Music | March 06, 2009 | 44 comments

Ipods are killing people's love of quality music

Image
mattbrawn
It seems that the younger generations are not only listening to their music too loud on their iPods and Mp3 players, but that they're beginning to 'no longer appreciate high fidelity' sounds.

The Professor of Music at Stanford Uni, California, Jonathan Berger has researched his students for the last eight years, looking at the music they listen to across a variety of formats and he discovered that "MP3s were not thought of as low quality, but over time there was a rise in preference for MP3s.”

He believes that living in this technology focused world has changed the way people are perceiving music, with the more familiar youngsters become to digital music, 'the more they grow to like it."

Berger likened the change in listening practices to how some people much prefer the sound of vinyl (me included!) and that how the infamous crackly sound that vinyl generates "a sense of warmth and comfort in that.”

Do you really prefer the sound of your MP3 over some vinyl?
  1. groups:
    Entertainment,   Music,   Earth and Science
  2. tags:
    Entertainment Music Earth and Science MP3 3 more
  3.     
    |

44 comments // Ipods are killing people's love of quality music

  • blaino
  • Ya_Yletayo
    • 0
      Ya_Yletayo  
    • well I could buy a hi-fi amp and hi-fi speakers (otherwise the increased quality is moot) but that is so expensive. and it depends on what you get out of music. if it's a message you can still receive theres no problem, if it's soundplay purely then of course hi-fi is preferred but the difference (mp3 vs. vinyl through the same set up) is so minute it doesnt bother me (as a DJ and long time audiophile) also although I agree that squared bytes can only go so far and never recreate real sound, there has to be a point where they come so close the human ears interpretation fills in the gaps exactly the same, and therefore I prefer .wav.
      My final point would be that any of these formats (vinyl included) will go through speakers and the electrical and mechanical impulses and movements will distort the sound so if were going to be this rediculous about it you may as well never listen to anything except live sets played on acoustic instruments.

    • 3 years ago
  • afishlikeme
  • the_night_diver
    • 0
      the_night_diver  
    • i just interviewed a guy who was in the music industry for several years and now teaches music industry studies.

      he said something really funny about this.

      basically he said that for the first time in history, we have accepted a technology that is a step backwards in sound quality. no doubt it is because of the convenience and affordability of digital music, but he said he thinks our kids will look back at us and say, "what the hell were you thinking?"

    • 3 years ago
  • asherp
    • 0
      asherp  
    • Though this may be disqualified with the statement that I am both an audiophile and a musician...

      F**K MP3s. They sound like crap. The high end register is full of pixelated distortion, which is especially noticeable in any crash or ride cymbals or hi-hat sounds.

      Give me vinyl any day of the week.

      None of my friends can hear the difference, but they've all blasted their high range out with earbuds, which are terrible for your ears even at low volume.

      I can hear when most electronic devices are on and drawing AC power, and it drives me batty.

    • 3 years ago
  • alivein85
  • oshbla
    • 0
      oshbla  
    • i would just like to say that music is music, we have all shared a part in listining to something really great in life, and that some peticular songs may bring us back to a certain sentamental memory. vinl on another level is just to dinosuar. and im sure no one wants to go out there and spend money on a record player and another half on vinl albums. thats why the ipod was created you can fit many vinl albums on them, and dont have to worry about your records bending over prolonged heat exposure. . . "MUSIC IS LIFE, LIVE IT"

    • 3 years ago
  • unclecharlie
    • 0
      unclecharlie  
    • I do not own a television, no ipod, no nano, still have my cassettes, a few CD's, Pogues mostly. I will say, what happens if these Ipod loving folk run the rest of us out of Dodge? What happens then? Will we all be forced to buy computers to enjoy our music?

    • 3 years ago
  • alivein85
    • 0
      alivein85  
    • unclecharlie:

      i was actually waiting for the price of the iPods to go down to get one. only recently did i realize they discontinued the first generation and have a new updated version just as expensive as the original, if not more so. what a kick in the pants! i think ill stick to my CD player.

    • 3 years ago
  • nazbags
  • alivein85
    • 0
      alivein85  
    • @ jadedgem: so does that include you then?

      ///////////

      yes, lets kill every ignorant little bastard who cant appreciate the "good old days".

      actually there never really were any good old days, it was just the days of your youth and now you are old and things are different.

      i for one do not own an ipod, I still use a portable CD player, and i used to have a really kick ass stereo for at home, but alas, I lost my home.

      i think there is more of an issue with the quality of the music itself, not so much the format. also, who are these people who call themselves artists these days???

      fuckin cris brown, jay z, kayne west, miley, brittney, et cetera. i dont even know man. all i know the death of rock was the death of jim morrison LOL (j/k)

    • 3 years ago
  • akute
    • 0
      akute  
    • You think vinyl is better than CDs? (.wav)

      I like to buy albums, pull the little tab on the bottom of the jewel case and flip it open (preserving the sticker on the top), then rip the CD and put the original in a pile.

      Then I use the MP3 either on my computer, on my XBOX360, or in my car.

      One kid on Xbox Live said that he has never bought a CD, he just rips his friend's. I find that very peculiar...

    • 3 years ago
  • flyingkick
  • jadedgem
  • l1ttlebear
    • 0
      l1ttlebear  
    • But did early recording devices kill live music? Didn't vinyl cheapen the "sense of warmth and comfort"?

      Phfft, what pretentious bull.

    • 3 years ago
  • rozmayher
    • 0
      rozmayher  
    • well there are record players, now out on the market, that play vinyl and make it into an mp3 so you can put it on your ipod. so you can have both!

    • 3 years ago
  • gonzo138
    • 0
      gonzo138  
    • iPods are way too convenient to not use on the go. its the most practical way to listen to your favorite music anywhere you want..

      But that's not to say that the sound of vinyl isn't anything but audio gold. the richness, warmth and fullness of a good ol fashioned record, i believe, will never be surpassed.

    • 3 years ago
  • MycoJ
    • 0
      MycoJ  
    • @NakedBum
      You have to start with a lossless filetype, it's pointless to convert a lossy file into lossless. Rip it in .flac or dl it in .flac. You can always convert .flac into .mp3 but you won't want to convert .mp3 into .flac

    • 3 years ago
  • nakedbum
    • 0
      nakedbum  
    • MycoJ:

      oh, thanks. i noticed the other day that not only the type of file and the bit rate make a difference but i couldn't decide what i like the best for playing it on. like, my ipod, car stereo, and computer all sound different but i don't know which i like the best. i saw a thread on a forum about blue ray movies and i think they were saying lossless or maybe it was stopless, is that the same stuff? is that how all blue ray are recorded?

    • 3 years ago
  • MornRail
    • 0
      MornRail  
    • Real music lovers, real people who appreciate sound quality see it live!

      This has been like the billionth article over this subject matter and the only cultural shift I see is people not getting out and seeing shows live anymore. I don't seem to get it. Whether you're watching a local band at a cramped house party or seeing an large scale orchestra at the Maracanã in Rio, isn't that 10 times better than both vinyl or mp3.

      I like all three mediums but this debate has become tiring. Hence why I seemed to bother myself with it again.

    • 3 years ago
  • kaps145
    • 0
      kaps145  
    • MornRail:

      I'd argue that live music isn't necessarily about the sound quality. Some of the best shows I have been to have had the worst quality mixes to touch my ears. Basement shows and local hall shows can't usually afford good PA systems and the sound guys are usually amateurs or hobbyists. But the performance put on by the bands and the reaction of the crowd were phenomenal.

    • 3 years ago
  • SHAWN_RITTIMAN
  • kaps145
    • 0
      kaps145  
    • Good vinyl beats MP3s hand down on quality. As mentioned there are plenty of new digital formats that can replace them (MP3's that is).

      Also a lot of people don't understand WHY vinyl is awesome. No, it's not convenient, but that's the point. There's something about going into a record store; physically searching through hundreds of records; finding something of interest; buying it; taking it home and exploring the sleeve, inserts, and now a days the color of vinyl; placing the needle into that first groove, hearing those crackles and filling up with anticipation...

      Like the article says it's about a feeling of comfort. I'm not a big collector, but I have freinds who are and through them I've learned to love sitting down and just listening to an album or line up of 7"'s.

    • 3 years ago
  • miguelaso10
    • 0
      miguelaso10  
    • listen to all you people . i appreciate music PERIOD. i dont give a F*** on the format. music is music. you humans are so high maintenance . . .

    • 3 years ago
  • renbyrd
    • 0
      renbyrd  
    • OK then, genius. You try finding free vinyl from the convenience of your home computer in just seconds.

      You know what's even better than recorded music in any format? Live music. Yeah, try beating that, Vinyl. And if I get to see more live bands because I'm saving money with all these mp3s floating around AND more and more bands are touring to make up for the money lost from freeshare music, then please, don't lecture me on high fidelity crap.

    • 3 years ago
  • kaps145
    • 0
      kaps145  
    • renbyrd:

      I can't tell if you're being sarcastic... MP3's are a specific digital format. As pointed out you can find other digital formats that sound a shitload better. Obviously MP3 are more convenient, but vinyl wins, hands down, for quality.

    • 3 years ago
  • alivein85
  • nakedbum
    • 0
      nakedbum  
    • i've never listened to a vinyl record. :(
      how do you get songs in a better format,lossless, like you guys were saying? can you convert mp3 files to better quality? i don't understand this stuff, i have no idea how it works.

    • 3 years ago
  • malathion
    • 0
      malathion  
    • it really doesn't matter if you have pristine vinyl if you have shit speakers or cheap headphones , etc. . the "average listener" , given an "average stereo" would probably have a richer listening experience if they listened to a track on an ipod , through factory headphones , regardless of fidelity .

    • 3 years ago
  • CalgarC
  • Exotic_Blue
    • 0
      Exotic_Blue  
    • unfortunately , he his talking about the same generation that uses there mobile phone as a boom box. I'm a sound engineer and it annoys me that digital beat analogue. Tape is practically the same thing as vinyl.

      For a lossless format, .WAV or .AIFF is the way to go but for a good quality compressed audio file go for .ogg. The only time i use MP3 files is when I'm told to or sending a sample mix.

      MP3s win for it's cheapness, i don't mind paying £30 for a vinyl when it's worth it. I only buy second hand dated records like my original American release of Jimi Hendrix or second pressing of pink floyd.

    • 3 years ago
  • alivein85
  • ddhboy
    • 0
      ddhboy  
    • Yes because I don't feel like spending thousands of dollars on a vinyl music system, and then hunting down obscure releases.

    • 3 years ago
  • ClareW
    • 0
      ClareW  
    • I don't think anyone really prefers the sound of mp3s over vinyl, it's more of a convenience thing...but I guess it depends on both the person and the type of music.

    • 3 years ago
  • Mr_Costello
  • jonbrooks
  • abbym0308
    • 0
      abbym0308  
    • Mr_Costello:

      It will NEVER surpass the quality. Not to say that HD isn't really good. It's just not the same. There's something about the quality and texture of film that cannot be reproduced digitally. Full stop.

    • 3 years ago
  • ras_menelik
  • bleach4bleach
    • 0
      bleach4bleach  
    • Ok, give me a portable record player that fits into my pocket... no? I can't even bring mine to uni with me, as it doesn't have anywhere to go.
      Everyone would probably prefer records, but alot of people don't buy them anymore, and it is way more convenient to just put a cd on, or switch on your computer. No one can argue with that (apart from my dad, who cannot switch on the computer). Its pointless saying it though, its like comparing a real painting to the poster you have at home. Of course you would rather the proper one, but you just make do. Hey, its nearly as good.
      I don't think its competely untrue, but i don't think it really matters, people will do what they do anyway.

    • 3 years ago
  • vkrippen
    • 0
      vkrippen  
    • I think I prefer my MP3 because of the convenience. I listen to it everywhere and the music is right in my ear so it blocks out any background noise if your on the tube or doing household chores like vacuuming. I can just easily slip into a world of my own and also no one else can usually hear what I'm listening to so I don't get embaressed over my weird taste in music.

      Maybe if I was a DJ I'd think different because they have a different way of interpreting music.

    • 3 years ago
  • roguedeals
    • 0
      roguedeals  
    • Additionally, mp3s are 'squared' bytes of sound where vinyl produce a natural curve, thus a more true-to-life sound. There are many different formats that out do mp3s, flac is among one of my lossless favorites.

      Although, I don't have flac files for all my music (some music really doesn't need to be 'perfect' in order to be appreciated) but my modern jazz collection, like Dave Weckl, deserve to have their sound on flac.

      If you are looking for lossless, I'd say research your different file types, mp3 is definitely one of the worst. It was designed in an age where file size was key and USB thumb drives weren't even created. It was 4GB hard drives, Omega ZIP drives, and the ol' 2x2x4 burner.

    • 3 years ago
  • abbym0308
    • 0
      abbym0308  
    • No way. I use my ipod for convenience only. If I could, I'd carry around a stack of vinyl and massive quality speakers everywhere I go. No crappy digital music file will ever sound as good as a quality record.

    • 3 years ago
  • mattbrawn
  • artist_speaks_out
    • 0
      artist_speaks_out  
    • abbym0308:

      People make the argument for vinyl recording referring to the crackling, skipping, and popping as "warmth" when really it's just a lot of audio distortion. Digital recordings, at a high enough fidelity, have no such imperfections, and lose no quality when copied (assuming there's no data loss between copies). You wouldn't argue that magnetic tape is better than a DVD, would you? Now, that being said, there is a certain aesthetic to be appreciated in vinyl, but to argue its superiority over modern digital recordings just makes you sound like you have no idea what you're talking about.

      The fact is, the vinyl revival is just a new way for scene savvy show-goers to sound hip and retro; snobbish. Unless you grew up with a vinyl collection in the sixties, appreciate it for what it is, not for what it isn't; stop being a poser.

    • 3 years ago
more from Music:

top videos