Green | August 28, 2008 | 26 comments

Obama convention speech on energy

Image
MeganMcKenzie
And for the sake of our economy, our security, and the future of our planet, I will set a clear goal as President: in ten years, we will finally end our dependence on oil from the Middle East.

Washington’s been talking about our oil addiction for the last thirty years, and John McCain has been there for twenty-six of them. In that time, he’s said no to higher fuel-efficiency standards for cars, no to investments in renewable energy, no to renewable fuels. And today, we import triple the amount of oil as the day that Senator McCain took office.

Now is the time to end this addiction, and to understand that drilling is a stop-gap measure, not a long-term solution. Not even close.

As President, I will tap our natural gas reserves, invest in clean coal technology, and find ways to safely harness nuclear power. I’ll help our auto companies re-tool, so that the fuel-efficient cars of the future are built right here in America. I’ll make it easier for the American people to afford these new cars. And I’ll invest 150 billion dollars over the next decade in affordable, renewable sources of energy - wind power and solar power and the next generation of biofuels; an investment that will lead to new industries and five million new jobs that pay well and can’t ever be outsourced.

America, now is not the time for small plans.
  1. groups:
    News and Politics,   Green,   Earth and Science
  2. tags:
    News and Politics Green Earth and Science Environment 2 more
  3.     
    |

26 comments // Obama convention speech on energy

  • khromadjo
    • 0
      khromadjo  
    • Both Obama and McCain have made and will continue to make questionable judgments in the eyes of their opponents.

      All of us. The American people. We can MAKE THEM work towards alternative energies. The finger-pointing and such is complete bull and a waste of time. These guys are BOTH interested in political power and subterfuge, no matter how varied. But what's more important is that you, that is to say all of us, have the power to shake up and overtake this bureaucracy. YOU ultimately control who goes in, and can influence all aspects of government, if you confront them. By confrontation, I DO NOT mean violence. Do not steep to their level. By confrontation, I mean that you should challenge the words, records, morals, values, discriminations, judgments and decisions of your appointed officials.

      You pay taxes, pay into the cycle of capitalism, and pay with your personal freedom, and still like sheep blindly obey because we think we are diminutive compared to Capitol Hill.

      --

      "To the efficacy and permanency of your Union, a government for the whole
      is indispensable. No alliances, however strict, between the parts can be
      an adequate substitute; they must inevitably experience the infractions and
      interruptions which all alliances in all times have experienced." --George Washington, from his farewell address

      This is not the nonpartisan country George Washington yearned for in his farewell speech, but it can be.

    • 3 years ago
  • Prijedor
    • 0
      Prijedor  
    • another thing, Obama voted YES to some things I wanted him to vote NO for, Obama should be like people not other way around and dont like much about McCain.

    • 3 years ago
  • wrenntanner
    • 0
      wrenntanner  
    • How about this, government is not supposed to be subsidizing oil prices or new car prices. If oil was not taxed to death and was traded between nations freely on the market, it wouldn't be so expensive.

      And as for investing in cleaner energy, who's to say that government should be doing that with our tax money? We should take the money ourselves as consumers and invest in green energy companies. Big government always looking out right, why aren't we investing in Solar technology then? Nuclear power, wtf?

    • 3 years ago
  • MeganMcKenzie
    • 0
      MeganMcKenzie  
    • It is scary that our choices are coal or McCain which would include offshore drilling, coal, nuclear, and more oil subsidies.

      Nadar looks better.

    • 3 years ago
  • Wetdog
    • 0
      Wetdog  
    • MeganMcKenzie:

      How about Pickens? His plan isn't perfect but he IS doing something. I don't think he'll have much success trying to sell people on his idea of converting cars to natural gas--too expensive and the storage tanks are a problem. NG however, IS the perfect answer to get rid of coal. It*s a fossil fuel, but compared to coal, it is clean, less damaging, efficient and easy to handle. He'd have far more success selling it to utilities to get rid of coal. And that is fine with me, because it is possible with NG to use it in a way that will reduce greenhouse effect even though it is a fossil fuel.

    • 3 years ago
  • EdieJane
  • karnathis
    • 0
      karnathis  
    • Al Gore's speech was the most energizing of the convention. What Nadar is saying about Biden is true.
      Wake up American wake up. I would vote for Kucinich.

      There is nothing new in Obama's energy plan if he is using coal. Obama is flat out wrong to support "clean coal" as there is no such thing. The danger to others and to our
      environment is too great.

      Obama waffled on abortion and a woman's right to choose and is inflicting his religious beliefs on others. It may cost him the presidency. Never have I witnessed such an outpouring of prayer and religious music at a democratic convention. I am 56 and have a great memory .... it is not ok. In our country we have a separation of church and state for a reason.

      Obama made a mistake when he did not choose Hillary. I knew two days ago that McCain would choose a woman to attempt to garner the angry Hillary supporters. I think it is unfair to lay this at the feet of 98% of the folks who supported Hillary. The Clinton's both gave overwhelming support to Obama.

      However did NARAL come to endorse him? Women, wake up as Kucinich called to us. We need to fight this battle full force.

      Obama needs to quit inflicting religion, quit the coal business, support a woman's right to choose, and quit the grandstanding and get on with getting elected.

    • 3 years ago
  • MeganMcKenzie
    • 0
      MeganMcKenzie  
    • Why is it that NO ONE is talking about reducing the speed limit? We all know that driving slower reduces gasoline consumption. When I travel on Interstate 5 going south from the San Francisco area to Southern CA I drive 75 and I am left in the dust by truckers and suv's and just about everyone.

      Our speed limit on that road is 70. It is insanity.

    • 3 years ago
  • vladrath
    • 0
      vladrath  
    • MeganMcKenzie:

      Megan it is actually not a good thing to just clear cut the speed limits down. I will agree if a tractor trailer type truck is going over 80 or 90 MPH that is certainly wasteing gas. Passanger cars and commerical trucks all have "optimial" operating speeds where you get the most fuel effincy. I know one trucker and his truck was set optimally to 68 MPH by the manufacturer. His company put a govenor on his truck to reduce him to 60 MPH and he is currently useing MORE gas then he was before since he can't always be in the highest gear.

      So, making the argument of just "drive slower" really does not always actually use less fuel it can actually cause you to use more fuel.

      What would be nice is if all those trucks flying by you on the highway were useing a bio diesel from resturant waste, instead of diesel from oil.

    • 3 years ago
  • AutifK
  • symn8
    • 0
      symn8  
    • I've hearing all this talk against nuclear energy, clean coal and all but my question to all the people against it is how are we going to power the massive amounts of energy this country uses.

    • 3 years ago
  • MeganMcKenzie
    • 0
      MeganMcKenzie  
    • symn8:

      How about conservation as a beginning with large industries using more solar and wind at their plants. I know plants that have done this.

      We could reduce the speed limit by 10 miles an hour. Something politicians are too scared to talk about.

      We can give more energy credits to business and homes that use alternative energy. We can build railroads and other mass transit.

      We can quit squandering natural resources.

    • 3 years ago
  • Wetdog
    • 0
      Wetdog  
    • symn8:

      Wind power---that is T. Boone Pickens choice, and he's an oil man----solar power, hydroelectric power, geothermal power, , wave power, ocean thermal layers, algae oil, ethanol, pelletized crop and wood waste, wood, diesel generators, natural gas, biogas from waste, hydrogen, biodiesel, E-85, methane, and bubble gum.(just checking to see if you were still reading)

      Energy is just heat, that's all. There are thousands of ways to make heat. We don't need oil, coal or nuclear power to make heat. If we can make heat, we can make electricity. That is all the coal or nuclear does, Just makes heat. That's all. Everything else is exactly the same. You don;t have to throw out the BBQ because you want to stop using charcoal because it is dirty, messy and takes too long. Just take out the grate, drill a hole and put in a gas burner. And keep on cookin'.

      Hairdryers and video games don't care where the electricity comes from. They work exactly the same on electricity generated by wind, solar or coal.

    • 3 years ago
  • Wetdog
    • 0
      Wetdog  
    • symn8:

      In addition to all the things that Megan mentioned---if we just did ONE thing, make biodiesel out of saltwater algae---we could do all the same things we are doing right now, not change anything and cut our oil imports by more than 60%. We would also cut greenhouse gas emissions. We would cut WAY back on the trade deficit paying for foreign oil and causing inflation. And we wouldn't have to change anything, biodiesel replaces petroleum straight gallon for gallon---it does the same thing, it can be used in any diesel engine with no modification, it can be used in railroad locomotives or jet aircraft. We can even generate electricity with diesel generators and that is all ready being done in many places.
      One company, PetroSun is already making biodiesel from saltwater algae in Rio Hondo, TX. They are making 4.4 million gallons of biodiesel from algae grown in ponds on 1180 acres.

      Getting rid of coal and nuclear would not be hard or expensive.
      http://groups.msn.com/BreakingTheChains/general.msnw?action=get_message&mvie...

    • 3 years ago
  • Robroy1
    • 0
      Robroy1  
    • I hope Obama can do what he says he would like to do, I don't think that it is the time for negativity after the speech he gave last night on energy and and all the rest of his topics. Just think of the alternative choice. Another war mongering, bad clone of Bush. Being a prisoner of war does not qualify him for president if so there are many other candidates, for him to play the war vetran card tells you what a war mongering candidate he is. He is going to get even with all of his old imaginary enemies and being a senile old man, he has many imiginary enimies. America needs to live for the future, not in the past.

    • 3 years ago
  • Prijedor
  • Prijedor
  • Wetdog
  • SeaJade
    • 0
      SeaJade  
    • Obama had stated, whilst he was running for nomination (and written on his web site re: issues), that he is a supporter of "clean coal" and nuclear energy as the solution to our energy woes. Neither did he at the time of running for nomination have a clear plan regarding health issues (don't know where he stands at present) but John Edwards had a really good plan (I grew up in a country that had a similar idea), Obama is also a member of the World Monetary Fund.... and has also been supported by some major corporations that do not have our best interests at heart. He also proposes to keep on going in Afghanistan - that is - he still proposes to keep feeding the war machine. My red flags were up when I read his proposed policy or ideas actually, on energy, along with his intentions to keep spending our money, our children's and grandchildrens money on war. One can't possibly address the environment and its health whilst at the same time blasting bombs about the world that not only suck up enormous amounts of oxygen, but also contribute to warming temperatures, not to leave out the amount of depleted uranium thats flying about the planet, its bad enough killing people with that stuff in the name of war, but these modern weapons of mass destruction created with terribly lethal substances leave their trace for an infinite amount of time.

      These are huge issues as far as I am concerned and not the way to go. He is a charmed speaker, and he certainly speaks well of change, but I am thinking the change most of us desire to see, is not the same kind of change he is speaking of.

      I agree with you that McCain is a really really really bad, very bad way to go - a nightmare. Sadly, however, we should recognize for the most part we have had one party for the past eight years (at least) and should be calling them republicrats - the democrats have absolutely enabled our errant political brothers and sisters of the republic to unleash devastating damage to our world, not just our country.
      Obama will probably do what he is told by those who pull the strings behind the government, the corporatocracy.... but, i hope - in fact, i desire to be totally wrong and wish with all my heart he will change the course of this amazing country. I love a good surprise and would be delighted to find myself misreading the direction he is wanting to take us.

    • 3 years ago
  • MeganMcKenzie
    • 0
      MeganMcKenzie  
    • SeaJade:

      I agree with much of what you have said SeaJade. I was a Hillary supporter (not a popular position here I guess) therefore I had not read his energy policy. Two nights ago when the Montana Governor mentioned coal in his state I felt a sinking feeling.

      Some folks have said that we cannot get out of this energy mess without nuclear energy and coal. It will not help and it will make things worse. I am severely disappointed.

      People joke about McCain and his new pick yet I believe that he stands a good chance of being elected. Once again we are being forced to choose between the lesser of two evils.

      We do not have a viable third party in our system. I truly think Obama made a huge mistake in not choosing Hillary. He may actually not win.

      As much as I do not like a lot of what he stands for I know for sure that I cannot sit and watch McCain and his new pick take over our country. No civil rights will be restored and we will end up with the most conservative supreme court that I have witnessed in my lifetime.

    • 3 years ago
  • SeaJade
    • 0
      SeaJade  
    • SeaJade:

      I know what you mean Megan. We are in a quandary. Any of the candidates running, including Kucinich, Edwards and Paul, who were discussing domestic policy, government corruption, the tearing apart of the constitution and restoring our values back to the constitution as was made by our forefathers, health care issues and positive solutions, the role of corporate owned politicians and why its not a good idea, wanting a departure date from Iraq, wanting to support clean energies (this does not mean nuclear energy or coal), severely damaged international relations and how to repair them, wanting to change the direction of oil companies, those who discussed the wire tapping issue/ privacy and wanting to return our liberties and freedoms, who wanted to bring up the illegal actions of this administration, a fair and honest voting system (I mentioned blackboxvoting web site for example), who discussed reversing the media consolidation that has gone on over the past many years, who were wanting to reverse the illusions of the "fair trade agreements" that are not fair to the people, only the world monetary fund and banking systems and big corporations, and protecting our precious and beautiful environment and planet, were blacked out. Mainstream media had full control over who got visibility - and it wasn't for the good of the people. The truth is very hard to discern, we are living in a world full of smoke and mirrors - it takes a while to put all the pieces of the puzzle together as well as a lot of courage, fortitude, intelligence, common sense and a bit of selflessness thrown in (as i write these words, don't lose sight of the good things that are going on either, it is essential to have some light in life). Shakespeare, one of the greatest literary genius' of all times, said it so succinctly "the world is a stage, and we are the players". Most of the better known politicians have charisma as all good actors do (or the manipulative media and other powers that be behind them), some of them are fantastic actors. Looking at a politician's track record and how they vote on issues over a period of time is one way to start discerning. Its not what they say, its what they have done. Are they serving self, or serving to bring forth a better world for all people, not just for the few percent who have most of the money and making life tough for the rest of us!

    • 3 years ago
  • retired_Navy
    • retired_Navy  
    • This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
  • MeganMcKenzie
    • 0
      MeganMcKenzie  
    • retired_Navy:

      Well, McCain will blow it as I do not think he is very intelligent or a good debater. He is not a dynamic speaker nor is he on the side of environment or the economy.

      Bush is behind this conflict with Russia and he hopes it will help McCain. I think it will backfire.

    • 3 years ago
  • MeganMcKenzie
    • 0
      MeganMcKenzie  
    • I supported Hillary Clinton and I believe she would have been a fantastic president. At the same time I am a strong supporter of the Democratic Party. I will support Senator Obama and fight to have him elected.

      I will also fight to influence Obama's energy policy. What he said in his speech tonight about nuclear power and "clean coal" is beyond disappointing. I sensed it was coming and I do not agree with it. After he is elected I am going to fight to be heard about his decisions.

      Senator Obama will address global warming and he will work to grow our economy. McCain will be a disaster. Even if we do not agree on all parts of Obama's ideas let us not forget how dangerous a world we will inhabit if McCain is elected.

      Make no mistake, if you vote for any independent or write in a name you are handing the election to John McCain and that will be disaster.

    • 3 years ago
more from Green:

top videos