Movies | March 23, 2009 | 16 comments

Thriller "Knowing" tops weekend box office in N. America

Image
ylin
Nicolas Cage sci-fi thriller "Knowing" topped the box office this weekend at U.S. and Canadian theaters, generating about 24.8 million dollars in its North American debut, according to preliminary figures released Sunday.

"Knowing," a Summit Entertainment release, is a tale of an astrophysicist who races to save the world after knowing an prophecy of doomsday by decoding a series of numbers.

Two other new releases, Paramount's comedy "I Love You, Man" and Universal's spy thriller "Duplicity," which co-starrs Julia Roberts and Clive Owen, were in the second and third places, with 18 million and 14.4 million dollars respectively, said Los Angeles-based box office tracker Media By Numbers.

Last week's box office leader, Disney sci-fi thriller "Race to Witch Mountain" fell to No. 4 with 13 million dollars in its second weekend, followed by Warner Bros.' superhero film "Watchmen" with 6.7 million dollars in its third weekend.

Hollywood's total domestic box office over the weekend was about 5 percent lower than that in the same frame last year, representing the second down weekend in a row this year, after the gross was down about 17 percent last week.
  1. groups:
    Movies
  2. tags:
    Movies movies_featured Box Office Knowing
  3.     
    |

16 comments // Thriller "Knowing" tops weekend box office in N. America

  • pennyharford
    • 0
      pennyharford  
    • thought it was good, Nick Cage even lost weight to look like the alcoholic, depressed widower. Kept my attention, even though it was very long. Didn't like the "bilbical ending", prefer to think it was an alien life form more advanced than ours, knowing that the earth was in trouble and trying to save us.
      the only big problem: it was way too LOUD....would prefer to rent it so you can turn down the volume on the disaster scences.
      Special effects were excellent...esp. the one in the subway!

    • 3 years ago
  • PajamaDan
    • 0
      PajamaDan  
    • Knowing (2009): D -

      What if we could predict bad things? Impossible,... 'cause I would've prevented this Rapture-ific movie from being made. Nicholas Cage does the same shtick he always does,... and he and everyone else are highly unconvincing. And, there is no surrounding help; real messages are trumped by poor storytelling,... it's clouded with Biblical themes,... there's elevator music,... the cartoony effects just aren't "special",... only 15 minutes of it are interesting,... the direction is unimpressive,... a global warming theme is omitted,... it took 7 people to write it,... the screenplay is clumsy,... and it's anti-climactic. Ironically, I predicted this would rub. See it - Never.

    • 3 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • sqweewee
  • Mobius2012
    • 0
      Mobius2012  
    • Hmm, well the budget for the film was $50 million so they're halfway there, but its probably going to be a fiscal decline of revenue from here on in, lets see......who wants to bet they wont break 50 mill by next weekend? I've got 25 cents that says they wont HAHHA

    • 3 years ago
  • nkeg87
    • 0
      nkeg87  
    • My mom saw it. Said it started out good. Then it got weird. She came home and simply said it was weird. Couldn't even explain it. I think the problems lie in the flow of the movie..not necessarily a bad story line.

    • 3 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • kewal91
    • 0
      kewal91  
    • What are you talking about!?!?!.. this movie was amazing... you dont watch movies for intellectual purposes... you watch them for entertainment.. read a fucking book..

      Granted the number thing wasnt as eleborate as it could have been but that wasnt the point of the movie.. it was about the relationship between the two and the world's end ..

    • 3 years ago
  • Humdrum
    • 0
      Humdrum  
    • kewal91:

      "you dont watch movies for intellectual purposes"
      "go read a fucking book"

      ?
      Movies can be intensely intellectual, and books can be "pure," bland entertainment.
      Where do you get off with these flaccid generalizations?
      Oh yeah!
      Thanks, mainstream media, for making it easier not to think.

      Also, what this movie is "about" is sucking money out of your pocket, using as little effort as possible.

    • 3 years ago
  • kewal91
    • 0
      kewal91  
    • kewal91:

      generalized media..??
      the whole reason movies were created was to entertain people .. it was relatively cheaper than other entertaintment forms for families.. and now its sort of a naturally occurring past-times...
      and i cant really think of any "intellectual" movies.. unless they are adaptations of books or rip-off of others..

      and the objective of a movie is obviously to make money... thats how business works.. thats why even authors write books.. .. if there was nothing in it.. why bother..

    • 3 years ago
  • AntGTO
    • 0
      AntGTO  
    • Due to the persistent urging of my sister, I quite begrudgingly saw this movie over the weekend. I'll try not to deviate into some played out stereotypical film connoisseur tirade about how Hollywood sucks. For the record, I truly like films, I'm just trying to adopt a "do something or shut up" attitude. Anyhow, I didn't want to see this flick to begin with, so if it was bad, it would've been of no shock to me. It wasn't nearly as bad as I thought it would be though. But was it good? Haha, No! But I never got frustrated or angry watching it, which happens a lot to me when I see shitty movies. The aforementioned plane crash scene I did find pretty awesome, but I watch a lot of exploitation flicks, so stuff like that will keep me minimally happy. It's one of those movies you pretty much have figured out about 30 or so minutes in (like, lets say.....every Saw film after 1), so you're never really surprised by anything that happens. Like I said, it's not good and the Christian allegories were a bit much (angels or aliens? blatant Adam and Eve references? does God have a fleet a starships?), but I've seen soooooo much worse, the smell of this one didn't get to me. I'm just glad my sis payed for the ticket, because movies are not cheap these days my friends. And most importantly, good or bad, it wasn't a remake.

    • 3 years ago
  • Humdrum
    • 0
      Humdrum  
    • AntGTO:

      What's the point of watching/ reading any story when you already know what's going to happen not even a third of the way into it...? That's a hallmark of shitty writing. It also lets the viewer know that the writers of said material obviously think the people watching/ reading it are morons.

      I may not be Hemingway, but I've been reading stories/ writing stories/ studying the art of prose/ drawing sequential art for most of my life (I now get paid to do it). Not bragging, just telling you where I'm coming from. I absolutely love the medium of film, and I love good films (go rent Let the Right One In, by the way), but the shit that Hollywood manages to cram down peoples' throats - with little to no effort at all - absolutely astounds/ sickens me. My feelings and conclusions about the mainstream American movie industry are my own. I didn't lift them off some interview I read in the New Yorker.

      People see money/ budget, and automatically equate it with quality. People see a story that expects you think instead of plowing through a blatantly lazy/ recycled plot at light speed, and they think it boring.
      Sorry, but I find that to be supremely annoying. I'm allowed to observe the media and have my say, particularly when this particular medium either enhances or deadens our country's culture/ collective brain on such a large scale.

    • 3 years ago
  • AntGTO
    • 0
      AntGTO  
    • AntGTO:

      Heh. I'm sorry, I think you've mistaken me for someone that likes shitty Hollywood movies. I'm not. I do on the other hand entirely agree with you on all your points. Every time some obviously shit big budget film or unnecessary remake (the bane of my existence) came out, I'd rant to my friends about how pointless it is and how great the seemingly mindless masses will love them. I just don't have the energy anymore.

      The masses don't care about watching a good film. It's not coincidence that this shit keeps coming out. People want to see this crap! And Hollywood's gonna feed it to them until they're bloated. I personally try (in vain) to steer my friends and family away from this type of schlock (unless it's 70' or 80's exploitation schlock of course), but they would simply rather watch this kind of stuff.

      It's nice know other people still have passion, I just don't have it in me anymore. I hope I didn't come off as a dick. My personality doesn't translate well in typed form. I know of Let The Right One In also, I just haven't gotten around to seeing it yet. And for the record, I didn't think you were bragging. I understand. I too am a bit of an artist and have done music as well.

    • 3 years ago
  • loustriker
    • 0
      loustriker  
    • Yeah guys, you're both right on.

      Maybe the box office take wouldn't be so anemic this year if "Hollywood" actually released a couple of good movies.

      And for that matter, Duplicity? Really? Who actually goes to a film to see Julia Roberts act sexy anymore?

    • 3 years ago
  • pashabear
    • 0
      pashabear  
    • I saw "Knowing" on the weekend with my grandson and was again astounded at the derivative pap being foisted on uneducated children these days. Starting with the hoary old standby "man/child loses wife/mother," the audience is once again asked to put all their confidence in the wacky world of numbers. This time around, a clairvoyant kid from fifty years ago has determined exact locations and dates of future disasters. Too bad she didn't have a racing form fifty years hence! Because all bets are off when this turgid thriller starts racing towards its absurdly realized biblical ending. With aliens looking like they just got off a rock video set, an untalented lead child actor and black pebble calling cards, it's no wonder Cage was drinking throughout the picture. Hope the scotch was real, Nick, to dull the pain of being in another "I'm only doin' it for the money" movie. The most disturbing aspect of this film was the spectacular realization of accidents,( plane crash, car crash,etc.) that directors throw at unsuspecting children watching, as if to wake them up once in awhile from the lugubrious quality of the acting. It's a shame that kids are now so used to seeing burning people, twisted metal and all sorts of mayhem that the most they can say is "Cool" when they see tragedies on-screen. And a small coke and popcorn cost $10.50! I'll stay at home, thank you very much!!

    • 3 years ago
  • Humdrum
    • 0
      Humdrum  
    • Oh, God. Someone just firebomb Hollywood already. I'm sick of them lowering the intellectual expectations of the mob with this bang-two-trashcans-together bullshit. It's watering down our culture, and our culture can't afford to be watered down any more than it already is.

      Seriously though - who the fuck actually goes to see Nicholas Cage movies anymore? Hasn't anyone noticed the stench? No number of burning gasoline cans or barely modified main characters can cover that up.

    • 3 years ago
more from Movies:

top videos