Green | June 23, 2008 | 47 comments

Electric cars vs. biofuels: The presidential energy debate heats up

Image
bshipp
Drawing a sharp contrast with his Democratic rival, John McCain today assailed government subsidies for ethanol production and unveiled a set of proposals aimed at encouraging the development and mass adoption of electric vehicle technologies.
  1. groups:
    News and Politics,   Politics,   Green,   Earth and Science,   1 more
  2. tags:
    News and Politics Politics Green Earth and Science 5 more
  3.     
    |

47 comments // Electric cars vs. biofuels: The presidential energy debate heats up

  • globetrekker
    • 0
      globetrekker  
    • Image
    • Check out this current news clip about an interesting alternative fuel concept. I know it's a while from being fully developed, but in the mean time, let's all do the electric slide. That would make the morning commute a whole lot more fun for everyone. It's electric...boogie boogie boogie!

    • 3 years ago
  • 1779fleet
    • 0
      1779fleet  
    • Electric and biofuel need not compete.

      We need both along with a whole lot more to gain energy independance.

      There is not one answer to our problem just like there is not one car for everyone.

      We have always chosen our vehicle based on shape or body type now we have to add another factor to our process... efficency.

      multi fuel systems...Its really that simple

    • 3 years ago
  • ntechie
    • 0
      ntechie  
    • All electric cars are the way to go, but it probably will not happen. Think of it, solar power at $1 a watt, within 2-3 years, on the roof of your abode, your little electric car and no middle man to tell you what the price is going to be. Would be a whole paradigm change, socially and economically. No the more than likely outcome will be, " going to a filling station to get whatever fuel has been decided on, at the price they want, more than likely oil".

    • 3 years ago
  • kcfoxie
    • 0
      kcfoxie  
    • ntechie:

      Which is exactly the problem that I see with it. Not to mention the service industry for internal combustion engines -- mechanics, dealers -- goes away. A perpetual motion machine does not make a good business strategy.

      That does not mean one can't have a little slice of heaven. Bring on the diesel-electric hybrids, 700-1200 miles per tank, reality (some older diesels do this sans electric motors).

      Electric will have its day -- it was the king of cars back before the Model T, in the 1800/early 1900s.

    • 3 years ago
  • kcfoxie
    • 0
      kcfoxie  
    • biofuels encompasses other fuels too, people.

      Biodiesel has none of the problems than ethanol faces:

      -ships in pipelines without corroding them
      -made from waste streams OR virgin oils (crops)
      -Works in every diesel engine made from 1900 - 2007
      -can be implemented now.

      The new diesels are coming from Honda and others. Do not wait around for the electrics and keep buying gas. Buy a diesel, go with biodiesel (B50 -- a 50/50 mix of petrol diesel and biodiesel -- or better) and start enjoying 500-800 mile tanks and knowing your fuel came from waste chicken fat, soy bean farmers, or the little thai place down the street...

      NOTE: I do not advocate straight vegetable oil systems, biodiesel is a chemically modified vegetable oil that is not human consumable, tho it is entirely nontoxic and its only waste stream can be used to make soap or cosmetics.

      ALL THAT SAID... a diesel-electric hybrid = beez kneez.

      Anything powered by gasoline is a bad idea.

    • 3 years ago
  • EdMcFunkin
  • kcfoxie
  • futuregen
  • covelogibbs
    • 0
      covelogibbs  
    • kcfoxie:

      Yes, a hybrid diesel electric would be sweet. Straight vegetable oil (SVO) systems work well and are even better on emissions than biodiesel, but with SVO you need two tanks and heaters, and it's a lot more to think about than biodiesel which will run your diesel without any modifications. I put 30,000 plus miles on a VW Jetta using 100% reclaimed restaurant waste oil biodiesel and I averaged over 40 MPG, and 45 on the highway. My next vehicle, died after using the same fuel after only a few thousand miles. I had to replace four fuel injectors and right now I'm using straight petroleum diesel. I'm very disappointed. The 10,000 Jeep Liberty's that were manufactured came from the factory with B5 in the tank (5% biodiesel and 95% petroleum diesel) and I was excited that I had finally found a 4x4 vehicle that could run on biodiesel. I know someone that owns a Liberty and has had better luck using B20, but right now I'm bummed. :(

    • 3 years ago
  • kcfoxie
  • devo64
    • 0
      devo64  
    • Image
    • Ethanol biofuel is a big bag of suck. It takes more energy to produce then it gives us. Algae biofuel is much more senseable. Algae can give us a renewable, carbon-neutral oil. Plus it won't take food away from hungry people.

    • 3 years ago
  • covelogibbs
  • jvanauken
  • futuregen
    • 0
      futuregen  
    • Be careful of your immediate environment. That goes for driving an electric car. Purchase an EMF meter and make sure you and your passengers are safe from EMFs which cause cancer - especially the children. You are riding on top of or beside a high volt line. The electric car fields that I have monitored have been close to off scale throughout the car (depends on the model). if you do use electric, make sure you are plugging into renewable energy and not coal or nuclear.

    • 3 years ago
  • osiris326
    • 0
      osiris326  
    • McCain is just throwing out there anything and everything to get elected. His straight talk express left the station a long time ago.

    • 3 years ago
  • lukewarmenthusiasm
    • 0
      lukewarmenthusiasm  
    • they need to find a way to make them more attractive yet cost affective. there are a lot of really nice looking electric cars that are way to expensive. i hope it happens soon because i doubt a majority of the public are going to buy ugly cars. image is everything after all!

    • 3 years ago
  • suhiak
    • 0
      suhiak  
    • if u havent seen the movie " Who killed the electric car " i recomend it... The government literally took peoples electric cars away from their homes because of the influence that the oil companies placed over the car companies

    • 3 years ago
  • crob80227
    • 0
      crob80227  
    • Electric is the only modern 21st century choice.

      The cars will be clean, zero pollution and you can charge them up right at your house (no more going to "fueling" stations and pumping -- always a plus).

      BUT that doesn't mean we can't have several different types of cars.

      There is a very small group of drivers who routinely drive 125 miles or more to work and back per day -- for those people we can make hydrogen cars or, hell, just leave it as gas I guess.

      But for the other 99 percent of drivers who only drive 60 miles to work (round trip) per day or LESS -- an electric car that has a 200 mile charge radius makes absolutely perfect sense.

      And for those retired people that don't work and don't drive much -- instead of driving around polluting engines they'd be very happy with an electric car or even the new air-powered cars that run on compressed air.

      College students that just go to school and back -- electric is a good idea.

      Right now it seems like if 99 people out of a hundred only drive 60 miles per day or less and just 1 driver averages 125 miles per day -- then we're building to the needs of that rare, rare long distance power-driver.

      We can make cars for those drivers, but the mass produced models should be electric, chargable at home and powered by wind, solar, geothermal, hydro or, heck, even nuclear sense the are in use right now and we can't tear them down.

    • 3 years ago
  • covelogibbs
    • 0
      covelogibbs  
    • crob80227:

      The nuclear power plants in operation now will eventually reach the end of their lifespan and have to be cleaned up to the best of our ability. We shouldn't bring anymore nuclear power plants on line. The sun is providing all the nuclear energy we'll ever need.

    • 3 years ago
  • JanforGore
    • 0
      JanforGore  
    • Hard to believe anything McCain or Obama promise or call for on the environment now in an attempt to one up one another since their ties to polluting industries were made known. Again, I'll believe it when I see it. When neither of them cater to nuclear, clean coal, offshore drilling, or any of the other pollutitng and toxic CO2 spewing energy sources along with these little giving a crumb initiatives then maybe it will mean something.

      You can't call for electric cars if you are still going to call for coal companies to continue being able to spew their poisons for at least the next twenty years, or call for building 45 nuke plants that will cost billions and suck up water we need to survive in the process and look credible, or lobby ethanol like Obama does just to please Archer Daniels Midland.

      So I will believe it when I see these incentives seriously in a climate bill one of them sign along with a global treaty next year (since unfortunately, the way this political system is set up it has to be one of them because no one else is allowed to win) because after next year we are surely going to be running out of time to continue to just banter about this.

    • 3 years ago
  • shelchak
  • shroomfairy
    • 0
      shroomfairy  
    • Electric cars are not slow! Chevy made the EV1 in the 90's and it was very fast. The Tesla is an electric sports car that rivals our current ones.

      The technology is here, our automakers just keep bowing down to big oil.

    • 3 years ago
  • electricsquiral
  • Mafioso
    • 0
      Mafioso  
    • And as for John McCain's or Obama's plans for alternative fuels/power, they are also coupling those great "incentives" and plans for alternatives with opening up more offshore drilling and continuing to subsidize the not so efficient fuels while builiding power plants in everyone's back yards. Once again giving in to this notion that as long as you promise one thing in exchange for another it won't matter as long as we have our conveniences as a top priority.

    • 3 years ago
  • Mafioso
    • 0
      Mafioso  
    • In order for any of the things everyone is talking about to work is if we get off our collectively fat asses (those of us living in this country at least) and realize in order to get anywhere productive in the future concerning global warming and alternative options to gasoline, we would need to enact not only changes in our driving habits but our need to have the ability to drive our own cars 700+ (or unlimitied miles with refueling) miles a trip. Most people don't even have the money for a fuel efficient vehicle, much less the money to travel anywhere over 500 miles away.

      I realize it would be an inconvenience for us to have to give up the ability to pick up and leave in our vehicle wherever we please, but come on, why not invest in zero emissions mass transit while the car companies argue about fuel alternatives, and then we can give up cars for a while (maybe a year) and then the car companies & government would realize we were serious enough to warrant any real change. They (car companies and the government) continue to make money off not so very fuel efficient vehicles and neglecting viable options because they assume most consumers would rather continue the trend of gasoline powered vehicles for their own conveniences of being able to drive from one part of the country to another.

      Some might say, "what about those people who travel daily for work more than 100 miles, or those of us who vacation often, or etc, etc, etc". Like I said people, sacrifice to make a point! If we acted together instead of complain together, things would be moving a little faster, no pun intended. And for those of you who hate the fact that electric cars only travel 40 mph top speed (although there are several electric options that go 80 mph and over 100 miles range), most Americans drive like shit with a speed limit of 60 in most areas, it's not like slowing down would kill anymore people (literally) than upping the speed limit (at least in local areas).

      We keep getting told these ridiculous notions by people (the "experts" in this country) that a lower speed limit wouldn't mean safer roads because we wouldn't be able to effectively enforce such a speed because most people would want and need to get to places quicker than a lower speed limit would allow. Maybe that's the fucking problem, everyone is always in a fucking rush. Let's slow down and enjoy life, rather than living in a fucking rat race.

    • 3 years ago
  • electricsquiral
  • PatrioticAstronaut
    • 0
      PatrioticAstronaut  
    • What if we lived in a world of electricity. A world where everything ran off of electricity, and There wasn't one source of power, but a broad assortment between solar, wind, geo-thermal, and hydro. Where the cars wouldn't need batteries, because electricity would be broad casted though radio waves everywhere, anywhere for free. Thats the world I see, and it works wonderfully.

    • 3 years ago
  • shroomfairy
  • electricsquiral
    • 0
      electricsquiral  
    • PatrioticAstronaut:

      Radio? Listen close here. the only way radio could be used for electrical transition would be to use higher power levels than a microwave oven; cooking everything in the area around the transmitter. Even if that were not the case radio is far less efficient than copper wire for electricity.

      The closest workable system was used to recharge the EV1. it used mutual inductance between 2 coils of wire to transfer power from the charging station to the car. This eliminated the need for metal contacts in the charging system.

    • 3 years ago
  • jubal
  • Cortlanderson
  • petarro
    • 0
      petarro  
    • Look at you'll comments!!! Full consumerist and still haven't learned anything, have you?

      You want a big car, a fast car and bulky car. Well, it ain't going to happen.

      Bio-Fuels do not work unless it's water which then, we should use Salty water (it would then vaporize and might become sweet_normal_ water) So in other words, use sea water.

      Or then, make Electric Cars which could be charged with the Solar Panels installed on your Roof.

    • 3 years ago
  • electricsquiral
    • 0
      electricsquiral  
    • petarro:

      The power of an electric motor is all in the winding configuration. Series windings provide greater torque than parallel windings, but at a greater cost in energy.

      A big fast bulky electric vehicle is possible, but would be really heavy, like a muscle car.

    • 3 years ago
  • Colonial_Zombie
  • EdMcFunkin
    • 0
      EdMcFunkin  
    • Colonial_Zombie:

      Have you considered an electric and vegetable oil hybrid? You could be going to McDonald's and asking them for the left over crap that they pour out anyway. I have a couple of friends who do this and it's very cheap for them. The only contingency that I'm aware of is that it takes a small amount of gas to start it up initially. It wouldn't be as much of a waste, although it's certainly a band aid on a gaping wound.

    • 3 years ago
  • peter_doerrie
    • 0
      peter_doerrie  
    • Colonial_Zombie:

      I know there are a lot of McDonalds in the US but even they would put pricetag on their grease if this is to become the fuel of the 21st century...

      Agrofuel is not the way to go. Hate to say it, but McCain has a point.

    • 3 years ago
  • EdMcFunkin
    • 0
      EdMcFunkin  
    • Colonial_Zombie:

      I don't disagree there. It's not the way to go, but it is a way to go in the mean time. What about using the Earth's magnetic field? I hear that it is not always reliable in certain spots, but how much research has been put into that area?

    • 3 years ago
  • stopnoise
  • electricsquiral
  • electricsquiral
    • 0
      electricsquiral  
    • Why not both?

      You could buy an electric car for daily driving, commuting, and running errands. For that a range of 100 mi. should be sufficient.

      Then you could buy or rent a generator trailer to extend the range. The generator could run on any fuel you chose. You don't have to lug it around all of the time. If you change you're mind about the fuel you want to use, you don't have to change you're car

      For those of you who want to know about electric vehicles, here is a link to the wikipedia article.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_vehicle

    • 3 years ago
  • blue_blooded
    • 0
      blue_blooded  
    • electricsquiral:

      this doesn't sound like a bad idea to me... most people don't drive more that 20 miles a day anyways, so unless you live in an area where traffic is hell (LA Miami) that should work for the average person.

    • 3 years ago
  • yue_yuki
  • electricsquiral
    • 0
      electricsquiral  
    • yue_yuki:

      I think you are referring to all those kits on the internet that only allow a car to move at 40mph. these people don't know how to build an efficient system, and are just out to make money on other people's ignorance.

      A properly designed electric drive system will allow for speeds of around 100mph with a range of 200miles. I would not buy any car or kit that doesn't offer at least that performance.

    • 3 years ago
  • jubal
    • 0
      jubal  
    • yue_yuki:

      The electric cars on the market right now are governed to go slow, they could output so much more as the man said in the post before me.

      I have seen the fast ones that had the governor removed, my they are fun.

    • 3 years ago
  • tomofnorthcal
  • jubal
    • 0
      jubal  
    • tomofnorthcal:

      You only need a hundred and fifty mile range to have a city electric car. I never drive more than 20 miles a day. I think there is room for all sorts of different vehicles.

      Hybrids for sure could be used for the trips of 300 miles and such.

      And yes it would be lovely to have a 500 mile range on a charge.

    • 3 years ago
  • rockstarmillionaire
more from Green:

top videos