The great GM crop yield myth exposed

I tried to find an English translation for my own reading, of your statement. I hope this is close enough to get the meaning, as I find it worth while reading in English too.

My apologies if it is not well translated?

'Unfortunately the god money blinded the peasants promising their a new one El Dorado, did not be so, and now complain themselves. Useless to complain itself, sent to ffanculo the seeds changed and returned to cultivate like nature commands.'

And no one report otherwise does either. Eat their crap if you (in general) want it, however, people have the right to know what they are eating. If you dispute that, you dispute Democracy. And this isn't just 'one report' disputing this. The entire GLOBAL COMMUNITY has rejected them, just like they did the Iraq War. I happen to think that matters.

I don't want to sound like "sour grapes" but I agree with your point about information such as this, which continues to be shot down is simply too obvious. I for one am getting tired of it too. This IS important "educational" type of media. And, it is effecting how people function, you better believe that!

Oh well, thanks to you JanforGore; your persistence is what will win out, because truth will prevail.

Stay Strong!

Lately this site has been more like 'tabloid' journalism with the influx of the same names posting tons of BS links getting to the frontpage everyday as they vote themselves up. If I didn't know any better I would think it was planned. That's what happens when you make posting here more about competition than quality reporting. People who put up one or two educational stories don't stand a chance against the influx of BS we have seen lately. And look at the four on TV now. Who cares what someone says about the next Batman? Or beer pong? It is ridiculous and imo goes against everything this station was meant to do. But of course, I guess if you speak out about that it only solidifies your place here as well.

Jan, this is a serious issue in society today, it is what keeps the sheeple, happy and content. Free to graze in the land of intoxicating simplistic views of the world; "oh what will Britney do next?"

I am quoting a friend of mine, whom I correspond with, a view from the UK:

"You mentioned the Britney Spears phenomena etc, - was listening to the late Texan philosopher on some audio lectures, Rick Roderick, who was superb in my view, largely self taught, at 13 he'd stopped going to school, - his father was a professional con-man and his mother a beauty therapist, - he was alone a lot, and reading Doestevsky and Sartre as a kid, - it didn't harm his development one bit.
Anyway, he is critical of all forms of authority and power, - including the profession he ended up in, as a professional philosopher, - he kept getting sacked from the universities over there, serious ones as well, like Duke, - he was just too honest and radical for the academic world to be able to deal with, - the fact he called most of his colleagues intellectual cowards I don't suppose helped, or the fact that he said the students he had to teach were being exploited, as "unpaid workers" - they have to pay for education, - which he felt was work, and that they should be paid for doing it.
Point being, he zoomed in on one lecture to Pres Reagun and Madonna, as powerful emblems of where things began to get really surreal, - he insists neither of them had any real talent in what they did, - but their "popularity" was a product of simply "being popular, for popularity's sake..." and it snowballed with every move they made of course, - the content was obscured, only the "image" was relevant. I agree with him.
He felt the media reached a new all time low by giving so much coverage to those two people, and became a travesty of what it once was meant to be."

Relevant to GMO's you bet. Relevant in how the media is bent to basically follow the money and turn their nose away from issues that will really matter.

Prove me wrong, I want to be wrong~