From Town, To Nation, To Dust
-
-
- shanklinmike
- added this
Freedom is more than an ideal. It is a way of life that all who embrace it can live, and prosper under. Morally speaking, it is the only way to live if you wish to be in charge of your own life and all you produce. The more freedom you either abuse or give up, the more government grows to fill in the gap.
In short, government is like a fire. Contained and well supervised, it serves its keeper well. Yet people like fire, and all too often perceive its benefit not its danger – living in ignorance of its full capability when it is unleashed. They feel the warmth from it on a cold day, and use it to heat water, and cook. They know that most others use it as well in such small amounts that it is not something to be feared, but rather used for their benefit. Yet one day someone takes their eye off of it. A smoldering ember pops out of the fireplace and starts spreading. Eventually the entire house is consumed, and the owner left destitute. People know that governance of any sort could be for the good – as long as it remained in their control under their watchful eye, and doing only what it was told to do out of well thought out reason.
Such a form was held by a small town once. So the townspeople allowed it, and kept it small. Yet one day while they were not using it, they stepped away from it and allowed it to keep burning. Yet while they were away going about their business, the fire decided that it was not burning enough to make everyone warm and happy. So it spread.
At first all the people noticed was a small piece of wood missing from each one of their stacks. Upon further investigation, they found one less fortunate enjoying a warm fire in an alley. It turns out that the mayor’s assistant had taken that small bit of wood, and used it to warm the guy who was down on his luck. Some people thought this was wrong – after all, they had always been kind to this man – given him food, a place to sleep when the weather got too bad, and even firewood on days that were just chilly. Others thought that this was great – it saved them the time and effort of dealing with the guy, and at the relatively low cost of a small piece of wood.
The general consensus was that it was no big deal. So the next day, the people went about their business again. This time they come back, and another small piece of wood was gone again. They had expected this however, so they did not think anything of it. This went by for a week or so, and they soon became indifferent to it.
Then one day they returned and did not even think about the wood anymore. Yet upon entering their homes, some found their cabinets open, some said that the last of their flour was taken, and some their water supply lower than usual. It would have sounded like the whole town was imagining things had fewer people noticed. Once again they investigated, only this time they found that the town hall was warmly lit, and a dozen or so were eating a well set meal.
This caused a little more of a stir. The town’s people did not mind feeding a guy who was driven to poverty by a bad fall while working, but most of the others enjoying the food and the fire worked far less than the rest of them. They were impoverished not by an accident, but by the choices they made such as becoming a slave to the bottle or some other bit of nonsense. However the towns people grudgingly gave a little more way, seeing the situation as a distasteful act, but not one enough to get too ruffled over – after all, they still had work to do and their families to go to.
The overseer of the provided food and shelter reported later that night to the mayor. He saw his task as not only justified, but morally imperative to any righteous society. He told the mayor that the job was done, but that the townspeople were a little upset by the situation. The mayor asked his opinion, and he responded that the townsmen should be ashamed of themselves – after all, it was only taking their spares and making good use of them. The mayor thought about the matter and concluded that his assistant was correct. However he did not want the matter to get out of hand, so he kept the provided food, fire and temporary shelter as the new norm – not to be added to.
However a month passed, and winter was due to set in. As a result, the townspeople had stockpiled more wood on their property. Yet due to the ever diminishing weather, more wood was needed to provide heat for the less fortunate of the town. However the wood was taken nonetheless, with food in just about the same amount.
The brutal winter came and went, setting the stage for a very nasty town hall meeting in the early spring. For the most part, most had enough stored for the winter, and sat quiet. Yet there were a few families that the extra taken from them all season long, and that little bit made a world of difference. After spending the last few weeks of winter with a meager fire and little food, they ended up finding themselves in the town hall just to get warm again.
One father stood up, and as respectfully as he could, made it known how outrageous this whole thing was. He was immediately answered by the condescending public servant who retorted with comments like ‘How dare you claim to be in the right yet refuse to give to help the needy’. The father lost his composure at that point and yelled back at the official for always having a full belly and warm place to go from his hard work while his family who had earned it had to remain with less. The official smiled and pointed out that maybe so, but the father and his family were both at the town hall with ready food and warmth when they needed it. In the end, the father was exasperated, and once he completely lost his temper, was asked to leave.
Once he left no one else had anything to say. They felt for the father, but did not feel like being made out to look like an unreasonable idiot like he had been. So it was decided that the experiment was a success, and would become policy. Long story short, this went on for a generation. There were always complaints, but in the end nothing changed.
The next generation had a mayor just like the last. He felt mortified when he found that his official and those under him were not getting paid for gathering the wood and the food. So he implemented a small tax to see that they were compensated. The taxes went the same way as the wood and food had, and despite the complaints, turned into policy.
Yet another generation passed and there were still problems. Even worse was that the people had began taking the idea of ‘giving until it hurts’ as a way of life, and the way they used to live was long forgotten (save for the old timers who were labeled as mentally ill anyway). The new mayor seemed consistent in the eyes of the people so they listened to him – after all, they still lived, so what was the wor....
http://www.peacefreedomprosperity.com/?p=3824
-
- tags:
- America, Control, Corruption, Unemployment, 17 more
-
-
BrushwithDeathToothpaste
-
Clearly a Libertarian society since they couldn't afford any law enforcement to curb the wood stealing.
Was there a point to this carefully crafted ,highly unrealistic fable that has no foundation in the real world?
- 1 year ago
-
BrushwithDeathToothpaste
-
-
davids80
-
BrushwithDeathToothpaste:
@Brush -
It is a tale of how government took power once the colonies won the rebellion in the 1780's. Every gave a little to it at first seeing no actual harm coming from it. yet as time wore on (as described in the article) - and with the passing of each generation, the government started taking more and more - I think Hamilton would be proud minus the corruption.
And I guess you did not read the whole thing - it was the mayors assistant following the mayors idea who were 'stealing the wood'.
So it is both realistic and founded on real world events. I agree that it was well crafted though :-) - 1 year ago
-
davids80
-
-
Jeremy_Benson
-
He seems to be suggesting that if someone is suffering because they got addicted to something then they should be left to die in the streets otherwise the government will kill you.
- 1 year ago
-
Jeremy_Benson
-
-
davids80
-
Jeremy_Benson:
Interesting - how did you arrive to that conclusion?
- 1 year ago
-
davids80
-
-
davids80
-
davids80:
lol - once again voted down for asking a simple question. wow....
- 1 year ago
-
davids80
-
-
UtopianSky
-
The 24 Types of Libertarian!
http://www.leftycartoons.com/wp-content/uploads/types_of_libertarian1.png
- 1 year ago
-
UtopianSky
-
-
shanklinmike
-
UtopianSky:
The 24 Types of Authoritarians/Statists...
- 1 year ago
-
shanklinmike
-
-
UtopianSky
-
shanklinmike:
You do realize that cartoon was stolen from the one I posted?
Of course you would fully support theft.
Your whole position is based on it. - 1 year ago
-
UtopianSky
-
-
figgdimension
-
I bet you sniff paint ...right?
- 1 year ago
-
figgdimension
-
-
shanklinmike
-
figgdimension:
I mean seriously, what kind of a comment is that? At least be mature and debate/discuss the ISSUES civilly!
- 1 year ago
-
shanklinmike
-
-
figgdimension
-
what a silly f!@#$ker
- 1 year ago
-
figgdimension
-
-
UtopianSky
-
And it seems it is again time for another Mike Shanklin post.
He pops out of his burrow like a groundhog, posts something, gets all of his little minions to applaud and spout the most ridiculous nonsense, and when challenged to support their assertions with any bit of rational thought they run away; only to come again when the coast is clear.
I think this little "political movement" of theirs should be reclassified as a religion.
Religions don't require any reason behind them.But, since the creation of the Tea Party, neither do political movements, so I guess the point is moot.
- 1 year ago
-
UtopianSky
-
-
Polochick09
-
UtopianSky:
It seems on all the other posts, people are the ones attacking the messenger and not the message. Shanklin seems to combat every single attack that is based around the issues on all the other posts. What has he not answered for you? It seems he has stated several times that he believes in the nonaggression principle. Where does your political backbone lie?
- 1 year ago
-
Polochick09
-
-
UtopianSky
-
Polochick09:
So, Polochick09, with only 25 points here, no submissions and only nine comments, do you honestly think you have even the SLIGHTEST grasp of anything you just said?
How about this- instead of spouting off without any knowledge whatsoever about what you are talking about, do some research.
Heck- just read the comment you replied to where I said, rather clearly, that the numerous people who post on Current HAVE commented on his ridiculous nonsense repeatedly.
Did you notice what he and his minions like you do when that happens?
So no, this is not about attacking the messenger and not the message.
No, Shanklin does not come CLOSE to addressing points in other people's posts. All he does is all he can do- he spouts propaganda about "statism", "goverment violence", and "taxation is theft" while ignoring any attempt at a rational discussion.
This is about making fun of the messenger because his message has been thoroughly debunked long ago, all of the holes in his reasoning laid out clear for all to see, yet he still keeps posting the same crap over and over.
My backbone is based on logic, knowledge, and evidence.
So where does YOUR political backbone lie?
- 1 year ago
-
UtopianSky
-
-
shanklinmike
-
UtopianSky:
You still have not raised an issue... when have I ever backed out of a discussion?!? What are you talking about?!? I take everything head on, and trump! Bring it, I will answer anything you want.... and everything I am saying is rational.....unless YOU are an irrational person!
- 1 year ago
-
shanklinmike
-
-
UtopianSky
-
shanklinmike:
I still have not raised an issue?
I raised HUNDREDS of them.When have you ever backed out of a discussion?
Just about every time you post here- including the last time you asked when have you ever backed out of a discussion.
http://current.com/news/92785058_which-human-farm-is-this-game.htm#92789240And as for being rational- you can't even go a single post without using your meaningless brainwashed propaganda soundbites.
- 1 year ago
-
UtopianSky
-
-
shanklinmike
-
UtopianSky:
Funny, your government support sounds like soundbites to me!
I can't be on every post every day! I have a life to live, but I am NOT ignoring you!
In response to your post on the other article, you need to research natural law, and then we can have a discussion on the necessity of laws through statism, and laws outside the political/violent system. If you haven't researched natural law, this will not go far....
- 1 year ago
-
shanklinmike
-
-
UtopianSky
-
shanklinmike:
Except, of course, I expressed no "goverment suport" or used any sound bites.
THis has nothing to do with "every day". You run away for weeks whenever anyone posts the questions you can't answer.
And as for your condescending little "you need to do research" statement, I will refer you to the cartoon I posted.
As I said, repeatedly- you made YOUR statements. YOUR STATEMENTS are illogical.
Nonsensical. And hysterical.I demonstrated how YOUR STATEMENTS make no sense.
That is why you run away.
Mike, you need to spend some time studying logic, like I have.
Because you haven't, I KNOW no discussion with you will go far. - 1 year ago
-
UtopianSky
-
-
ThatCrazyLibertarian [removed]
-
UtopianSky: This comment was removed by its owner.
-
ThatCrazyLibertarian [removed]
-
-
neocongo
-
UtopianSky:
Cult, political religion. Whichever. A bunch of silly asses who need an education.
- 1 year ago
-
neocongo
-
-
UtopianSky
-
ThatCrazyLibertarian:
Four days have gone by, and as usual Mike has run away with no answers to the hard questions- I won the wrestling match by default!
- 1 year ago
-
UtopianSky
-
-
Polochick09
-
Amazing stuff David! Thank you
- 1 year ago
-
Polochick09
-
-
davids80
-
Polochick09:
Thank you.
- 1 year ago
-
davids80
