Green | August 02, 2008 | 25 comments

Bush and Monsanto pushing to give FDA more power

Image
JanforGore
Rep. Diana DeGette (D-Colo.) is pushing to get a provision into the Food and Drug Administration Globalization Act of 2008 that would give the FDA the power to issue mandatory recalls of contaminated food. Oh, dear. We need to not give any more power to that agency to do squat.

Let's take a moment for a little background. The FDA is essentially run by Big Pharma, including Monsanto, and not for our benefit. click here

The FDA is in the process of eliminating YOUR vitamin companies, the foundation of a critical alternative health movement.

http://soundofcannons.blogspot.com/2008/01/no-more-vitamins-or-their-companies.h...
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?noframes;read=117225
http://www.naturalnews.com/022499.html

Why? Because they are true competition to the pharmaceutical industry. Supplements are cheap and and worse - non-proprietary. That is, they can't be patented though corporations have certainly tried - including to get hold of turmeric as it is proving to be a major defense against and treatment for cancers. Vitamin C is so multi-valuable and inexpensive and looking to be just what Linus Pauling said it was decades ago - a non-toxic chemotherapy - that there is now a bill in Canada to criminalize it.

The point is, if they can't solely own supplements which can treat all kinds of diseases naturally and cheaply and non-brutally, they are seeking to cut off access to them, treating them as dangerous. That is exactly what is happening Canada with the bill to criminalize vitamin C - being pushed, incidentally by the FDA, USDA, WTO and FAO, all influenced by Monsanto et al. click here

The FDA (run at the time by Michael Taylor, a Monsanto lawyer) is responsible for introducing rBGH - a genetically engineering Monsanto product, and one which Monsanto is trying, state to state, even as of today, to keep unlabeled, and without a peep of objection from the FDA. click here rBGH is still on the market despite citizens petitions to the FDA and scientific conferences indicating it increases the risk of breast cancer 7 fold and of prostate cancer 4 fold and of colon cancer. click here

"Monsanto and the FDA refuse to acknowledge recent research directly linking elevated levels of IGF-1 to increased risk of breast and prostate cancer. Monsanto and the FDA colluded in 1993 and '94 to block labeling requirements for rBGH milk. Consequently, the average dairy consumer has no idea if they're increasing their own risk of getting cancer.

Since 1994, every industrialized country in the world except the U.S. -- including Canada, Japan, and all fifteen nations of the European Union -- has banned rBGH milk. The United Nations Food Standards Body refuses to certify that rBGH is safe. Even the WTO, or more specifically its food standards body, the Codex Alimentarius, has refused to endorse Monsanto's claim that rBGH is safe for use in the dairy supply. In the face of facts and the majority opinion of the global political and scientific community, Monsanto and the [FDA] continue to endorse rBGH milk for general consumption, at the same time scratching their heads about increases in breast cancer deaths and the continually declining age of puberty for girls. ..."

Given what the FDA really is, why do any progressives blindly trust it to handle disease outbreaks and to do recalls (which can easily be used to destroy farmers)?

The FDA is not our friend or a neutral scientific agency meant to help the public, but just another agency in the grip of multinational corporations which are rapidly taking control of food and medicinal sources internationally and now making draconian moves to limit access to the natural medicinals.

  1. groups:
    Green,   Health
  2. tags:
    Green Environment Health Bush 9 more
  3.     
    |

25 comments // Bush and Monsanto pushing to give FDA more power

  • ihateyou
  • SamuraiDave
  • JanforGore
  • JanforGore
    • 0
      JanforGore  
    • Image
    • Monsanto and the Drug War In Columbia

      More dots to connect. Just as they did in Vietnam with Agent Orange, Monsanto has been spraying Round Up on coca plants and everything else in Columbia... The one Senator, Paul Wellstone who opposed this, wound up dead in an airplane crash not too long after his visit to Columbia. Another coincidence I am sure.

      Monsanto is an evil company with deep ties to the Bush administration which is pushing the current Globalization Act. So, to then say the title of this post is inaccurate is inaccurate at best. I suspect this is just the tip of the iceberg.

    • 3 years ago
  • Vierotchka
  • JanforGore
  • JanforGore
    • 0
      JanforGore  
    • From the article:

      'But what people need to understand is that frightening the public is valuable to the FDA in pushing the Food and Drug Administration Globalization Act of 2008. It is a Bush bill so red flags should go up. A bill that Bush wants is not a bill that people would.'

      The title is accurate and I already commented regarding the fact that a Democrat is asking for this provision. There has been no political favoritism in my postings about Monsanto. The facts are the facts. Bush is lobbying for them, and he like his father has used the power of the office and influence through the FDA to give special treatment to a company that has poisoned many people and the environment with their products. And this current globalization act will do nothing but give this agency even more power over the health and wellbeing of our citizens which is to me at this point is criminal.

    • 3 years ago
  • Bovey
    • 0
      Bovey  
    • JanforGore:

      The title suggests that this is something being pushed by Bush and his cronies when the story clearly states that the amendment in question is being pushed by a Democrat.

      The title is NOT accurate.

      Don't let your dissatisfaction with the Bush admin cloud the fact that the Democrats bear nearly as mush blame as the Republicans for the mess our country is now in. Blaming the President for an amendment being pushed by a Democratic congress woman is just partisan BS.

    • 3 years ago
  • JanforGore
    • 0
      JanforGore  
    • JanforGore:

      Well, I'm not changing it and as was also quoted from the article, Bush IS pushing this. Sorry you refuse to see that in your insistence on focusing on one sentence of an entire article. I will not address the title again. It is accurate in the context of this article and in context to the FDA Globalization Act that IS a Bush bill wanted by him and it is staying.The only partisan BS I see is the favoritism being paid to this company at the expense of people's livelihoods by ALL sides. That is the overriding issue here and I intend to continue to focus on that.

    • 3 years ago
  • Bovey
    • 0
      Bovey  
    • JanforGore:

      OK, apologies if my comments came off as some sort of thread jack. I certainly do not wish to take away from the importance of the article. You are absolutely correct in your statement that both sides play on peoples fears to expand their own power and influence, and this seems like a good example.

      My concern is simply that so much blame is being placed on the Republican administration for the mess of the past 7 years (and rightly so), that many people will simply had the keys to the kingdom to the Democrats in November and think that everything will be OK now.

    • 3 years ago
  • Bovey
    • 0
      Bovey  
    • The headline claims that "Bush and Monsanto" are pushing to increase the power of the FDA, but the article CLEARLY states (in the VERY FIRST sentence mind you), that the legislation is being pushed by Rep. Diana DeGette (D-Colo.) The "D" stands for "Democrat" in case you were wondering.

      This is certainly an important issue, but today it is a Democrat trying to expand the power of the federal government for the benefit of her corporate contributors, NOT a Republican. According to the statistics provided by Opensecrets.org, "Health Professionals" and "Pharmaceuticals/Health" are two of the three leading industries that contributed to DeGette in 2007-2008. http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/summary.php?cid=N00006134

      Good story and link JanforGore, but your headline is false, misleading, and will likely result is many people dismissing the story out of hand as just another Bush-hater post. I'm giving the story a vote up, but I wish I could also give the headline a vote down.

    • 3 years ago
  • smizzle1
    • 0
      smizzle1  
    • I feel like I'm going crazy. Though I knew about the FDA and its' real motives, I get downright depressed over everything that is happening. People...we have to revolt or boycott anything to do with big corporations. Every single aspect of our industrialized society is corrupt. The power has to come from us citizens to reject this bullshit!!! I take so many different vitamens and natural supplements. It's eventually going to come down to the American people to stop their daily lives and revolt/protest against the government (corporations). I'm also now learning about the banking system and how everything is geared toward putting more money in the hands of a few elites. This has been occurring for centuries. We are dealing with sociopaths here!!!

    • 3 years ago
  • jubal
    • 0
      jubal  
    • The FDA should not have the same people who they are supposed to be monitoring also be the monitors. This should never be allowed.

      Scientists who are in charge of the FDA should be paid well and never be allowed to serve in private industry, or else they loose the privilege of being an FDA official. These scientists must be sheltered from the lobbying influence of the industries they are charged with policing.

    • 3 years ago
  • jubal
    • 0
      jubal  
    • Image
    • Here is an Essay I wrote about Family Stratification and Affirmative Action for Families. It goes into great detail and makes the argument for what I am advocating.

    • 3 years ago
  • jubal
    • 0
      jubal  
    • The FDA is due for a major overhaul; like Homeland Security except, there should be a Presidential committee established, much like the EEOC (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission).

      It should be called CFEE (Commission for Family Equality and Edification) who should be placed in charge of the overhaul and consolidation of government agencies charged with protecting public health, family services, and human resources. This would include Department of Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Department of Housing and Development, National Centers for Disease Control, Department of Agriculture and Department of Labor.

      The new government agency could be called The Department of Family Security. It's mandate would be to ensure that all families; traditional heterosexual, non-traditional heterosexual, same-sex unions, polygamous, polyandrous, and polyamorous, are treated equally under the law, have the same rights and responsibilities and receive the same benefits and considerations as Corporations do as artificial people.

      This would include a massive overhaul of the FDA, the Family Court System, the Department of Health and Human Services just to name a few. Through Presidential decree, just like Dubya did with Homeland Security with his pen on a piece of paper.

      Do it for the good of the Country and its people, for the families that are left by the wayside, and to put family rights on an even par with those of artificial people like Corporations and Government Institutions.

    • 3 years ago
  • Mafioso
    • 0
      Mafioso  
    • Love the pic you used!

      I am convinced it will take some severe actions to stop this monster (Monsanto). Action that would put the killer tomatoes to shame.

    • 3 years ago
  • sueathome
    • 0
      sueathome  
    • Where with you on this Jan. Thanks for enlightening us on what the big, bad, ugly, underground is up to at the moment. Ahh, how fast can we get Bush Man out of office?

    • 3 years ago
  • JanforGore
    • 0
      JanforGore  
    • The FDA is an agency in the US Department of Health and Human Services... another oxymoron. It doesn't look like anyone regulates it these days. And if you look at the first sentence in this story, it is a Democrat who is trying to get this provision into this act... very disheartening to see they are all in this together. Where is our protection? They are trying to destroy family farming as we know it to industrialize, privitize, and supersize their own profits and the profits of multinationals like Monsanto by allowing them to peddle their poisons and cover for them. Dangerous indeed.

    • 3 years ago
  • Elligirl
  • SamuraiDave
  • JanforGore
    • 0
      JanforGore  
    • Yes, and the fact that our food labels do not tell us if we are eating GMOS in our food which the FDA was instrumental in supporting along with Monsanto doesn't seem to bother the FDA regarding "disclosure" matters, only 'killer' tomatoes...

    • 3 years ago
  • queenofit
    • 0
      queenofit  
    • Yes, a few measly outbreaks of Possible tomato or jalapeno, and we were inundated in the msm over it. Good gosh, there are many more conditions that we are experiencing from chemical exposure, and "they" are not in the msm daily.

      For example: Roundup is one that just puts me almost in the hospital. Yet anyone can spray that stuff and legally poison me,

    • 3 years ago
  • JanforGore
  • queenofit
    • 0
      queenofit  
    • one more thing:

      here is a quote from the article that further explains my view:

      Recalls are a weapon that can be to destroy those competing with corporations, and land particularly brutally on small producers. And as with the tomatoes, the USDA or FDA, if they truly wished to protect those family farms and were not interested in writing more power into a Bush bill, would simply put out a message to the public to heat any milk they are concerned about for 5 minutes, or that the tomatoes are safe if made into a sauce. Instead, they whip the public up into a frenzy of fear, and get them to push politicians to write regulations that will ONLY benefit corporate interests. And producers are forced to throw away valuable product.

    • 3 years ago
  • queenofit
    • 0
      queenofit  
    • Ok, I just read the entire article.

      Here is what came to me:

      I recall (good word ;) ......back when all this salmonella scare started, I was wondering why they were so freaking worked up over a few isolated incidents of Possible tomato contamination. I knew then something bigger was coming down the tubes. Now I know, now I can see the bigger picture, and it ain't pretty.

      They (fda) in my view (and I don't wear tin foil hats) has created this scare in order to further push their agenda, and then real "dance" begins.

      Thank you Jan for this enlightening piece!

    • 3 years ago
more from Green:

top videos