Movies | September 23, 2009 | 11 comments

David Goyer to write Ghost Rider sequel?

source: http://weblogs.variety.com/bfdealmemo/2009/09/ghost-rider-latest-marvel-movie-to-rev.html

Image
smurph25
David Goyer is in early talks to create the story and supervised the staff for the sequel to "Ghost Rider".

Columbia Pictures is moving forward the project which is based on the Marvel comic character. David Goyer previously scripted the Blade trilogy.
  1. groups:
    Entertainment,   Movies,   Upstream,   Film,   4 more
  2. tags:
    Movie News,  movies_featured,  ghost rider,  David Goyer,  1 more
  3.     
    |

11 comments // David Goyer to write Ghost Rider sequel?

  • PajamaDan
  • PajamaDan
    • 0
      PajamaDan  

    • Great! Not only did Ghost Rider rub,... Goyer's projects are not favorites. Jumper? The Crow 2? The Unborn? Nick Fury? Puppet Masters? The Invisible? Kickboxer 2? The Blade films? AND,... he helped destroy Batman, with those last two unmentionable flicks. But,... I'll give him credit for Dark City. I actually like that one.

      And Marvel is outta control. They pump out films (often 3rd rate characters), do the sequel dance, surrender to The Mouse and they're already remaking their movies?! Somebody stop Marvel, please.

      P.S. Doesn't Nic Cage look like the Invisible Man, when he'd put on makeup to look normal???

    • 2 years ago
  • TheDecemberists
  • remanns
  • TheDecemberists
  • remanns
  • Miriam_Wallace
  • remanns
    • 0
      remanns  

    • Well,....I liked "Blade,1,.2,.3.",... perhaps there is hope for mr anorexic flame cycle from hell. Should have been done in "western version" though...better suited for it. Flaming hooves are better than burning rubber.

    • 2 years ago
  • Inofuilwell
    • 0
      Inofuilwell  

    • Why does Current TV blast my Topic List with CR@P like this when I select news?

      Current. In the last 3 months you have become far too "commercial" with ads all over your pages and hundreds of FLUFF topics wrongfully categorized as "NEWS".

      I'm outta here if it doesn't change. THEN if I click on some cr@p like this to complain, I'm inundated with movie and TV fluff as suggested stories to follow. Get a program director who doesn't come from the 18-24 demographic PUHLEEZE!

    • 2 years ago
  • borborigma
    • 0
      borborigma  

    • Did anyone watch this movie? Why would there be a sequel? Does Hollywood have extra money laying around to put out more crap like this. This movie, reportedly, cost $120,000,000 to make. It looks cheap. Very cheap. I've seen better special effects in cartoons. The movie grossed $116,000,000 in the USA. That is a $4,000,000 loss. Does that make sense business-wise. Maybe I don't get the quality of drugs that Hollywood does.

    • 2 years ago
  • vistapoint
more from Movies:
from the community

top videos