Green | July 16, 2008 | 138 comments

HHS moves to define contraception as abortion

Image
Allsunday
In a spectacular act of complicity with the religious right, the Department of Health and Human Services Monday released a proposal that allows any federal grant recipient to obstruct a woman's access to contraception. In order to do this, the Department is attempting to redefine many forms of contraception, the birth control 40% of Americans use, as abortion.
  1. groups:
    News and Politics,   Politics,   Green,   Earth and Science,   4 more
  2. tags:
    News and Politics Politics Not News Green 15 more
  3.     
    |

138 comments // HHS moves to define contraception as abortion

  • marlykins
    • 0
      marlykins  
    • This is absolutely outrageous and ridiculous. Also, what about using birth control pills as a form of regulating a woman's cycle, or decreasing the effects of PMS, etc? I know that that's the primary reason I started taking BC pills.

    • 3 years ago
  • Daisako
    • 0
      Daisako  
    • What irritates me about this is the fact that some women must use birth control for medical purposes. I don't think the government should be saying what two consenting adults do in their time also. I am against abortion personally, but I'm not a woman so I sure as hell am not going to say what they can and can't do with their own bodies. Isn't the whole point of a government to protect and help it's people, not criminalize almost half, if not more, of its population? If a government is criminalizing a large percentage of the population, something seriously is wrong. The things that people do that are widespread in this country are there because of how the country was formed and how the society evolved, it's not good to try to trash part of that.

    • 3 years ago
  • exinron
    • 0
      exinron  
    • It is not abortion. Most of these drugs stunt the body from releasing the hormones that control the release of the egg. The only loss is maybe one or two eggs in the beginning then only the sperm. Ridiculous to define it as an abortion.

    • 3 years ago
  • TouchArt
    • 0
      TouchArt  
    • Image
    • Margaret Atwood's Handmaid's Tale describes a world where women's bodies become controlled by the state.
      Disturbing and prophetic.

      Speak out before it's too late.

    • 3 years ago
  • TouchArt
    • 0
      TouchArt  
    • If people actually read the article, they'd know that HSS is defining 40% or more contraceptive methods as abortion by defining the beginning of life at the point of conception, not on implantation of the fertilized egg in the uterine wall.

      This definition makes most contraceptive methods abortion, not just the morning-after pill.

      The moment of conception is essentially unknowable, so this ruling would "include the 40% of the birth control methods Americans use, such as the pill, the patch, the shot, the ring, the IUD, and emergency contraception, under the classification "abortion."

      Again, facist governments and religions all try to control women's reproduction to enforce their police states. They routinely use religious arguments to limit women's control over their own bodies and choice about whether or not to have children. Research what the Nazi Party did in Germany.

    • 3 years ago
  • skobos
    • 0
      skobos  
    • if you do the research you'll find that a lot of birth control actually does result in abortion. specifically the morning after pill. people gasping at this fact are just putting on display ignorance.

    • 3 years ago
  • skobos
    • 0
      skobos  
    • skobos:

      i know that a lot of my views don't match up with this society but i'm going ahead and stating them.

      if people would just keep it in their pants we would have a GREAT deal less of these problems. i know we still have to deal with horrible crimes such as rape, there is always going to be evil stuff out there. but what did people do BEFORE birth control, if they didn't want a kid? they didn't have sex. i know sex isn't JUST for reproduction, but that is what it results in.

      and i don't understand when a woman says it's her body so it's her choice. yes. it is her body that a baby is growing inside...but the baby is NOT her body. it is a new life.

      i know most people here don't agree with me, and i do not want to argue, i just wanted to state what i felt.

    • 3 years ago
  • edbr
    • 0
      edbr  
    • skobos:

      the problem is that who is big brother to tell us to keep it in our pants? and who really will keep in in their pants?

      that's like saying gays wouldn't be chastised if they'd just keep it in their pants.

      humans are wired to be sexual. get over it.

    • 3 years ago
  • SuperLayne
    • 0
      SuperLayne  
    • My hormones are messed up. I have a bunch of really disgusting problems with my cycles, and have to be on birth control to fix them. By this logic, would hysterectomies be abortion, too?

    • 3 years ago
  • jacijacijaci
    • 0
      jacijacijaci  
    • I can't stand how our government spends time on such frivolous issues. The fact that they care if a couple wants to postpone and prevent such a life-altering change as having a baby, shouldn't be up to the government to decide. Besides, I find it even more horrifying for someone to bring a child into the world who can't properly provide for it in the first place.

    • 3 years ago
  • ladyshiba
    • 0
      ladyshiba  
    • I can understand why people have negative views on actual abortions, but contraceptives serve a purpose.

      I have a relative who, if she were to become pregnant, could have her life at serious risk due to some physical abnormalities with her female parts.

      For some people, not getting prego is not just about not wanting babies. For some people, keeping from pregnancy is an act of self preservation. Obviously, there are some married women who this applies to.

      Next, they'll be trying to tell us that women who have their tubes tied are commiting mass abortion.

    • 3 years ago
  • TouchArt
    • 0
      TouchArt  
    • Limiting women's control over their bodies and reproduction is a tried and true method to oppress and control populations eg. the Holy Roman Empire, Catholic Church, Islam, Puritan America.

      Remember Margaret Atwood's prophetic THE HANDMAID'S TALE.

    • 3 years ago
  • HellaDelicious
    • 0
      HellaDelicious  
    • It is interesting that while the US has gone around the world sterilizing certain groups of women (even within the US as well), they on the other hand are running around babbling and screaming and forcing pro-life onto people....

      As we all know it is all about control.....

      It also kind of trips me out that while there is so much heated discussion about abortion it seems to be perfectly fine for other bizarre things to be going on with creating babies, like our young women selling their eggs to pay for their college education and what-not...

      Not only that but what is the point in believing in a 'loving God' who in reality just likes to play cruel jokes on everyone by making the most wonderful experience of the coming together of two individuals an evil thing to do unless you are making a baby.

      So twisted.

    • 3 years ago
  • dson
    • 0
      dson  
    • Haha technically the hhs By doing this will increase world population hunger etc. do they really want to help people?

    • 3 years ago
  • Lite_Black
  • purplefox
  • haleyann
  • estar
    • 0
      estar  
    • That's what you call a parting gift. Bush is pretty bold for a president with the lowest approval ratings ever. Thank God the Founders knew enough not to let the Administrative branch be in charge of creating law.

    • 3 years ago
  • iamajoey
  • sexsage
    • 0
      sexsage  
    • excuse me? i don't think i can find the proper words to describe how absolutely ridiculous this proposal is.

      and, shouldn't we all be preoccupied as a society about population control and trying not to overburden school, health, and other state and national systems that are already stretched too thin?

      i also love how it is always women that have to deal with this crap - if there were oral contraceptives for men, i bet no one would be trying to classify them as abortion, or the guys as sluts and baby killers. if it were up to these idiots, women would never be allowed to enjoy sex or have the right to choose whether we want to reproduce or not. just because i have a womb doesn't mean i have to have kids - it is not my reproductive fate! lucky for men, they aren't saddled with the physical and emotional burden of bearing children, and that makes it easier for them to ignore the reality of pregnancy and to run away from the responsibilities that come along with it.

    • 3 years ago
  • pennyharford
    • 0
      pennyharford  
    • I learned in the eighties that the "right to life" groups considered all birth control as abortion. ( I belive I heard it on the Phil Donahue show). these people are CRAZY. Birth control used to be illegal in Ireland also (imagine the TSA confiscating your condoms @ the airport), but I think the laws are changed now.

    • 3 years ago
  • charleshope
    • 0
      charleshope  
    • This interesting as an example of how the US government's language tends more & more closely to that of our old friend Osama bin L & other deranged extremists who quote divine support.

      Hitler's Waffen SS had "Gott mit uns" i.e. 'God with us' etched on the inside of their belts... clearly so, & now he's with Dubya & Osama bin Laden too...

      Didn't I read something about a new American SS recently? Check their belts.

    • 3 years ago
  • keeshii768
  • singrrr
    • 0
      singrrr  
    • Uh I thought the whole point of birth control was so that women didn't have to go get an abortion...
      and since when did rich old white men have the right to tell me what to do with my ovaries!!!!

    • 3 years ago
  • THEREisHOPE
  • aaronklong
  • helloimcat
    • 0
      helloimcat  
    • This reminds me of what's happening in Manila, Philippines. Their bill was called the EO (Executive Order) and was passed by Mayor Jose Atienza in 2000, and they also cited religious reasons (the Philippines is 90% Catholic- 400 years of Spanish rule will do that to you). The EO bans "artificial contraceptives" (the pill, intrauterine devices, etc.) and instead focus on natural family planning (condoms, lacational amenorrhea method, cycle watching).

      In the 8 years since it began, it's become a major women's rights issue. Women are having 6 or more children then they are financially capable of having. Also, why won't anybody realize that being anti-abortion/anti-contraceptive means nothing if you're a misogynist who doesn't understand that "no" means "no". All this bill will do is be trouble for women, especially poor women.

      I also wonder what this means for women like me, a virgin who needs hormonal birth control to prevent uterine cancer.

    • 3 years ago
  • anglcazn
    • 0
      anglcazn  
    • This is their idea of trying to prevent sex. "If we label contraceptives as abortion, they will stop handing them out and therefore stop sex! HA HA HA!"

      Fucken morons. I'm moving to Switzerland

    • 3 years ago
  • RudyRudell
  • BigErn74
  • teenelizabeth
    • 0
      teenelizabeth  
    • Birth control is the prevention of pregnancy. Abortion is most commonly defined as the termination of pregnancy. How can one terminate a pregnancy that has not even begun yet? The HHS is going to have one hell of a time trying to redefine "abortion."

      And even further than that, a sperm and an egg are *not* the same thing as a fetus. They are simply cells, and the average human body is made up of 10 trillion different cells. Scratching your arm results in the death of hundreds of cells, yet no one calls this murder.

      If women cannot legally obtain abortions and/or contraceptives, they will resort to obtaining them illegally, which is dangerous and will result in innumerable deaths. Their blood will be on the government's hands.

    • 3 years ago
  • inapickle
    • 0
      inapickle  
    • DJMatt2..I agree w/ you..I am not surprised ,either. And in case the people that concern themselves w/ everyone's sex lives ...Don't they realize but BIRTH CONTROL has been around a very long time.. Before drugstores !! And hospitals and the HHS.... And abortions aren't new either! But aren't we supposed to have seperation of state and church ? Or am I confusing the u.s. w/ another country?
      This is such a waste of time/energy/money.Could we please have the govt. show some common sense ? Let's get to work on the real issues!

    • 3 years ago
  • MikeyGFunkEra
    • 0
      MikeyGFunkEra  
    • This is exactly why I can't stand religion. They try to make everyone conform to what they think people should be. Why can't everyone just let people do what they want as long as they aren't hurting others? I think the world would be a much better place if all these assholes could just relax.

    • 3 years ago
  • currentlyreading
  • fraggle
    • 0
      fraggle  
    • WTF mates. I thought abortion was the destruction of a human life. I thought a human life was a . . . . . . . . human. You know, a MAN and a WOMAN do the horizontal mambo and the womens egg is fertilized. . . . do i really have to ramble on with this crap.
      Can a womens egg be human and not need a sperm to become a human.
      Someone please tell these religious right RETARDS that the Bible is a work of the JEWS and was re re re retardedly interpreted by some doosh who call it the word of god. So religious rights should stop going to the hospitol and all that other crap that pertains to SCIENCE.
      i am flabergasted.

      wow WOOOOOW!!!

    • 3 years ago
  • DJMatt2
    • 0
      DJMatt2  
    • I really don't see how anyone can be shocked or surprised by this kind of action. This is all just part of their overall agenda. Look at the special interest groups they have been in bed with since day one. Overturning Roe vs. Wade? That was always just one FRAGMENT of their grand scheme.

      As the late Heath Ledger said "it's all part of the plan..."

      Don't get scared about this... Don't talk about running away and either crying in your pillow or going to Canada. GET MAD! Get angry! Get so pissed off about this that you and your friends will march over to Washington and start throwing people out on their pampered butts. That's really the only way that the surrender-monkeys in Congress will listen, when their very jobs are threatened.

    • 3 years ago
  • palomita3
    • 0
      palomita3  
    • They complain because we're overpopulated, and now they want us to define contraceptives as abortion?! Way to go, America. I anticipate an even larger increase of unplanned births occurring.

    • 3 years ago
  • samonster34
  • artist_speaks_out
    • 0
      artist_speaks_out  
    • Well, I guess this falls right in line with my plans to make sure that every time I ejaculate I'm getting someone pregnant. This way I'll be sure not to abort any of my potential sons or daughters...

      Has anyone written these people a letter kindly informing them that their heads actually don't belong up their asses? If not, it needs to happen...

    • 3 years ago
  • DeliaTheArtist
    • 0
      DeliaTheArtist  
    • Does this mean that every time I have my period, I'm aborting a baby? Because, you know, it COULD have been a child, afterall, maybe we should give my eggs more legal rights that I have?

    • 3 years ago
  • asianotter
  • azalea
  • blabHERmouth
    • 0
      blabHERmouth  
    • This is seriously disturbing…

      Is this some wingnut conservatives attempt to FORCE abstinence? This “proposal” is offensive, outrageous and ridiculous! We already have a generation of parentless children and half-a** parental guidance as it is. Imagine what the world would look like if every nimwitt that had sex produced a baby!

      SERIOUSLY!

      Government involvement in personally issues is really getting too deep! Back up outta my bedroom…

      PLEASE!

      -Jaye ;-/

    • 3 years ago
  • FallenMorgan
    • 0
      FallenMorgan  
    • I just hope that if the religious right take over completely, either a) California declares independence, or b) The liberals of America rise up!

    • 3 years ago
  • Dmitri_Molotov
  • Saladin
    • 0
      Saladin  
    • FallenMorgan:

      Not about liberal or conservative or politics at all.

      It's about the sane versus the insane.

      It's about our Enlightened Republic versus a Medieval Theocracy.

      I say we do it right now.

    • 3 years ago
  • blabHERmouth
  • Saladin
    • 0
      Saladin  
    • FallenMorgan:

      I'm all for it, Oregon and Washington can come too if they behave. Maybe Nevada for some extra cash.

      We'll call ourselves the Western Pacific Republics.

      If you know the Tenacious D song, sing it.

      "The first step will be to legalize marijuana..."

    • 3 years ago
  • edbr
    • 0
      edbr  
    • FallenMorgan:

      hell yeah, i'll so be there! i'll be driving my veggie oil (from McD's) bus there while those religious conservatives wait for the gas pump and the apocalypse .......... :-P

    • 3 years ago
  • ThisGuy
    • 0
      ThisGuy  
    • dumb, dumb, dumb, dumb, dumbbbbbbbb.......................Does Canada even issue Green Cards to Americans? I'm sure Mexico would.

    • 3 years ago
  • Saladin
    • 0
      Saladin  
    • This is the next phase in the religious right's attack on our lives.

      It's not about abortion.

      They want ALL contraceptives banned, for EVERYONE.

    • 3 years ago
  • amilli23
    • 0
      amilli23  
    • This administration needs to leave the office immediately. The earth is already overpopulated. I would rather we have access to birth control then taking some drugs from the dude in the alley or getting an abortion from some crazy doctor in her kitchen.

    • 3 years ago
  • meggo
    • 0
      meggo  
    • i don't think there are words to describe my utter and complete outrage at this shit.In all seriousness, It seems to me that the world is really going to hell in a hand basket. And women are going to be the first casualties. Ladies don't be fooled, our rights have been and always will be temporary. The moment the shit hits the fan we will become chattel once more. Enjoy your freedoms while they last.

    • 3 years ago
  • Saladin
  • McAfee
    • 0
      McAfee  
    • This is a really bad idea. If women weren't allowed to use birth control and this lead to more women having unwanted pregnancies, then could one assume more women would be having abortions AFTER conception anyways?

    • 3 years ago
  • RoBot_rOcKer
  • EverChanging
  • mako2424
  • FallenMorgan
    • 0
      FallenMorgan  
    • If this goes through, I will be soon enough standing at the Canadian side of the US border, watching with a tear in my eye as America is hijacked by the religious right.

    • 3 years ago
  • Dmitri_Molotov
  • shroomfairy
  • owner1
    • 0
      owner1  
    • What kind of sense does this make? There are enough unplanned pregnancies as it is. Women will be forced to have real abortions if they can't control when they want to have children. PRO-CHOICE all the way. Wonder what the folks at Planned Parenthood agencies think about this.

    • 3 years ago
  • mako2424
  • brylou01
    • 0
      brylou01  
    • Ok, so if you consider birth control abortion, and make it hard or impossible for most women to obtain, all that is going to do is increase the amount of actual abortions. It sure as hell isn't going to make people stop having sex. All I can see coming out of this is an increase in unwanted pregnancies, ie an increase in actual abortions. Way to shoot yourselves in the foot, idiots.

    • 3 years ago
  • StuArt_Gould
  • edbr
  • evaunit2
    • 0
      evaunit2  
    • Stop bitching. If you get knocked up just say your getting fat have the thing at home and make sure you have a good garbage disposal and your good to go.

    • 3 years ago
  • dbocaz
  • Argon18
  • huffamoose2k
    • 0
      huffamoose2k  
    • Ok what?! Since people have the freedom to do whatever they want in this country, this should never pass. No laws trying to stop Abortion or birth control should ever be passed because it violates a woman's given right to choose whether she wants a kid or not. Our world is over-populated anyway!

    • 3 years ago
  • evaunit2
    • 0
      evaunit2  
    • Arent their cases of babies suffocating in the night for no reason. I predict if this passes the number of these cases will explode.

    • 3 years ago
  • jh64487
  • Mafioso
  • yessuh
    • 0
      yessuh  
    • that's like saying everyone who wears condoms expose themselves to AIDS. I feel like all these reactionary groups are going to get theirs when they realize they've completely misjudged the mood of the youth. Soon we'll take over all their jobs and stick them in nursing homes. I just have to be patient.

    • 3 years ago
  • mookster_07
  • flyingkick
    • 0
      flyingkick  
    • It's funny how the people who are against birth control and/or abortion rights are usually in the same group of people who are against welfare programs.

      They want to you to have a lot of children but if you're having problems raising them they don't want to help you.

    • 3 years ago
  • panamacanalzone
  • mookster_07
    • 0
      mookster_07  
    • Classify contraception as abortion, increase the unwanted pregnancy rate, flood the already flooded child-welfare system, and then get pissed when a case of abuse flies under the radar.
      I can see nothing wrong with this idea.

    • 3 years ago
  • jjmaster
  • nikki185usa
    • 0
      nikki185usa  
    • They must not know how the pill works or the definition of abortion... this is an absolute outrage. Taking away birth control is just as bad as taking away condoms. Not to mention birth control for most women is free. You have to pay money for condoms. It'd be like urging young teenagers to have unprotected sex.

      Besides, birth control is used for many different health issues outside of sex. Do they not know that?

      If it passes, there will be a fight. One that is promised.

    • 3 years ago
  • wisegrrl
    • 0
      wisegrrl  
    • nikki185usa:

      Anyone remember the March for Women's Lives four years' ago?? It is time for a new one.This time it must send a STRONG MESSAGE to VOTE in November!! By the way, if you will check Planned Parenthood, NOW, NARAL, and RH Reality Check, you will learn that birth control is becoming out-of-affordable-reach for many women this very moment.

    • 3 years ago
  • wisegrrl
    • 0
      wisegrrl  
    • This is a serious result of the once-feminist divides between the Obama and Hillary Clinton supporters. What happens when you are divided over candidates over trivial matters? The foes against the most important issues you have IN COMMON sneak in to try to take them away. IT IS TIME FOR UNITY AMONG PRO-REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS PEOPLE!! The frightening Margaret Atwood book "The Handmaid's Tale" is inching closer to reality every day ...

    • 3 years ago
  • HollybyGolly
    • 0
      HollybyGolly  
    • will these call condoms abortion too? Or will they hypocritically keep telling us to use them? While, I'm sure they will keep pumping men with Viagra. OY!

      I wonder if this stems from the fact that Viagra is covered under health insurance and Birth Control is not. Are they trying to get out of insuring birth control by making it sacrilege?

    • 3 years ago
  • AndreaKnoll
  • mako2424
    • 0
      mako2424  
    • If only our founding fathers had wanted to keep a wall of separation between religion and government perhaps we wouldn't be in this predicament.

    • 3 years ago
  • Ricky84
    • 0
      Ricky84  
    • mako2424:

      I cringe when I read stuff like this because I think your anger is misplaced. This isn’t really a “separation of church and state” matter, it’s more like a special interest group trying to take away the rights of everyone else matter. When you type cast this as a solely religious predicament then you not only feed anti-religious ideas but you single out a particular set of actions that will fail to address the real problem.

      A religious group is guaranteed the right to discuss the issues of the day. You cannot revoke freedom of speech because a person belongs to a large or influential group. The truth of the mater is that the founding fathers gave us all the tools necessary to protecting our rights. We don‘t need laws to reduce the ability of the religious right to campaign for their ideas. We need people to defend the constitution and to laugh at anyone who would have the audacity to impose such a ridiculous law.

      You could replace the religious right with any other special interest group and the solution would still be the same. I’m so tired of hearing about how the religious right is destroying our country. The only reason why they get away with this sort of thing is that we as a nation do not protect the constitution at all times. When a law benefits an individual, even at the cost of another, we don’t care so long as we are the ones who benefit.

    • 3 years ago
  • mako2424
    • 0
      mako2424  
    • mako2424:

      We may have to agree to disagree on this issue since I, to this point in the discussion, do not feel as though my anger is displaced. My point being, the entire anti-abortion movement (attempting to ban contraception included) is drenched in religious dogma.

      Thus, when a government agency proposes acting on the religious beliefs of the current administration (or anyone), it violates the "wall of separation." They are not simply talking about doing something. They are proposing control over womens' rights based on the religious beliefs of our President.

      Perhaps I've misunderstood you. How can you say this is a free speech issue?

    • 3 years ago
  • tarie111
  • onechance
  • vixen0078
  • SpookyFish
  • Argon18
    • 0
      Argon18  
    • Sounds like they're taking the Monty Python sketch to heart "Every sperm is sacred, every sperm is great, if a sperm is wasted then God gets quite irate."

      That's reducing everything down to a flatland where all life is equal and leaving out all the depth of how things evolve to be more complex.

      If you're going to go to that extreme then you'd have to outlaw all innoculations because that kills the virus and their are a lot more virus than people so that is the greatest good for the greatest number.

    • 3 years ago
  • VitaminB2
  • lattee
  • shroomfairy
  • vixen0078
  • Angiegetscurrent
  • kellysontheroad
  • shroomfairy
    • 0
      shroomfairy  
    • As mad as this makes me, I have a feeling the drug companies are calling Bush right now. They stand to lose billions of dollars if they can't sell birth control pills.

    • 3 years ago
  • jjmaster
    • 0
      jjmaster  
    • Okay then, let's label the food and drug administration as a government run genocide institution.... and I'm not just talking about birth control! Jeeps... It appears that many of our agencies for public health and safety need to be totally restructured and gutted of its biased corporate appointed/supported employees. Corruption is EVERYWHERE in them! Our liberties are endangered!

    • 3 years ago
1 - 100 of 138
more from Green:

top videos