WTF | January 13, 2009 | 5 comments

Fathers & families takes child support challenge to new court

source: http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=3198

Image
regjoeschmo
The new Massachusetts Child Support Guidelines went into effect January 1. They are causing substantial increases in child support in almost all cases. Many payors will see increases of “only” 20%, but some will see a tripling of their child support order, even when they are poor and the recipient is wealthy. In high income cases, the child support order for one child could exceed $50,000 per year.

We are bringing a lawsuit in state court to stop the new Guidelines. We need your financial gifts to sustain our legal expenses. When we went to federal court on January 5, there was an outpouring of gifts, and we need you to rise to the occasion again by clicking here.

How much money is legitimately needed to support a child? Far less than the Guidelines require, in many cases. If a recipient and payor earn the same amount, when all factors are taken into consideration, the recipient will enjoy a standard of living almost double that of the payor. This holds true throughout the broad range of middle class incomes.

For details, see The link
  1. groups:
    WTF
  2. tags:
    WTF,  Corruption,  Civil Rights,  Parental Rights,  4 more
  3.     
    |

5 comments // Fathers & families takes child support challenge to new court

  • Hoax_Productions
  • netstorm2k8
  • saludevil
    • 0
      saludevil  

    • This is obvious and blatant political greed so that the system can stick their hands in a bigger pot. There is NO CONCERN for children in this new policy.

      Do these people really feel safe walking the streets? They've just put big targets on their backs and declared themselves for open season.
      = )

    • 3 years ago
  • netstorm2k8
  • justadad
    • 0
      justadad  

    • Joyous enslavement of "little red hens?"

      Perhaps "hens" now merely wards of "State/Greedy."

      Pursuit of Happiness?

      Or to further the expungement of Loving Parents by entrusted Governors/esses.

      Of course, we already know that addicts rarely want less; and likewise care little for the victims of their crimes.

      Today, even "our" now all-knowing Gods(esses)-In-Training believe themselves divinely called upon to act in "best interest of . . . (self-interests).

      And you know what?

      Presumably the present successor to the former steward for the MA American citizens made some of their marks In 1994, as the Clinton nominated Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division. This entrusted member for benefit of the People, while within the Civil Rights Division, reportedly worked on issues of discriminatory profiling, police misconduct, fair lending enforcement, human trafficking, and prosecution of hate crime.

      Well what say we? Never a day,
      Of more greater pay,
      Than for hate,
      Discrimination,
      And invigoration,
      Of Ill-will.

      Now what further say you?
      Stay the pay?
      Not today,
      Rather, widen the lines of IV-D via the seductive allure for maiming loving parents.

      No more joyous toil in American Soil.

      We've new stewards on da block with more valued urgent needs to "beaf-up" budgets for the Mores.

      Dignity of humanity be DAMNED!

      So let us bring out the sleek,
      Unconstitutional deal bent bats.
      To further the bopping of loving pops,
      Via sublime works of clever "bureaucrats,

    • 3 years ago
more from WTF:
from the community

top videos