Image
rodstradamus
"As the science scandals keep coming, the air has gone out of the climate-change movement.

In 2007, the most comprehensive report to date on global warming, issued by the respected United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, made a shocking claim: The Himalayan glaciers could melt away as soon as 2035.

But the claim was rubbish, and the world's top glaciologists knew it. It was based not on rigorously peer-reviewed science but on an anecdotal report by the WWF itself. When its background came to light on the eve of Copenhagen, Rajendra Pachauri, the head of the IPCC, shrugged it off. But now, even leading scientists and environmental groups admit the IPCC is facing a crisis of credibility that makes the Climategate affair look like small change.

“The global warming movement as we have known it is dead,” the brilliant analyst Walter Russell Mead says in his blog on The American Interest. It was done in by a combination of bad science and bad politics."

more at link

More like corrupt science and corrupt politics. Global governance took a step back thanks to real scientists, like the 30,000 trying to sue the IPCC and Al Gore including John Coleman, founder of the Weather Channel. It's a con, a scam, a fraud...We've all been suckered. Its ok though, "fool me once shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me." Remember when Bush tried to say that and botched the quote?

To understand how and why this swindle was perpetrated on the world, I recommend 'Global Warming or Global Governance?'
  1. groups:
    Community,   Green,   Comedy,   The White Rose,   4 more
  2. tags:
    Green Environment Climate Change Global Warming 13 more
  3.     
    |

11 comments // The Great Global Warming Collapse

  • JanforGore
    • +1
      JanforGore  
    • Anyone who needs an e-mail to validate there is no global warming is simply devoid of logic and reasoning. People all over the world from the Maldives, to the Carteret Islands, to Bangladesh, to South America, to Australia, to China, to the Arctic can tell you of their personal experiences in living the effects of climate change. No hacked cherrypicked e-mail changes that. They are just an excuse for people who didn't understand science in the first place to validate their own political biases and ideological predispositions.

    • 2 years ago
  • Wetdog
    • 0
      Wetdog  
    • from the page header at the link---------" OPINIONS
      National
      Politics
      World
      Opinions
      Arts
      Tech
      Business
      Investing
      Sports
      Life
      Driving
      Margaret Wente
      The great global warming collapse"-------------


      It is opinion, not science. Margeret Wente writes opinions to cause emotional response, which causes arguements, which causes increased readership(both in print and electronic media), which increases advertising revenues.

      Whether you think global warming is valid, or you don't think it is valid---no matter which side you are on----you are ALL being used and manipulated to sell advertising and make money for Margaret Wente and a whole lot of other people.

    • 2 years ago
  • tenletters
  • mcjk
    • +1
      mcjk  
    • Yeah, climate change is stupid. Humans can't change the planet. We're too small...
      We could never throw away enough plastic to littler the world's largest ocean. Humans could never fish the world's stocks down to 3% of what they were a century ago. Humans can't change the climate and suck all the water out of the ground, creating a sunken dry valley.
      People could never drive thousands of species to extinction and create areas of the planet that can't absorb water becoming hot deserts.
      Even if humans could, there would have to be some way to fix it. An app for that. Or some pill.

    • 2 years ago
  • PajamaDan
    • 0
      PajamaDan  
    • mcjk:

      Yep,... that's the defense I get a lot (mostly from older family members). "We're too insignificant to hurt Earth or change things." Apparently, when people are faced with large-scale problems, fear or change,... they tend to forget just how powerful (and destructive) our species is. (And you'd think that even a POSSIBILITY of these dangers would invoke some instant and massive changes,... but NOOOO!)

    • 2 years ago
  • PajamaDan
    • 0
      PajamaDan  
    • To not "believe" in Global Warming/Climate Change is one thing,... for there will be fluctuations, times when our destructive actions will not effect the climate, or times when Earth will counteract the changes we've caused. But to sit there and ignore the OBVIOUS destruction we cause,... is another thing. Please tell me that these deniers are simply just debunking the temperature factors, and not Environmental Destruction itself. (Because, once you tell others that you DON'T think humans harm Earth,... you forfeit credibility and awareness.)
      What it will take,... for people to realize that humans eff up this planet, for people to stop behaving selfishly, for us to take responsibility, and for us to change to protect our dying environments?!?!?! WHAT WILL IT TAKE?

    • 2 years ago
  • Nephwrack
    • +1
      Nephwrack  
    • and that's why this story is posted in comedy. LOL what science scandals? care to name a few? w've already heard about faux noise's attempt to discredit global warming using meaningless cherry picking, so please come up with some of these new scandals you speak of (the copenhagen emails). good job on the placement of this article, it sure got a laugh outta me.

    • 2 years ago
  • tenletters
  • JanforGore
  • JanforGore
  • rodstradamus
more from Comedy:

top videos