J_Jammer bites the dust

Who was this J_Jammer?

i think i finally bumped into the new incarnation the other day. wow i wanted to punch my laptop just reading the comments.

omg this is hysterical.

Wow. It is really is you Jammer. Your the only one who would respond to a post like that. I must say I greatly enjoyed you not being around.

Kenny your funny man.

The reason for my response - I grow weary of my email being bombed by this thread.

I will post no more in this thread no more. I was over and tired of all this 5 months ago.

Jubal says it best "Either do something really meaningful or keep quiet and stop trying to use the back door."

It has come to my attention from a friend of mine that happens to be a medical professional and has been examining JJ's posts for the last couple of days that this person JJ appears to be an immediate danger to people that are in close proximity and a possible danger to the public in general. If you have any connection with JJ please help get him some mental health because it appears he may be a danger to himself as well.

People, look.

This thread sounds feels and sounds like an argument in a gossip magazine.

JJ deserves no props for tenacity and no credibility. He was was infuriating. Only looking to cause conflict. A disruptor. The kid in class who just made noise because he could. Free speech is a big one for me. Bigotry and ignorance are not. And while people continue to discuss this many more important things are going on in the world.

If you don't like current, don't stay. I for one am happy with what they chose to do. If you don't think I'm in the right do a little research, read the arguments he got into with people. But for the love of Pete it was over five months ago. He's gone. Let all just move on. Let's talk about more important things.

And he may be back as some other name. I recognize his sentence structure and how he choose to attack people. But even if he his, how pathetic is that? So you get kicked off a web site? So what? They are millions of websites out there. There and millions of other ways to spend you time and millions of other things a person could be doing that are positive, helpful, and insightful.

All things that JJ was not, nor would ever be.

The man made an impression, you must give him that. 5 months after the article has been posted, and after he was removed from current, people can't seem to stop talking about him.

i'm new here & not familiar with J_Jammer, but free speech is for all.
you can vote post down or ignore it completly. i fully intend to offend some people with posts & responses .. but i will try to keep my offensive responses brief .. i hate long responses even when i fully agree with them.
PS Godling i hate you ; )

The only problem I had with JJ was that he posted a novel on every story.

Freedom of expression even if we don't like it ...people thats how everything start first JJ later anybody commenting... I don't like censorship to accommodate some..Sad day for current sad day:(

Hmmm. I rather enjoyed a lot of the Dr. Who dialog,...but there was quite a bit of it,...and I didn't slog through it all.

J Jammer has reappeared as Dr_Who, apparently.

Can someone tell him please that "duh" is spelled with an "h" and not an "r" (as in "dur")? I find the diphthong somewhat off-putting.

But maybe it's just an unfortunate speech impediment resulting from having run into things too often as a child, like his friends' fingers balled up into something conventionally called a fist. Childhood can be such an angry time.

So it's a disability maybe, in which case it's okay, because those meds can get expensive, and Title VII will help him out with the bills.

(Don't tell him that Title VII is the Civil Rights Act. That'll really piss him off.)

If JJammer was lied about then he should file a libel suit, that should settle things. Frankly I am tired of this whole thing going on and on and on and on. If you aren't going to take legal action then move on, stop whining about it. Either do something really meaningful or keep quiet and stop trying to use the back door.

Honestly , I have not missed him .

I like how Current keeps all his posts, but "disables" his account.

Ah well. I think Jammer could have been a god Catholic priest somewhere, like Father Flanagan.

Tell him to come over. http://currentb.ning.com is the current alternative where the outcasts congregate.

I cant believe so many Current users misunderstood J_Jammer. He was quite hilarious when you were able to see his side of things. I am going to miss his satire because I found him entertaining.

Instead of just creating a thread full of opinions, why not write an actual article that explains why Jammer got booted?

Is this conducive to free speech? Is this a knee-jerk reaction to a zero tolerance policy about racism or is this perhaps someone being ostrasized because a few people didnt like his point of view? Is this a real issue, or is it just political correctness running rampant because of advertising money?

And before anyone thinks that I am just Jammer with a new name, let me dispell that myth from the start. Jammer writes for me on my site. His views are not political (he writes movie reviews) and while I dont always agree with his opinions of movies I support his right to speak his mind.

I'd love to hear some real discussion about this.

most of the posts on current would not have been half as long if Jammer had never been here. That said, yay for me not having to read that monkey religion crap anymore. At least from him.

You can private me if you want her email address. She gave it to me, in case you did want to talk to her again.

WHOA! jubal, I had no idea they were the same person. That's kind of a weird feeling, because I had separate conversations with them both... Kind of creepy! But, to kick her out... I don't know. I guess it just comes down to the fact that I don't make the rules.

Xiola, ladybuglady, was Mao4brats. That is why ladybuglady was removed. But I never did understand why Ma was removed in the first place. At least we have some sort of explanation with Jammer.

I just realized LadybugLady was removed too. I hadn't realized that maof4brats was... Wow, we're droppin' like flies around here, huh? Guess we best be careful... :)

Its 'Jammer'; "The Sailing Vessel",.....riding the variable winds of discourse,....methinks.

dig it---------- "stopping" the wind",....to move forward.

not JAM as in DAM (the river),...."catch" as a mode of propulsion.

I will miss him.

Wow, J-Jammer was a dude I argued with ALOT here on Current. But in the end I will miss him. He's like that enemy you can always trust will be there. I even agreed with him a few times...

I never post here, but I visit everyday. Let the man speak!

Enough with this thread, it's boring and one less bully is a good thing. JJ was nothing but a waste of space in most of his comments. Over the last year we have lost far more important posters than JJ could have ever been!

It is simplistic to suggest that J Jammer never had anything useful to say. Although I am not aware of all the circumstances I do not agree with kicking J Jammer off the site. Chomsky had a quote that I think applies also to this situation in referring to a Holocaust denier:

Faurisson's (J_Jammers) conclusions are diametrically opposed to views I hold and have frequently expressed in print (for example, in my book Peace in the Middle East, where I describe the Holocaust as "the most fantastic outburst of collective insanity in human history"). But it is elementary that freedom of expression (including academic freedom) is not to be restricted to views of which one approves, and that it is precisely in the case of views that are almost universally despised and condemned that this right must be most vigorously defended. It is easy enough to defend those who need no defense or to join in unanimous (and often justified) condemnation of a violation of civil rights by some official enemy. [6]" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faurisson_affair

This is truly unfortunate for current.

Holy lollipops. Go for a nice winter break and come back to this? It reminds me of the times in elementary school when the "cool" kids ganged up on the less "cool" kids who didn't do what they wanted him/her to do. Once the supposedly uncool kid who didn't conform was kicked off the team or out of the game (because, of course, not conforming makes you a bad player) everyone celebrated, because now they could play by their own rules. Without dissent.

Everyone complaining about him really doesn't need to do so. It seems like you're all angry at him despite the fact that YOU were the ones who gave him air-time. YOU responded to him. Boo fizzle hoo if what he said pissed you off. No one forced you to respond to him or even read what he had to say. Heck, he's gone and you're celebrating, but you are STILL giving him air time. Maybe you don't hate him nearly as much as you'd like to make it seem.

Hell, I didn't always agree with him, but that doesn't mean we all call to form a mob and celebrate that he's no longer on current. What he said may have been racist - it appears the comment on it's own IS. But there must be a greater context to take into account before judgment can be made.

I don't know. The comments on this all seem childish to me. Like this is something I used to do when I was a kid - celebrate the pruning off of non-conformists because I was bitter that I had to conform while they didn't bother. I thought we had all grown up.

A major tool, prick bastard. Way too many posts to read but as long as he didn't make any threats why not let him be. This is a private forum and current has the right to do what they want. Hope it works itself out.

pointlss ramble i like current too but come on g.a.l.

sad to see ya go JJ. Never really liked ya or got along with ya but censorship in any form sucks and you had every right to say what you wanted. Id love to see the comments if I had gotten kicked off.

It pains me to comment on this topic because it only adds to all that was provoked by the troll formerly known as, ryhmes with "Hay Banner". But I think someone needed to point out that giving someone such as the (who shall not be named) only gives it a send off it so obviously did not deserve. A thread with more than three pages of comments (not counting sub-comment)? The topic at hand is about a person (if that's what passes for 'human" now) whos presence should have been ignored, behavior starved, and banishment acknowledged but not shouted from the roof tops. For that only allows the troll to do something other trolls can only dream of doing. The ability to provoke arguement even after its presence is no longer. Yes, that's right.......... you made him Jesus, the son of God, the Messiah. Great job!

inb4 /b/ shitstorm