LEAP Responds To White House: Pot More Popular Than Obama
source: http://www.tokeofthetown.com/2011/10/leap_responds_to_white_house_pot_more_popular_than.php
-
-
- Anonmaly
- added this
One of the popular petitions, submitted by retired Baltimore narcotics cop Neill Franklin, called on the Obama Administration to simply stop interfering with states' efforts to set their own marijuana laws.
"It's maddening that the administration wants to continue failed prohibition polices that do nothing to reduce drug use and succeed only in funneling billions of dollars into the pockets of the cartels and gangs that control the illegal market," said Franklin, who serves as executive director of Law Enforcement Against Prohibition (LEAP), a group of cops, judges and prosecutors who support legalizing and regulating drugs.
"If the president and his advisers think they're being politically savvy by shying away from much-needed change to our drug policies, they're wrong," Franklin said. "The recent Gallup poll shows that more Americans support legalizing marijuana than support continuing prohibition, so the administration is clearly out of step with the people it claims to represent.
"President Obama needs to remember his campaign pledge not to waste scarce resources interfering with state marijuana laws and his earlier statement about the 'utter failure' of the drug war," Franklin said.
Five of the top 10 petitions on the "We the People" site are about some aspect of marijuana or drug policy reform. The eight marijuana petitions that the White House's Friday rejection was intended to address have collectively garnered more than 150,000 signatures.
This isn't the first time that marijuana policy reform has proven popular in online forums hosted by the White House. A question from LEAP member and former sheriff's deputy MacKenzie Allen got the most votes in a White House YouTube forum this January.
Marijuana questions also dominated the White House's "Open for Questions" online town hall in March 2009 and the Obama transition team's Change . gov website in late 2008. Each time, the administration has issued terse rejections that contradict Obama's 2004 statement that "we need to rethink and decriminalize our marijuana laws."
http://www.tokeofthetown.com/2011/10/leap_responds_to_white_house_pot_more_popul...
-
-
JohnA
-
More popular than Obama, well that's not saying much.
- 7 months ago
-
JohnA
-
-
jubal
-
Obama is being Wolfowitzed on this issue. WRONG!!!
- 7 months ago
-
jubal
-
-
Des_Akkari
-
I got this email and what a crock of crap.... I am black and I cannot support this clown anymore. Why even put the petition online if you were just going to ignore it? The study should also compare it to alcohol, fatty foods, and High Fructose corn syrup....diabetes anyone?
- 7 months ago
-
Des_Akkari
-
-
EmilZola [removed]
-
Des_Akkari:
Somehow I don't believe you.
- 7 months ago
-
EmilZola [removed]
-
-
floydyboy
-
The swine running this country must be stopped. They care nothing for what the people want. Vote the bums out. This is not the country I learned about when I was back in school.
- 7 months ago
-
floydyboy
-
-
sugarmountian
-
I apologize to all people with learning disabilities and their families for my last rant. But those thugs bring out the worst in me.
Thanx Anonmaly for your post. - 7 months ago
-
sugarmountian
-
-
sugarmountian
-
If President Obama came out and said he was for legalization, the retardicans would have a field day. Those dirty,hypocritial,souless,no good,punchworthy,slimey snakes would have all the arrows in their quiver they would ever need to make the pres. appear baaaad for the the country. Sorry, but I HATE those f*@%)!* retards.
FREE THE WEED! - 7 months ago
-
sugarmountian
-
-
cabinettags
-
sugarmountian:
Sugar bias against marijuana isn't only a republican pejorative. If you list your occupation as politician chances are you're in the group. There's only a small handful that both recognize the stupidity of continued prohibition and aren't afraid to say so in public. Regrettably the public is the same way. Look what happened in CA.
- 7 months ago
-
cabinettags
-
-
sugarmountian
-
cabinettags:
Understood. But the thugs would be doing the spinning. And of course the dems would be timidly standing on the sideline.
In California it was the pot growers and beverage council who put up a big chunk of money to stop legalization. - 7 months ago
-
sugarmountian
-
-
paplanner
-
Expecting this white house to do the right thing for the right reason on any issue is an exercise in futility. Mr. Obama has shown that he is basically one more in a line of mediocre leaders. Anyone who had hoped that he had the balls to lead systemic change like Lincoln or FDR has had a rude awakening. This president is only a slightly improved version of the losers occupying the white house since 1980, he'll probably get re-elected but his re-election isn't going to improve the lives of too many people. Perhaps when these "American Exceptionalists" understand how incredibly complicit they are in theft of our children and grandchildren's futures the might start dealing with reality. These intellects have not figured out you can't win a war against an idea, you can't win a war against a tactic, and you can't win a war against natural human behavior. Until then I expect nothing more than continued intellectual gymnastics to justify raping the planet, subjecting more and more of humanity to poverty, hunger and incarceration.
- 7 months ago
-
paplanner
-
-
dinm76
-
paplanner:
Sad isn't it? I share your view.
- 7 months ago
-
dinm76
-
-
hombre76
-
Official White House Response to
Legalize and Regulate Marijuana in a Manner Similar to Alcohol. and 7 other petitions .What We Have to Say About Legalizing Marijuana
By: Gil KerlikowskeWhen the President took office, he directed all of his policymakers to develop policies based on science and research, not ideology or politics. So our concern about marijuana is based on what the science tells us about the drug's effects.
According to scientists at the National Institutes of Health- the world's largest source of drug abuse research - marijuana use is associated with addiction, respiratory disease, and cognitive impairment. We know from an array of treatment admission information and Federal data that marijuana use is a significant source for voluntary drug treatment admissions and visits to emergency rooms. Studies also reveal that marijuana potency has almost tripled over the past 20 years, raising serious concerns about what this means for public health – especially among young people who use the drug because research shows their brains continue to develop well into their 20's. Simply put, it is not a benign drug.
Like many, we are interested in the potential marijuana may have in providing relief to individuals diagnosed with certain serious illnesses. That is why we ardently support ongoing research into determining what components of the marijuana plant can be used as medicine. To date, however, neither the FDA nor the Institute of Medicine have found smoked marijuana to meet the modern standard for safe or effective medicine for any condition.
As a former police chief, I recognize we are not going to arrest our way out of the problem. We also recognize that legalizing marijuana would not provide the answer to any of the health, social, youth education, criminal justice, and community quality of life challenges associated with drug use.
That is why the President's National Drug Control Strategy is balanced and comprehensive, emphasizing prevention and treatment while at the same time supporting innovative law enforcement efforts that protect public safety and disrupt the supply of drugs entering our communities. Preventing drug use is the most cost-effective way to reduce drug use and its consequences in America. And, as we've seen in our work through community coalitions across the country, this approach works in making communities healthier and safer. We're also focused on expanding access to drug treatment for addicts. Treatment works. In fact, millions of Americans are in successful recovery for drug and alcoholism today. And through our work with innovative drug courts across the Nation, we are improving our criminal justice system to divert non-violent offenders into treatment.
Our commitment to a balanced approach to drug control is real. This last fiscal year alone, the Federal Government spent over $10 billion on drug education and treatment programs compared to just over $9 billion on drug related law enforcement in the U.S.
Thank you for making your voice heard. I encourage you to take a moment to read about the President's approach to drug control to learn more.
Resources:
•National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
•Marijuana Facts (ONDCP)
•Drug Abuse Warning Network (HHS)
•Treatment Episode Data Set (HHS)
•National Survey on Drug Use and Health (HHS)
•Monitoring the Future Survey, University of Michigan
Gil Kerlikowske is Director of the Office of National Drug Control PolicyHere is the LAme Ass responce to over 150,000 signitures to legalize Marijuana and over 50% of the nation saying they want legilization now.
Please reply in kind.
Notice who wrote this excuse for toilet paper responce Gil Kerfuckle Director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy protecting his bullshit job by siting propoganda from a research group who gets paid to talk shit about marijuana they wont even allow research into the benificial effects of maijuana just its so called negitive effects which cannot be duplicated under controlled experimant as is really demanded of scientific teories that pass mustard. and notice how legilization of merijuana became drug use because it is imposible for these assholes to stay on subject (probably drinking too much) and I love the note about the progress they have made against alcoholism a substance with no medical value and still legal as shit. if they are so concerned about addiction why can't they treat the addics and leave the rest of us the fuck alone?! they seem to be doing a fine job running alcohol how bout that just legalize and tax marijuana and open a bunch of not for profits to take care of those who claim to be pot addics, my guess is they will be out of business in a month. - 7 months ago
-
hombre76
-
-
wolfess
-
hombre76:
So our concern about marijuana is based on what the science tells us about the drug's effects.
But it's okay for little old ladies with cataracts to use it "under close doctor supervision" of course.marijuana use is associated with addiction, respiratory disease, and cognitive impairment
Alcohol is associated with addiction, cirrhosis of the liver, and cognitive impairment, but IT'S legal!. - 7 months ago
-
wolfess
-
-
dugdog47
-
Free the weed-end the greed.
Man I wish weed was legal, so I could smoke again! It's been way to long.
- 7 months ago
-
dugdog47
-
-
KB723
-

-
Ha Ha!
- 7 months ago
-
KB723
-
-
bailey78
-
Look folks Big Corp is making to much money from it being illegal than they would makeing it legal. You have to look at the war on drugs and the prison system. Then you also have all the fines and court cost that they are getting. Plus Big Pharm would lose billions because it will do the work of just about any pill big pharm is pushing. there is a whole lot rideing on it staying illegal.
- 7 months ago
-
bailey78
-
-
David_H [removed]
-
bailey78: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
David_H [removed]
-
-
cabinettags
-
bailey78:
I hate it when you make sense like that.
- 7 months ago
-
cabinettags
-
-
bailey78
-
David_H:
Like a three legged horse in the derby
- 7 months ago
-
bailey78
-
-
bailey78
-
cabinettags:
Yeah so do I :*(
- 7 months ago
-
bailey78
-
-
Anonmaly
-
-
http://https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvFYCky0muY&feature=fvst
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvFYCky0muY&feature=fvst
War on Drugs a "Complete Failure"
& it is...
What's better the clandestine illegal drug labs, or a somewhat more controlled, legal operations conducted in the safest manner possible..?
I don't like meth, not a big fan of opiates (okay maybe just a little, not the point)... Still I wouldn't want to hurt or endanger anyone with my recreational activities, or urge to consume frowned upon products or chemicals...
Nobody wants a paranoid drug dealing or manufacturing neighbor... Nobody wants to live in a neighborhood where you know the crap is going on, and the illegal nature of it makes it worse, more dangerous.
If things were legal, price would be down, there would be no making a fortune off the illicit market. No urge to want to kill somebody and corner a market, which is fairly common enough place in certain urban areas....
We could pass some fair enough laws... No cooking meth in your apartment complex... Think we could agree the chemicals, harmful vapors, the destruction of someones property rendering places unlivable... Prohibition encourages that, if it were legal in certain areas, a little bit of oversight.... Or if it was just taken over manufacturing on a larger scale by a quite regulated operation, or several (in the case of meth).... Who would want to make it if the chemicals to make it cost more than the finished product somewhere else....?
& look at Portugal, 10 years of decriminalization of EVERYTHING.... Surprise surprise, in the younger generations, the romance is gone.... They don't even use marijuana on the same levels as the their older counter-parts... They're better educated, and even though it's right there, they mostly don't care... The existing user numbers went down...
10 years of hard science, the number don't lie, defending complete decriminalization and it's effectiveness in Portugal.... (find your own link it's true)
- 7 months ago
-
Anonmaly
-
-
artemis6
-
Anonmaly:
Thanks for the info about Portugal , i did not know about it ....
- 7 months ago
-
artemis6
-
-
DanCastro
-
Anonmaly:
I think it is a testament to the strangle hold religion has on the nation. You can't legalize pot because "it's not nice to get high" or "god sheds a tear every time someone lights up"! Just the idea of it must have raised church attendance, "next thing they'll want legalized prostitution!" (yes, please! ;-)
- 7 months ago
-
DanCastro
-
-
Des_Akkari
-
DanCastro:
funny thing is...they will arrest you under the law and make you have a trial by swearing on a bible that clearly says in the FIRST CHAPTER: "And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth,". Then apparently you'll can be found guilty for breaking their law while doing what the bible tells me....the one they just made you swear on. Everyone who goes to trial should defend themselves and get a jury trial. If they only have you on possession...then swear in, take the stand and read it to the jury. And ask them to do the right thing... if they call themselves christians
- 7 months ago
-
Des_Akkari
-
-
Anonmaly
-
-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VCf2fJsBxRc
Really.......
- 7 months ago
-
Anonmaly
-
-
Anonmaly
-
I'm thinking if I'm president.... I got people protesting in the streets across the nation, marijuana is more popular than me...
Let's see, pot = chilled out people who want to listen to Led Zeppelin & PInk Floyd....
Would maybe settle a good portion of people with serious grievances down a little..
What kind of ________ president would want to continue down this road of FAILED prohibition?
- 7 months ago
-
Anonmaly
-
-
wolfess
-
Anonmaly:
A president who will do anything to keep his overlords happy.
- 7 months ago
-
wolfess
-
-
KB723
-

-
wolfess:
D'OH!
- 7 months ago
-
KB723
-
-
cabinettags
-
Anonmaly:
What kind of ________ president would want to continue down this road of FAILED prohibition?
Every single one of them. For a president, marijuana = blind eye & dead brain.
- 7 months ago
-
cabinettags
-
-
Anonmaly
-
cabinettags:
I know there is way to much money to be made by the power elite to keep it prohibited....
- 7 months ago
-
Anonmaly
-
-
cabinettags
-
Anonmaly:
Anon, I've been an advocate for legalization for so long I don't remember when I started. The whole prohibition thing has been, is, and will continue to be ludicrous. I don't believe it was made with the people in mind at all. In view of the events of the last few years, with the drug cartels running amok, it made more sense than ever to finally lift the prohibition. Anyway they wanted - federal legalization - federal decriminalization - federal hands off and let the states handle it - anything they wanted. What they want is to continue the status quo. I really had my hopes up for the CA initiative. But now that that's been shot down I've lost hope of ever seeing any sense come into this in my lifetime. What their reasoning is I truly don't know. I only know it's stupid, whatever it is. I had some hope from Obama in the beginning as well. Turned out he was as full of shit as all the rest of the politicians. I'll continue to wish for it, but I've given up hope.
- 7 months ago
-
cabinettags