Comedy | January 06, 2010 | 89 comments

Plus-Size Models Clothed & Nude V Magazine Photo Spread (NSFW)

Image
c7girl
V Magazine is innovating and instead of using super skinny, unhealthy looking models, the plus-size models will dress up and pose sexily without fear of showing too much skin in a special “Size Issue” which will hit newsstands on January 14, 2010

MORE + NSFW PHOTOS http://bumpshack.com/2010/01/06/plus-size-models-clothed-nude-v-magazine-photo-s...
  1. groups:
    Community,   Comedy,   Fashion,   bOObies
  2. tags:
    Art and Style Funny Fashion Boobs 14 more
  3.     
    |

89 comments // Plus-Size Models Clothed & Nude V Magazine Photo Spread (NSFW)

  • Jonathan_Nathan
    • 0
      Jonathan_Nathan  
    • to so called plus size women migrate Nairobi Kenya am sure you will be appreciated here
      Anything that is good but small in size is termed "CUTE"
      But what ever that has high quality and quantity is described by the word
      BEAUTIFUL
      So they are plus size but beautiful women

    • 1 year ago
  • observer2121
    • 0
      observer2121  
    • You always see those women who you say "She would be so hot if she lost weight", now they have a magazine to show them. Good for them.

    • 1 year ago
  • feefer2010
  • pandaman2105
    • 0
      pandaman2105  
    • all we need is "average" looking chicks in the modeling industry. not fat, not skinny, but normal sized parts and nothing that looks overly boney or squeezy.
      not sure if that makes complete sense...

      but what im saying is that neither body size isn't ok. we should all be healthy, not skinny consumers of nothing, or fat consumers of everything. that yields a twisted perception of American women. everyone knows how bad the skinny regulations are in modeling, but do we want to start saying it's ok for other women to become big for a new plus-size industry?? look at our existing issues with heart disease, diabetes, and obesity...

    • 2 years ago
  • natbat
    • 0
      natbat  
    • pandaman2105:

      why can't we have all three in the industry? Women come in many different sizes. Some are naturally very tall and thin, some are naturally medium boned and average height, while some are naturally larger boned and have more curves. So, why can't we celebrate all types of bodies?

    • 1 year ago
  • EdJoyProductions
  • Sarah_Honea
    • +1
      Sarah_Honea  
    • Query:what is Normal? hmm last time I asked an academic. Normal is the established ideal that that a majority deems okay. Second Query what is the percentage of people that are overweight in America. The CDC reports that 67 percent of Americans are Overweight or Obese. Skeptic-Google it.That means the majority is the new normal but they are try trumpeting the anorexic ideal of the minority in New York's fashion Nexus.

      Yes being overweight and obese is medically dangerous thats why i have made life style changes

      But stop and think 67 percent. Thats an epidemic peeps. It cannot mean that there are legions of people on their ass. Sorry. But the most unhealthiest foods and derivatives: Corn, Soy, and wheat are subsidized. when one eats saturated fats it destroys endothielial cells[ which are crucial for the circulation and getting it up] and the hormone leptin which curb hunger.

      Models are the surface issue. The brass tax is what foods we value to cheapen and subsidize. If we subsidized fruit and vegetables- making them cheaper-Wonder how ove weight we will be as a majority or normal then.

    • 2 years ago
  • remanns
  • DreSandoval
  • natnatnat19
    • 0
      natnatnat19  
    • it's always between ridiculously thin or plus-sized models. HOW ABOUT AVERAGE-SIZED, HEALTHY MODELS??? neither stick-thin nor overweight models promote a healthy image, or at least in my opinion. not to say that a woman can't look beautiful if she's a skeleton or if she has some extra meat on her bones, but... it's just not healthy.

    • 2 years ago
  • diabolical44
    • 0
      diabolical44  
    • these are some sexy women right here. nice full bodied figure. they actually look like a human being . unlike those bigtime supermodels who look like starving aliens.

    • 2 years ago
  • Sarah_Honea
    • 0
      Sarah_Honea  
    • I think there are some good comments in here and I think there are some poeple who need to STFU and get some therapy.
      That aside, it is a recent phenomenon alla 'Twiggy' in the sixties, that we are made to believe that one particular size of women is the idea of beauty. Thanks to marketing and advertisement-your are programmed to see beauty as skin deep. Then your skin sags/penis wont work/hairline recedes. What do you do? : the Market suggests. Botox, viagra, hair transplant. To fix the problem of your existential self. Problem is your a douche, anxious-or still lonely.

      What happened to health and fitness being a hallmark of beauty. I have seen a fat Jazzercise instructors who can really move, I have had skinny people complain that walking a mile is too much trouble-. I am a size 16 and I can still bring my feet up to my ears-thank you Bikram Yoga.

    • 2 years ago
  • Dwayne_Samuels
  • GuaranteeVictory
    • 0
      GuaranteeVictory  
    • Keep up the good work V Magazine! I will buy this issue to support this new trend! A trend that would bring the goo goo ga ga general public back to reality. Media outlets had swayed us too far from reality for too long! Im glad to see the change. And yes, Cablevision dropping FoX WOO HOO!!!

    • 2 years ago
  • jimmysemens
  • jimmysemens
  • remanns
  • remanns
  • littledunn_03
  • raylinmarie
    • 0
      raylinmarie  
    • I have nothing against plus sized models, but these girls look a little too big. I'm not saying models all need to be stick thin, but how is being overweight any better?

      I see a lot of people saying things like "oh, it's good to see real women in a magazine!" But why does being a "real" woman mean being overweight?

      It isn't good to justify being unhealthy just because you saw a model in a magazine that was the same size. The fact that so many people consider overweight to be "real" is kind of worrisome to me.

    • 2 years ago
  • bombastinator
  • life_4_rent
    • 0
      life_4_rent [removed]  
    • How come this isn't done with male models? Where is the outrage there? Unless I am the only person in the world who works in an environment with men who do not have finely chiseled features and well-defined abs.

    • 2 years ago
  • bombastinator
  • martinesheen
    • 0
      martinesheen  
    • i definitely have a problem with the unrealistic bodies that the media so often portrays and the effects it can have on the body image of women and girls in this country. having said that, obesity is a growing problem and i am ashamed that more than one third of my country is overweight. while i think women (and men too) should accept and love their bodies no matter what size they are, there is something to be said for taking care of that body and eating right, exercising, etc.
      i think that depicting some "real" women with whom the average American woman can relate is great and will encourage this acceptance but we shouldn't forget the importance of health and promote being overweight.

    • 2 years ago
  • CuteBruiser
    • 0
      CuteBruiser  
    • While it's nice to see a model larger than a 00, I'd really prefer if we got to see a variety of sizes/shapes/skintones/etc. I'm tired of hearing the term "real women" thrown around. Thin women are real women, whether they are naturally slim or have an eating disorder it doesn't make them any less real. Most of the time what people mean when they say "real" is "average", which is fine albeit an extremely illusive term, and it doesn't even begin to cover the spectrum of beauty that is the human form.

    • 2 years ago
  • smallgod
    • 0
      smallgod  
    • CuteBruiser:

      I don't think it's in good taste to promote women with eating disorders as models and thus rolemodels for little girls. I understand your point, but the past has been so full of models with eating disorders or mental disorders about their bodies (when my friend who is now 49 modeled in her 20s, women were being ordered to surgically remove their ovaries because they 'poked out too much' and made them 'look fat'!). The last thing the modeling industry needs is to keep over-representing a relatively small, mentally abnormal and physically unhealthy group of women.

    • 2 years ago
  • calm_incense
    • 0
      calm_incense  
    • Sorry, but I could never see myself with a woman who weighs more than I do.

      If non-Americans see this magazine, it'll only confirm their notions of our country. -_-

      "They're so fat, even their MODELS are fat!!! Omg, Americans are sooooo faaaaat!!!"

      Bleh. Stupid bastards.

    • 2 years ago
  • bombastinator
  • calm_incense
  • bishopobispo
    • 0
      bishopobispo  
    • What exactly is being underweight or overweight? Are we using someone's BMI (Body Mass Index) or are we using their appearance as a rule of thumb?

      A person who is 5'7" has a healthy BMI if their weight is in between 118 and 159 - a huge spread, no? Wouldn't that mean that two people with that same height could be equally as healthy if one is 118 and the other is 159?

      I'm thinking that being plus-sized doesn't necessarily mean someone is unhealthy.

      In the meantime, a few of those women pictured are absolutely gorgeous.

      http://www.medicine.org/profiles/blogs/can-being-overweight-be

    • 2 years ago
  • Ricky84
  • smallgod
    • 0
      smallgod  
    • bishopobispo:

      Exactly. BMI is not the most reliable or healthy way for all peoples to measure their bodyweights. For many people it is a very unhealthy way of determining bodily health. Thanks for the insightful input. :)

    • 2 years ago
  • jesuswho
  • bombastinator
  • Mudboy16
  • fun_size
    • 0
      fun_size  
    • Not to say they arent pretty or whatnot but these models arent really my cup of tea. I prefer slim to skinny or plus sized. This is def a step up from heroin cheek and ribs popping out though.

    • 2 years ago
  • LM807
  • EdJoyProductions
  • CuteBruiser
  • bombastinator
  • EdJoyProductions
  • nursediesel
  • MornRail
  • MornRail
    • 0
      MornRail  
    • I think this is really great but why are we showing women in these two extremes? Tiny ladies and big-boned girls. Some of us ladies are just a size 10. Big on the bottom, small on the top. I find that to be the average rather than this or the stick thin women.

      All in all though, it would be great to see more diversity in fashion. Just because you're a size 2, doesn't mean you're unhealthy and just because you're a size 16, doesn't mean you're unhealthy. Let's just see what's real. You'd have more people interested in your fashion line if a woman of any shape or size can see themselves in your clothes.

    • 2 years ago
  • smallgod
    • 0
      smallgod  
    • MornRail:

      I agree. I like this and think it's a great step forward for modern culture, but they should really start showing some 'in-betweens'. 'Normal' for girls is a wide range of sizes, heights and circumferences. Still this is a move in the right direction! And to all you people saying 'Ew' to these women - that's not nice! That's supporting the last couple decades of insane modeling standards and it's just not nice to normal women or young girls learning about society and acceptance! Shame on you!

    • 2 years ago
  • Scathian
  • czarkeri
    • 0
      czarkeri  
    • the point of mentioning photoshopping women, is that it gives society an unrealistic view of women. most people realize that music is digitally altered. but altered music doesnt give young girls esteem problems and young boys unrealistic fantasies that in return lead to self esteem problems in girls. totally not on the same playing field dude.

    • 2 years ago
  • titan50
  • iamfree
    • 0
      iamfree  
    • czarkeri:

      so we blame photoshop for how a young girl perceives the world around her?I thinks thats a bit naive...If girls self esteem is suffering so much maybe we should work on educating them instead of tabooing different forms of art and expression.

    • 2 years ago
  • Ricky84
    • 0
      Ricky84  
    • czarkeri:

      @iamfree

      Anorexia and Bulimia are the deadliest mental health conditions known to man. Many magazines help reinforce those conditions by distorting pictures and presenting a version of the human form that is just as unrealistic and unattainable as anything a little boy or girl could imagine. Now I'm not going to say that we should outlaw photoshopped pics but we should at least require a disclaimer like other countries.

    • 2 years ago
  • calm_incense
  • Ricky84
    • 0
      Ricky84  
    • czarkeri:

      Ha. right so Calm's informed enough to know anorexia and bulimia are not the deadliest mental health conditions but at the same time he's either unaware of what is or is simply not saying. Thanks but no thanks Calm for that informative piece of information. I think when it comes down to it I rather trust in the CDC, N.M.H.A, American Journal of Psychiatry, Journal of American Medical Association and The Surgeon General’s Report on Mental Health.

    • 2 years ago
  • iamfree
    • 0
      iamfree  
    • these women simply look thick or in ol' school terms "big-boned"...not my cup of tea personally but there has been those rainy days;-)...also to the guys who complain about the photoshopness of pictures should make note that most modern musicians also use technology to enhance their art.If you want unaltered visions of women,go outside.

    • 2 years ago
  • samthesixth
  • Argon18
    • 0
      Argon18  
    • iamfree:

      I like that point, it is a lot more "real" to look at women outside than just a 2D image that represents them.

      But the other thing about "unaltered" isn't necessarily true with facelifts, breast implants and botox injections in such widespread use.

      Even native tribes use tattoos and jewelry to enhance themselves so does that mean that self-esteem issues are forced on them too?

    • 2 years ago
  • Psymoniac
  • bombastinator
  • czarkeri
    • 0
      czarkeri  
    • i agree with you Saladin, the airbrushing is what really makes any model look ridiculous. These models do look slightly overweight, but it is refreshing to see any body type other than 6'1 100lb women. I do worry slightly that too many images of "plus sized" women will encourage people to stay overweight by making it "acceptable", but these women look normal to me.

    • 2 years ago
  • Argon18
    • 0
      Argon18  
    • czarkeri:

      Make-up, hair styling, different lighting and camera angles is just as fake.

      How "real" can you get when the image itself is only a representation?

      Get used to the fact that it is all an Illusion then you won't keep fooling yourself about the degrees of being fake.

      Photoshop is just another tool

    • 2 years ago
  • bethopea
    • 0
      bethopea  
    • czarkeri:

      photoshop and airbrushing - i really do not understand why the makeup artists here chose to brush the models chin and cheek bones...thought they were trying to show off their curves, why should the face be any different?

    • 2 years ago
  • Saladin
    • 0
      Saladin  
    • The idea is nice, a good change from the impossibly anorexic models you typically see in these magazines.

      But I would actually prefer if they just stopped airbrushing them with photoshop, that's what's really fake. Human skin just doesn't look like that. I can deal with absurdly skinny women or other silliness if it's actually -real-.

    • 2 years ago
  • Argon18
    • 0
      Argon18  
    • Saladin:

      Make-up, hair styling, different lighting and camera angles is just as fake.

      How "real" can you get when the image itself is only a representation?

      Get used to the fact that it is all an Illusion then you won't keep fooling yourself about the degrees of being fake.

      Photoshop is just another tool

    • 2 years ago
  • Saladin
    • 0
      Saladin  
    • Saladin:

      Nuh-uh, the difference is crucial and you need only look at photoshopped vs. unphotoshopped pictures to see it.

      Make-up, lighting, etc. can make you look -better- than you really are, but they can't make you something you're NOT.

      With photoshop, impossibly skinny women can be made to look normal or vice versa, effects from heat and environment on the skin are eliminated, colors and clothes of any kind can be changed, parts of the body can be made bigger or smaller, etc. etc. etc.

    • 2 years ago
  • Ricky84
    • 0
      Ricky84  
    • Image
    • Saladin:

      Sal's got it right. Even with the best hair stylist, lighting crew and photographer most magazines use photoshop to create an image of the human body that's physically impossible to obtain.

    • 2 years ago
  • mindcruzer
  • bombastinator
  • mindcruzer
  • magic6435
  • bombastinator
  • czarkeri
  • bombastinator
  • marioee
  • Argon18
  • DeliaTheArtist
  • Argon18
    • 0
      Argon18  
    • DeliaTheArtist:

      Considering the extreme of the size 0, I suppose it would be, it's all relative to which end of the pendulum swing that you're at when looking at the prevailing style of the fashion cycle

    • 2 years ago
  • cztheday
  • Argon18
  • EdJoyProductions
  • Argon18
    • 0
      Argon18  
    • Argon18:

      Even better that they would be more tolerant of all body types to show the full range and choose the one that fits the purpose.

      It's way past time that they stop trying to fit the people to the kind of clothes they make and start fitting the clothes to the people now that CAM methods are available to customize sizes are practical and cost effective.

    • 2 years ago
  • spacemikey
    • 0
      spacemikey [removed]  
    • Argon18:

      I personally love the whole "Rubenesque" thing as illustrated there, and maybe I'm a d!ck, but those models are looking 10-30 lbs. over "Rubenesque". Okay the one in the middle is close but..... There is a fine line between pretty and portly...

    • 2 years ago
  • Dejan_Croatia
  • RaceBannon
  • jimmysemens
  • raylinmarie
  • jimmysemens
  • bethopea
    • 0
      bethopea  
    • jimmysemens:

      being a real woman does not entail looking good for men (whatever be the mans perspective on what is pleasing to the eye)...being a real woman means having self respect and being happy with who she is - regardless of weight and beauty....i really do not understand why the makeup artists here chose to brush the models chin and cheek bones, shading this makes their head very unproportional looking to their body...thought they were trying to show off their curves, why should the face be any different?

    • 2 years ago
  • NuclearLullaby
    • 0
      NuclearLullaby  
    • These ladies are not skinny,but at the same time, they don't really seem fat ether ! I think it's about time models with somewhat realistic body figures find their way into media! It sets a better example to young women! Tie a few things about health into beauty magazines (which actually already seem to be in several!) & you are setting culture on a better path!

    • 2 years ago
  • masterzip
    • 0
      masterzip  
    • being underweight is unhealthy just like being overweight is unhealthy,...
      with that said, ...i much prefer a woman that has a little meat on the bones compared to a woman that is just skin and bones...

    • 2 years ago
  • CuteBruiser
more from Comedy:

top videos