Green | May 13, 2008 | 1 comment

Don't be fooled by windmills in the McCain photo op

Image
JanforGore
Conservative presidential candidate Sen. John McCain chose a clever but ultimately hypocritical location for his big climate speech. I hope the media aren't fooled by his ironic choice of wind turbine company Vestas as the backdrop, but I have little doubt they will run enticing photos and videos of wind turbines. McCain, however, does not deserve to be linked to such images.

I would title the speech "Not the man for the job" (see "No climate for old men").

Let's be clear: Conservatives like John McCain, or more accurately, conservatives including John McCain, are the main reason McCain has to go to a Danish wind turbine manufacturer to give a climate speech. With the major government investments in wind in the 1970s, the United States was poised to be a dominant player in what was clearly going to be one of the biggest job-creating industries of the next hundred years. But conservatives repeatedly gutted the wind budget, then opposed efforts by progressives to increase it, and repeatedly blocked efforts to extend the wind power tax credit.

That's right. The United States is now a bit player in an industry we launched (we had 90 percent of global installed capacity in the mid-1980s) -- thanks to conservatives, including McCain.

In December, McCain himself failed to show up for a key vote that would have extended the wind power production tax credit, which has been a key driver of wind power in this country -- allowing it to compete with our better-subsidized power sources (like nuclear) in this country, and to partly offset the much bigger subsidies other countries have for renewables. The vote would have shifted money from subsidies to the oil industry, which hardly needs it given record oil prices and record oil profits (see "How high must oil go before we end subsidies?")

McCain's vote could have broken the conservative filibuster blocking the effort to support renewables, since the clean energy tax package failed 59-40, but his spokesperson said that "he would not have supported breaking the filibuster." This was but one recent example of a series of missed votes or anti-renewable votes McCain has cast in recent years.
  1. groups:
    News and Politics,   Politics,   Green,   Earth and Science,   1 more
  2. tags:
    News and Politics Politics Green Earth and Science 8 more
  3.     
    |

1 comment // Don't be fooled by windmills in the McCain photo op

  • JanforGore
    • 0
      JanforGore  
    • Let's wind die but votes for nuclear. Environmentalist? Hardly. Saying he is better than Bush is not saying much. To be better than Bush all you have to do is be able to say global warming. But I knew he would be the Republican candidate.They figured Democrats would be ahead on this issue...yes, touting clean coal, nuclear, and 80% reductions in ghgs by 2050 like he does. The one issue getting traction that Democrats could really lead on, and we still get similar plans so as to not get the special interests too angry at them. Where is the political courage? Al Gore stated that political will is a renewable resource...that may be true but to me it depends on the politicians.

    • 4 years ago
more from Green:

top videos