Green | September 14, 2008 | 30 comments

Nonstick cookware chemicals found in human breast milk

Image
JanforGore
Toxic chemicals used in nonstick coatings and stain-resistant fabrics were found in the breast milk of every woman tested in a recent study conducted by researchers from the University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

Researchers tested the milk from 45 different nursing mothers for two different varieties of perflourinated compounds (PFCs): perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), also known as C8. PFOA is used in nonstick coatings such as Teflon, while PFOS is an ingredient in stain-resistant fabric.

PFCs were found in the milk of every woman tested, at an average concentration of 131 billionths of a gram of PFOS and 44 billionths of a gram of PFOA per liter.

The researchers said that this concentration would expose infants to PFC levels below the maximum set by the British Food Standards Agency Committee, but noted that infants may also be exposed to PFCs from other sources.

"Breast milk should be considered as an additional source of PFCs when determining a child's [total] exposure," researcher Kathleen Arcaro said.

She urged parents to keep in mind that breastfeeding still provides important nutritional and immune system benefits to infants.

The researchers also found that concentrations of PFCs in the milk of women who were nursing for the first time actually increased during the first six months of nursing.

"This may be related to increased food intake to meet the energy demands of nursing, and changes in food consumption patterns," said Arcaro. "In a Canadian study, diet was shown to contribute 61 percent of a person's total daily [PFC] intake."
  1. groups:
    Green,   Earth and Science,   Health,   Current News UK,   1 more
  2. tags:
    Green Earth and Science Environment Health 10 more
  3. recommended by:
    goldenways,
    Vierotchka
  4.     
    |

30 comments // Nonstick cookware chemicals found in human breast milk

  • sueathome
    • 0
      sueathome  
    • OK, bottom line is that the government will lie as long as there is a buck to be made. This is not new news. Non of it is. Do you know how many times the scientists do the studies and find out how harmful the substance in question is only to be told to shut up and go sit down. Better to make a billion first and then we will look astonished and play dumb when we are caught. Wouldn't have anything to do with a society that does nothing to hold these crooks accountable for their actions regardless if they "claim" that they knew the truth or not.

    • 3 years ago
  • darkhorsejim
    • 0
      darkhorsejim  
    • There's nothing quite like being raised throughout the Petro-Chemical age. But once your health is compromised, you quickly realize how everything in life stems from being healthy. Achieving & maintaining minimally good health in this day & age at the mercy of the most expensive, most complicated & most ineffective health care system is so challenging to navigate, that too many people have accepted their less than optimal health by living in pain or suffering from a chronic condition. Making small, incremental changes over time can empower anybody to a healthier, more fulfilling existence.

      Just one healthy change per week equals 50 a year, but really 100, because you’re replacing a negative choice with a positive one. Try going organic in sustenance, personal care & cleaning products, exploring homeopathic health care & making the healthiest lifestyle choices as possible to build & sustain a reliable immune system. In this convoluted age of misinformation, any industry’s corporate profits drive public policy through powerful, unlimited & unregulated political influence by lobbyists & special interest groups. Remember, we the consumer aren’t completely powerless & have the final say by how & where we spend our hard earned money. Choose wisely, your future & that of your family depends on it.

    • 3 years ago
  • Short_Shanks
    • 0
      Short_Shanks  
    • "The dose makes the poison." This dose, while relatively small, is likely chronic (not that kind of chronic). Over time exposure to low levels, even really low levels, (especially early in child delopment) may pose health risks. The problem is that there really is no long-term research available as the longitudinal study for the effects of compounds of this type is still in progress...(we're all the lab rats, right?)...Thalidomide anyone? Remember that chemicals may also have react (or interact) together to produce negative effects, even though by themselves, they may not be particularly harmful.

      To name a few other compounds:
      PCBs, PAHs, Dioxins, Phthalates, Bisphenol-A, Chlorinated Insecticides, FD&C dyes, Organophosphate Insecticides, Carbamate Insecticides, PBDEs...do I need to go on...?

    • 3 years ago
  • _Hayko
    • 0
      _Hayko  
    • Maybe it's nature's way of exposing babies to all the chemicals that we come into contact everyday whilst they are at the time when they are most able to adapt to their environment.

      Children who grow up in families with pets, who are free to fall down and cut themselves, roll around in the mud, eat bugs etc. grow to have have less allergies than those who don't have these experiences.

    • 3 years ago
  • ThePaleOne
    • 0
      ThePaleOne  
    • Human Engineering, anybody? First fire-retardants in children? Now Teflon? Sounds like some people are trying to make us into a super-race of Slippery People who can't catch Fire.

    • 3 years ago
  • JanforGore
    • 0
      JanforGore  
    • No, breast milk is still best. Mothers and mothers to be need to be informed in order to make safer and more natural food choices and mor einformed chocies on how that food is prepared. I would also state that if at all possible stay away from soy formulas... they are more than likely made with genetically modified soy that has been shown in some tests to cause problems as well regarding cancers and early puberty in girls. And yes, I think we are coming to the conclusion that the old ways were really the best. Progress is good in many ways, but not when it toxifies the planet.

    • 3 years ago
  • LindseyIndigo
    • 0
      LindseyIndigo  
    • So is it possible that statistically baby formula could be safer for babies than breast milk, as it doesn't contain the mother's pollutant load?

      It seems the only way to properly protect yourself and yoyr family is to never use, eat or drink anything that has come into contact with mass-produced chemicals, and only use organic and natural products... just like our ancestors used to! Funny how we've taken 2 steps forward and three steps back.

    • 3 years ago
  • kennyJ
    • 0
      kennyJ  
    • Image
    • Did anyone see Children of Men? It's set in 2027- and women can no longer get pregnant. The reproductive effects of these types of chemicals makes one wonder if we might be headed that direction...

    • 3 years ago
  • bittramp
  • GeoffNI
    • 0
      GeoffNI  
    • Not at all surprised. I have a book by Don Colbert. I guess I will discredit the man by saying that he is John Hagee's doctor. Anyway his "Toxic Relief" is really good. He speaks about our Toxic Planet and how we are exposed to Toxins by simply showering in our unfiltered water. Great Read to understand why and how to detox.

    • 3 years ago
  • rvmedia
    • 0
      rvmedia  
    • Image
    • Here's an interesting article looking at this issue of cookware closer, for those worried about Teflon and non-stick pans. (IMO, go cast iron). But notice that the authors still think that Teflon is "safe" when they state:

      "According to DuPont, the finished product of Teflon does not contain any of the production-process chemicals linked to health problems in factory workers. And the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency says that ingesting small particles of Teflon flaked off into food is not known to cause any health maladies."

      Another more journalistic look at this issue comes from a food reviewer at the Seattle Times:

      http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/pacificnw11262006/2003441775_pacificptaste...

    • 3 years ago
  • rvmedia
    • 0
      rvmedia  
    • We dealt with this in Ohio, where DuPont essentially bought out an entire town right next to their major C-8 plant, because the water was completely contaminated. And this is after hiding evidence of C-8 contamination dating to the 1980s!

    • 3 years ago
  • Menchaca
  • joshua2310
  • JanforGore
  • Acoltus
  • davidtaylor
    • 0
      davidtaylor  
    • It's pretty clear why this would be bad for women, especially nursing women. How bad is it for guys? Yes, I am probably being lazy...but it sure is easier to clean the nonstick pans...

    • 3 years ago
  • JanforGore
    • 0
      JanforGore  
    • Perhaps... and maybe the genetically modified foods (soy) you are more than likely consuming. So many toxins and choices to choose from. Man has surely shown so much respect and love for the Earth...

    • 3 years ago
  • Vierotchka
    • 0
      Vierotchka  
    • That's possible, dognamedblue - there's a lot of oestrogen in the water supply due to the contraceptive pill being used by most women. The oestrogen passes into the urine and from there into the sewers, and it is not filtered out during the purification process. There's even high levels of oestrogen in ground water, I have read.

    • 3 years ago
  • dognamedblue
  • Vierotchka
    • 0
      Vierotchka  
    • Stainless steel is the best, Tori. You can always rub the surface with some butter or oil to make it non-stick before you cook. :)

    • 3 years ago
  • keeshii768
  • Tori
    • 0
      Tori  
    • Yikes! I think practically all of my pots and pans are non-stick. Sounds like I need to do some shopping!

    • 3 years ago
  • JanforGore
  • ScreamingDinosaur
  • JanforGore
    • 0
      JanforGore  
    • Image
    • More on PFCs.

      An advisory board of scientists for the EPA has recommended that they be listed as a likely carcinogen, and a recent study in Toxicological Sciences has shown they damage the livers of laboratory rats.

      Considering the number of products that use perfluorochemicals, there may be reason to be concerned. U.S. residents were found to have the highest levels of these compounds of any people in the world, and researchers at Johns Hopkins have even found trace amounts in newborns.

      Part of the problem with these compounds is that they never break down in the environment, which means they can accumulate over time since the human body takes over eight years to rid itself of these chemicals.

      Companies that produce the compounds have questioned the results of the study, claiming that rats were used as subjects and that the results don’t necessarily carry over to humans. DuPont says their company’s studies have shown no health problems among workers exposed to thousands of times the amount of perfluorochemicals compared to the general population.

      The company has spent millions of dollars studying Teflon, and they say the chemicals are not coming off their pans, at least not in high amounts. And they may be right. The small amounts that come off the pans do not appear to be enough to account for the high, widespread levels found in the environment.

      Companies are being cautious, however, and eight of the major manufacturers of perfluorochemicals, including Du- Pont, have agreed to phase out these compounds by 2015. Even though a single source of contamination is hard to pinpoint, Kuruthachalam Kannan, a researcher at New York State Department of Health, thinks perfluorochemicals are leaching from everyday consumer products.

      So, while the full risk of exposure to perfluorochemicals has not been fully established, you may never look at your jacket, pizza box, shampoo, or microwave popcorn bag the same way again.

    • 3 years ago
  • JanforGore
    • 0
      JanforGore  
    • Yes, and logically stay away from cooking what you eat in nonstick cookware.

      From the article:

      'The United States has not set any regulations for exposure to PFCs.'

      Unbelievable.

    • 3 years ago
  • crazykatlady
    • 0
      crazykatlady  
    • yes breast milk is the best for a newborn but people also have to remember that you need to seriously monitor what you are putting in your body (in this case, unintentionaly) before and during that time.

    • 3 years ago
  • Vierotchka
    • 0
      Vierotchka  
    • You'll be amazed by all the other harmful chemicals that can be found in breast milk everywhere in the world. Still, breast milk is the least harmful there is. :(

    • 3 years ago
  • csmonut
    • 0
      csmonut  
    • But the FDA says that Teflon is a food substance and we're allowed to use it for cooking and when it flakes off it won't hurt us......
      Once again, the money wins.

    • 3 years ago
more from Green:

top videos