Mommy's Little Secret

Your parents had sex whether you end up watching it or not. Being unable to acknowledge that simple truth is a sign of childish denial. Watching it doesn't change shit; and if it does, you seriously need to get over yourself.

Not to mention, denying the reality of your parents fucking each other amounts to an existential paradox.

where in my post did I deny the reality of my parents having sex? Once again, someone has decided to insert words into my post that I didn't put there. The only reason I watch pornography is for the sexual stimulation, and I don't know about you, but in the culture I was raised in, looking at your parents for sexual stimulation is wrong. If you were raised differntly, I apoligize for insulting your twisted sensibliteis.

who the fuck said anything about the holocaust? If you'd read the fucking post, it says, and I quote, "You have to watch a eight hour film series you found of your parents banging all over your family home OR, you have to feed your self with meal worms and water for a period of five days. " Where the fuck does it say anything about genocide? If your going to call me a moron, make fucking sure you know what the fuck your talking about. It said an 8 hour montage of your parents banging all over the house. I made the assumption that an 8 hour tape of people having sex was sure to be a porno, but if yuou want to read genocide into that, that's your own interpertation, but it's not mine. But i got to say one thing, I feel sorry for your spouse if you equate sex with the holocaust. Shut the fuck up already you kinidiot!!

You said that the only reason you would watch this video was for sexual stimulation.

Is that true? Yes or no?

I'm with you Snarly! Mealworms however gross have the word meal right in them, however I'm fairly certain watching the old folks gettin busy would haunt me forever. In no way am I denying that my parents have sex, but I don't need to see it! Oh and for the real moron-
pornography, by definition, any literature, film, or pictures that are judged obscene or indecent, especially because of sexual explicitness. So yeah in this case, it is porn. One last thing where in the post did it mention a holocaust? It said to chose one or the other OR Failure to do so will result in very bad things. If the holocaust is the very bad thing in this case, eating the mealworms would prevent it, yes, so who is the moron now?

Learn to read. I said that the only reason I watch porn is for stimulation, then I said I wouldn't be watching this video. Quit putting words in my mouth. If you want to argue with me, fine, but dont make up quotes and say i said them, that's not an arguement, that's fiction. And thank you Ladydaze for your supprot in this matter, at leastt there are some people out there that aren't twisted parent porno watching sickos.

Jesus Christ, you people are terrible at understanding concepts.

My point was instead of eating mealworms, it was the murder of your family or something of a similarly drastic nature. NOT that the Holocaust would happen if you didn't eat mealworms. I don't know HOW you even interpreted it that way. THINK, people.

Oh, and if if ANYTHING considered indecent or obscene is pornography, and pornography is ONLY for sexual stimulation, then that means South Park, Fight Club, bonobo sexuality studies, and Titanic were all intended solely to be for sexual stimulation, eh?

*LOGIC*, people. Please use it.

Ok, let's try this again:

You have to make a choice. You have to watch a eight hour film series you found of your parents banging all over your family home OR, your entire family will be murdered. Failure to do so will result in very bad things. What would you do?

Logic? Is it logical to rag on me for my answer to the original question and then tell me 7 posts later that you've gone and changed the question? Sounds to me like you don't like to be proven wrong, and will do anything to make it look like you're right. Please, the first time the holocaust was mentioned was when you were yelling at me for not wanting to watch my parents have sex for eight hours. Now you've gone and completely disregarded the mealworm part of it just so you can feel morally superior to me. P;ease stop before you embarass yourself further.

Seriously what the hell are you talking about? maybe you should look up the definition of logic! you obviously just make this shit up as you go along. Please tell me how eating mealworms is equated to a holocaust, and if you are going exchange one for the other you should at least pose that as a question before you assume what someones answer will be. And if you don't consider an 8 hr video of 2 people doing it porn, what would you consider porn? Is there no such thing as porn in your twisted little world? Why are you trying so hard to create a situation in which people have to watch their parents having sex, do you get some perverse pleasure out of it?

no we're not starting this over. I answered the first question, which said absolutely nothing about genocide, holocaust or my family being killed if i didn't watch this video. Again, it said, "You have to make a choice. You have to watch a eight hour film series you found of your parents banging all over your family home OR, you have to feed your self with meal worms and water for a period of five days. Failure to do so will result in very bad things. What would you do?" I made my choice, but apperantly, my not wanting to watch the video offended you enough to call me a moron. Please stop this stupid shit.

Something is porn if it was intended to be porn. A private sex video is not porn. A surveillance video of someone being raped is not porn. A scientific video depicting animal intercourse is not porn. If these things turn you on and you wish to view them as porn, so be it, but that's not what they were intended for.

Now, back to the original point:

Answer the question.

And no, I did not disregard the meal worm part. Rather, I questioned your system of rationale. I would have never bothered if your original post wasn't so accusatory and inflammatory. Here it is in case you forgot who' the first one to start vilifying others:

"to all the people who said parents: Are you fricking serious? Really? Sickos! Meal worms all the way!"

If you want to call me a "sicko" for wanting to avoid eating meal worms, I have a right to question your logic.

Now, again, just answer the question. Which will it be? Parent sex tape or the murder of your entire family?

Although my most recent comment came after your last reply, I will repeat myself for good measure, because you seem to have a knack for misunderstanding:

"I made my choice, but apperantly, my not wanting to watch the video offended you enough to call me a moron."

No. There are plenty of people here who said they would rather eat meal worms; I didn't have a problem with ANY of them. My problem was with you labeling those who WOULD want to avoid eating meal worms as "sickos".

Get the difference?

YOU are the one who made the first insult. Get it through your thick skull and stop victimizing yourself.

first, no I wont answer YOUR question, I answered the original question in the manner it was asked. Second, a private sex tape is typically made for later enjoyment, not scientific study, so yes, a private sex tape is porn, and lastly, did you just threaten my entire family? I really think that that is against Current's terms of service. And as far as me calling you a sicko in my original post, you seem to be the only one who took offense to that, but be that as it may, if i offended you, I'm sorry. But if you would rather watch your parents do it, IMO, a form of incest) rather than ingest protien, then I have to stand by my original assumption.

If I threatened your entire family, then the person who wrote this article also threatened to feed you meal worms.

Do you get it yet?

No, of course you don't, because you're dumb as a doorknob.

I know why you refuse to answer my question. Because your answer is that OF COURSE you would rather watch a video of your parents having sex than have them all be murdered—ANYONE who truly loves their family would make the SAME decision.

The implication behind this, of course, is that, if your original assertion is correct, then this means that you get sexual stimulation out of that video. OF COURSE NOT. So therefore, your "hypothesis" is WRONG.

That's the scientific method for ya. It works wonders. It's amazing what LOGIC can accomplish, instead of clinging to gut feelings without thinking them all the way through to their logical conclusions.

what did I misunderstamd? That you decided to replace mealworms with killing my whole family? Are you the one who posted this question in the first place? Why must you change it in the middle, and then call me a moron because I answered the first question? Who said anything about animals mating, survielience footage of a rape? Are you calling my parents animals? Rapist? Please clarify. And while your at it, stop insulting my parents, they're not involved in this.

you can't just make up your own definition of porn there are things in this world called facts Merriam-Webster states:
Main Entry: por·nog·ra·phy
Pronunciation: \-fē\
Function: noun
Etymology: Greek pornographos, adjective, writing about prostitutes, from pornē prostitute + graphein to write; akin to Greek pernanai to sell, poros journey — more at fare, carve
Date: 1858
1 : the depiction of erotic behavior (as in pictures or writing) intended to cause sexual excitement
2 : material (as books or a photograph) that depicts erotic behavior and is intended to cause sexual excitement
3 : the depiction of acts in a sensational manner so as to arouse a quick intense emotional reaction
— por·no·graph·ic \ˌpȯr-nə-ˈgra-fik\ adjective
— por·no·graph·i·cal·ly \-fi-k(ə-)lē\ adverb
How does an 8 hr parent sex tape not fit this definition? You are the only one talking about amimal sex, surveillance rape tapes, South Park, Fight Club, Titanic or any number of other random things that have absolutely nothing to do with the original question.

Ugh.

Both of you go look up the definition of an "analogy".

Get back to me when you're done and when you fully understand what an analogy is.

Didn't either of you ever take a middle school English class?

Do you know what similes are? Metaphors? Metonymy? Hyperbole? Litotes?

Am I the only one here who's actually literate in standard rhetorical devices?

A-N-A-L-O-G-Y.

Listen carefully : I refuse to answer your question because it's not the question i choose to answer in the first place. Who the fuck do you think you are, demanding that people answer your questions? If I dont want to answer it, I wont. That in no way reflects my intelligence. As for an anagoly, how is eating mealworms anagolous to killing my whole family? Just because you want to replace one with another does not put them on the same level. Two completely differnt concepts. Just because you say it's so doesn't mean irt is? Get over your incestous self already. Done

Heck, I have so little faith in your guys' intelligence that I'll do it for you:

Analogy - drawing a comparison in order to show a similarity in some respect; "the operation of a computer presents and interesting analogy to the working of the brain"; "the models show by analogy how matter is built up".

Understand? I'm not talking about the murder of your family in an of itself. I'm using its undesirability to extrapolate from your assertion when only eating meal worms was the risk. I'm not talking about Fight Club, South Park, rape, or animal intercourse in an of themselves, but using them to highlight the fact that a depiction of sexual intercourse does NOT only have to be with the intent of stimulating arousal. To use another ANALOGY, the depiction of slaughter in Schindler's List and South Park have VERY different PURPOSES.

Get it?

Please tell me you do. I'm honestly trying to make this as simple as I can. I don't know how I can dumb this down any more for the two of you.

"As for an anagoly, how is eating mealworms anagolous to killing my whole family?"

THIS ISN'T ABOUT EATING MEAL WORMS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Jesus CHRIST.

I'll repeat this again:

THIS. ISN'T. ABOUT. EATING. MEAL. WORMS.

Do you GET IT YET?

This is about THIS accusation:

"to all the people who said parents: Are you fricking serious? Really? Sickos! Meal worms all the way!"

Your accusation that those who would rather watch a freakin' VIDEO are sickos. I can watch a video of people dying. I can watch a video of a physics lecture. I can watch a video of two horribly obese men having sex. I don't give a fuck. I'd rather watch ANYTHING than eat meal worms for five days. This has nothing to do with the video's content, and therefore that doesn't make me a "sicko".

I'm honestly trying the best I can to explain this as clearly as possible to you. Please re-read my comments if you can't understand them the first round. They aren't very hard to understand, but something tells me you're not even making an effort to understand what it is you are so vehemently fighting against.

You said it yourself: Analogy - drawing a comparison in order to show a similarity in some respect; "the operation of a computer presents and interesting analogy to the working of the brain"; "the models show by analogy how matter is built up".

how does eating mealworms equate to killing my family?

Quote: I'm not talking about the murder of your family in an of itself.

You said that several times.

where in the original question does it mention fight club, south park, bobobos mating?

Nowhere.

I calle dyou a sicko because you would rather watch 8 hours of parent sex than eat mealworms for 5 days. I stand by my statement.

You called me a moron because you equate eating mealworms with the holocaust.

And by the way, when you find an 8 hour tape of nothing but south park sex, would that not be akin to anime porn? How about 8 hours of sex scenes from fight club? Someone would have to have compiled that for a reason, I'm going to say, maybe, just maybe, sexual stimulation.

and nowher did I ever say that I would find an 8 hr tape of my parents doing it stimulating. I said I would rather eat meal worms than watch it. Please, stop reading things into my post that aren't there. All you do is proclaim your'e stupidity for the entire world to see.

It has everthing to do with the videos content!!!

I promise you will not have the last word on this, and it is obvious that we are not the one's lacking intelligence in this debate, as the only points you have made are that; 1. Not wanting to watch ones parents have sex means that, in your exact words "Your parents had sex whether you end up watching it or not. Being unable to acknowledge that simple truth is a sign of childish denial. Watching it doesn't change shit; and if it does, you seriously need to get over yourself.
Not to mention, denying the reality of your parents fucking each other amounts to an existential paradox." There a huge difference between knowing that parents have sex and watching for 8hrs. 2. Again your words "Who the fuck said a video of two people having sex must inevitably be "pornography"? I believe Merriam-Webster did. 3. When faced with a true definition of pornography you decided to change the suject to the definition of analogy. So what what random subject would you like to argue about next?

The whole thing is about the contents of the video. It was the gist of the original question. Go to the top of the screen and reread the fucking question again. And just in case you cant find the top of the screen, here it is:

You have to make a choice. You have to watch a eight hour film series you found of your parents banging all over your family home OR, you have to feed your self with meal worms and water for a period of five days. Failure to do so will result in very bad things. What would you do?

It's obvious to anyone who can read and understand English, Watch the video or eat mealworms! Why can't you understand that. As for the sicko comment, you youself said

Parents—as would all of you, regardless of what you'd like to believe.

No I wouldnt watch the video if my other choice was eating mealworms, and if you answered the other way, yes, i truely believe that you are a sicko. I have no desire to watch my parents having sex, mealworms will cause no damage to me.

You've done nothing but try to twist my words, change the whole meaning of the question, insult my intelligence several times, and threaten to kill my entire family. All because I called a sicko a sicko.

*sigh*

You people are hopeless.

I don't know whether to give up or to keep going in the name of logic and sound reasoning.

I should give up, because I know you two have already aptly demonstrated that you have absolutely zero capacity to recognize your massive misunderstanding of what I'm saying, but I'm a persistent individual so I shall keep going.

Although I still think incredibly lowly of both og you, I'm going to refrain from any further insults, because I genuinely want you two to understand my point, and insulting you would only further make you resistant to making an effort to actually understand my point.

"where in the original question does it mention fight club, south park, bobobos mating?

Nowhere."

A. Let's say you're trying to explain addition to a child.

B. You use an illustration to depict the concept, "If I have one shoe, and then another shoe, how many shoes do I have?"

C. The child asks, "Where in the original question does it mention shows? Nowhere."

D. The child says this because he does not understand that analogy was used in order to illustrate a concept—in this case, addition.

E. My point of mentioning those other things was to highlight that sexual stimulation is NOT the only reason one may have for viewing sex. It may be for humor. It may be for drama or suspense. It may be to avoid eating meal worms. Extending that hypothetical scenario, it may also be to avoid your family being murdered, a genocide occurring, or any of another infinite number of hypothetical alternatives. Which alternative it is is NOT the point—the point is that there ARE valid reasons to watch sex—no matter how unpleasant it may be—other than for sexual stimulation.

Please let me know if you understand this so far. Feel free to point out anything you disagree with—just be specific so that I can adequately address it.

one shoe plus one shoe is anaglous to addition. Ok i get that.

eating mealworms is analogous to killing my family, not making that connection.

south park, bonobos, fight club, nothing to do with my parents having sex, not analogous.

no matter how hard you try to make it so, it's not.

You're the one who brought south park, et. al. into the discussion, not me. You're the one who brought killing my entire family into the discussion, not me.

You're the one who decided to look down on me for not wanting to watch my parents have sex instead of eating mealworms, not me.

You're the one who decided to change the entire premise of the original question, not me.

I'm just the one who says that I dont care to watch such a video, you said that everyone that said worms was fooling themselves.

I'm sorry, but watching that video is just not something I would want to do, I have no desire to watch it, nor would I recieve any stimulation or satisfaction in doing so.

What is wrong with that?

Youre the one who said that you would rather watch the video than eat mealworms. How does that make me a stupid person?

I did call you a sicko for that, and if that offended you, then I truely am sorry. I forgot the main rule of posting, You can't infer sarcasm if you don't actually say youre being sarcastic. But if youre going to say that you would rather watch 8 hrs of parent sex than eat mealworms, then I do believe that the vast majority of people are going to think that you are, in fact, a sicko. Either that, or you're justing baiting someome, looking for a fight.

Which is it?

Now you want to talk logic and sense, how logical is it to totally change the meaning of the original question, than attack someone because they answered the original?

How sensible is it to continually demand that I answer your question, when it's not the question I wanted to answer in the first place?

Why do you insist on continuing this discussion when you know, deep down, that you're wrong?

Eating meal worms is unpleasant. Yes or no?

Having your family murdered is unpleasant. Yes or no?

If your answer is the same for both of them, THAT is their similarity. THAT is where the analogy applies.

South Park has depicted sex. Yes or no?

A video of bonobos having sex depicts sex. Yes or no?

Fight Club depicts sex. Yes or no?

A video of your parents having sex depicts sex. Yes or no?

If your answer is the same for all of them, THAT is their similarity. THAT is where the analogy applies.

“You're the one who decided to look down on me for not wanting to watch my parents have sex instead of eating mealworms, not me.”

I’ve repeated many, many, many, MANY times that that is NOT the reason why I took issue with you. As I already said, there are MANY here who said they’d rather eat meal worms, and I did NOT take issue with them. I took issue with your assertion that anyone who didn’t want to eat meal worms is a sicko. Do you get it? Re-read that last sentence as many times as you need to in order to understand this.

“You're the one who decided to change the entire premise of the original question, not me.”

This isn’t about the question. It’s about your claim.

“I'm sorry, but watching that video is just not something I would want to do, I have no desire to watch it, nor would I receive any stimulation or satisfaction in doing so.

What is wrong with that?”

But would you watch that video if it meant saving the lives of your family? Or of six million strangers? THAT is my question. It is relevant because if your answer is “yes”, it demonstrates that there CAN be a valid reason to watch something you don’t like in order to bring about a greater good. If you want to be melodramatic about it, it’s called “sacrifice”. Soldiers don’t LIKE dying, but they do so because they’re fighting for a CAUSE. You don’t have to ENJOY the video in order to want to watch it rather than suffer worse consequences. For you, it may be the death of your family. For me, the thought of having to eat meal worms is enough.

“how logical is it to totally change the meaning of the original question, than attack someone because they answered the original?”

But you’re forgetting that you did NOT just answer the question. You appended it with an libelous claim.

“Why do you insist on continuing this discussion when you know, deep down, that you're wrong?”

I’d ask the same to you, but it’d be like asking Hitler to reconsider his anti-Semitism.

Yes, that is an analogy, and no, I did not call you Hitler.

"He said the only reason HE watches porn was for stimulation."

He wouldn't watch porn if it meant saving someone's life?

so your saying that the unpleasentness of having my entire family murdered is anagolous to the unpleasentness of eating mealworms? Really? You have that little love for your family? As for south park, bonobos, fight club, and the sex scenes in those as anaglous to watching my parents having sex? No it's not!!! If my parents were in fight club and had a sex scene, I still would not want to watch it. Just because they all depict sex does not mean i want to watch my parents have sex. As far as the sicko comment, how many times do I have to apoligize for it? I'm still waiting for an apology for the moron remark, not to mention the dumb as a door knob comment.

"I’d ask the same to you, but it’d be like asking Hitler to reconsider his anti-Semitism.

Yes, that is an analogy, and no, I did not call you Hitler."

You may have not called me Hitler, but you compared me to him. And that I am really going to take offense to. How is not wanting to watch this video instead of eating mealworms make me comprable to the worst mass murderer the world has seen?

The question was, and I repeat,

You have to make a choice. You have to watch a eight hour film series you found of your parents banging all over your family home OR, you have to feed your self with meal worms and water for a period of five days. Failure to do so will result in very bad things. What would you do?

It had not a damn thing to do with killing my wholee family, you threw that in there yourself.

What is your obsession with killing someones family?

Please, please. please, leave my family out of this.

Maybe he would and maybe he wouldn't, but the simple FACT is, that was not the question put forth in this post, and no one is talking about plain old porn or there would be no question about it. 8 hrs of your parent doing it is a little more than just porn. Mealworms may be unpleasant but I would argue that one's entire family being murdered is not even close to unpleasant, why do you continue to harass?

“You may have not called me Hitler, but you compared me to him. And that I am really going to take offense to. How is not wanting to watch this video instead of eating mealworms make me comprable to the worst mass murderer the world has seen?”

Hitler and I are both males. In that sense, we are both alike.

There—I just compared myself to Hitler, the worst mass murderer the world has ever seen. Are you happy now?

“Please, please. please, leave my family out of this.”

This never had anything to do with your family. I could just as easily use “have your hand sawed off” or “have a tsunami wipe out the entire country of Indonesia” or any other of an infinite number of things. THIS IS NOT ABOUT YOUR FAMILY; THIS IS ABOUT A CONSEQUENCE UNDESIRABLE ENOUGH TO MAKE WATCHING A VIDEO THE PREFERRED CHOICE, NO MATTER HOW MUCH YOU MAY DISLIKE WATCHING THE VIDEO.

Of course, I already said that. Clearly it didn’t get through to you. I don't know why I expect you to get it the second time around.

This is not about your family.

This is not about meal worms.

This is not about your parents having sex.

This is about a situation in which one choice is bad enough to make you prefer another choice, and the fact that you chose this choice does NOT mean you *like* this choice, but rather that you dislike it less than the other choice.

“Mealworms may be unpleasant but I would argue that one's entire family being murdered is not even close to unpleasant, why do you continue to harass?”

My point was that sexual stimulation was not the only reason someone would watch porn. Watching a video of a puppy being crushed to death to avoid having to eat meal worms doesn’t mean I hate puppies; it just means I don’t give a damn what I see on a screen, so long as it doesn’t actually affect me in any real, physical way.

I really don't know what's so hard to understand about this. Are you guys even reading what I'm typing? I feel like I'm communicating with automated spambots.

Are you even reading what you are typing? If trying to communicate with us is such an exercise in futility why do you continue to do it? "This never had anything to do with your family. I could just as easily use “have your hand sawed off” or “have a tsunami wipe out the entire country of Indonesia” or any other of an infinite number of things. THIS IS NOT ABOUT YOUR FAMILY; THIS IS ABOUT A CONSEQUENCE UNDESIRABLE ENOUGH TO MAKE WATCHING A VIDEO THE PREFERRED CHOICE, NO MATTER HOW MUCH YOU MAY DISLIKE WATCHING THE VIDEO." So as far as I can tell this is really about using whatever language is nessesary to get someone one else to say they too would watch their parents get freaky for 8 hours so you don't have to feel so dirty about yourself for the choice you made.

*sigh*

Forget it. You guys are hopeless. I don't know why I bother.

"This never had anything to do with your family. I could just as easily use “have your hand sawed off” or “have a tsunami wipe out the entire country of Indonesia” or any other of an infinite number of things. THIS IS NOT ABOUT YOUR FAMILY; THIS IS ABOUT A CONSEQUENCE UNDESIRABLE ENOUGH TO MAKE WATCHING A VIDEO THE PREFERRED CHOICE, NO MATTER HOW MUCH YOU MAY DISLIKE WATCHING THE VIDEO."

but you didnt say cutting my hand off or wipeing out indonesia, you said killing my entire family, so yes, you made it about killing my entire family. And nowhere in the original question does it say anything about a consequence undesirable enough to make me watch the video, it said watch or eat mealworms. Again, please don't try to rephrase the original question.

"This is not about your family.

This is not about meal worms.

This is not about your parents having sex.

This is about a situation in which one choice is bad enough to make you prefer another choice, and the fact that you chose this choice does NOT mean you *like* this choice, but rather that you dislike it less than the other choice."

You made it about my family, yes it is about mealworms, yes it is about my parents having sex, and yes it is about one choiice breing bad enough to make me prefer another choice, only not in the way you keep insisting.

"My point was that sexual stimulation was not the only reason someone would watch porn. Watching a video of a puppy being crushed to death to avoid having to eat meal worms doesn’t mean I hate puppies; it just means I don’t give a damn what I see on a screen, so long as it doesn’t actually affect me in any real, physical way"

Now it's about killing puppies?

"I really don't know what's so hard to understand about this. Are you guys even reading what I'm typing? I feel like I'm communicating with automated spambots."

I totally understand where you're coming from. You opened your mouth, inserted your foot, and now you don't know any other way out of this other than trying to confuse the situation with a bunch of bullshit that has absolutely nothing to do with the original question.

"but you didnt say cutting my hand off or wipeing out indonesia, you said killing my entire family, so yes, you made it about killing my entire family."

Ugh.

This is where I lose all expectations of ever having an intelligent conversation with you.

I bet you think that math problem was about shoes, eh?

I'm done. Now I know what Galileo must have felt like when trying to explain heliocentrism to the Catholic Church.

Good day.

So now we bring Galieo into the mix? You know what the original question was, you know you tried to change it to suit your beliefs, so who is gallieo here and who is the church?
I gave up on intelligence from you a long time ago, but you just want to continue the arguement. I said done a long time ago, but you still kept going, no matter how wrong you are.

We gave up on getting anything intelligent outta you about 3hrs ago but you just keep on talking, like somehow throwing around big words makes you smart. Nevermind they don't have anything to with the subject at hand. Whatever you gotta do to feel good about watching you parents have sex.

Now I know what it's like to talk to retarded kids. Amusing.

nice way to prove how smart you really are.

So what part of this discussion would you find comprable to talking to mentally challenged children? The disagreement with your twisted position that watching a video of your parents having sex is better than eating mealworms, or you losing the arguement completely

Actual proof would fall deaf on your ears, so I needn't bother.

and yet, you keep talking, and digging yourself a little deeper each time. Good Night

How long do you plan on spewing your venom cuz my kids got a snow day tomarrow and I can do this the rest of the night and all day tomarrow.

Still not as disturbing as 8 hr of parents having sex. mmmmmmmmm dinner!

really, this is your final arguement? Picture of mealworms? Seen em before bud, no big deal. Hell, I've eaten worse in college. If that's the best you can do, you might as well go to bed and quit harrassing me

I agree, but that dude was like a pit bull on a pant leg, just wouldn't let it go. LOL, now there's an analogy.

Anything you want. :)