Nuclear storage at Yucca jumps 38% — to $96B
source: http://climateprogress.org/2008/08/06/nuclear-storage-at-yucca-jumps-38-to-96b/
-
-
- MeganMcKenzie
- added this
DOE has spent $13.5 billion since 1983, and figures to spend $54.8 billion on construction, operation and decommissioning of the repository; $19.5 billion for transporting the waste — including building the canisters for holding waste; and $8.4 billion for other program activities.
The report notes that the expenses were based on a repository opening date of 2017 — a best possible opening date that Sproat has already said is no longer possible due to budget constraints, which have pushed it to 2020. The lifecycle estimate also does not include the at least $11 billion in liability expenses DOE expects for breaking its contract with utilities to begin taking away the spent nuclear fuel in 1998.
Another possible cost increase could come from the more than 30 planned new nuclear reactors, which were not included in the estimate. Sproat said trying to estimate costs for waste from the new reactors would be speculative and would no longer provide “an apples to apples” comparison with the 2001 report….
The report notes that the expenses were based on a repository opening date of 2017 — a best possible opening date that Sproat has already said is no longer possible due to budget constraints, which have pushed it to 2020. The lifecycle estimate also does not include the at least $11 billion in liability expenses DOE expects for breaking its contract with utilities to begin taking away the spent nuclear fuel in 1998.
Another possible cost increase could come from the more than 30 planned new nuclear reactors, which were not included in the estimate. Sproat said trying to estimate costs for waste from the new reactors would be speculative and would no longer provide “an apples to apples” comparison with the 2001 report….
-
- groups:
- News and Politics, Green, Earth and Science
-
- tags:
- News and Politics, Green, Earth and Science, Environment, 1 more
-
-
jubal
-
This is precisely why we do not need any more nuclear power plants to deal with in this country, they can't even get their shit together to safely storage the waste.
This is pathetic and alarming.
- 3 years ago
-
jubal
-
-
lovelydacey
-
OHMIGOD!!! seriously why are we even USING nuclear power, when we can totally use Solar, wind and renewable resources with less risks???
I learned about renewable resources in FOURTH GRADE!!! Well, then again, I think It's clear Bush didn't ever get that far... - 3 years ago
-
lovelydacey
-
-
MeganMcKenzie
-
Just 54 more billion reasons I am against nuclear energy. Come on we have to do better than this.
- 3 years ago
-
MeganMcKenzie
-
-
onechance
-
MeganMcKenzie:
I second that.
- 3 years ago
-
onechance
