Movies | October 21, 2009 | 45 comments

Francis Coppola says Cinema is Collapsing? So What Are You Gonna Do About It?

Image
thefilmtalk
Don’t know about you but I was excited to hear that Francis Ford Coppola thinks cinema is collapsing:

“The cinema as we know it is falling apart,” says Francis Ford Coppola.

“It’s a period of incredible change,” says the director of “The Godfather” and “Apocalypse Now.” “We used to think of six, seven big film companies. Every one of them is under great stress now. Probably two or three will go out of business and the others will just make certain kind of films like ‘Harry Potter’ — basically trying to make ‘Star Wars’ over and over again, because it’s a business.”

Coppola, 70, sporting a dark suit, is being interviewed in the Lebanese capital Beirut, where his latest movie “Tetro” opened the Beirut Film Festival after premiering at the Cannes Film Festival this year.

“Cinema is losing the public’s interest,” says Coppola, “because there is so much it has to compete with to get people’s time.”

The profusion of leisure activities; the availability of movies on copied DVD and on the Internet; and news becoming entertainment are reshaping the industry, he says. Companies have combined businesses as customers turn to cheap downloads rather than visit shops or movie theaters.

“I think the cinema is going to live off into something more related to a live performance in which the filmmaker is there, like the conductor of an opera used to be,” Coppola says. “Cinema can be interactive, every night it can be a little different.”

Course we should pay attention when Coppola speaks on the future of cinema.

His prediction of ‘electronic cinema’ was absurdly prescient and his early-80’s insight while shooting ‘One From the Heart’ of what would happen when box office totals started appearing in newspapers, i.e. “this would turn the movies into sports” was so spot on that it chills me now to think of it, (how else to explain the championing of crap, of films like G.I. Joe and Transformers unless you look at them through the lens of sports – to fanboys these films are their teams, so of course they have to be defended and praised in the face of what I guess we used to call ‘good taste’).

(for more thoughts on this click on the link above)
  1. groups:
    Entertainment,   Culture,   Movies,   Celebrity,   5 more
  2. tags:
    Film Cinema indie movies blockbusters 2 more
  3.     
    |

45 comments // Francis Coppola says Cinema is Collapsing? So What Are You Gonna Do About It?

  • TDubs
    • 0
      TDubs  
    • ICinema is a smoldering pile of a mass that once began as a well lit tower in the night. It's not compelling. The same story gets dressed up again and again and we're supposed to pay a hefty sum to see it. Down size the CG teams, hire writers, add cinematography...back, and write a friggin good script that is not the same thing studio 'x' just released. Give the movie going public some credit!

    • 2 years ago
  • ljhello
    • 0
      ljhello  
    • It is a matter of demand. We do not teach art in school. So we have very few art appreciators out there. When the PC first came out everyone thought they were tyesetters and designers. Now we have amazing video and sound equpipment and people think they are filmmakers. It's all very hard.

    • 2 years ago
  • jubal
    • 0
      jubal  
    • Cinema is failing because they don't have any good stories to tell anymore. Everything has become formulaic and contrived.

      Now I have enough new material to save cinema, stories from the minds of incredible story tellers. The problem is that with the system the way it is, even a good story gets watered down until it is unrecognizable.

      Its all about profits and very little about the art anymore. Very sad.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • DUH!

      They did this to themselves.

      REFUSING to change just like the music business. THINKING they could just go on being crappy and people will be ok with it.

      Have you seen the winter films? What's going to be awesome? Name some.....

      tough to do when some is really just two --- maybe. There hasn't been a lot of promotion for many films coming out during winter when this is OCTOBER....and normally we start seeing such films being advertised.

      I go to the theater every weekend to see movies and I do it because I like it and I write silly reviews...it's more of a job that I don't get paid for than it is fun sometimes.

      They have to change how they do things. Asking for more money for cruddy films like Transformers II or Fast & Furious is just not cool.....

      and yes they made lots of money---but they are witless crap that only makes Hollywood make more crap.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • 24French
    • 0
      24French  
    • I think he meant "icebergs" are collapsing. "Icebergs" as we know them are falling apart.

      Cinema is here to stay. We're absolutely enthralled by the moving image. It's just that the renegades have been replaced by suits, innovation by business as usual and field polls, and diverse viewpoints by univision. It's all gone slick. But still, the persistent and crazy still sometimes break through.

    • 2 years ago
  • hpseaton
    • 0
      hpseaton  
    • 24French:

      You are right 24, the persistent and crazy do break through...'Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind', 'I (heart) Huckabees', 'The Royal Tannebaums', etc. The movies are there you just have to ignore current public opinion most of the time and find what makes film relevant to YOU. Too many Americans seem to care more about what everyone else is seeing then what they actually want to see.

    • 2 years ago
  • Kamilo
    • 0
      Kamilo  
    • First Ebert now Coppola. Happens all the time when you get old, its called being crotchety. Basically these men are the cinematic equivalent of Archie Bunker, sitting on their armchairs, complaining about how these kids today are ruining the world they created. Whine whine bitch bitch moan moan.
      May I remind you that crappy cinema is nothing new. Case in point: the entire science fiction genre pre-1970. Good movies are still being made and always will be just like the bad ones. Let the plebs have their prole-feed (Transformers), and the literati have their art.
      Let's just think about what has come out in the last decade when cinema has been supposedly dying: Mulholland Drive, Brokeback Mountain, Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon, Amelie, There Will Be Blood, Spirited Away, Mystic River, Memento, Babel, The Pianist. Yeah, cinema must totally be on its deathbed.

    • 2 years ago
  • Mariana_GS
    • 0
      Mariana_GS  
    • Kamilo:

      "...sitting on their armchairs, complaining about how these kids today are ruining the world they created. Whine whine bitch bitch moan moan. "

      hehe good analogie, very true!

      Is that list at the bottom what you consider to be good films? I’m not gonna comment on those because that’s highly subjective and we could go on and on…
      I do get your point, though. There have been good films recently even among the shit, as always. He’s just whining ‘cause he realizad his last good film was forever ago…

    • 2 years ago
  • hpseaton
    • 0
      hpseaton  
    • Kamilo:

      Good point Kamilo and we see this same syndrome in other arts as well. Seems at a certain age people decide to blast away at everything that came after them. I'm planning on going the opposite direction!

    • 2 years ago
  • yimyamyo
  • KSirys
    • 0
      KSirys  
    • Hollywood's collapsing because there isn't anything good to watch. Everything that's on is about the white folk saving someone or something.

      When Cinema decides to start thinking outside the "white only" movies box, that's when they will see profits go up.

      IF you don't think so, think of Will Smith and the amount of money he makes when movies come out. Why? because he's not white! and he's a good actor.

      Think of the last 10 movies out today and ask yourself, why is the main character in every movie a Caucasian actor saving someone or something...

      Let me name them for you... and please check a website with the top 10 movies out right now, before you reply to my post and say no, it's not.

      Couples Retreat,
      Zombieland,
      Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs,
      Paranormal Activity,
      Toy Story,
      Surrogates,
      The Invention of Lying,
      Whip It,
      Fame and
      The Informant.

      So, what would you call this? where 95% of the leading roles are played out by white folks and are not in tune with the outside world?
      Lack of creativity? Yes!
      Racism? nah!
      Lack of roles for other races? Yes!

      Not everything has to be about a white folk saving someone or saving something. Add some spice to it and the change will happen!

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • KSirys
  • J_Jammer
  • KSirys
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • KSirys:

      Then there's the boss of Bruce Willis in Surrogates. He has a big part of that film. He's not Bruce Willis or his wife, but he's about fourth billing.

      That makes two.

      Then there is Eve in Whip It.

      That's three.

      I can keep going.

      Fame has more minorities than the other films....but they are not well known. And they do make up the majority of the film.

      I've seen every single film except that Paranormal crap. I would know where the minorities are.

    • 2 years ago
  • KSirys
    • 0
      KSirys  
    • KSirys:

      Make sense in what you're talking about before you post next time JJ, now you're getting on my nerves with your BS comments. My original comment was about leading roles, you know what a leading role is, right? Cause if you do, everyone you mentioned does not have a leading role, they have a supporting role.

      Get your facts straight before you comment, because it's becoming more and more apparent that you're just clueless!

      By the way, the only one you got right is Fame...

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • KSirys:

      I read what you posted.
      I was just helping you out. No need for you to look greedy...wanting all the main parts just for greed reason, not because one got it on talent. Sounds like you want the now failed affirmative action to show up in movies.

      How many white people are on telmondo? Japanese? Black? Jewish?
      What about bet? How many white people? Japanese? Indian?

      This idea that it is only fair is a farce. They want to crack the Hollywood market not for fairness but to make the big bucks. It has nothing to do with fairness.

      I don't watch Heroes because they have Japanese characters. I watch it because I enjoy the show as a whole. I will never feel connected to someone because they are the same race as me. And every time I hear someone say that they need that validation in life I almost have to giggle at the thought.

      If you have to be prejudice and only like characters that share your racial profile....that's pretty sad.

      I have never done that and I will never do that.

      My favorite character in the X-Men is Cyclops and he (if I must mention) is white. I am half Irish and he isn't even close to being that either. So only in racial terms would we be similar but not ethnically.

      There are Japanese X-Men but I don't like them that much and it has nothing to do with race and everything to do with personality and morals.

      My other favorite X-Character is Multiple Man and he's also white.

      I write tons of stories and how do I handle race? I don't. I never mention the race of my characters because it's not important...EVER to the story. But recently I decided I would do that just to give the characters more of a real life feel because it'll be necessary for many reasons outside of the over used and never good (now) Affirmative Action.

    • 2 years ago
  • hpseaton
    • 0
      hpseaton  
    • KSirys:

      'How many white people are on telmondo? Japanese? Black? Jewish?

      What about bet? How many white people? Japanese? Indian?'

      Hmmm...I suppose those outlets exist is because they weren't seeing themselves anywhere else. Down the road when whites get fewer and fewer roles I'm sure they'll be complaining that 'it's not fair!'.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • KSirys:

      And when they do I'll say something to that too.

      Except that if white people created a station for just whites---well...that wouldn't go to well with people who jump on the racist bandwagon---cause they'd scream KKK.

      It's not the same no matter how people pretend equality should exist. ha.

      that's like saying women want equality. Don't see them fighting for women to get higher prison terms like men do for certain crimes like sleeping with a student. Nope. They let women get off easily (double meaning) because that's ok not to be equal there.

      This idea that people want equality makes me laugh because they don't fight for it in everything, just the positives. They want more. Greed is what they have more of....not reasonableness.

    • 2 years ago
  • KSirys
    • 0
      KSirys  
    • KSirys:

      I don't care for Affirmative action in Movies, what I care for is CREATIVITY in movies and MORE roles for people of DIFFERENT RACE.

      How many more times is Hollywood going to do a remake of something great and classic that came from the Asian Market (Dragon Ball Z, Speed Racer, Street Fighter and many more) and put the Leading actors as white folks saving the world?

      The topic of this forum is about Cinema collapsing, why in my view? because not everyone wants to see white folks saving something and everything... Put some flavor and spice in there and I promise you it will do great. Keep it the way it is and it will fail eventually.

      Also, I watch smallville, Californication and Dexter, and guess what? the leading actors are white and I don't relate to them in any way shape or form (except for the guy in Californication).... but I do watch the shows because they are good and have something different.

      Remember JJ, not everything has to be about equal rights, it has to do about change and right now, it's about time the white folks in Hollywood see that and put some different faces for us to see.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • KSirys:

      In those markets in Japan and India they use Japanese and Indian actors....how many white actors do they use? How much diversity and creativity do they have over there?

      According to what I hear Japan has great movies (and I've seen a few) but all they use are Japanese actors. How does that fit your criteria of it being more creative to do so? Or how about Bollywood? Singing and dancing but only if your Indian.

      What the hell does flavor and spice mean? It looks like it means any minority but white has flavor and spice....but that so not what you're trying to state...is it?

      That's how it reads, though.

      I relate to Clark and Chloe's relationship because it's similar between mine and my friends and I'm a mutt and she's Latino.

      I don't think the failure of the movie industry rests on color. It rests on writers and producers giving us better stuff.

      Ever seen a Tyler Perry movie? 95% of all people who see those movies are black. That's the kind of people his films attract but that's not what kind of ship he runs on his set. He has all kinds of people working for him and all kinds of people in the film that are not black.

      But mainly only black people see his films.

      I love most of them and laugh because Madea is so funny. I am not black...but I still find it funny and I still can relate.

      And that is a perfect example of a mixed races being in a film but not attracting that kind of audience. Based on reputation only a certain race goes to it.

      I find that sad and at the same time understandable.

      I watch Japanese films and I enjoy them, but they all look the same. Few actually look different enough and this has more to do with the same hair cuts than it does with features.

      I'm not against more races in films. I'm against thinking that's why it's a failing industry.

      I really dislike when people feel scorn so they say, "I'm going tell my people to protest you." and turn it into a race thing...like the Hispanic community did during the election.

      What the hell is that suppose to accomplish? Oh... segregation only when it means they have power.

      Don't ask for togetherness when what is promoted is the exact opposite.

    • 2 years ago
  • KSirys
    • 0
      KSirys  
    • KSirys:

      AGAIN JJ, you're all over the place and not focusing on the topic here. We are not in Japan, China or India. Who is talking about those countries?

      Stop trying to comment just for the sake of it, make some sense in what you write. Half the time I ignore it because it doesn't relate to what I care for, but you're beginning to tickle my funny bone with the stuff that you comment on.

      We are talking about Cinema in the US... not China or any other country. We are talking about here! and i'm talking about a FACT that's promoted every day on TV and on the Theaters. Where 95% of the Leading Actors are white and are always saving something. I don't care for Telemundo, Japan net or BET...

      What I care for is a CHANGE in what's out there, so that cinema can stay alive. I go to see movies once or twice a week, just to get out and enjoy what's there. But half the time the theaters are empty, why? because it's the same ol' BULLSHIT! A white folk saving someone or a white folk saving the world or how about transformers? where a white kid is saving the UNIVERSE from destruction.... It's always the same...

      And when I mean add some flavor and spice to the movies, I mean add some Latino and Black LEADING ACTORS to the movie... Let the Black or Latino save the day for once and you'll see ticket prices go up.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • KSirys:

      I know what you mean. White = boring.

      Lame.

      You know what else is lame? You ignoring great points because you can't counter them. This "focus" bs you made up is only stated because you got slammed.

      You're stating that different races make for better creativity. Japan and India totally spit in the face of that logic.

      More races does not = more creativity and it sure the hell does not = more spice.

      I saw Under the Same Moon and unless spice is suppose to lull me to sleep....that had none.

      It felt like propaganda for the border soul.

      I watch movies and tv for the story not for who has what color skin. What you have not given me is a reason to think that race equates to better stories and creativity. What you have showed me is that people who are black and Latino only want to see black and Latino people.

    • 2 years ago
  • KSirys
    • 0
      KSirys  
    • KSirys:

      JJ, you get slammed every day because of the pointless comments you make. You comment just for the sake of commenting, even though half the time NO ONE can or has agreed with you.

      Don't you get the issue of the topic? The FACT that Cinema is dying for a reason? So i brought up a reason on why I, again, I thought it would change.

      Does White = Boring? Some time, but all the time? nah..

      Does JJ = clueless and fact less comments? YES!
      all the time? nah, 80%? YES!

      Why? cause you comment for the sake of commenting.

      So, you want to know why more race equals better film? Lets see, no more Matt Damon in every other movie, no more Kevin Bacon in every other movie, no more George Clooney in every other movie. Get the picture?

      Also, I don't care for India or Asia only wanting their race in movies because they are not known as the Land of the FREE and the place for the American DREAM. We are here JJ, not down there, stop trying to incorporate everything else just to make a point on something for the sake of winning an argument.

      Or should I bring up the comment you mentioned the other day? on how WE " The Latinos of South America" speak spanish because we derived from the Spaniards????? I thought of 30 words to call you when you wrote that, i didn't, but I corrected your clueless comment and left it alone.

      So, to end this little back and forth, do i, again, do I want to see more Latinos and Black in movies, yes! why? because it will add more to Cinema.

      Does it have to relate to me? no, does it have to relate to my family or ancestors? no, but I would like to see someone other than Nicolas Cage or Bruce Willis in a movie saving the world from something. Why? not because they relate to me, but because it's getting BORING!!!!!!

      Get your facts straight before you post next time.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • KSirys:

      You're fake.

      Why? Because you don't stick to the topic. You have to make it personal. Not only personal but so personal that you're suggesting that you are right and anyone disagreeing with you is wrong.

      FAKE because you pretend to be about equality and all this other BS and you can't even reasonably disagree with someone without dredging up all kinds of things.

      First people tell me I don't know everything.

      Then when they find out I don't know everything they go HAHA you don't know everything.

      I never claimed, like you do, to know everything. Yes I don't know about Mexico. Do you know everything about Cinema? Apparently not since you made a very stupid comment about who is in every other film.

    • 2 years ago
  • KSirys
    • 0
      KSirys  
    • KSirys:

      I'm fake? ok... do I know it all? no, do I claim to know it all? no. Do I know Cinema the way you claim to know it? no, Am I about equality, yes!

      So lets stick to do this from now on, no more connecting. I'm moving on and I'm not going to call you names because I do have some respect for you JJ. But going forward, every single time you post some unfounded, clueless, lame, nonfactual comment, I'm going to call you on it and keep a score on it just for future reference. Why? just to show you that commenting for the sake of commenting, is just boring and other words I can think of, but i'll leave that one alone.

      Thanks for the comments JJ!

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • J_Jammer
  • franksalot
  • RFIDemocracy
    • 0
      RFIDemocracy  
    • franksalot:

      That is the intent of Current. Debate is good. Sucking up a bunch of information without any discussion represents the nature of the old media.
      As for the wisdom portion of your comment, while valid, one can't legislate wisdom.
      It's the individual's responsibility to glean wisdom from the massive input of information available.
      It is also the responsibility of the parent(s) and teachers in our society, which, BTW, is a sound argument for not privatizing education because, once we do things will begin to seriously deteriorate.
      Once corporations take over education, they will not care whom they hire but how much they cost.

    • 2 years ago
  • hpseaton
    • 0
      hpseaton  
    • franksalot:

      The debating and discussing articles is what I find relevant on current. People post articles that they find interesting or upsetting and hope that others will as well. And current tells you to make the articles your own when you post them, not just copy and paste the entire thing. Idea is to make them required reading or viewing.

    • 2 years ago
  • Mariana_GS
    • 0
      Mariana_GS  
    • Cinema isn't collapsing; Hollywood is collapsing. And how could it not be? They've been doing nothing but remakes, adaptations and shitty irrelevant films for decades.

      Independent cinema is still thriving outside (and occasionally inside) the comercial market, mostly thanks to the fact that they don't participate in volture culture.

      By the way, none of Coppola's last films have lived up to his earlier stuff, so he's has some balls talking about collapse at this point.

    • 2 years ago
  • masterzip
    • 0
      masterzip  
    • Mariana_GS:

      remakes are not a sign of the times,..(7) basic plot shave been repeated throughout history of literature.

      1 - [wo]man vs. nature

      2 - [wo]man vs. man

      3 - [wo]man vs. the environment

      4 - [wo]man vs. machines/technology

      5 - [wo]man vs. the supernatural

      6 - [wo]man vs. self

      7 - [wo]man vs. god/religion

    • 2 years ago
  • Mariana_GS
    • 0
      Mariana_GS  
    • Mariana_GS:

      The repetitive use of certain universal subjects is not a remake. A remake is just that, literally: when somebody decides to redo an entire film, not just the basic plot, but the ENTIRE film. Take Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory, for example. It was a perfectly good adaptation when it was first made back in the 70’s, and then on a sudden (moronic) whim, Burton decided to make his own (much) crappier version. That’s what a remake is.

      Now, remaking films has been around forever, and it isn’t always bad. However, nowadays (read: for decades) it seems to be the only thing Hollywood is making! Besides adaptations of (lame) best-sellers and untrascendental crap. It has been like that for a while, actually… that’s why I find it ridiculous that Coppola is just catching on NOW. Especially with his record…

    • 2 years ago
  • lordsbassman
  • FishaHouse777
    • 0
      FishaHouse777  
    • Cinema is not only collapsing because of the internet age and mail-in movies. It's also collapsing because directors and producers are not making as many original movies and grade A plots. They are making more and more remakes of books or other movies.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • FishaHouse777:

      Ooh...don't get me started on people that steal movies. ha..I think it's worse than stealing music. Music is justifiable for many reason since the musician most likely doesn't see much profit from album sells...even with Itunes.

      Movies are a totally different thing, though. Many people profit from the sell of a movie.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • FishaHouse777:

      I would let you borrow it when I buy it. ha.ha.

      I can't stop people from doing what they want to do. I can just share my opinion...that's all.

      But it is a good movie. I believe you'll like it, because it's not a love story -- as the tagline states.

    • 2 years ago
  • masterzip
    • 0
      masterzip  
    • Cinema collapse is due to $6 drinks $7 hotdogs $3 candy and $5 popcorn. Not to mention cost of tix $10
      (no bargains here)
      lower the price and get more people buying to increase dollar to volume ratio.
      it can be done.

    • 2 years ago
  • FishaHouse777
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • masterzip:

      That's not how it works.

      The studios take a high % of profits from ticket sales (if I am not mistaken) and the movie theater gets the rest. They don't get more of the percentage until 3 weeks later. That is why they LOVE films like Star Trek that just keep on giving so that they can get more money.

      That is why there is those prices at the concession stand.

      Want them lowered the studios have to give up some of that first week percentage to allow theaters to make money.

    • 2 years ago
more from Movies:

top videos