    • for the record, those statements had no means of relating to the holocaust . Or even him being Jewish or not. He's not persian, the end. I find it just as odd when any one plays a role that is based on heritage when they are in fact not apart of said heritage. That is all.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • Vierotchka
  • MizPiz
  • Cynic2
  • lenhart
    • 0
      lenhart  
    • Cynic2:

      Re: "Re: " Yes, that's why I wrote "Millions of Jews died in the Holocaust." Can you point out where I wrote that Hitler persecuted Persians?"

      I didn't say that you said that Hitler persecuted Persians. Persians are WHITE.

      Secondly, Hitler persecuted JEWS because they were not, he said, Aryans.

      Persians are WHITE and, moreover, they are 'ARYANS', in fact, caucasians, a synonym for 'white'.

      There is, moreover, that Hitler never singled out PERSIANS for persecution.

      Moreover, the argument put forward was that BECAUSE Hitler persecuted Jews they must not be 'white'. That's BOGUS, FALLACIOUS and, if it is repeatedly with the intention to decive, it is a lie. Secondly, the word JEW does not even CONNOTE RACE! Many non-white people are Jews just as many whites ARE!

      You --by your own admission --wrote " millions of Jews died in the holocaust".

      Millions of jews died in the Holocaust because Hitler was bigoted and ignorant, as ignorant with regard to racial matters as some who post on this thread!

      Certainly --nothing you have said proves that Persians are NOT WHITE.

      Secondly and finally JEWS have nothing to do with this thread! "Jew" does not relate to 'race' ----white, black, yetlow --in any way whatsoever!. As I pointed out: Sammy Davis Jr was a black man but he was also a JEW!

    • 2 years ago
  • flyingkick
    • 0
      flyingkick  
    • Cynic2:

      Ienhart,

      You are very confused. So confused, in fact, that you responded to the wrong post! I'm guessing you're talking to me since you quoted me.

      You're ignoring a very important point that hurts your claim that Persians are white. If Persians are white, can you explain to me how the racial profiling of Persians exists in America? How can hate crimes against Persians exist if they are indeed white? If a white person assaults a person of Persian decent while yelling racial slurs against Persians, we call that a racially motivated hate crime. Plenty of those happened right after 911. How can you explain that, if Persians are considered white?

    • 2 years ago
  • lenhart
    • 0
      lenhart  
    • Cynic2:

      RE: "You are very confused. So confused, in fact, that you responded to the wrong post! I'm guessing you're talking to me since you quoted me. "

      I always put what I am replying to ON TOP in quotes.

      Frankly, I don't give a CRAP who I am replying to....I am just trying to set the frickin' record straight.

      Persians are NOT non-white. They are white, in fact, Aryans.

      Hitlers holocaust is irrelevant and even Hitler did NOT claim that Jews were not 'white'.

      And white guys can play Persians in films if they get the part.

      Got it?

      Now --IRANIANS walk upright, use language, form family groups, live in villages, towns and cities and use tools. Roughly --that makes them human beings and that's all that counts.

      Re: " Racial profiling and hate crimes against Persians are committed by white people. How can Persians be white if this happens. ^You're ignoring this too^"

      So what?

      Because Iranians (Persians) are PROFILED by someone for whatever reason DOES NOT change what Persians (Iranians) are --in fact!

      Listen up: i don't care that the are profiled for ANY REASON WHATSOEVER. Hitler profiled folk for a panoply of dubious and bigoted reasons. It does not address the point. It is IRRELEVANT !

    • 2 years ago
  • flyingkick
    • 0
      flyingkick  
    • Cynic2:

      Aryan = white. Hitler called Jews non-Aryan. Therefore, Hitler called Jews non-white.
      ^You're ignoring this^

      Racial profiling and hate crimes against Persians are committed by white people. How can Persians be white if this happens.
      ^You're ignoring this too^

      Debating with you about this is pointless, since you are dodging all my key points, which shows you either don't know how to argue or you know you're wrong.

    • 2 years ago
  • Vierotchka
  • lenhart
    • 0
      lenhart  
    • Re: "Y'know Iran is "Land of Aryan", white race"

      Absolutely! I have lots of "Persian" friends in Houston, TX. They are ALL 'white' (Aryan). I suppose it is possible to be Iranian and be black, just as it is possible to be British and be 'black'. One has almost nothing to do with the other. But to build a whole article around the idea that Iranians are not 'white' is just plain wrong and misleading.

    • 2 years ago
  • zarathura
  • lenhart
    • 0
      lenhart  
    • Re: "Millions of Jews died in the Holocaust because they were not White."

      WRONG!

      Hitler did NOT carry out genocide against Jews because they were 'not white'. He said that they were 'non-Aryan'. Hitler, in fact, never claimed that Jews were not white.

      And who cares what Hitler thinks anyway?

      Being 'jew' is NOT a matter of race.

    • 2 years ago
  • flyingkick
    • 0
      flyingkick  
    • lenhart:

      Again, what you're saying makes no sense.

      If Aryan = White like you say, then Hitler calling Jews non-Aryan = Hitler calling Jews non-White. You cannot be non-Aryan but still be White.

    • 2 years ago
  • Vierotchka
  • lenhart
    • 0
      lenhart  
    • lenhart:

      Re: " If Aryan = White like you say, then Hitler calling Jews non-Aryan = Hitler calling Jews non-White. You cannot be non-Aryan but still be White."

      Hitler said that Jews were were Non-Aryan. He did NOT claim that they were black or negroid.

      Moreover, what Hitler called 'non-Aryans' is irrelevant. It proves absolutely nothing.

      Secondly --who CARES what Hitler thought. Hitler was full of prejudice and mis-information and --tragically --he acted upon it. NO INTELLIGENT person has ever cited Hitler as an AUTHORITY on racial matters. Hitler is NOT cited by socialists or anthropologists on matter having to do with either race or ethnicity except, perhaps, as an oddity or example to show the consequences of being wrong about everything having to do with race or ethnicity.

    • 2 years ago
  • lenhart
    • 0
      lenhart  
    • Re: "ake Gyllenhall is Jewish. Millions of Jews died in the Holocaust because they were not White."

      Hitler persecuted JEWS ---not Persians! And, it is quite possible for a Persian, to be Jewish though that has NOTHING to do with Hitler's persecution of European Jewry.

      Persians are WHITE. They are --in fact --Aryans!

      A point ---ALL Aryans are White but not all Whites are Aryan.

      And --in any case --it MAKES NO DIFFERENCE to the issue of whether or not Persians are white or black. Persians are NOT black but white.

      Moreover, HITLER'S persecution of someone for WHATEVER reason PROVES ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. It most certainly DOES NOT prove that Jews are anything but white.

      Secondly, Hitler himself NEVER claimed that Jews were not white. He said that they were NON-ARYAN.

      At last --to be perfectly precise --being Jewish is NOT a race because Jews do not share one common ancestry or biological distinction. People of many different races have become Jewish people over the years.

      Sammy Davis, Jr was a BLACK MAN but he was a JEW!

      A word of advice ---one would be well-advised to look up stuff before posting nonsense, wasting everyone's time.

    • 2 years ago
  • Vierotchka
    • 0
      Vierotchka  
    • lenhart:

      A great many Persiand (Iranians) were not profiled at airports, and a great many non-Persians but Europeans were profiled as they were taken for being Iranian. Iranians are white, full stop.

    • 2 years ago
  • Ricky84
    • 0
      Ricky84  
    • lenhart:

      V you’re not American and I seriously doubt (based in part on your lack of evidence) that you can make an accurate on the spot comparison of profiling by airport security for Persians and Europeans. At any rate Flyingkick is absolutely right. You’re not an American V so stop acting like you understand everything about American culture.

      Americans by and large do not consider Persians to be “white.” It doesn’t matter whether or not they are. This is a discussion of a social construct within the US. Your point simply put is useless because a social construct is an agreed upon perception and not a fact or absolute based on reality. Again by and large the US does not consider Persians to be white.

      Sweet Jesus this is a retarded argument.

    • 2 years ago
  • Vierotchka
    • 0
      Vierotchka  
    • lenhart:

      Ricky - what a gynormous non-sequitur! Your argument fails completely, and the retarded elements in this argument stem from you and those others who come across as ignorant as you.

    • 2 years ago
  • Ricky84
    • 0
      Ricky84  
    • lenhart:

      LOL, oh yes in a discussion of American perceptions you reference airport security protocol yet somehow my argument is non-sequitur.

      “Your argument fails completely”

      Well in my defense at least I actually have something of an argument. You an Len have completely failed to grasp the concept of a perception since you insistently argued against the obviously well established American perspective of what constitutes white(ness?) Seriously are you even aware of the article in question or the rest of the discussion outside this thread?

      Americans do not consider Persians to be white, hence Jake whatever playing a Persian is being discussed!

      “and the retarded elements in this argument stem from you and those others who come across as ignorant as you.”

      You’re right V if anyone is retarded it would be me because for some odd reason I love to poke bat-shit crazy with sound logic.

    • 2 years ago
  • Vierotchka
    • 0
      Vierotchka  
    • lenhart:

      So, people with white skin, brown eyes and dark hair are not considered to be white in America? Since when?

      Sweetie pie, you wouldn't know sound logic if it gave you a half-hour long French kiss!

    • 2 years ago
  • lenhart
    • 0
      lenhart  
    • lenhart:

      Hitler persecuted JEWS ---not Persians! His confused ideas about Aryans are irrelevant.

      Persians are WHITE and -in fact --Aryans!

      BIGOTS are more concerned with Hitler's opinions than am I. Moreover, HITLER'S persecution of anyone for WHATEVER reason PROVES ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. It DOES NOT prove that Jews are anything but white. And Hitler is not cited in scientific papers as an authority on race or ethnicity. When he is citied, he is most often roundly denounced. Hitler's opinion is of no importance on this issue one way or the other.

      Secondly, Hitler himself NEVER claimed that Jews were not white. He said that they were NON-ARYAN. In fact, it is quite possible to be both JEWISH and ARYAN.

      At last --being Jewish is NOT a race, Jews do not share one common ancestry or biological distinction. People of many different races have become Jewish people over the years. Sammy Davis, Jr was a BLACK MAN but he was a JEW!

      A word of advice to everyone ---look up stuff before posting nonsense, wasting everyone's time.”

      "LOL, oh yes in a discussion of American perceptions you reference airport security protocol yet somehow my argument is non-sequitur. Your argument fails completely”"

      I am an American --a Native Texan, in fact --and, as a white, anglo-saxon with native american ancestry, you are flat wrong you are full of it. You writing style is pretentious and overblown.

      "Well in my defense at least I actually have something of an argument."

      You don't have a FACT, let alone an argument. LOL LOL LOL How old are you? Twenty? or Twelve?

      "... You an Len have completely failed to grasp the concept of a perception since you insistently argued against the obviously well established American perspective of what constitutes white(ness?)"

      I will ignore the sophomic ad hominem. I got a really, really good tan on several occasions. Does that mean I became a BLACK MAN by U.S. standards?? I suggest you take an elementary anthropology course before you embarrass yourself again.

      I got a really, really bad SUN BURN on other occasions! Does that mean I became an APACHE?

      Once I had a really, really bad case of jaundice. Does that mean I was a CHINAMAN for a few weeks?

      "Seriously are you even aware of the article in question or the rest of the discussion outside this thread? Americans do not consider Persians to be white, hence Jake whatever playing a Persian is being discussed!"

      What the majority of Americans consider to be 'Persian' or 'white' is of little interest to me. the MAJORITY of Americans are wrong about any number of matters than are not matters of opinion but of scientific, verifiable fact. So what? For example, if I wish to know the distance from the earth to the sun, I DO NOT consult an opinion poll. I asked a reputable scientist and measure his response against a proven methodology.

      "and the retarded elements in this argument stem from you and those others who come across as ignorant as you.” You’re right V if anyone is retarded it would be me because for some odd reason I love to poke bat-shit crazy with sound logic."

      No one gives a shit about race but bigots! Now --Persians are NOT black nor are they NEGROID. Persians are white. I have had many Iranian friends. Some of them had lighter complexions than mine. By any definition recognized by professional sociologists, Persians are white.

      "Americans do not consider Persians to be white, hence Jake whatever playing a Persian is being discussed!"

      That proves nothing. Americans may be white, black, red or yellow! 'American' refers to either residence or citizenship but it DOES NOT denote either race, ethnicity or ancestry.

      Would you please tell me how and when 'Americans' became the SOLE arbiter of this issue?

      I don't care what MOST AMERICANS think nor is it true that the standard by which this issue is settled is by taking a poll of Americans.

      Persians are white!

    • 2 years ago
  • Ricky84
    • 0
      Ricky84  
    • lenhart:

      “So, people with white skin, brown eyes and dark hair are not considered to be white in America?”

      Not if you’re Persian. Look V I didn’t write the rulebook. Hell I don’t even endorse the rulebook. All I’m doing is acknowledging it’s existence. Americans, by and large do not consider Persians to be white. It’s that simple. If you actually have a counter-argument as to why Americans do consider Persians to be white I would love to hear it.

      FYI sweetie pie is definitely an American term of endearment and not the opening phrase for a put down.

    • 2 years ago
  • lenhart
    • 0
      lenhart  
    • lenhart:

      Re: "Americans by and large do not consider Persians to be “white.” It doesn’t matter whether or not they are. "

      I don't care what Americans 'by and large' consider to be white and what they 'consider' to be black. This is an ANTHROPOLOGICAL issue and it is NOT decided by referendum.

      PERSIANS ARE CAUCASIANS AND THUS ARE 'WHITE'.

      Live with it!

      Re: "You’re right V if anyone is retarded it would be me because for some odd reason I love to poke bat-shit crazy with sound logic."

      LOL LOL LOL Nothing in your post indicates even an ELEMENTARY acquaintance with the most basic syllogism let alone the subtleties of logic, symbolic logic, or inference. I suggest you read --and master --Russell's 'Principia Mathematica', Ayer's "Language, Truth and Logic' and Bronowski's 'Science and Human Values' before boasting of having mastered LOGIC. Post some evidence of at least having mastered a rudimentary three line syllogism.

      Now --it you don't like that, I suggest that you contact Harvard, Yale, University of Ca at Berkely, Cambridge, Texas A and M, Oxford and INFORM them that their sociology departments have gotten it all wrong. They might be grateful and bestow upon you an honorary degree.

    • 2 years ago
  • Ricky84
    • 0
      Ricky84  
    • Image
    • lenhart:

      “I am an American --a Native Texan, in fact--and I say you are not only wrong you are full of it. And your writing style is pretentious and overblown.”

      I do not have words for that since I wasn’t even talking to you. So what I want you to do is look at that picture I uploaded of Mr. Jones and look hard and long at it. Bad len, very bad len. No one cares where you are from and no one cares whether or not I come off as pretentious.

      “You don't have a single FACT, let alone an argument. LOL LOL LOL How old are you? Twenty? or Twelve?”

      Yes because I’m COMPLETELY and ABSOLUTELY NOT commenting on an article that denounces a WHITE man playing a PERSIAN. Yes, yes, yes, my argument is non-existent just like my “facts.”

      “I got a really, really good tan on several occasions. Does that mean I became a BLACK MAN by U.S. standards??”

      You’re an American right? Can’t you answer that question for yourself?

      “I suggest you take an elementary anthropology course before you embarrass yourself again.”

      Oh stop being intentionally thick. Just because I acknowledged the perception of what is white it doesn’t mean I believe or endorse it. For fucks’ sake by your reasoning civil rights groups are racist for acknowledging racism or the ACLU is composed of homosexual, Nazi Klansmen for defending the rights of Homosexuals, Nazi’s and Klansmen. BOO, BOO, BOOOOOO. Go look at that picture again smarty.

      “I got a really, really bad SUN BURN on other occasions! Does that mean I became an APACHE?”

      So Apaches look like really, really badly sub burnt Texans. Uh-huh. That doesn’t sound racist at all.

      “Basically --you are ignorant of the very concept of race and you bore other people. A suggestion: go back to school. Take a course and learn something.”

      You…picture..look….This argument is insane.

      “My position this: no one gives a shit about race but bigots!”

      Ok than stop talking about race smart-ass.

      “Now --Persians are NOT black nor are they NEGROID. Persians are white. I have had many Iranian friends. Some of them had lighter complexions than mine and ALL of them were smarter and spoke/wrote better English than you!”

      Yawn…Please explain Sasha Baron Cohen. If Americans consider Persians and other middle eastern types to not be white than how can an English, Jewish man play a Kazakhstan (not even a middle eastern country) reporter and come off, so perfectly (to those in the movie) as NOT white.

      “Admit it: you are just being bigot!”

      You know that picture of Mr Jones is mighty lonely right now.

    • 2 years ago
  • Vierotchka
    • 0
      Vierotchka  
    • lenhart:

      So, Ricky - how do you tell the difference between a blonde, blue-eyed and white-skinned Persian and a blonde, blue-eyed and white-skinned Belgian, how do you profile them, by what criteria do you make the difference?

      Oh, and I was called "sweetie pie" by British people, in England, over 50 years ago, it is originally an English expression - and I was being patronizing when I called you sweetie pie.

    • 2 years ago
  • Ricky84
    • 0
      Ricky84  
    • lenhart:

      Oh yes, haha V I love you. So let me get this right. A person that correctly acknowledges the American perception of race (no matter how messed up it is) should also be quizzed about their own perception of race since the acknowledgment itself is a sign of ignorance or racism. Dear god how is that any different than labeling a black person a thug, drug dealer, delinquent because of the actions of a select few?

      @Lenhart.

      Do you want me to post that picture again because I will.

      “No --you are the fuckin dumbass who insists upon a blatant non sequitur that would have gotten your thrown off my Jr High school debate team.”

      “You cannot win this argument”

      “I am NOT interested in what you are saying.”

      Great so you would have been kicked off the Jr high debate team too because you can’t have a debate or argument by willfully ignoring what the other party is saying.

      So here’s something for you to ignore again.

      “Americans by and large do not consider Persians to be “white.” It doesn’t matter whether or not they are. This is a discussion of a social construct within the US. Your point simply put is useless because a social construct is an agreed upon perception and not a fact or absolute based on reality.” Ricky84

      It doesn’t matter whether or not they are.
      It doesn’t matter whether or not they are.
      It doesn’t matter whether or not they are.
      It doesn’t matter whether or not they are.
      It doesn’t matter whether or not they are.

      “You don't undertand! I DON'T CARE”

      Oh I completely understand that point.

      “I care and I am somebody!”

      I fucking love you, seriously.

      “You can'tn even insult with imagination or creativity.”

      Says the guy with a Che Guevara avatar :P

    • 2 years ago
  • Ricky84
    • 0
      Ricky84  
    • lenhart:

      Oh my that joke about your AV completely sailed over your head. How the hell did you miss it? Granted it's not the funniest or most clever joke I've ever told but the point should be pretty god damn apparent.

      Che= super over used symbol of rebellion found on everything from teeshirts to key chains, and usually worn or possessed by a collection of ignorant uninformed, ill-informed jitterbugs with a bone to pick. That's your av len, the symbol of non-imaginative and uncreative Utopian morons. Of course I would never call you a moron it was just a joke and I'm truly sorry you didn't get it.

    • 2 years ago
  • flyingkick
    • 0
      flyingkick  
    • Excuse me, but most of you are being really stupid.

      Jake Gyllenhall is Jewish.

      Millions of Jews died in the Holocaust because they were not White.

      Moreover, ethnic Jews are descended from the Middle-East. Gyllenhall playing a Persian is no different than Zhang Ziyi playing a Japanese woman in Memoirs of a Geisha.

      Get over it...

    • 2 years ago
  • Vierotchka
    • 0
      Vierotchka  
    • flyingkick:

      Persia is in the Middle East, flyingkick. The reason why European Jews were slaughtered by the Nazis had nothing to do with skin colour, either. As for Jews and skin colour - what about the Jews of China (who don't look different from the Chinese)? What about the African Jews from Ethiopia? Etc.

    • 2 years ago
  • flyingkick
  • Vierotchka
  • lenhart
    • 0
      lenhart  
    • flyingkick:

      Re: "Millions of Jews died in the Holocaust because they were not White."

      NOPE! Millions of jews and other groups to include gypsies died in the Holocaust because HITLER was a bigot, a megalomaniac and ignoramus who presumed to rule the world. What HItler did or did not do for any bogus reason proves nothing but that maniacs should never presume to rule or conquer the world.

      NO ONE of any intelligence takes Hitler's RACIAL PREJUDICES seriously! The HOLOCAUST followed from Hitler's FUZZY and un-informed ideas and prejudices about race and ethnicity. Hitler was a bigot and because HITLER did something is most certainly not evidence for or against ANY view whatsoever.

    • 2 years ago
  • lenhart
    • 0
      lenhart  
    • In any case, thank you, for setting the record straight!

      Once again -- ideas take root because someone or some group has a political AXE to grind!

      For the record --PERSIANS ARE WHITE! Get over it!

    • 2 years ago
  • flyingkick
    • 0
      flyingkick  
    • lenhart:

      'White' is a social construct that is only a few hundred years old. Persians are definitely not white. Ask an average American if the leader of Iran, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is white. Can you guess what they'll say?

      Also, the issue of racial profiling Persians at airports would not exist if Persians were white.

    • 2 years ago
  • Vierotchka
    • 0
      Vierotchka  
    • lenhart:

      By your standards, then, flyingkick, most Italians, Spaniards, French, Bosnians, Kosovars, Serbs, Greeks, etc., are not white either - many of them are darker than most Iranians. You don't know what you are babbling about, flyingkick.

    • 2 years ago
  • flyingkick
    • 0
      flyingkick  
    • lenhart:

      Vier,

      You're completely misunderstanding what I'm saying. 'White' is a social construct. George Bush can get a tan that's darker than Obama, and he will still be white. It's the American perception of race I'm talking about, not skin color.

      Italians were not considered white when they first migrated to the US, and Spaniards are still not considered white, in the US at least.

      Anyway, the Persians I know do not identify themselves as white.

      Where were you during the white racism against Middle-Eastern people after 911? How is that that kind of racism is even possible if Middle-Eastern people are white?

    • 2 years ago
  • lenhart
  • Vierotchka
  • Vierotchka
  • Vierotchka
  • Vierotchka
  • flyingkick
    • 0
      flyingkick  
    • Vierotchka:

      'White' is a social construct that is only a few hundred years old. Persians are definitely not white. Ask an average American if the leader of Iran, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is white. Can you guess what they'll say?

      Also, the issue of racial profiling Persians at airports would not exist if Persians were white.

    • 2 years ago
  • Nettle
  • Nephwrack
  • RoBot_rOcKer
  • J_Jammer
  • eta
    • 0
      eta  
    • regardless of ethnicity, i like gyllenhaal as an actor, but either way he doesn't fit this role. i think the more disappointing example of this is with Avatar: the Last Airbender.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • eta:

      What does that even mean?

      And many people don't think actors don't fit roles before the movie comes out (IE Heath Ledger as the Joker....A LOT of people thought that, I was in the minority that didn't) and then when the movie comes out they become utterly wrong.

      Oh what a pleasure it will be when this is the case for this movie.

    • 2 years ago
  • StaleCookie
  • versasrev
  • Anachronitsicds
  • Mikeysfake1
  • KSirys
    • 0
      KSirys  
    • another movie played by a white fella.... Cant wait till Hollywood decides to do a movie on a Black or Latino activist and prominent leader.... I wonder who plays the role???

      A. George Clooney
      B. Matt Damon
      or
      C. Tom Hanks..

      Either way, Hollywood will never learn!!

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • flyingkick
    • 0
      flyingkick  
    • KSirys:

      Last time I checked, 'Malcom X' was a Hollywood film starring Denzel Washington, and Morgan Freeman played Nelson Mandela in the Hollywood film 'Invictus.' Matt Damon was a co-star in 'Invictus' though, is that OK?

    • 2 years ago
  • KSirys
    • 0
      KSirys  
    • KSirys:

      NO, it's no OK.... 2 movies in the last 15 years... that's the best you can do? Than my point is more valid.... and Jammer aka the second coming of Moses, who cares what you think...

    • 2 years ago
  • flyingkick
    • 0
      flyingkick  
    • KSirys:

      Ksirys,

      You are hilarious. You don't even know when you're wrong!
      Want some more? I can't believe you've never heard of these movies.

      Miracle at St. Anna
      Frida
      Stand and Deliver

    • 2 years ago
  • bking74
  • Minus5scenePoints
    • 0
      Minus5scenePoints  
    • This is funny. But, im whatever about this movie.
      Oh, has anyone seen the Princess and the Frog? the prince looks like a white guy with a spray on tan! oh, Disney!

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
1 - 100 of 123
more from Comedy:

top videos