California becomes first US state to ban trans fats
-
-
- huffamoose2k
- added this
In a statement, Schwarzenegger noted that consuming trans fat is linked to coronary heart disease.
"Today we are taking a strong step toward creating a healthier future for California," he said.
Violations could result in fines of $25 to $1,000. Food items sold in their manufacturers' sealed packaging would be exempt. The bill's author, Assemblyman Tony Mendoza, D-Artesia, said he hoped the legislation would lead to similar laws in other states.
New York City, Philadelphia, Seattle and Montgomery County, Md., have ordinances banning trans fats, but California is the first state to adopt such a law covering restaurants, said Amy Wintefeld, a health policy analyst for the National Conference of State Legislatures. California and Oregon already have laws banning trans fats in meals served at schools, she added.
The legislation signed by Schwarzenegger will take effect Jan, 1, 2010, for oil, shortening and margarine used in spreads or for frying ...
-
-
elegua
-
awesome
- 3 years ago
-
elegua
-
-
funksoulgurlll
-
i hate how this works... he makes a decision right now - but it takes 2 years to be enforced. I could shove my face with butter and die in that amount of time.
- 3 years ago
-
funksoulgurlll
-
-
monochromat
-
Restaurants cooking fries in a healthier way isn't taking away your freedom. This is a step in the right direction -- cutting out unhealthy, unnecessary food products.
- 3 years ago
-
monochromat
-
-
JaceTurnerFilm
-
wow that's pretty cool. But I don't know how I feel about the government telling us what we can and can not put in to our bodies.
- 3 years ago
-
JaceTurnerFilm
-
-
ohh_Donna
-
cool! thank you for feeding me, Arnny in 2010.
- 3 years ago
-
ohh_Donna
-
-
onechance
-
Good, now go get on your bike and stop eating meat, fatty. ; )
- 3 years ago
-
onechance
-
-
squidteeth
-
yeah yeah... You can say all you want about how the ban is for the health of the general public.. but the only reason this ban is going through is because eating healthy is a popular subject right now, and there's nobody to lobby in favor of trans-fats.
There are plenty of things that are bad for the public that California would never touch, like, as somebody mentioned earlier, sunbathing. Everyone knows it gives people skin cancer, but there's no way the state would ever try and ban it because people would sh*t a brick.
They're only banning it because it's a completely one-sided issue, an easy win that all the fat consious Califonians can get behind and will earn the govenor brownie points.
It's a popularity scam people. You're allowing the government to get their foot in the door on regulating more things they don't need to bother with so that the policitians can walk around giving themselves pats on the backs instead of paying attention to something that really matters.
If people can't see that they're being dooped then that's their problem.
- 3 years ago
-
squidteeth
-
-
Lauren_Marie
-
wow squidteeth, you don't get it do you?
this ban is not because we are "fat-o-phobic, body-image obsessed", this ban is for health!
And Trans Fats have been being studied since the 1990's (if you read that big long ranting post from RylanWhite) and they are not good!
You can not excersize this crap out of your body, it stays in your heart arteries!
And IT WILL NOT AFFECT THE WAY YOUR GREASY FOOD TASTES!!
everything that we know and love will be made with different ingredients that hopefully wont be as bad as using trans fats....The government is not telling us how to eat, they are making a conscious decision for the health of americans, and that is awesome!
My only concern with this trans fat ban, is that they might find something worse to use in out foods...
- 3 years ago
-
Lauren_Marie
-
-
donkeyfly69
-
"Trans fat is in a lot of things"
seriously? it's not like they're hiding trans fats in apples and lettuce. it's in foods like fries and chips and donuts. if you're eating this crap and mad because you're fat then you're an idiot. you might as well sue mcdonalds because they forced you to eat that crap. this isn't going to end the fat "epidemic." treadmills and salad will.
and the fact that so many people are for it boggles my mind.
once the ban is enacted are you going to continue eating at the places that have been poisoning you for years?
- 3 years ago
-
donkeyfly69
-
-
squidteeth
-
What is California NOT regulating in order to pay attention to this BULLssssshit? I can just imagine the politicians sitting around...
"What should we do today guys? Our jobs? NOOOO. Our polls are down, we should just continue to manipulate people into voting for us by making up rediculous laws that will earn us popularity points with our fat-o-phobic, body-image obsessed populace. "
HOOORAY for DEMOCRACY!
- 3 years ago
-
squidteeth
-
-
squidteeth
-
OK...
WWwwwwwhhhhhaaaaat?
So now the government can tell me what i'm allowed to eat?You guys can all jump for joy if you want to, but i thought this country was about personal freedom and protecting people's rights... not taking them away because we think we need to baby-sit people and their eating habits.
Next month some new study's going to come out about how trans-fats aren't as bad as we were led to believe. Taking care of yourself is a good idea, but this is just nuts.
And did you ever think that maybe those people who kill themselves with fatty foods and no excercise deserve what they do to themselves?
I'm sorry, but if i want to eat fried onion rings and butter burgers once and a while, with extra grease, then i should be allowed to do so. That's my business, not yours, and not the state of California's.
So go ahead and turn a blind eye... Californians.
mine are open and so is my stomach.
They can keep their laws away from my lunch. - 3 years ago
-
squidteeth
-
-
rylanwhite
-
UGH! Reading through the sea of ignorant responses here has simply made me sad.
I have decided to get all bitchy and reply to some of what you guys have said with the following points:
#1 " Since research began on trans fats in the 1990s, scientists have linked trans fats to various diseases, including heart attacks and strokes, breast and prostate cancer and possibly type 2 diabetes."
#2 "the legislation will not stop the sale of popular foods like french fries and doughnuts, just change how they are cooked."
#3 One of the things they use Trans-Fats for is a substitute for BUTTER! But why when butter tastes WAY better and it's actually better for you!? The reason is it's CHEAPER to use Trans-Fats. Thats why you're eating them, not because they're in any way better...
It's like saying "OK I know that plain old table sugar tastes good and doesn't have such a high rate of diabetes, BUT High Fructose Corn Syrup is CHEAPER and comes in a liquid form so it's less work to mix into soda, LETS USE IT!
Fuck everyone who consumes it, we'll make %5 more money every year!PS Hydrogenated Oils = Trans Fats
PPS Fructose does NOT equal High-Fructose-Corn-Syrup. Fructose usually comes in a fine granulated form: "Crystalline fructose and high-fructose corn syrup are often mistakenly confused as the same product. The former is simply pure (100%) fructose. The latter is composed of nearly equal amounts of fructose and glucose. Crystalline fructose is held to offer many unique benefits such as improved product texture, taste and stability. Specifically, when combined with other sweeteners and starches, crystalline fructose is said to boost cake height (in baked goods) and mouth-feel of foods and beverages and to produce a pleasing brown surface color and pleasant aroma when baking.[1] Fructose is often recommended for, and consumed by, people with diabetes mellitus or hyperglycemia, because it does not raise blood glucose or insulin concentrations since it is metabolized without the need of insulin."
PPPS, to the guy who thinks the Federal Government should step in and tell us how to run OUR state: You must be high. Share what you're smokin with the rest of the class please.
- 3 years ago
-
rylanwhite
-
-
Lauren_Marie
-
I love this great state of California!
We are always trying to make things better for us and the future... - 3 years ago
-
Lauren_Marie
-
-
phoenix_fire999
-
Hooray! Trans fats should be banned. I'm so proud of my state for taking the initiative!
- 3 years ago
-
phoenix_fire999
-
-
chanaeva
-
The next step to a healthier California would be to also ban high fructose corn syrup and all those Hydrogenated oils, which are contributing to the large and still growing number of people suffering for diabetes and obesity.
- 3 years ago
-
chanaeva
-
-
CarlosIsDown
-
Yup, we're transfat nazis over here. To tell you the truth, I think people should avoid them on their own accord, but hey, whatever.
- 3 years ago
-
CarlosIsDown
-
-
oahspe
-
"Food items sold in their manufacturers' sealed packaging would be exempt."
-- says it all. The real problem here is the corporations with no concern for human welfare who are using things like hydrogenated oils & factory farming methods, etc. because it is cheaper. That is the bottom line. Although, yes, it is true that hydrogenated oils impart a certain consistency to baked goods; but I have had some delicious muffins made with regular old oil -- so it can be done!
On a side note, I read about a study once concerning Hi-fructose corn syrup where some scientists forced fed a bunch of it to some rats & their hearts exploded!
- 3 years ago
-
oahspe
-
-
metalcookiesxy70
-
trans fat is bad for you but its still your choice if you want it or even if you do eat trans fat you can always excerise!!!! come on people you can eat healthy and its not like no one is making you eat,Mcdonald's is going to go extcint because of this!
- 3 years ago
-
metalcookiesxy70
-
-
maxamust
-
Sorry to burst the bubble, but New York City did this first.
- 3 years ago
-
maxamust
-
-
donkeyfly69
-
maxamust:
new york city is not a state
plus if you've eaten anything fried in new york you know that law is not being obeyed
- 3 years ago
-
donkeyfly69
-
-
tuxxorx
-
I can't believe you guys are all for this. Its not the governments place to tell us what we can and cannot eat, they are just getting their foot in the door so they can make more outrageous laws.
- 3 years ago
-
tuxxorx
-
-
Liberal_Extinction
-
Typical liberal nanny state BS.
- 3 years ago
-
Liberal_Extinction
-
-
Bovey
-
Liberal_Extinction:
So help me to understand. Regulating food health/content is a liberal nanny-state, so it's bad, but regulating sexual behavior is a conservative nanny-state so it's OK?
This has nothing to do with Liberal or Conservative, it has to do with allowing government legislate and regulate personal choices in order to advance a particular agenda.
- 3 years ago
-
Bovey
-
-
jakerohde
-
i think this law is reaching a little to far its not like restaurants are putting mercury in the food
heres a simple solution if you don't want to be fat dont eat lots of fatty foods! - 3 years ago
-
jakerohde
-
-
chatterbox168
-
Wow, this is great! there is a fast food place called Hi-Life near my highschool where the kids go hang out and buy chili cheese fries and burgers. i even hang out there and i see kids eating these greasy, fatty foods all around me, and even i have a blob of some kind of lard ball called "chilli cheese fries" in front of me and my friends. then we begin to wonder what exactly is in it.............
- 3 years ago
-
chatterbox168
-
-
kenzkenz
-
I can understand banning trans fat in school lunch programs, but all of these new controls the government is trying to implement seem quite disturbing. It is sad when government censorship carries over into meal planning. Next we will be purchasing bootlegged sugar on the black market.
- 3 years ago
-
kenzkenz
-
-
Bovey
-
kenzkenz:
What do you mean next? Some people are doing this already. Ever had a Coke sweetened with actual cane sugar instead of corn syrup? If you've traveled outside of the US you probably have (and it is yummy), but here in the "land of the free", government tariffs designed to protect domestic producers against "unfair" foreign competition ensure that all our soft drinks are (cane)sugar-free.
- 3 years ago
-
Bovey
-
-
CarlosIsDown
-
kenzkenz:
I can imagine myself totally on the street corner with a long coat and one of those film-noir hats.
"Sugar, cane sugar. . . .get it while its fresh. Trans fats. burned american flag five dollah!"
- 3 years ago
-
CarlosIsDown
-
-
ClassicWinter
-
Nor Cal baby. I grew up eating mostly organic food anyway, but its also my personal choice of what I'm putting inside my mouth whether I know its a bit harmful or not.
- 3 years ago
-
ClassicWinter
-
-
joannaearl
-
Just so glad we're raising our kids in California!
One less thing to scrutinize on the grocery aisles...
- 3 years ago
-
joannaearl
-
-
brad62
-
I worked in the first restaurant in Lincoln, N.H. that went to Non Trans-fat cooking oil in the frialators. And we did it by choice. Not by an act of Government. It cost a little more. But you know what? It was worth it.
What's that I hear? Oh, that was Arteries hardening.
- 3 years ago
-
brad62
-
-
seary6579
-
This legislation is a little too much. What next? A ban on carbonated beverages? Deep fried food altogether? Hell, in fifty years, two pats of butter could be a capital offense...
We are more than capable of deciding what we should and should not eat, I don't think we need Gov. Conan babysitting us.
- 3 years ago
-
seary6579
-
-
maxamust
-
seary6579:
If we can't handle the responsibility, which we obviously can't, then we don't deserve it.
365,000 people died in 2007 because of obesity.
3,000 people died on 9/11.I am all for waging a war on fatty foods instead of terrorism.
- 3 years ago
-
maxamust
-
-
stopnoise
-
Here is a little history of the bill;
- 3 years ago
-
stopnoise
-
-
maxamust
-
2nd state. I am pretty sure its illegal in Manhattan at least.
- 3 years ago
-
maxamust
-
-
Bovey
-
maxamust:
Manhattan is not a state
- 3 years ago
-
Bovey
-
-
AlinaJette
-
maxamust:
It is not illegal in NY. It has been "encouraged" a year ago, that restaurants stop using trans fat, so that they do not issue a law regarding it. So, though a restaurant in this NY can use trans fat, most now choose not too. I know where I live in ny, all the restaurants here advertise that they are trans fat free.
- 3 years ago
-
AlinaJette
-
-
HighT3chR3dn3ck
-
Wow... absolutely rediculous... It's called restraint people. Instead of giving the government more power than it should have over personal choice, you could always use self control and chose where you eat.
The fact of the matter is that obese people deserve to be obese. Can't you see? These people are not the victims, they did it to themselves, and it all could've been avoided with a little self control, it's not like these restaurants are force feeding you.
So good for you California for giving up more personal freedoms, why don't you just make alcohol illegal, b/c it's killing people right? It's not the drunk drivers that are killing people it's the alcohol, oh and don't forget to ban guns, cigarettes, marijuana (people do get killed over mj), driving, all contact sports, movies, music, tv... heck why don't you just ban life period, b/c if you can't live then you mostly certainly can't die. So it must be life's fault you're dying, absolutely no one elses huh?
- 3 years ago
-
HighT3chR3dn3ck
-
-
FallenMorgan
-
HighT3chR3dn3ck:
Trans fat is in a lot of things, mostly because of corporate greed. Same with hydrogenated oil.
- 3 years ago
-
FallenMorgan
-
-
HighT3chR3dn3ck
-
HighT3chR3dn3ck:
Ha! Corporate greed? More like American gluttony and lack of care. Oh wait, yes of course, blame it on somebody else other than yourself. Did you not read a word of my comment?
If people just simply decided to live a healthier lifestyle and cut out all the things that they "crave" and stick to fruits, vegtables, breads, grains, fish, and certain meats, then we wouldn't be having this discussion in the first place.
All it takes is a little personal choice in the right direction.
- 3 years ago
-
HighT3chR3dn3ck
-
-
seary6579
-
HighT3chR3dn3ck:
Though I fully agree with your comments on restraint and it not being government's place to act as our personal dieticians, your comment about obese people deserving to be fat reeks of douchebaggery of the highest caliber.
- 3 years ago
-
seary6579
-
-
HighT3chR3dn3ck
-
HighT3chR3dn3ck:
Oh, yes I can tell from your vocabulary that you are quite the educated one; I'm sure the formation of the word "douchebaggery" put quite the mental strain on you. It sure is a big one.
While I normally wouldn't debate one of your great and obvious mental capacity I will to entertain.
Just to be clear, what you are saying is that people whom are fat, don't deserve to be fat? (And I will make exceptions b/c there are always exceptions to a general statement.) Which means in essence you are saying that when a person makes a lifestyle choice, they should not be held accountable for that?
So then if you play with fire, and you get burned, you didn't deserve to get burned. If you drink a lot then you don't deserve to have a bad liver. If you are extremely promiscuous and don't use protection, and you contract an STD, then you obviously didn't deserve that. If you break the law and get caught, then you don't deserve to be punished.
I think you get the point by now, really what you're are saying is that a person doesn't deserve the consequences of the choices they make. We should all just be given lease to do whatever the hell we want, without worrying about the consequences. Absurd.
You know how I feel sorry for, are the children of fat people, b/c at that point it really isn't their fault. If it were up to me any parent of an obese child would be charged with child abuse b/c that's exactly what it is. They are doing harm to the childs not only physical state, but their mental as well.
- 3 years ago
-
HighT3chR3dn3ck
-
-
seary6579
-
HighT3chR3dn3ck:
actually, I was just saying you kind of come off like an asshole.
- 3 years ago
-
seary6579
-
-
antifence_sitter
-
HighT3chR3dn3ck:
Yeah, well you do come off like an asshole, but you've got an acceptable point about children of Obese people. There isn't any reason to get personal (I.E. Vocabulary of the other person) when discussing a matter like this.
Think of it this way, generations of people have had children while overweight. It isn't moral to say that everyone did it to themselves, because you have no idea of their history. If your point is that It is the fault of the Overweight parents, then what about theirs? And their grandparents? When you are as ignorant as you seem to be, you should not judge anyone by what they seem to be. And obviously you aren't considering the other factors on this matter because there are other reasons, like faulty weight-loss solutions and fake diet plans that doubt America's reform to solve the problem in the second place.
So your Ignorance isn't helping your opinions. Please look more into the subject before you maintain a solid thought, okay.
- 3 years ago
-
antifence_sitter
-
-
FallenMorgan
-
Yay!
Trans fats and hydrogenated oil are evil things that should be banned.
- 3 years ago
-
FallenMorgan
-
-
SuncatcherEyes
-
I wonder what the government is getting out of this one.
- 3 years ago
-
SuncatcherEyes
-
-
iah
-
its about time.
- 3 years ago
-
iah
-
-
Egnatius212
-
Good for them!
- 3 years ago
-
Egnatius212
-
-
Bovey
-
I think it is great that restaurants in CA are going to be cutting out the trans fats, but the Libertarian in me does not like the way it is being done. I would be much more in favor of requiring restaurants to disclose to their customers which dishes contained, or were cooked using trans fat's, along with some type of warning about the health effects of consuming trans fats. By using this type of warning (such as we now have on cigarettes and alcohol), you empower the consumer by making sure they are able to make an informed decision, without actually taking away the freedom of a business owner to serve what he chooses, and the freedom of the consumer to purchase and eat what they choose.
When you consider that meat and milk from cows naturally contain small quantities of trans fats, is it really that big a stretch to imagine some vegan group pushing for a similar ban on all beef products? Now, there would certainly be way to much opposition to such a ban on the national, and even the state level, but what about smaller communities with high vegan populations?
Do we really want or need our government regulating what we can eat through force of law? Personally, I prefer freedom.
- 3 years ago
-
Bovey
-
-
rockstarmillionaire
-
Bovey:
agreed
- 3 years ago
-
rockstarmillionaire
-
-
graysea
-
CALIFORNIAAAAAA!! CALIFORNIAAAA!!! HERE WE COOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOME!
- 3 years ago
-
graysea
-
-
rwylie
-
After the recent report that California uses more fossil fuels than all of China, I feel slightly less inclined to say well done!
- 3 years ago
-
rwylie
-
-
Dmitri_Molotov
-
The only reason transfats are used is because of their exceptionally long shelf life compared to natural fats. Don't worry, we can still eat french fries, burgers, onion rings, KFC, and other tasty/unhealthy foods. They'll probably even taste better because of it, due to transfats being neither essential nor salubrious.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transfat - 3 years ago
-
Dmitri_Molotov
-
-
Bovey
-
Dmitri_Molotov:
"neither essential nor salubrious"
Hmm, you took that right off the Trans fat wiki page didn't you?
- 3 years ago
-
Bovey
-
-
flyingkick
-
Obesity has more to do with the amount of overall calories consumed, not the amount of trans fat consumed.
Trans fats are an easy target for the politicians because unlike the tobacco industry, there is no huge lobby.
- 3 years ago
-
flyingkick
-
-
mcbreeezy
-
"i do what i want"! there is no way the state of cali or any one else is going to tell me what i can and cant eat. this is getting rediculous! Id like to know the motivation behind this crap, its obviously not americas health! cigerette anyone?
- 3 years ago
-
mcbreeezy
-
-
antifence_sitter
-
mcbreeezy:
It is merely a step in order to attempt to reform America's health. it is always the first step that begins it.
- 3 years ago
-
antifence_sitter
-
-
squidteeth
-
mcbreeezy:
yeah, the first step towards completely controling the public, thats what i'm afraid of.
- 3 years ago
-
squidteeth
-
-
IndieArtist
-
I don't mind but does this mean no more onion rings and french fries???
- 3 years ago
-
IndieArtist
-
-
Dmitri_Molotov
-
IndieArtist:
No. Transfats are only used because of their long shelf life, and are completely replaceable with natural fats.
- 3 years ago
-
Dmitri_Molotov
-
-
BirthDayCake0504
-
let the people eat what they want to eat its the over weightpeople to decide weather they want to eat fatty foods or good foods. just another way the states are taking away our freedoms.
- 3 years ago
-
BirthDayCake0504
-
-
jakes_green
-
horrah!a beginning of the end of the obese epidemic!
- 3 years ago
-
jakes_green
-
-
antifence_sitter
-
jakes_green:
And the Health Book Marketing. And Diet Supplements. Then we will be good.
- 3 years ago
-
antifence_sitter
-
-
TheWallruss
-
I find this a wee amusing that California is outlawing trans fats and doing nothing about smoking of tobacco, drinking of alcohol, and the legalizing of marijuana. How do we justify that? Next they will be making it felony to eat red meat.
The government should keep their nose out of my bedroom and my kitchen. OK, make the apparent bad side effects of trans fats publicized and well known as they have done about smoking and drinking. But to make it illegal to eat it is just wrong. It is just another part of our democratic society being reduced by some few individuals who think they have the right to tell the majority how they have to act. Or in this case what they may not eat. This is how socialised societies control their people.
I have not seen them outlaw backyard Bar-B-Q's. That has been linked with cancer. And how about sunbathing? Wow! That would go over big with the California Beach Societies. Enough is enough, this wrong. Tell me I can not eat arsenic. Tell me I can not eat cyanide. Tell me not to drink antifreeze or gasoline. But trans fats? get real.
Maybe we could pass a law requiring FAT people to quit eating. Or maybe we could pass a law requiring skinny people to eat more. Or maybe we could tell the politicians and the government to mind their own business. People have brains of their own, and just as it is my prerogative not to go to the doctor with every little ache and pain or every little scratch, bump and bruise, it is their choice as to eat trans fats, red meat, Ice cream, and candy bars. It is not just to try to legislate ones diet or eating habits.
Wally
- 3 years ago
-
TheWallruss
-
-
Dmitri_Molotov
-
TheWallruss:
Actually, California is always trying to get rid of smoking. Come on over here and if you ask someone for a light they'll probably look at you like you've got lobsters crawling out of your ears.
As for banning trans-fats, they are neither essential nor better tasting.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trans_fat - 3 years ago
-
Dmitri_Molotov
-
-
TheWallruss
-
TheWallruss:
Dmitri_Molotov:
That is not the point. To eat or not to eat foods containing trans fats. To drink tap water or bottled water. To eat cereal with or without sugar. Do drink diet or non diet soda water. To eat meat or not to eat meat. To put salt on that meat or not to. It is the individual's right of choice. This is someone with a arrogance to think they have the right to think for and make choices for someone else. This is not how it is done in a democratic society. I support your right to not eat this stuff. I personally do not eat any of the garbage mentioned above. I eat a very healthy life style. And just as I try to persuade others to eat and live healthy I support your right to do the same. However you and I do not the the right to force our life style or life choice on some one else. That is just blatantly wrong.
- 3 years ago
-
TheWallruss
-
-
squidteeth
-
TheWallruss:
THHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAANK YOUUUUUUUUUU!
- 3 years ago
-
squidteeth
-
-
mott
-
i'm assuming when they say "oil, margarine and shortening", that includes olive oil? i thought that olive oil was healthier for you then butter. and how are italian restaurants gonna get with this?
- 3 years ago
-
mott
-
-
Dmitri_Molotov
-
mott:
Something tells me they'll allow olive oil.
- 3 years ago
-
Dmitri_Molotov
-
-
Bovey
-
mott:
You missed a couple keywords there.
"oil, margarine and shortening containing trans fats"
Trans fats are, for the most part, artificially created to extend shelf life, change melting temperature, etc. Trans fats occur naturally only in small amounts in some meat fat's, and to my knowledge, do not naturally occur at all in vegetable products. Unless your olive oil is partially-hydrogenated, you should be OK.
- 3 years ago
-
Bovey
-
-
stopnoise
-
Right on! Cut the fat! The truth it is when people go eat outside they do not have much of a choice. Many times they do not know if what they are eating are healthy. Cutting fat from it it is the way to go!
- 3 years ago
-
stopnoise
-
-
AlinaJette
-
stopnoise:
If it is important to you to be healthy, then you will make the effort to understand what you are eating, or only eat at establishments that are geared toward health food.
My problem with this law is not so much that I personally will miss trans fat (I live in NY where it is not yet a law, but has been "encouraged" so all the restaurants around here promise trans-fat free food and to be honest, I can't tell the difference) however, this is opening up a gateway for a huge step of government regulation. Next year no saturated fats, then no sugar, no caffeine... you see where I am going with this....
- 3 years ago
-
AlinaJette
-
-
stopnoise
-
stopnoise:
Alina, I understand your point. People should be looking after themselves. However this case is a different one. Caffeine or sugar it is more of a choice than cooking oil. In case of trans fat oil, you cannot just go to a restaurant and say: "I want my food without trans fat when all they use is trans-fat oil. This is less of a political issue and more of a healthy issue to elevate the basic standard of food quality. Would you eat in a Restaurant if you knew they use MSG for cooking?
- 3 years ago
-
stopnoise
-
-
squidteeth
-
stopnoise:
yes i would.
OHHHHHH NOOOOO, msG!!!!!!!!
iT MAKES MY DORRITOS TASTE FUCKING AWESOME and my CHINESE FOOD ORGASMIC!SOMEBODY STOP IT! FOR THE LOVE OF GOD!
*eye roll*
pulllleeese. - 3 years ago
-
squidteeth
-
-
omordn
-
If people ate with moderation, this wouldn't be a problem. People eat more than what they should so yes... I am for this. I hope we take other measures as well. Our obesity rates are absurd.
- 3 years ago
-
omordn
-
-
AlinaJette
-
I really do not want the government to be my "mother". Trans fat is bad for you, so are cigarettes, sugar and alcohol. I still want the choice!
- 3 years ago
-
AlinaJette
-
-
mott
-
AlinaJette:
heck yes.
- 3 years ago
-
mott
-
-
Dmitri_Molotov
-
AlinaJette:
We're working on getting rid of cigarettes...
- 3 years ago
-
Dmitri_Molotov
-
-
Disable
-
AlinaJette:
The government also has to play fair and list the exact amount of trans fat in a product. Currently, if an item has less than a half of gram of trans fat in a serving, the company can say it has none whatsoever. Well, if you have two servings, you just had one gram of trans fat.
So, while I agree with you, the government doesn't need to give in to the food corporations.
- 3 years ago
-
Disable
-
-
oahspe
-
AlinaJette:
Somehow it seems like less of a choice when it is 'hidden' in your food.
- 3 years ago
-
oahspe
-
-
squidteeth
-
AlinaJette:
then why not change pre-existing laws to get rid of that whole "hidden fat" issue?
This is just too much.
- 3 years ago
-
squidteeth
-
-
donkeyfly69
-
AlinaJette:
hidden in your food?
if you're eating onion rings i'm sure the last thing you care about is the trans fats. you're going to get fat either way. maybe you should order a salad instead
- 3 years ago
-
donkeyfly69
-
-
regularrf
-
Do we really need the state telling us what to eat,they have so many problems I wish the public servants would just do what we want them to do. If I want a french fry I'll fu***king eat it.What a waste of time.
Just eat healthy produce like tomatoes and peppers - 3 years ago
-
regularrf
-
-
AlbeeYap
-
Is California ready to say goodbye to fries?
- 3 years ago
-
AlbeeYap
-
-
stopnoise
-
AlbeeYap:
No! But we will say goodbye to the way they used to fry it!
- 3 years ago
-
stopnoise
-
-
Dmitri_Molotov
-
AlbeeYap:
California has great fried foods without trans-fat. Just look at In&Out Burger. http://current.com/items/76395102_tasty_temptations
- 3 years ago
-
Dmitri_Molotov
-
-
donkeyfly69
-
AlbeeYap:
have you eaten in & out's super dry fries? they're the worst. i love their burgers but i go across the street to a burger king just to order fries.
- 3 years ago
-
donkeyfly69
-
-
LuckyPenny
-
Next on the list should be fructose and corn syrup.
- 3 years ago
-
LuckyPenny
-
-
xplayhousex
-
good! something needs to be done about all the fatty fatty fat fat.
- 3 years ago
-
xplayhousex
-
-
LuckyPenny
-
Right on California. I guess if people can't monitor themselves, the government will have to do it for them.
- 3 years ago
-
LuckyPenny
-
-
antifence_sitter
-
LuckyPenny:
well, thats why we're in turmoil in the first place. Good thinking.
- 3 years ago
-
antifence_sitter
-
-
squidteeth
-
LuckyPenny:
OH YEAH, let's make sure people can't to ANYTHING unless the GOVERNMENT says it's ok.
Cause thats the real definition of Freedom isn't it?
you people are nuts.
- 3 years ago
-
squidteeth
-
-
Jaded2784
-
This is a good start. But I think a ban on soda or something else bad that people overconsume moreso than trans fats would be more effective. Not enough people are aware of what foods contain transfats, and I think something like soda or refined sugar would be a much more "visible" win for the health of the public.
- 3 years ago
-
Jaded2784
-
-
ProjectDRAFT
-
nice... maybe now the plastic surgrey numbers will go down.
- 3 years ago
-
ProjectDRAFT
-
-
osiris326
-
I'm a little surprised that the Bush admin. hasn't made the FDA tell California that they can't do that, that the whole country has to have the same standard.
- 3 years ago
-
osiris326
-
-
javita516
-
osiris326:
are you seriously surprised? I'm not.
- 3 years ago
-
javita516
-
-
RudyRudell
-
whooohooo for MoCo MD
- 3 years ago
-
RudyRudell
-
-
petarro
-
Way to go!!!
- 3 years ago
-
petarro
-
-
dcuisinot
-
A good step forward, but what about all the foods that already contain trans fats even before they're cooked? That seems like the bigger problem.
- 3 years ago
-
dcuisinot
-
-
constantdisregard
-
dcuisinot:
I'm not sure I've heard of this. What sorts of foods?
- 3 years ago
-
constantdisregard
