kennymotown
This guy will crack you up, did I just say crack?
  1. groups:
    Community,   Comedy,   Progressive America,   Funny,   18 more
  2. tags:
  3.     
    |

53 comments // "Why Marijuana Should Be Legalized" // Video

  • Naumadd
    • +1
      Naumadd  
    • Fear is the gateway drug to religion which is the gateway drug to strapping explosives to yourself or to some other idiot and flying planes into buildings thus setting off a decade long war in two countries sucking the nation's economy dry and putting a lot of people out of job and home.

      Let's legalize drugs and get rid of the f-ing churches and synagogues and temples.

      M'kay?

    • 4 months ago
  • noxidereus
    • +1
      noxidereus  
    • New Rule: When nature itself is illegal in order to keep more people in prison than any other nation has and to keep corrupt profits rolling in against the best interests of the people you have to stop saying that your country is a free country that values democracy.

    • 4 months ago
  • GavinTheMother
    • +1
      GavinTheMother  
    • There are 1000 reasons to make weed legal and maybe 3 to not. I only need one. When it comes to collective decisions that we all have to make together I'm 100% for democracy. When it comes to my own personal life I'm 0% for democracy. If when it comes to me smoking weed or not and it comes to 99 other people saying I can't but 1 vote by me saying I can. That's 1-0 as far as I'm concerned.

    • 4 months ago
  • Naumadd
  • mybologna
    • +6
      mybologna  
    • Reasons why pot will never be legal:
      1. Hemp is a threat to the chemical industries that produce pesticides and fertilizers for growing cotton.
      2. The medicine produced by the plant is a threat to pharmaceutical industries. If people could grow their medicine, they wouldn't buy it at the drug store.
      3. Drug testing is really pot testing since alcohol, cocaine and other drugs are out of the body in a couple of days, while pot stays in your body for a month. The drug testing industry wouldn't exist.
      4. It is an excuse to violate the civil liberties, deny voting rights, and a way for the minority to stay in power.
      5. For profit jails will not make as much money. They have powerful lobbyists.
      6. Lawyers, judges and the whole judicial system would loose the revenues from prosecuting pot offences.
      6. The police would lose the stream of revenue they get from prosecuting the war on drugs.
      7. Arms and military equipment manufacturers would lose revenue from the war on drugs.
      8. The oil industry would loose revenue from natural hemp fibers replacing polyester, and natural hemp oil replacing petro based oil.
      9. The alcohol and tobacco industry would see a threat to their profits if consumers could grow in their yard a substitute to their product.
      10. Government is set up to protect industry and the status quo.

    • 4 months ago
  • COMMONSENSEFORCOMMONGOOD_COM
  • Avior
  • Naumadd
    • +1
      Naumadd  
    • Avior:

      I'm afflicted with more than a few of those labels on that chart, brother, and could use some legalized relief right about now.

      Unfortunately, we have children in charge of things in this country ... and children voting to put them there.

    • 4 months ago
  • EdJoyProductions
    • 0
      EdJoyProductions  
    • Naumadd:

      That is an insult to children. Most children have more sense. You can usually reason with a child. These are adults with agendas. Agendas designed to keep persecuting people that they do not agree with. Agendas that make sure that there is always something to hold over the heads of people that they deem "dangerous". Insane and incomprehensible drug and tax laws will always be there to make sure that everyone is prosecutable for something if he/she gets out of line.

    • 4 months ago
  • Naumadd
    • 0
      Naumadd  
    • EdJoyProductions:

      Don't know what children you've been around but, "you can usually reason with a child" sounds more than a little naive. My experience has been quite different.

      In any event, if the word "immature" works better for you than "children", it carries the meaning I mostly intended. I do know children who are mature beyond their years, but they're greatly the exception to the rule.

    • 4 months ago
  • EdJoyProductions
    • 0
      EdJoyProductions  
    • Naumadd:

      It is just that children have the capacity to learn and grow and the people in charge and the voters that put them there do not. Children have curiosity. Politicians and their their mindless followers are no longer curious about anything that does not fit into their narrow view of the world.

      They are nothing like children. Children can be a pain in the ass but they are great. These people that make life difficult for others and do it on purpose have no redeeming value.

    • 4 months ago
  • Naumadd
    • 0
      Naumadd  
    • EdJoyProductions:

      In my experience, children and adult alike can often and want often to learn and grow. Children do not have some unique ability that suddenly disappears when you're older. I'm one of many examples of an adult - now in my fifties - who are as capable if not more capable than ever. I also have an overabundance of curiosity and, again, there are many adults such as myself similarly passionate. I don't think the claim that adults in general lose these abilities - and the willingness - as they grow older is actually supportable. As I said, my experience has been quite different both in my own life and as I've observed in others on several continents around the world.

      True, when you get older you do tend to establish routines and, true, many adults get set into their routines with little apparent change over the years. That can either be apathy or the person has found their happiness and is content to keep it. For myself, I pretty much deliberately stir things up daily just to keep them fresh. I'm quite certain that's not a unique way of life by any means. For some, it's a necessity - for me, it's simply choice. Circumstances do not drive me to seek novelty, it's just how I'm made.

      I must disagree that adults are nothing like children. I happen to believe all of them are simply children with increased experience which, for more than a few, doesn't seem to have made a difference. I also know that there are many children who have all of the maturity they are likely to need before they actually "qualify" for the label adult. To me "adult" and "mature" are not synonymous and neither are "child" and "immature" synonyms.

      To me the line between "child" and "adult" is rather arbitrary which is why I prefer the terms "immature" and "mature". You'll find children and adults in both categories.

    • 4 months ago
  • Tayllerand
    • 0
      Tayllerand  
    • I heard on the radio that Black Water is going to take over the war on drugs.
      A private security company , put your skates on cause a lot drugs are going to be flowing on the streets.

    • 4 months ago
  • Wyley_Wombat
  • COMMONSENSEFORCOMMONGOOD_COM
  • Tayllerand
  • Tayllerand
  • Ambill94
  • kennymotown
  • Ambill94
  • rerushg
    • +5
      rerushg  
    • "'The War On Drugs Has Failed', said a self-appointed 19-member commission on June 2, 2011, including former United Nations Secretary General Kofi Annan, Mexico's former President Ernesto Zedillo, Brazil's ex-President Fernando Henrique Cardoso and former Colombian President Cesar Gaviria, as well as the former U.S. Federal Reserve chairman Paul Volcker and the current Prime Minister of Greece, George Papandreou. The panel also featured prominent Latin American writers Carlos Fuentes and Mario Vargas Llosa, the EU's former foreign policy chief Javier Solana, and George Schultz, a former U.S. Secretary of State.
      Rafael Lemaitre, ONDCP Communications Director, issued a response the same day stating that President Obama's policy on drugs is a marked departure from previous approaches to drug policy."

      Would sombody clue me in on Obama's "marked departure"? I can't figure it out.

    • 4 months ago
  • Truthitswhatsfordinner
  • GavinTheMother
  • Naumadd
    • 0
      Naumadd  
    • rerushg:

      We put those who poison themselves - assuming certain more destructive drugs - and those who promote valuable agriculture (weed) in jail while putting those who poison the Earth's atmosphere and the environment with mass chemistry and radiation in tall office buildings and limousines.

      Something wrong with this picture?

    • 4 months ago
  • rerushg
    • 0
      rerushg  
    • Naumadd:

      We've evolved a culture that rewards and empowers the psychopathic mind. I could get all long-winded about it but that's my most fundamental belief about our situation. All else springs from that.

    • 4 months ago
  • Naumadd
    • 0
      Naumadd  
    • rerushg:

      Can't say I agree with "psychopath" nearly as much as I agree with "sociopath". I think, for the most part, human beings are in healthy control of their bodies and minds, but most aren't really suited to civilized relationships. For most, civility takes a conscious decision. Sure, many make that choice if it doesn't just come to them naturally. The rest might be able to make the choice, but are simply unwilling to make the choice.

      Like I said, healthy otherwise but not really suited for respectful human relationships - sociopaths or, in the least, socially dysfunctional. It's not a judgment of them as human beings, only as social beings.

    • 4 months ago
  • rerushg
    • 0
      rerushg  
    • Naumadd:

      Fair point.
      But with regard to the folks in the "tall office buildings and limousines" I think psycopathy is the more defining factor. The popularization of the word "psycopath" tends to make us think of crazed killers. Clinically it just means they lack empathy to some degree. Combine a good native skillset with a high-end education and psycopathic tendencies and you have the perfect upwardly mobile corporatist, responsible, by law, to only the stockholders. For him, "empathy" takes the form of maximizing return for them.
      Psycopathy can exist invisibly or, at least, not recognized for what it is. Sociapathy tends to be quite the opposite and can limit upward mobility except in extreme situations of genius, determination, and resources like, say, Howard Hughes.

    • 4 months ago
  • Naumadd
    • 0
      Naumadd  
    • rerushg:

      Yes, I see what you mean. Certainly the problem is a lack of empathy - that which makes them predators on their own kind. Regardless of what science calls it, lack or deficient empathy for other human beings is certainly the problem.

      I often say there are three plagues mankind struggles with and has for centuries - irrationality, i.e., an inability or unwillingness to get the genuine facts, inconsistent logic or poor reasoning skills and deficient empathy. These failings are the source of everything human beings call "evil" which is nothing more than a word referring to these plagues. Many or most think of "evil" as some existing force in the universe.

      I do not. It is a superstition. It is these plagues or mental and psychological shortcomings that are real.

    • 4 months ago
  • Anonmaly
    • +6
      Anonmaly  
    • We could fix this, or drive the establishment insane.....

      #opcannabomb....

      It's simple, especially for the less privileged connoisseur, we're always getting seedy shit anyway.... sprout your damn seeds, nurture them for a month or two, and then go gorilla transplanting EVERYWHERE!!!!

      If you're a heavy smoker, start some new seeds every week or so, be prepared for the plants you planted to get snatched, replace them elsewhere.... All at the most public places you can possibly get away with....

      IF people were to do this in numbers equal to the actual amount of regular consumers... Really it's just a matter of time....

      I'd get a map to judges homes, law offices, a few out in front of the courthouse, in the yards of your elected officials....

    • 4 months ago
  • kennymotown
  • GavinTheMother
  • Naumadd
    • 0
      Naumadd  
    • Anonmaly:

      It'd only take a variety as aggressive as Kudzu to be deliberately released for the government's party and that of other busybodies to be over.

      When human beings become agents of nature versus enemies of nature, most of our woes will be gone.

    • 4 months ago
  • Leen61
    • +7
      Leen61  
    • I'm with Lee Camp! Free the weed! But we know why it hasn't been legalized. We are up against big pharma and big insurance. Time for a revolution!

    • 4 months ago
  • kennymotown
  • EdJoyProductions
  • kennymotown
  • Leen61
  • EdJoyProductions
  • EdJoyProductions
  • sugarmountian
  • kennymotown
  • PressCore
    • +9
      PressCore  
    • In addition to maintaining their Big Pharma greasing, and their $2.3
      Billion annual Prison Industrial Complex revenues, they understand
      their Military Industrial Complex would take a nose dive too when the
      citizenry can maintain themselves on a legal sedative substance. That
      means they wouldn't have a prevailing supply of hardened, alchohol
      prefered men & women to replace the military personelle leaving the
      armed forces. They'd have a prevailing supply of Cannabis users who,
      although they'd be stronger for their immunization, would likely be less
      likely to want to kill & maim. Can you immagine how the .01% would
      loose their stranglehoid on the USA then ? And how the Banksters
      fueling their military expansion would falter then ? We need a peaceful,
      bloodless, lawful revolution here in the USA very badly. The Fascists
      understand that legalizing a sacred herb of Peace would signal their
      death knell. We'd still have a powerful defense force ample enough
      prevent invasion of foreigners from without. But the Fascists' who've
      invaded the USA from within, and are invading our homes in their
      UnAmerican war without end TV surveilance culture would also be
      ended. Because then the members of Congress, and all the States'
      legislatures would see the Patriot Act for the ambiguous deliberately
      UnConstitutional atrocity it is, as the FBI engineered it to be routinely,
      criminaly abused under the color of lawful authority to commit crime with.
      Their rotten to the core house of cards would blow away in the winds
      of change that legalizing Cannabis would bring.

    • 4 months ago
  • Truthitswhatsfordinner
  • Progresshiv
  • circlesquared
    • +5
      circlesquared  
    • never ate paste so I can't say it was my gateway to smoking cannibus, but from time to time I do get a craving to eat cheese in a bunny hat.

      needed some laughs...thanks again today for that Mr Freedom

    • 4 months ago
  • kennymotown
  • kennymotown
    • +7
      kennymotown  
    • I'm thinking that if we legalize Pot, we could let a lot of people out of jail, more munchies would be bought boosting the economy. It's a win, win situation!

    • 4 months ago
  • TanzaniteDiamonds
    • +6
      TanzaniteDiamonds  
    • kennymotown:

      I think it's a great idea too, kenny!
      If it ever becomes legal, do you think there should be a law against smoking and driving?
      The main reason I ask is because years ago, I was hit head-on by a DUI (he almost killed me and he did some major damage to my car); he wasn't drunk -- he was high. Very stoned.
      That unfortunate incident of the past doesn't stop me from wanting to support legalizing marijuana, however, I do think it's important to think about the "driving" issue, too. Or, maybe we shouldn't need laws for common sense?

    • 4 months ago
  • Truthitswhatsfordinner
  • TanzaniteDiamonds
  • Truthitswhatsfordinner
  • kennymotown
  • Naumadd
more from Comedy:

top videos