Duped again by the fraud...

Yo, Highr0ller!

chasingame has commented on something that you posted on Current.com:

chasingame said:

There is obviously more here than what we are being told. Whether the US was "giving" Israel the missile defense system and wanted to avoid complaints from other countries or it was bad/old information, he had to be a double agent or something. I do not think he would have gotten off this easily no matter what his age if the government was not complicit in his actions. On top of that he made $104000 in '07 through investments? Yeah sure. Whatever.

Check out the conversation or leave a reply here: http://current.com/items/90141420_us-man-who-spied-for-israel-goes-free.htm#9015...

Frantz, a former journalist for the Los Angeles Times, had extensive contacts with high-ranking Israeli military, intelligence and foreign ministry officials before joining the Senate Foreign Relations Committee staff. He and co-author Catherine Collins conducted interviews with those Israeli officials for "The Nuclear Jihadist", published in 2007. The interviews were all conducted under rules prohibiting disclosure of their identities, according to the book.

The unnamed Israeli intelligence officer’s statement that the "blueprints for a nuclear warhead" - meaning specifications for a missile reentry vehicle - were identical to "designs his agency had obtained from other sources in Iran" suggests that the documents collection which the IAEA has called "alleged studies" actually originated in Israel.

A U.S.-based nuclear.............

continued

The report included what appears to be a spectacular revelation from "a senior allied intelligence official" that a collection of intelligence documents supposedly obtained by U.S. intelligence in 2004 from an Iranian laptop computer includes "blueprints for a nuclear warhead".

It quotes the unnamed official as saying that the blueprints "precisely matched" similar blueprints the official's own agency "had obtained from other sources inside Iran".

No U.S. or IAEA official has ever claimed that the so-called laptop documents included designs for a "nuclear warhead". The detailed list in a May 26, 2008 IAEA report of the contents of what have been called the "alleged studies" – intelligence documents on alleged Iranian nuclear weapons work — made no mention of any such blueprints.