Movies | July 15, 2009 | 22 comments

'Harry Potter' earns $22 million from midnight screenings breaking the record set by 'Dark Knight'

Image
AwesomeJosh
Harry Potter has conjured up a record-breaking witching hour.

The latest adventure of the teen wizard, “Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,” took in $22.2 million domestically from midnight screenings, distributor Warner Bros. said Wednesday. That breaks the record set by another Warner blockbuster, “The Dark Knight,” which grossed $18.5 million from midnight shows last summer.

The sixth installment in the “Harry Potter” franchise also topped this year’s biggest hit, “Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen,” which pulled in $16 million from midnight screenings on its first day in June.

“Half-Blood Prince” raked in $10 million more from midnight screenings than part five, “Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix,” in summer 2007.

There was pent-up demand for “Harry Potter” after that last movie. The two-year lag since “Order of the Phoenix” was the longest fans have had to wait for a new “Harry Potter” flick since the first movie arrived in 2001.

Warner originally planned to release “Half-Blood Prince” last November but bumped it to 2009 to take advantage of an open weekend in Hollywood’s busy summer schedule.

“We’re sorry that it caused some angst with our fans, but they’re troopers, and they came out and supported the movie,” said Dan Fellman, head of domestic distribution for Warner.

The new movie has Harry (Daniel Radcliffe) trying to pry loose a hidden memory from one of his teachers, who holds key information about the wizard world’s darkest enemy, Lord Voldemort.

Earning some of the best reviews in the franchise’s history, the new “Harry Potter” tale played to packed crowds in 3,003 theaters for its midnight debut. Domestically, that theater count climbed to 4,275 later Wednesday, and 50 more cinemas will be added Friday.

With that kind of market saturation, “Half-Blood Prince” could set other new box-office highs — both for the “Harry Potter” franchise and Hollywood in general.

“It’s definitely within reach of some of the biggest records in box-office history,” said Paul Dergarabedian, box-office analyst for Hollywood.com

“Order of the Phoenix” also opened on a Wednesday and had the franchise’s best five-day debut at $139.7 million. “Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire” had the top three-day weekend opening of $102.7 million.

“The Dark Knight” is the record-holder for best opening day ($67.2 million), best weekend ($158.4 million) and best five-day debut ($203.8 million).

The seventh and final book in J.K. Rowling’s fantasy series, “Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows,” is being split into two parts for the big screen, with the first movie due out in November 2010 and the second in July 2011.

David Yates, who directed both “Half-Blood Prince” and “Order of the Phoenix,” also is making the final two films.

“We just wish there were another four books,” Fellman said...
  1. groups:
    Community,   Entertainment,   Movies,   Current Tonight,   5 more
  2. tags:
    News Entertainment Movies Entertainment News 2 more
  3.     
    |

22 comments // 'Harry Potter' earns $22 million from midnight screenings breaking the record set by 'Dark Knight'

  • Ares
    • 0
      Ares  
    • I saw this yesterday afternoon with some mates. It was pretty good, but I was totally surprised by all the sex, drugs, and beer in it.

    • 2 years ago
  • curtisreed
    • 0
      curtisreed  
    • all I can say is that I read all 7 of the novels to my kids (7 and 9 y.o.) over the course of TWO years.

      They LOVED them...so did I.

      I'm a literature major, and while I won't rank it up there with some of the best works of all time, I do think that the series compares favorably to the JRR Tolkien books. There are shaky moments in the Potter books, but otherwise, it actually has a superior plot, in my opinion.

      The movies have been very good. It's almost impossible to capture everything in the movies that the books contain, but what's great is that BOTH have their own value, so you can read the book before or after having seen the movie and feel like either was a new and fresh experience.

      I can't wait to take the kids to see this movie. I hope it's long: I'm totally willing to sit through a longer movie to get more of the story told.

      Love live JK Rowling!

      (by the way, has anyone read the "Bartameus Trilogy"? Talk about a GREAT piece of literature that could make a superb series of movies. If you liked Harry Potter, read that trilogy. It's actually written much better than Potter, and has a great concept and wonderful sense of humor)

    • 2 years ago
  • jeckersly316
  • calm_incense
    • 0
      calm_incense  
    • curtisreed:

      @ jeckersly316:

      As a creative writing major, you'd think you'd be a little better at reading. curtisreed never claimed JRR Tolkien or JK Rowling to be "among the best".

      curtisreed said they're good, and that's it.

    • 2 years ago
  • jeckersly316
    • 0
      jeckersly316  
    • curtisreed:

      Curtisreed stated, "and while I won't. . .," in which I read hesitation, so I ASSURED curtisreed, that they weren't. With the word ASSURED, I agreed with curtisreed, but more fervently.

      Before you try to jump on me, calm, you may want to have a go at some semantics training. Get to it.

    • 2 years ago
  • Sam_the_Wizer
    • 0
      Sam_the_Wizer  
    • Do they do anything to account for population growth and inflation of currency? They should determine the number of tickets sold compared to the total world population before making these judgements.

    • 2 years ago
  • bailey78
  • MissAmanda
    • 0
      MissAmanda  
    • the movie was cute. it was craaaazy the amount of people there. i went at 745 last night, and there were sooo many different age groups, it was kinda cool to see.

      but there werea bout 50 to 60 people just standing in the theatre looking confused b/c they sold too many tickets (apparently)...luckily we got there an hour early...long night...

    • 2 years ago
  • AdrianBikes
  • corylol
  • jeckersly316
  • curtisreed
    • 0
      curtisreed  
    • jeckersly316:

      i GET THE FEELING that they figured out that they can't go wrong, so they are slowing down and letting the movies get a little longer to preserve much of the plot and details.

      just like the books, they didn't know at first that peoples' attention span (especially the kids') would be long enuf to stick with such long books, and they paired down the flicks too much for the same reason. Now they are letting them grow longer and I think that's a good idea.

      to think movies used to be under 1 1/2 hours, but then the Lord of the Rings blew out that limit to 3 hours, and people still loved them.

      this should be a fun ride. can't wait to take the kids

    • 2 years ago
  • jeckersly316
  • calm_incense
  • idealist
  • Curiousdave
  • lilysol
    • 0
      lilysol  
    • "Protego totalum!"- (defensive spell against spitwads and attacks from Malfoy). I was there at midnight...gulp, and at midnight releases of a couple of the books. I swear I was popular in high school if that helps my case.

    • 2 years ago
  • seanalyn
  • bailey78
  • lilysol
  • seanalyn
more from Movies:

top videos