Global report card of green countries/US falls short
-
-
- JanforGore
- added this
...the EPI is the best measure we have of how nations are faring in the battle to save the environment, and the findings are striking. As one might expect, the overall rankings place small, wealthy Scandinavian societies at the top, and poor, war-torn African nations at the bottom. But one big surprise is that size is no excuse for poor performance; big and small nations occupy both the top and bottom ranks. And bigger surprises come when you compare nations with peers of similar income, or with neighbors. In the following pages, you'll find chapters on the best—and worst—nations in every income group: the rich, the middle class and the poor.
China in particular has long argued that it is too poor to afford the Western luxury of environmental awareness. The EPI exposes this claim to be bogus. China ranks last among 15 nations in its income group (the fifth decile), behind Vietnam. If Colombia, the group's leader, can afford environmental concern, why can't China?
snip:
In its environmental priorities, the United States is in some ways remarkably similar to China, the EPI reveals. Like China, the United States scores poorly among countries in its income class (the top 10 percent), ranking third from the bottom, due in large part to terrible scores for emissions, which are heavily weighted in the index because of their contribution to global warming. And like China, the weak U.S. emissions scores are due in part to reliance on coal. In the EPI, the United States scores 38 on carbon emissions from electricity generation, compared with an average of 68 for countries of similar wealth. That statistic lowers the U.S. score in emissions per capita, which Yale puts at 56, far below the peer-group average of 74.
~~~~~~~~
Again, it comes down to moral and political will. Trying to excuse the lack of it by stating anything else is simply bogus. Even in Kenya people are turning to solar and they hardly have an economy to speak of. So the US, China, and other rich countries will be exposed for the morally bankrupt leadership they have all at the expense of this planet and its people just to make gold bars that will serve no purpose without a planet.
-
- groups:
- News and Politics, Politics, Green, Earth and Science, 1 more
-
- tags:
- News and Politics, Politics, Green, Earth and Science, 13 more
-
-
onechance
-
Very interesting.
- 3 years ago
-
onechance
-
-
indyfitz
-
great looking photo used for the article.. that's what i'm talkin about.
- 3 years ago
-
indyfitz
-
-
JanforGore
-
Yes, and the corrolation between peace and sustainability is a message.
- 3 years ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
jubal
-
JanforGore:
It is the most important message we can try to convey.
- 3 years ago
-
jubal
-
-
jubal
-
I like this whole GNP idea it is really a great tool to measure a countries effectiveness in dealing with environmental issues.
- 3 years ago
-
jubal
-
-
JanforGore
-
The US scores poorly among countries in its income class ranking third from the bottom on that. Some might want to actually read what it says.
- 3 years ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
jason1973tl
-
Someone might want to check on the EPI charts. It puts the U.S 39 out of 149 countries. We are not near the bottom of the chart by any means.
- 3 years ago
-
jason1973tl
-
-
JanforGore
-
-
The century's environmental leaders.
Great photos. My all time favorite is number twelve ;-)
indyfitz: done.
- 3 years ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
indyfitz
-
Right away.. I'd say.. interesting story, interesting topic, but that picture doesn't really portray the entire story as a whole. Newsweek even failed to see that. Maybe if they would have zoomed out and seen the surrounding environment that they're talking about, it would have worked. People like images that tell stories, you know? This is all just in case you wanted some constructive crit.
Peace.
- 3 years ago
-
indyfitz
