Sarah Palin's message to all 57 states

opportunistic or not, at least she knows how to make an honest buck

Honest? You can't be serious. There's not a single honest bone in her.

what politician does? it wasnt really in reference to her as an individual but to her way of making money. any woman who can shoot a weapon is ok by me as long as its not pointed my direction. but is your comment just an opinion or is it based on reliable sources? cnn doesnt count. happy new year

Yes, V. You and I would consider it other than honest, but in the ComboGoy and Sarah Palin world, you just go for "studiously misinformed" and rest on your "I can't remember" laurels.

That way you unplug your brain from the honesty loop. If you really believe you know russia by looking across the pacific, then you can honestly say that abstinence is the best policy, and Jesus is in the next room, and when SP is elected president, -- "oh, my where are those nuclear codes again?"

Actually, there are a few honest politicians, although I'll grant you that they are not many. Senator Gravel and Dennis Kucinich come to mind.

I was referring to her way of making money, and my opinion is by no means based on CCN but on people who know her personally and have known her well for a long time.

Except, of course, that the two parties are NOT identical.

One wants to provide universal health care, provide for our public school system, regulate the banks and corporations, supports equality and human rights for all individuals, and seek diplomatic solutions to disputes with foreign powers.

The other wants to leave health care to the Insurance companies, privatize the school system, de-regulate the banks and corporations, believes in forcing everyone to comply with "Traditional Family Values", and launch pre-emptive strikes against any possible foreign threat.

They are NOT tweedle-dum and tweedle-dee.

One has good intentions but often fails, the other is pure evil and often succeeds.

And as a gay person, you should NOT support Ron Paul, who spoke out in favor of Texas having the right to have anti-sodomy laws. He thinks a state has the right to define what sexual activities consenting adults can perform in the privacy of their own homes.

He actually believes that states have more rights than humans.

The man is NOT good for this country.

You miss the point entirely! Have you even read Carroll Quigley? He doesn't say the false left/right paradigm is identical. As a matter of fact, he specifically states that "the two parties should be (almost) identical". The issues you mention are deliberately promoted by each party in order to divide the nation, while the international bankers rape and pillage the economy. It is time to Wake Up. Unfortunately, you appear to be in a coma!

Of course, I do not agree with Ron Paul concerning gay rights, but I would vote for him hands down because he understands the real threat to this country.

Also, please provide me with evidence that Ron Paul wants to legislate "Traditional Family Values" or that he supports: Texas having the right to have anti-sodomy laws. I don't doubt that he does...I've just never heard him say it.

I certainly have concerns about Ron Paul's socially conservative views, but I believe the greatest threat to humanity is the secret cabal running our country via puppets like Obama and Bush; both Republican and Democrat.

I wouldn't vote for Ron Paul just because his hair looks like a cross between Kim Jong Eel and Donald Trump. Screw the fact that his ego is bigger than Richard Branson.

Up His.

Again- I am wide awake. If you want to keep this conversation civil, stop the "coma" attacks.

Second, I read exactly what you posted. Yes, he said "almost" not identical. Almost is a huge word filled with shades of Grey. In your view, the similarities outweigh the differences. In mine, the differences outweigh the similarities.

The issues I quoted, which include regulating banks, are NOT just a distraction. They effect everyone's lives.

Yes, I agree about the banks- the problem is you are so focused on one issue you have lost the big picture. Like people so focused on only the war, or on only GMO crops, or on only animal rights, or on only glbt rights- there is MORE involved than just one issue.

Plus, on that one issue there is a significant difference between Liberals and Conservatives.

And what makes you think Ron Paul, a life-long politician, is NOT part of that Cabal?

And what makes you think Obama, who came out of nowhere, IS part of that Cabal?

Read this:

http://emptv.com/p/ron-paul-doesnt-deserve-your-support

It is not just his Fundamentalist Christian views that are a problem- it's his entire political philosophy.

He is by no means a Libertarian, in any way- yet, Libertarians support him.

Yes, he believes in limiting the power of the Federal government- but that is the only goverment he thinks should be limited.

He believes States are more important than people. That states have the right to do whatever the hell they want to their citizens. He does not believe in the right to privacy.

He simply does not believe in human rights at all.

His own words where he criticized the Supreme Court's ruling in Lawrence v. Texas against Texas' anti-sodomy law, which criminalized consensual sex between same-sex partners:

"Consider the Lawrence case decided by the Supreme Court last June. The Court determined that Texas has no right to establish its own standards for private sexual conduct, because these laws violated the court's interpretation of the 14th Amendment. Regardless of the advisability of such laws, the Constitution does not give the federal government authority to overturn these laws. Under the Tenth Amendment, the state of Texas has the authority to pass laws concerning social matters, using its own local standards, without federal interference. But rather than adhering to the Constitution and declining jurisdiction over a state matter, the Court decided to stretch the "right to privacy" to justify imposing the justices' vision on the people of Texas.

Since the Lawrence decision, many Americans have expressed their concern that the Court may next "discover" that state laws defining marriage violate the Court's wrongheaded interpretation of the Constitution. After all, some judges simply may view this result as taking the Lawrence decision to its logical conclusion."

-- Protecting Marriage From Judicial Tyranny, 22 July 2004

You know, this was the ONLY comment you made directed towards me that was polite.

And I answered it- with facts.

And you ignored it.

what if he had tits?

As I stated before, I do not agree with Ron Paul on gay rights! I will take the time to examine the accuracy of the quote above. I don't doubt that Ron Paul is homophobic. Many people of his generation are both racist and homophobic. However, it does not negate his stand on issues concerning the greatest threat to the world, i.e., the international banking elite.

Stop with the claims that I am rude simply because I don't agree with you. I am replying to your comment now that I have returned to the site. I have other responsibilities besides sitting on Current.

with your over simplified misspeak, misinformation and down right leftest propaganda, i'm afraid i'd have to flip a coin in deciding between the two

I have checked the above quote and find it to be absolutely reliable. Ron Paul appears to do the same as most politicians and speak out of both sides of his mouth. Notice that he says "Regardless of the advisability of such laws, the Constitution does not give the federal government authority to overturn these laws." and earlier in the same speech he states: "Mr. Speaker, as an original cosponsor of the Marriage Protection Act (HR 3313), I strongly urge my colleagues to support this bill. HR 3313 ensures federal courts will not undermine any state laws regulating marriage by forcing a state to recognize same-sex marriage licenses issued in another state. The Marriage Protection Act thus ensures that the authority to regulate marriage remains with individual states and communities, as the drafters of the Constitution intended."

I was aware that he supports State's rights...does not believe Federal Government should interfere. As stated before, I know he is against gay marriage.

It does not negate his position concerning the greatest threat to America and the globe, i.e., the Federal Reserve and the international banking elites.

WAKE UP! YOU ARE IN A COMA!
You have bought into a bunch of propaganda!

Sound familiar?

I did not claim you are rude because you disagree with me.
I said you are rude because you are rude.
Now, are you going to learn to stop being rude?

Or, are you HOPELESS!

See? stuff like that!

Again, as I stated rather clearly, it is not JUST his stand on gay rights.

It is his entire position on the role of State goverments in our lives, and his entire view of religion dominating secular law.

Yes, big banks are bad.

That is NO reason to support a moron like Ron Paul.

I responded to you. Now please respond to the fact the Obama, Bush, and most of the Congress are allowing the Federal Reserve to destroy the U.S. economy. Why doesn't the current President do anything to stop it?

Like anyone cares who you side with.
You are so far to the right that the middle looks like the left.

On the Fedral Reserve, I have no idea. That is not a topic I know much about.

And because I don't know about it, I'm not going to make any claims about what they can or can't do, or what they have or have not done.

As far as big banks are concerned, Repeatedly, the Democrats have been for regulation, and the Republicans have been against it.

Presidents are not Kings. You are talking about huge powerful opposition from the Republican party.

thanks, i try

Hitler shared his stand on issues concerning the greatest threat to the world, i.e., the international banking elite, so I suppose that you would have also supported Hitler for this reason.

Normally I might chide you for pulling the whole Hitler thing, but since Globalpolitical used it himself so many times it's only fitting. :)

Not only fitting, but accurate too. :)

Boy that would be a neat trick. Sorry, her stupid has been bought and paid for by the media.

He didn't. She was picked by his new team of advisers and convinced she was the key to pick up Hillary voters.

He saw the finacial collapse and decided he didn't want to be saddled with the economy Bush was leaving in his wake. So he called in the B squad to blow the game.

yeah . . Those "Hillary voters" love anti-abortion, christian conservatives who shot animals from aircraft as long as they have a vagina just like the democrat ? ?

He looked at all the candidates and selected the hot bimbo without a brain.

Why?

Hillary is just as big opportunist as Palin.

even more so

yeah hillary has a clue, shes a dumb lying bitch

Hillary Clinton is not dumb. I don't know how honest she is or if she is truly the megabitch that her reputation claims, but she is not dumb. Sarah Palin is dumb.

"reflections of family, faith, and flag" buy your copy today!"reflections of family, faith, and flag" buy your copy today!"reflections of family, faith, and flag" buy your copy today!"reflections of family, faith, and flag" buy your copy today!"reflections of family, faith, and flag" buy your copy today!"reflections of family, faith, and flag" buy your copy today!"reflections of family, faith, and flag" buy your copy today!"reflections of family, faith, and flag" buy your copy today!"reflections of family, faith, and flag" buy your copy today!"reflections of family, faith, and flag" buy your copy today!"reflections of family, faith, and flag" buy your copy today!

I think that Obama was pandering for the subnational votes(common wealth/territory) when he said 57 states. Some places like America Somoa & Peurto Rico can vote in primary & general elections, or just in the primary in some cases.

But i'de bet if you looked at when he said '57 states' you would find that there were 7 subnationals able to vote in that general or primary election.

Good politicians know every vote counts, so why not fake a gaff in order to stroke the egos of tons of overlooked legal voters without seeming to be pandering to non residents.

nah those cases obama just misspoke, it happens nothing wrong with it. people on all sides are to eager to demonize i believe

you can fool some of the people all of the time

here on current, you can fool most of the people all of the time

That's because all conservatives are fools.

That's what you erroneously believe and what you try to do all the time.

i thought you were talkin about obummer until i saw the 8 year thingy then it clicked, you wuz talkin w. and just look what two years of extensions and new legislation hath wrought. under the current admin. thank god for the mid terms now we can have some change we can all believe in...yeehah!

you should be so lucky

this i mostly agree with.. i think she is sincere, and umm unqualified and is a being used as a puppet of the corps, much as nearly everyone else in washington is. her packaging is just more blatant i think, and they are equally ok with her being used politically or as a tool to sell book and magazines and reality tv advertising

That's about where Barack Obama's qualifications top out too, obviously.

The premiums went up because the regulations don't go into effect until 2012 and 2014...they are gouging while there is still time. Use some common sense and you will be amazed at what you will discover.

Has it ever changed? What makes you think that covering more people will make our rates go down? Seriously, just pay attention to what happens in Washington. Common Sense (your term), will tell you that big corporations own our government, and the Health Insurance Industry, will pull the strings to defeat anything that works against their interests.

They are gouging us while there is still time. That is, before the government starts gouging us.

Long history of saying truly stupid things...sounds like someone else who held a high office in our government recently.

you have gotten funnier as of late.
taken up pot? or does sarah just bring it out of ya?

No drugs, unless you count tryptophan from the turkey. :)

if only turkey had that effect.it would make black friday hysterical

very funny, not.

even i will vote you up on this one, sometimes you can be mildly amusing

lol that made me spit my soda out thanks

BOOM. Crystalman with the ZINGER. That'll take some time to recover from, I'm sure.

+^'d. Someone is paying attention.

i wouldnt mind a good whore in the white house again. its been kind of bleak since the clintons left.

Clinton didn't have to pay for it.

I saw an article that interviewed prostitutes who worked the Democratic National Convention and the Republican National Convention.

The ones who worked the RNC did a whole lot more business than the ones who worked the DNC.

That's because Democrats don't need to pay for it- we have sex with each other!

There was a whore in the White House after the Clintons, you don't remember Condi Rice?

Bleak. Yup. That's the right word. Republicans are NOT for small Government. They are for a bleak nation.

Thanks for the tip. It makes everything much more clear out here in the paradise we have created for the unemployed worker.

She's a commie whore. They don't don't them red states for nothing...:)

commie whore? i thought you leftylibs worshipped communism. and you never know when a good whore can come in handy!

i never took you for a racist ken

almost half the white house was a whore, Haliburton's.

thats cause we have more money and are willing to pay for a good whore. we always prefer to pay our own way. the dems always want their shit for free

you'll have to talk to your president about that one

Agree, and Condi was happy being paid off with shoes!

The Whitehouse has become a whore of fascist capitalism, along with the house of CEO's and the house of "fill my pockets"

I'm an anarchist. Left right they all birds of a feather. Wipe disk and start over."Save the Planet?" for who? and for what?

zing! lol sad but true i fear

"Only a warrior chooses pacifism; others are condemned to it."

What you "think" and reality have nothing to do with each other.

Fascist Capitalism?
You're joking, right?

I sure do hate that damn communist money chasing--for the state mind you--greedy corporate slugs.

Them and the Gay Nazi's, the Black Klansmen, and those damn Evangelical Satanists, they all need an attitude adjustment...

You know dog, if everyone started feeling that way we would have a real problem. We can not loose hope, there's still a lot of decent people in this country and in the world. We will always find some bad apples in every tree, but that does not mean the whole tree is bad. So, the good apples need to get together and make a difference, because if we don't then what... I'm sure that everyone here has young ones in their family or know people who have young people in their family.... What about them, we can not be selfish and say ok I used my share of this earth the hell with the people that comes after me. Imagine if all the people before us had lost hope and their dreams, would we be here today.

You must be a Sarah Palin acolyte...I just visited your activity page....my my my....are you in love with her?

...Again: You're joking, RIGHT?