CNN Anchor Fired For Saying Jews Run The Media WFT

usualy i find what you have to offer moderate, but now you are just being retarded.please flag this so i can return the favor, as i may have insulted you, but you attacked an entire race of people based on theory not any substative fact.
murdoch owns fox
ge owns msnbc
no jewish organization of any sort owns the media, or even a part of the media.
saying the jews own the media, because of involvement in it, is as realistic as saying muslims own the transportation industry as a result of the majority of cab drivers in our country being arab.just retarded prejudicial thought, void of facts.

how did the jews use media to manipulate the mass's again? i know it wasnt to get kosher food on fast food menus, or userp christianity in any way.what was the result of this supposed jewish media control other than making hollywood great?

you've caught me on a good day, and plus it's not the first time something i've said has been called retarded, definately won't be the last.
Ok so jews and media I was stereotyping, looking at old Hollywood though, it was full of jews, directing, producing, financing, and my favourite films are actually from the pre code (pre 1934) era.
As I did say at the end of my post, I believe that although quite a few people involved in media and government may be jewish, does not mean they are practicing, or actually have anything to do with the jewish religion, they were just born jew, just like i was unfortunately born british (with a quarter jew thrown in, bit of black too)
But, the point of my post, was to mention (as many people already know) that the old money lenders-from which we have central banking to thank-were mostly JEWISH FAMILIES.

still so massively wrong.
but i think british is cool, i dont know why you guys ae so hard on yourselves.i mean thier is humble and then thiers is strict self deprication.
look, just as a bunch of christian people getting together to open a book store, doesnt make it a christian book store.just because every single employee or author on the shelf are christian, it would still just be a book store.a book store that happened to be christian.the volume of jews in hollywood, is the same thing.the social temperment of the era enjoyed the jewish humor stylings above all else.before that it could be said that the cowboys owned hollywood, if what act is most common at a given time.

no movies had jewish messages, or agendas.actualy as i think of it we dont really have one to push.i dont even today with pact groups, dont see too much of the old moral of the story kids is support israel.then or now.

I wasn't going to reply to you as this is getting ridiculous, and you seem to be either putting words into my mouth, or completely misunderstanding what I am saying and trying to make it sound like i'm some jew hater who believes they are at the centre of a conspiracy of one world domination.
Right, so the UK is a sh*t hole, i'm not being self depricating (I do not measure my person on what country I happened to be born in) there are many Sh*tholes across the world, not just the uk. that aside now.
clearly a jewish agenda is not being pushed, I don't see kosher meat in my face or those ridiculous curls at the sides of the young boys heads they force them to wear being put forward as the new fashion style.
But, I feel I really need to say this again, the rothschilds, rockerfeller's etc are all from jewish families, and again like I have already said, I doubt their jewishness has anything to do with their corrupt greed for money.

wow, i really didnt think after that amount of time a reply would come.

i may be missunderstanding you, but you posted this-u can't ignore the fact that they do own most of the media, and the original money lenders were jews, look at some of the sickest most evil families in history,

im not putting words in your mouth, just responding to your assertion that the entirety of global jewry are one in the same with its individuals.sure woody allen is a scumfuck for marrying his daughter, but that certainly wouldnt validate stating that "jews are incestious", would it.you place control of the media at the feet of jews.not a collection of jews, but as if it is a conspiracy amomgst us.not requiring seperating harvey wienstien from shlomo the shoemaker.that is how you presented it, and i may missunderstand, but putting words in your mouth i certainly havent done.

let me ask you as a brit, would it seem reasonable for some one to state that the english are inbred, as a fact of status? or would it be appropriate to seperate the royal family as they have the history of inbreeding, not the entirety of england?one paints the monarchy negatively, the other all of england.

if the jews own the media, thier must be a reason right.that is what stating that results in.and for fuck sake, im as jew as the day is old, and i assure you im not in media, nor do i recieve a check.i wish to god it were a true deal, but just like with the banks or anything else, judaism plays no role.its like saying the christians own the auto industry, as opposed to all the head auto guys are christian.huge difference in meaning and implication, no?