Comedy | November 17, 2010 | 45 comments

One Hundred Naked Citizens: One Hundred Leaked Body Scans

source: http://gizmodo.com/5690749/these-are-the-first-100-leaked-body-scans

Image
insaintity
At the heart of the controversy over "body scanners" is a promise: The images of our naked bodies will never be public. U.S. Marshals in a Florida Federal courthouse saved 35,000 images on their scanner. These are those images.

A Gizmodo investigation has revealed 100 of the photographs saved by the Gen 2 millimeter wave scanner from Brijot Imaging Systems, Inc., obtained by a FOIA request after it was recently revealed that U.S. Marshals operating the machine in the Orlando, Florida courthouse had improperly-perhaps illegally-saved images of the scans of public servants and private citizens.


http://gizmodo.com/5690749/these-are-the-first-100-leaked-body-scans
  1. groups:
    Community,   News and Politics,   Tech,   Art and Style,   2 more
  2. tags:
    Privacy Rights,  Police State,  Privacy,  NWO,  6 more
  3.     
    |

45 comments // One Hundred Naked Citizens: One Hundred Leaked Body Scans

  • SHAWN_RITTIMAN
  • Psymoniac
  • Tayllerand
    • 0
      Tayllerand  

    • According to the TSA they said that they will never keep the images of the people in their computers , but it looks like they were lying again.I bet you they havent tell to the employes about the radiation.

    • 1 year ago
  • Psymoniac
    • 0
      Psymoniac  
    • Tayllerand:

      for 100% they havent told them a word about the radiation and saving the images is key for this operation....the whole scanning process is for fullbody images so they can track you as much faster as before using image analysis-software to compare the fullbodyscan with other cctv images....

      like the trade-rights for africa belong to the father of the underwear bomber, an high-ranking african politician....sounds crazy - it is! check http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F._William_Engdahl and do your research =)

    • 1 year ago
  • Gravity_Man
    • 0
      Gravity_Man  

    • If the scanners had been around 70 years ago and had revealed to the public that Marilyn Monroe was stuffing her bra with tissue paper, I reckon old Marilyn's entire movie career would've also went down in Pennsylvania.

      Imagine that. Ohhh, it's great to be an Americannnnnnn where at least I know I'm freeeeeeee. Yeah baby, bring it on. Roll the tanks in front of me and light the damn wick already.

    • 1 year ago
  • alexandrek
  • CalgarC
  • CalgarC
  • Dejan_Croatia
    • -2
      Dejan_Croatia  

    • who gives a fuck, America has got to be the only nation who gives a fuck if people see a fucken animation of your body underneath for fucks sake!

    • 1 year ago
  • CalgarC
  • TomTucker
  • insaintity
    • +3
      insaintity  
    • Dejan_Croatia:

      For me, it's more of an issue of the police state mentality lying about the police state that's being created. It is clear to me that these scanners have not been put in place for my safety, or the safety of any non-elite, power-having freak.

      Plus, there's a tremendous amount radiation coming at you from these things. What better way to feed the cancer industry?

    • 1 year ago
  • JohnA
    • 0
      JohnA  

    • Not that I'm one side of the issue or another, but do these pictures really turn anyone on? They look like an x-ray or a ultrasound to me. Not really porno material. There is plenty of free real porno available on the internet, why would anyone want to look at these? Just saying.

    • 1 year ago
  • tverdell
  • JohnA
    • 0
      JohnA  
    • tverdell:

      Could be. But you have to admit, there are some big fat ugly people in the world. Chances are slim those two are who I would want to look at naked.

    • 1 year ago
  • alexandrek
  • JohnA
    • 0
      JohnA  
    • alexandrek:

      You are right, I can't disagree. But it's not like you would recognize them on the street or anything. I wouldn't care. You get to see me naked through your whatever scanner, so, I'm not a prude. I've got the same equipment as everyone else. Nothing you haven't seen before. Not a big deal to me. But that's just me.

    • 1 year ago
  • Gravity_Man
    • 0
      Gravity_Man  
    • JohnA:

      John, having the Power over another human being to unclothe them while not married or anything is a turn-on for some people. Power over others to strip their clothes off. Like for instance a teacher seeing a young boy in her class and she sees he has a hard on well, she would love to see his pants down, but because she is not given one of these scanners she is forced to do the right thing and not have sexual intercourse in the coat closet with him.

      See how that works John? Everyone has to follow the same rules of conduct to have any kind of a societal order, otherwise you have chaos and disorder... because if one man can receive exemption from the laws concerning voyeurism of the non-consenting by working at the airport then his doing that sets a legal precedent an actual lawbreaker might use in court to get a vastly reduced jail sentence.

      See how that works John? Get outta jail fast, repeat crime fast.

    • 1 year ago
  • JohnA
  • GLOBALPOLITICAL
  • im1mjrpain
    • 0
      im1mjrpain  
    • Image

    • The full body scanners that President Obama authorized to be rolled out in airports across the country at a cost of over $1 billion dollars not only produce detailed pictures of your genitals, but once inverted some of those images also display your naked body in full living color.

      And you don’t need to be a graphics wizard using a $600 software suite like Photoshop to pull off the trick – inverting a photo is a simple process that takes one click and is an option available even in the most basic image editing software. Simply inverting some of the pictures produced by the body scanners creates a near-perfect replica of a naked body in full color.

      http://justgetthere.us/blog/plugin/tag/body+scanners

    • 1 year ago
  • maasanova
    • +3
      maasanova  
    • im1mjrpain:

      I think that pic is a fake though. I fell for that one and posted it on my blog when it came out and then someone wrote to me and showed me it was a fake.

      BUT, with that said, I personally wouldn't be surprised if the resolution could be set to achieve that much detail.

    • 1 year ago
  • Gravity_Man
    • -1
      Gravity_Man  
    • im1mjrpain:

      Well, if you take a photo and first convert it to targa (tga) that saves the resolution really great, especially those juicy teenage never touched yet hormone-swollen-fat nipples. Then you increase the Pixels-per-inch say 400%. Then you get the software that converts that picture across many multiple tiled pictures and wallpaper your Living Room.

      So then your place has become the life of the party and you gain many new friends who bring liquor over and you all jack off to little Suzy, who is some jerk Dad's daughter.

      Then one of your guests gets the really enlightened idea to set up a replication process and you sell the wallpaper and get lots of money.

      Soon the innovative little Japs will have 3-d conversion software perfected and modeling software that can animate the jerk's daughter and have her in some black market game performing illegal acts, fellatio anal, sodomy with blacks oops.

      Yep, you guys are right. Totally harmless. If animals can do it then by golly we can do it too!

    • 1 year ago
  • macdontcare
    • -2
      macdontcare  

    • What better way to protect the "privacy" of these ordinary citizens than to post these photos. Stop bitching about "privacy" when your attempt to protect people comes in the form of post their images(regardless of whether you blur the face, to protect the innocent). Radiation? How many CT, MRI, PT scans are they equivalent to? If your a frequent flier that's the question you should be pondering. I'll ask again, "Anyone wanna touch my junk?" Please!

    • 1 year ago
  • maasanova
    • +3
      maasanova  

    • These images are from a county courthouse, they are not the same scanners that the airports use. These images are being leaked into fooling people that the resolution on the airport scanners isn't very high.

      The point of this article is that the all of the images either are being saved or have the potential to be saved by government workers who don't care to abide by the rules.

      TSA lied and said that the scanners don't have the capability to save the images.

    • 1 year ago
  • im1mjrpain
  • mindcruzer
  • KSirys
  • Radical_Centrist
  • CalgarC
  • alexandrek
  • CalgarC
  • littlwarrior
    • +3
      littlwarrior  

    • If the picture above is really what the body scan looks like then honestly scan me all you want. thats so fuzzy i dont think i could bring myself to care.

    • 1 year ago
  • insaintity
  • littlwarrior
  • TomTucker
  • littlwarrior
  • TomTucker
  • littlwarrior
  • tverdell
    • tverdell  
    • This comment was removed by its owner.
  • EmperorThan
    • +4
      EmperorThan  
    • tverdell:

      "I got hot off the press body scans of Drew Carey. Who wants this?"

      ....*today the TSA announced it is discontinuing it's nude body scans after one machine exploded following a scan*

    • 1 year ago
  • tverdell
  • CalgarC
  • CalgarC
  • Gravity_Man
more from Comedy:
from the community

top videos