Limbaugh: I'll Leave US If Health Care Reform Passes (VIDEO) From 2010!

Well said! I'll happily pitch in!

heirs some thing you might like it based on some thing on the young Turks lol http://authspot.com/thoughts/so-you-want-to-leave/

Great idea!

Agree! That fat-bastard p.o.s needs to GO!!! and his fellow FASCIST travelers with him!

unfortunately because of the ACA these idiots will live longer

Yes, a real disaster. But there is under 7 months left to endure of Obummer.

Here we go folks with the Communist thing again! How pathetic, what a sore loser....again!

Like The Death Star!!!!

It will be difficult but yes this is probably the only real thing to be done.

... next, it'll be claiming Vlad the Impaler was a "leftist."

Believe it!

? Explain

if you don't see it I feel so sorry for you. I have seen many get removed for less than whats going on right now.

Yes, the Left-wingers undoubtedly claim that El Rushbo doesn't pay his "fair share."

Liberals like that expression, "fair share," even though those whom they think are EVIL (the upper 10, 5 and 1%) are actually paying far MORE than their share, while the lower HALF of America pays only 2.7% of the total revenues, living off the rest of us.....

That my friend is a fact that the progressive 99% refuse to acknowledge.
To do so, would discredit their hyperbole of the "ee-evil rich" not paying their "fair share," wouldn't it?

. Reverend Jim Jones was a republican

and it was Flavor-ade not kool-ade

if your going to lie at least get some of the facts straight

I forgot you work at Faux news you don't worry about facts.

I know it was "flavor aid," but that is precisely from where the expression originated. Why do you deflect and misrepresent?

why do you lie?

It is right in Wikipedia where you went. The "flavor aid" is referred to as Koolaid. I never lie. It is rude and against Current guidelines to accuse people of such things.

No I asked a simple question. I have read the rules and have not broken any of them. Now if I had called you a lier that would be againest the rules. Why do you hate Homosexals so much?

The reason is because labor produces all wealth, and only 1% of the population receives the vast majority of said wealth.

O.K. so I have seen you make this statement many times, and I thought I would take the time to go ahead and respond. The idea that Jim Jones was a "leftist" is absurd. He was a LUNATIC..he was not a "leftist" any more than Timothy McVeigh was a "righty."

I've noticed you hate on gay people real bad why is that?

Jim Jones was a republican that is a large part of what was wrong with him.

Jones was a Marxist. He belonged to the Communist Party. He wanted to set up a socialist utopia in South America. Read about him please.

Jones was a leftist in the sense that he was a member of the Communist party and wanted to set up a socialist paradise. He cannot be compared to McVeigh. Jones had a church and received funding and had many followers. He was a brilliant man and established himself in many places. Check out his history please. He was not some isolated loner, plotting to kill people.

My point is Jones was a lunatic...to call him a Republican OR a Liberal and claim that his actions are an indictment of either political philosophy is the height of idiocy. He was not a lunatic BECAUSE he was a Republican...he was a LUNATIC who happened to be a Republican...his political affiliation has nothing to do with his actions and are not a reflection of Republicans in general.

{The reason is because labor produces all wealth}

Unless you reference it, I do not know to what you are responding.

But labor is dependent on those who set up the factories, the stores, the places of work. Labor just shows up, taking no real risk and demanding guarantees. Labor lives off the creativity, innovation and capital investments of others, most of whom have failed but they do not care.. Labor just wants its guarantees and wants others to set up places of work off which they can swarm in and feed.

No he was a republican he even said so

It is not about Democrats of Republicans. Possibly you noticed that I rarely ever refer to political parties. I refer to Jones as a Leftist, and I already explained why.

I responded to Bailey17 who made the assertion that "Jones was a Republican" his political lunacy are NOT a reflection of people who have similar political leanings. Jones may have been brilliant, and charismatic...but he was still a sociopath. That has nothing to do with whether he was a "Republican" or "Leftist." Using him as an example lessens your credibility.

OK. But he was a commie.

Oh, Martin Luther King was a Republican.....

So the factories, stores and places spontaneously spring out of thin air? I'll tell you what..we'll have an experiment...you bring ALL the Capital and Ideas you want..I will bring ten laborers...let's see which can produce more.

Nope in his own words he was a republican I have done more research on him in my life time than you could ever think of doing.

No he was a republican not a commie.

Agree, and well said!

I didn't search Wiki I found a real source for the information just so you couldn't say Wiki is not reliable

...credibility, ya made me LoL!

Yeah but Dr Martin Luther King did not bash gay people the way you do why is that?

What is it about Gay people that scares you so bad?

Bailey, was Jim Jones a paranoid schizophrenic, do you think? He sure sounded like one.

He suffered from a god complex that ended very badly for his flock.

You are right. I should just stick to the origins of the "Koolaid" reference.

Lets see some proof of him being a commie.

Some creative people, working with capitalists, could produce something new. But laborers of themselves cannot. Of course, a laborer may know how to fix a car and such, but engineers, inventors got it started with the help of capital.

I didn't mean any of that as a personal attack. In fact, and this is not the first time I have seen this, I find it amusing that every time you post something the great majority of responses are name calling and bomb throwing. That's not to say you do not use slightly vitriolic rhetoric as well, but you actually bring up salient points that, at least to me, are worth debating.

The mistake I think people make is in thinking that ALL people who are Republicans (as opposed to Republican Politicians) are fascist racists who have no heart or care about the poor or the sick. And that people think that all Democrats (as opposed to Democratic Politicians) are communist, freedom hating, indoctrinating, Stalinist statists.

It is rarely as black and white as all that, and almost everyone I know thinks that what they are doing is GENUINELY in the best interest of their fellow man. If we use that as a common ground beginning, I think we could make many strides towards reconciling the two major factions in American Politics.

How does capital produce anything on it's own? How does an idea produce anything on it's own? Of course labor can produce without the aid of Capital or Ideas. I can still go out and grown my own food, and build my own house without any capital or engineers.

Jones was a member of the Commie Party.

I know you will contrive some way to reject these facts, and I will regret posting data, but what the heck:

"[jones] asked himself "how can I demonstrate my Marxism? The thought was, infiltrate the church."

"Jones moved away from the Communist Party and Maoists when CPUSA members and Mao Zedong became critical of some of the policies of former Soviet leader Joseph Stalin."

"Moved away from" means "was formerly close to." And he was upset over criticism of Stalin.

{Jones had long been critical of the United States' opposition to communist leader Kim Il-Sung's 1950 invasion of South Korea, calling it the "war of liberation"} Loved North Korea.

{before the late 1960s Jones chose to conceal that his gospel was actually communism. By the late 1960s, Jones began at least partially openly revealing in Temple sermons his "Apostolic Socialism" concept} "Conceal" means to hide WHAT IS THERE. A COMMIE.

{Jones admitted to the New York Times that, as early as age 18 when he watched his then idol Mao Zedong overthrow the Chinese government, Jim Jones realized that the way to achieve social change through Marxism in the United States was to mobilize people through religion}

E-NOUGH. It goes on and on. Please stop the denials and games.

More, from my previous research and study.... Jones promoted socialism. That is what the Left promotes, and I hope you can admit that most of the posters on these threads encourage or espouse socialism.

Jones said, "those who remained drugged with the opiate of religion had to be brought to enlightment - socialism."
-from Seductive Poison, xxiii

"Thank Socialism almighty we will be free at last."
-ibid xix

"Jones called his blend apocalyptic socialism."
-Hearing the Voices of Jamestown, page 8

"members of the temple would realize that socialism was the priority"
-ibid, page 71

"According to Jones, God was socialism."
-Salvation and Suicide: Jim Jones...., page xvii

"[Jones'] perceived socialism as an alternative to vast economic inequalities."
-ibid, page 4.

[Jones'] sense of compassion led him to reject the American system of capitalism."
-ibid, page 4.

"God is principle, principle is love, and love is socialism."
-Jim Jones

{I didn't mean any of that as a personal attack.}

From you, I do not take disagreement or contradiction as a personal attack. I have voted all of your posts (except one) up, even though I may have disagreed. (Not that the voting is important, however.)

{The mistake I think people make is in thinking that ALL people who are Republicans (as opposed to Republican Politicians) are fascist racists who have no heart or care about the poor or the sick. And that people think that all Democrats (as opposed to Democratic Politicians) are communist, freedom hating, indoctrinating, Stalinist statists.}

Yes, but I hope you have noticed that I rarely ever refer to political parties. In fact, I find the discussion of specific policies and bills rather boring. These things come and go. It is the underlying principles, values and beliefs that drive all of these, and these are not things that are occurring today; they have been with us for decades and even centuries, driving policy and programs. If one can see the overall motives, philosophies, principles and values, most of these day-to-day changes become very clear.

{almost everyone I know thinks that what they are doing is GENUINELY in the best interest of their fellow man.}

Probably, but it is interesting to explore what people think is in the best interests. But it is almost impossible to get people to think about this.

Well, let's just say that you developed a new device to make toasters work with less electricity. Basically, you could make it pretty much on your own. But if you wanted it mass produced, you would then need labor. But unless you created this, there would be nothing for labor.

"I can still go out and grown my own food, and build my own house without any capital or engineers."

Yes, any non-handicapped adult can do this. But only a few can actually create something new, and desired enough to be sought by large numbers of people and then requiring labor to make what SOMEONE ELSE has dreamed up.

Where did the toaster come from? Perhaps I am expressing myself a little too hyperbolically. Maybe it would be more accurate to say that the success of business is hopelessly intertwined with that of Labor. Without labor, innovation would be limited to a more efficient toaster for you and your next door neighbor, at BEST.

Of course I am not one of those people who think that labor should get ALL the money. That would be absurd...I think we are seeing a reaction today because executive pay is so far out of tune with reality that it has created a LOT of labor unrest. Despite what you may see in places like Wisconsin..I feel and experience a very nasty current growing through the population and it is all aimed at the government AND corporations..and more specifically banking institutions. If there is nothing done to address this, there WILL be a Bolshevik style revolution..history shows us this...and then EVERYONE loses.

We have to find some way to create an equitable share of the wealth. Otherwise, violence will ensue.

My response to your toaster reply covers my response to this..:-)

a "left(ist)" every three words, you so angry about left, why, are you like zoolander, can't turn left?

.{Of course I am not one of those people who think that labor should get ALL the money. That would be absurd...I think we are seeing a reaction today because executive pay is so far out of tune with reality that it has created a LOT of labor unrest.}

It is important to take human nature in the equation. It is what it is, and government policies can never change it.

Let's say that there were many jobs, would people be screaming about the pay of CEOs? I propose that this agitation has been brought about mostly by those who are doing it for political and ideological purposes. People do not generally care about what others are making, especially in America. But in bad economic times, people are frustrated and looking for reasons. And the politicians and ideologues are there, contriving plenty of them.

This is not anything new at all. It is a repeat of the 1890s when populists and progressives actually lied about and distorted what was going on in the country for political purposes. For example, farms were doing poorly because of rapid mechanization and, even more so, government policies of cheap land. Also from land speculators. In a nutshell, people who did not have any skills were trying to be farmers, and they were failing. And there was the move to the cities, causing cultural unrest. I could go on and on with the changes, but the point is that the populists and progressives said it was the BANKERS AND RICH INDUSTRIALISTS who were totally the blame, and that the only way out was the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT managing, regulating and even owning the means of production.

Nothing has changed: These left-wingers simply see an opportunity to achieve the dream that they have pursuing for 125 years: The central authority managing the society and the economy.

{I feel and experience a very nasty current growing through the population and it is all aimed at the government AND corporations..and more specifically banking institutions. If there is nothing done to address this, there WILL be a Bolshevik style revolution..history shows us this...and then EVERYONE loses.}

I suppose it is possible, but please look at OUR history: Yes, in Europe and Asia, there were revolutions, and if we look, all the pernicious ideologies came out of Europe: Marxism, Communism, Fascism, Nazism. All European, not American.

Americans are disinclined to revolution. If anything is part of our REAL (non-Leftist) culture, it is anti-revolution. Now, the Left-wingers will write some infantile posts that our Founders were revolutionaries, and that is not true. I hope nobody writes some stupid statement like that because I will feel compelled to respond; I hate it when these fatuous Leftists distort history for their own malevolent ends.

Well just post a link to prove your right other wise your just blowing smoke.

I posted a link to prove he was a republican and all you can do is say he wasn't.. what to you offer as proof?

Why so hateful towards others that are so diffrent yet so much like you ??

Revealing Very revealing

Revealing Very revealing Not true but I have come to expect that from faux news. Why check sources that takes to much time and the facts always get in your way

I see you are trying to quote something but your just not getting it ......Revealing Very revealing

{I posted a link to prove he was a republican and all you can do is say he wasn't..}

Numerous points:

1. I never said the Leftist icon, Reverend Jimmy Jones, was NOT a Republican. Please show me where I said he was not.

2. Please notice that I almost never refer to political parties. That is rather myopic and stifling, of course. Parties do not represent Leftism and Conservatism. The reality is that people of those persuasions usually gravitate to either.

3. I wrote that he was a Commie-Marxist-Socialist.

4. If you look at my posts, I presented a lot of information from Wiki. But I also presented direct quotes - with page numbers - from several books. I have done research in the past, so this is accurate and complete.

Revealing very revealing. But why do you think gay people are so bad.

in your own words from the other day Wiki is no place to get reliable information.

I posted the link to the book that pretty much gives you a inside look at the man. all you did was post something that was written about him. thats not reliable at all

I'm going to get that middle of the road badge yet. Thanks ...

"gat people" ???

Sorry, do not understand.

Wiki can be good. I simply do not want to respond to people who understand nothing about a subject and post "cut and pastes" from Wiki.

Notice that I included books. It appears that you are denying Rev Jones was what I said he was.

Revealing, very revealing....

You know Gay people the ones you like to bash on other sites. i was wondering you don't do it here?

What I find to be revealing is you hate for people that are diffrent than you. Revealing so very revealing....

But you yourself said Wiki was unreliable. just the other day. I guess you changed your mind when you use it.
Revealing so very revealing....

Wiki can be a good supplement - for people who actually understand the subject.....

for those days when your to lazy to do the real research. I do that now and then.
but why dodge the question of why your hateing on gay folks on other web sites but not here?

Hey hammy I know he was a lunatic I did a couple of papers on him in school. Got very good marks on them