Comedy | January 02, 2012 | 28 comments

Ron Paul: Civil Rights Act Of 1964 'Destroyed' Privacy

Image
Buckeye_Bill
"If you try to improve relationships by forcing and telling people what they can't do, and you ignore and undermine the principles of liberty, then the government can come into our bedrooms," Paul told Candy Crowley on CNN's "State of the Union." "And that's exactly what has happened. Look at what's happened with the PATRIOT Act. They can come into our houses, our bedrooms our businesses ... And it was started back then." - Ron Paul

Hmmm...and if a black man were to marry a white woman the authorities would have entered that "bedroom" and dragged both to jail...and it was started waaaay back then even before Ron Paul's "back then"! Weren't THEIR civil liberties being infringed upon by the "law of the land" at that time?

And, Ron Paul, how long would it take for these "changes in attitudes" to come around without the law of the land altering and thereby stepping in to remedy injustices, eh? Another one hundred years after the Civil War certainly wasn't enough time. Two hundred years would do the trick? Three? Do I hear four?

And what about all those laws on the "books" that prevented the races from coming together? Ever think about that one, Mr. Ron Paul?

No?

Myopia of the mind is a terrible thing to witness!

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/01/ron-paul-civil-rights-act_n_1178688.htm...
  1. groups:
    Community,   Comedy
  2. tags:
    Propaganda Disinformation Race Relations Smear Campaign 2 more
  3.     
    |

28 comments // Ron Paul: Civil Rights Act Of 1964 'Destroyed' Privacy

  • SFirman
  • cherry5000
  • cherry5000
    • +2
      cherry5000  
    • I will not be watching that circus show on current tonight, I can't understand why people support ron paul and his son. they are both nutjobs to me.

    • 5 months ago
  • SFirman
  • Anonmaly
    • 0
      Anonmaly  
    • My civil liberties are still infringed upon daily... So are those of EVERY Native American "Indian" living in this occupied land.

      Go check out Russel Means; "Welcome to the Reservation".

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-LA-S64QY3o

      And everyone living on a "Reservation" is living under over 100 year old laws governing "prisoner of war camps".....

      The civil war never ended either.... It's still being waged (quite successfully) by the banking institutions of the North. And guess what we all got FUCT!!!

      GO read up on ole "Honest Abe" he wrote of who he feared more for the future of our country over.... (hint; it wasn't rural farmers of the South, of whom only a small portion owned slaves) He actually explicitly mentions the banking institutions behind the big industry in the North....

      Oh and Gandhi showed people how to make changes, how to change a system, Martin Luther KIng Jr. showed you how to change things....

      And neither were about passing or obeying any fucking LAWS, instituted by an elitist government and power structure.

    • 5 months ago
  • Buckeye_Bill
    • +2
      Buckeye_Bill  
    • Image
    • Anonmaly:

      Don't you find it peculiar that Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi AND Martin Luther King, Jr. were assassinated twenty years apart?

      And we all know what happened to "Honest Abe".

      It's sad how those that stand for equality for all die so young.

      So, talk about someone's 'civil liberties' being infringed upon...you can't get any more infringed upon than being killed for having the belief that human beings have an inalienable right of existence that supercedes some government's say-so that a person is considered a second class member of society!

      My own father was born a noncitizen January 13th, 1923, in Cherokee, North Carolina where his ancestors had lived for thousands of years and was not thought of as an American with rights. Is that infringed liberties enough for you? He thought it was a travesty of justice for him to have to prove his citizenship to a country that thought of him as not worthy enough to be called an American. He was not afforded an education since the government believed it wasn't their responsibility to do so. Just yesterday some assclown told me how Native Americans didn't possess "title" to this land because they lived nomadic lives and so it was quite alright for Europeans to take this land as theirs since those that had lived here for so long did not understand the concept of land ownership even though they didn't travel about as the Plains Indians did. They were very much a "stationary" people. But that didn't make not one iota difference to those that wanted their "land".

      Many Native Americans gained their right to vote long after African Americans won their right to!

      Could you imagine the uproar on the daily news if we still had certain "people of color" incarcerated on "plantations" or "concentration camps" today?

      You know, what we call "reservations" for NDNs.

      Go figure.

    • 5 months ago
  • Calodemon
    • +1
      Calodemon  
    • Anonmaly:

      Oh I see, you would rather have the north american continent occupied and ran by people that can't even care for their own people?. your bitch rant is retarded. truth is that the indians were really glad to see white astute people of commodity to soothe their savage need's. our free commerce was\is like heaven to them. they turned savage when they learned they had to work for it. what do you think started all those war's, savage Indians murdering white people crossing the plain's for their merchandise., it is you who need's to do the reading. the U.S is done with it's retribution to people who think their indian mexican heritage was ever infringed upon cause those mexican indian's choose to have an obloquious attitude cause they think the U.S owes them merely cause we had to kill obloquious mexican indians merely to have safety for our nation. it look's as though that time is nearing again. Hello Mr. Reagan kick it into high gear!!!!!!!!!!!!!. even the Mexican's homeland (Spain) came to kick the mexican's butt's again. Alike London sending their encouragable criminals to Australia cause England didn't want them on the same continent as their innocent people. Spain also sent their criminals away on ship's to mexico, a waist land to live out their obloquious live's. so this makes mexico a prisoner country and the United States need's to close it's borders to it and stop aiding and abetting them so they will get down to their own business of fixing their own obloquious country.!!!!! Incest was rampant in mexico during the 1790's and 1930's incest is obloqiouus retardation at the worst ever known to mankind. mexican's and indian's are the most inflicted by it cause they never had any real respect for the decent things in life and that's why they are always murdering each other clear from the middle east to mexico. incest causes destructive individuals to carry out their retarded curse onto the world around them. the Mayan's had the most incest and it made them dangerously retarded remember that next time you think you got reason's to hate white people. learn to respect your elder's.

    • 5 months ago
  • Calodemon
    • +1
      Calodemon  
    • Anonmaly:

      Hey Anonmaly, you can't turn psychotic over some Jacobin idiot posting falsities onto the internet engineered to exacerbate ignorant echelons into false acts of vengeance. don't you know that the republican demon-o-cracy is running multi billion dollar business from ignorant psychic visual echelon's committing act's of martydom against establishment's. if you ask me there should have been ten custard's. and I'm half cherokee. if you truly want peace you need to realize it takes two to tango. the world is too advanced to have to put up with a bunch of retard's. WISE UP PLEASE .

    • 5 months ago
  • Leen61
    • +2
      Leen61  
    • First of all, I will NOT be watching that circus on Current TV tonight....the covering of the Iowa caucuses. Anybody that doesn't know enough about Ron Paul and the others by now, shouldn't be voting. The bottom line here is it's not important to know the differences at this point. All you need to know is that they are all alike in one basic way---they hate America.

    • 5 months ago
  • kennymotown
    • +3
      kennymotown  
    • Whats really amazing to me is how fast so many people jumped on the Ron Paul bandwagon, just because of his end the wars and bring all the troops home stance. Without any further investigation into his voting record, and his other nutty stances, Sure I would be for that but, he's against a Womans right to choose, against Social Security, Medicare the Department of Education etc, etc. His son has also said he was against the 1964 voting act, these types of Republicans (Tea Party) have fooled a lot of people. Not to mention his age is a big problem as well.

    • 5 months ago
  • Leen61
  • kennymotown
  • Leen61
  • kennymotown
  • Leen61
  • kennymotown
    • +2
      kennymotown  
    • Leen61:

      The overall plan by the Elite is to make huge austerity cuts in Medicare and Social Security, and those that fall for the guy just to do that sort of thing are enemy's of the people! Ron Paul bottom line is a Republican, and embraces cutting Social Programs and going back to the days of segregation and control over Women. Besides I don't think the guy will live much longer and we certainly don't need another senile Reagan as President with someone else calling the shots!

    • 5 months ago
  • Leen61
  • Buckeye_Bill
    • +3
      Buckeye_Bill  
    • Leen61:

      "The only 2 things I agree with Ron Paul on are ending the wars and legalizing pot."

      But, but, but, but......he's NOT for legalizing pot! He has ALWAYS stated that it's a "State's RIGHT" to determine what the law of the STATE land is! If you were to...and I mean NAIL him down to what he BELIEVES about pot or drugs in particular...he will tell you it's up to the individual states as to what THEY want to do as far as dealing with those who imbibe! If someone would have the gall to ask him what he would do if his son Rand had been caught smoking a joint AND what he felt about it, well, you'd hear how he would have had him institutionalized in a treatment facility in a heartbeat to rehabilitate him! He would NEVER have said that it would be, "Fine with him if Rand felt it was okidoki to smoke pot."

      He's not for the legalization of drugs, per se....he's for each state to mandate what they want done if someone were to be "busted" with a joint in their possession! If a state enacted a law that says if a person was to be thrown in jail for LIFE if they were busted...well, he'd be ALL for that!

      What he has ALWAYS said is he's against FEDERAL LAWS to incarcerate lawbreakers...NOT each state from doing so!

      And why do I say this? It's because he thinks it's up to each state to pay for the imprisonment of those who were caught "holding"! That the Federal government should NOT have to bear the burden of using FEDERAL taxpayer money to do so! He's against the concept of supporting Federal prisons having to house inmates for crimes that are broken within the borders of a particular state.

      Ron Paul's "double speak" is used to confuse people into thinking he's FOR legalizing drugs, when in fact he's NEVER been on the bandwagon!

      Listen to his speeches he's made at the annual John Birch Society's conventions year after year and tell me differently.

      But...I know I'm speaking to a fellow choir member..so who am I to tell you! I'm not...really. I am taking this opportunity to tell those that do not know Ron Paul as you and I do!

      +^d

      }B^)

      P.S. If anyone wants to know who the JBS is...just think 'KKK in suits'...okay?

    • 5 months ago
  • Leen61
    • +2
      Leen61  
    • Buckeye_Bill:

      One thing Ron Paul is good at is saying things in a way that gets wishy washy "lefties" to support him politically. They know not what they support.
      "But, but, but, but......he's NOT for legalizing pot! He has ALWAYS stated that it's a "State's RIGHT" to determine what the law of the STATE land is!"
      Thank you for pointing out the distinction, Bill. My bad for being so black and white.

    • 5 months ago
  • Buckeye_Bill
    • +1
      Buckeye_Bill  
    • Leen61:

      Ohhhhhhhh....he's one sneaky snake! I can't blame others for not seeing through his sly subterfuge by what he says by the way he manipulates the English language!

      He's he best at "double speak"...there's none better at it, I assure you!

      He had me fooled for some time until I scritched and scratched at what he was saying and how he was posing his "arguments".

      I wonder if he could have talked that Ol' "Serpent of Lies" down from that 'apple tree' where that Evil Snake seduced Eve into disobeying the Almighty God (If you believe in that tale).

      And the John Birch Society is one evil group of subversives if ever there was one!

    • 5 months ago
  • Leen61
  • timelord999
  • Leen61
    • +1
      Leen61  
    • timelord999:

      I hear you, timelord. Don't worry--I'm not fooled. Besides, I don't like anybody who wants to put women's reproductive rights back into the dark ages. I like your new avatar. :)

    • 5 months ago
  • Frosty46
    • +1
      Frosty46  
    • Mr. Magoo for President! Being dazed by the total media blitz being given the Republicans, 24/7 coverage on all news outlets, I find myself wondering where our nation is headed in 2012. Even the few Liberal news shows on MSNBC cover every fart, burp, and verbiage spewed by Republicans.
      Ron Paul is after all is said and done a Republican and has the same memory problems all liars fall over repeatedly!

    • 5 months ago
  • Buckeye_Bill
    • +2
      Buckeye_Bill  
    • I know I wouldn't want to live in a Ron Paul world where ignorance abounded, sick people were strewn on the streets of America, the underpasses of bridges full of homeless people and on and on and on....

    • 5 months ago
  • Buckeye_Bill
    • +2
      Buckeye_Bill  
    • The hypocrisy of Ron Paul is immeasurable!

      First, he says the government has no right to enter into a person's bedroom and then he contradicts himself by saying that the government HAS the right to enter into a person's bedroom!

      George Orwell's "double speak" in action!

      And Ron Paul has no equal in the world of politics!

    • 5 months ago
  • Calodemon
  • Buckeye_Bill
    • +1
      Buckeye_Bill  
    • And here's another one of those Rethuglican candidates who would have no problem stepping into a person's bedroom....heh....stepping into a woman's womb even...to enforce a law that should not be enacted that has ramifications of the government lording over a woman's right to her reproductive system.

      The "government" is already using gurneys to strap women down on during childbirth in some prisons...ask Sheriff Joe Arpaio!

      Inch by inch, step by step...slowly Roe V. Wade is being overturned....

      http://www.aclu.org/blog/prisoners-rights-reproductive-freedom-womens-rights/mot...

    • 5 months ago
more from Comedy:

top videos