Green | September 15, 2008 | 14 comments

Almond growers sue USDA to halt mandatory fumigation of raw almonds

Image
JanforGore
After having their organic almond businesses devastated by the USDA's bizarre decision requiring mandatory chemical fumigation of almonds, the almond industry is fighting back. Fifteen American almond growers have filed a lawsuit against the USDA in an attempt to repeal the requirements that all almonds grown in California be fumigated or pasteurized. (Virtually all almonds sold in the United States are grown in California.)

Since the USDA's ruling in 2007, organic almond growers in California have been economically devastated by the mandatory fumigation of almonds. Because USDA rules don't apply to almonds being imported from other countries, however, the industry has seen a huge shift away from U.S. growers and towards almond growers in Spain and other countries. Some American almond farmers have even called the USDA's decision "a plan to destroy the U.S. almond industry and put small organic farmers out of business."

The USDA's plot to deceive consumers over "raw"

The mandatory almond fumigation requirement is seen by health-conscious consumers as not merely bizarre, but downright fraudulent. That's because the USDA's regulations allow fumigated and pasteurized almonds to be labeled "raw," thereby intentionally deceiving the consuming public and instantly destroying consumer trust in the labeling of all almonds.

By any honest measure, the people making these decisions at the USDA can only be described as either idiotic or criminal. To enforce regulations requiring the intentional mislabeling of raw food seems more like the actions of a criminal racket than a government agency. While online pharmacies selling mislabeled pharmaceuticals are routinely raided and shut down by U.S. authorities, when the government itself engages in similar deceptions, it declares itself above the law and immune to prosecution.

This lawsuit by U.S. almonds growers aims to overturn the USDA's deception. These fraudulent actions on the part of the USDA have generated an enormous amount of criticism from the raw food community, whose members depend on almonds to make raw almond milk, raw almond "burgers" and other raw foods preparations. As leaders of the raw foods movement rightly insist, fumigating or pasteurizing nuts destroys as much as 90 percent of their original nutritional value, altering proteins and destroying disease-fighting phytonutrients. The USDA, however, remains remarkably illiterate on this topic, have never made a single statement acknowledging any qualitative difference between cooked foods and raw foods.

__________

However, the USDA doesn't require this of almonds imported from other countries, only the almonds grown here, mostly from California. Why does the USDA seem to hate the American farmer so much? GM foods, irradiation, and now this. If I didn't know any better, I would say they were out to destroy the livelihoods of American farmers. And again, we have the deceptive description regarding pasteurized nuts as raw with a lack of scientific backup. Is there no end to it?
  1. groups:
    News and Politics,   Green,   WTF,   Earth and Science
  2. tags:
    News and Politics WTF Green Earth and Science 14 more
  3.     
    |

14 comments // Almond growers sue USDA to halt mandatory fumigation of raw almonds

  • third_eye_view
    • 0
      third_eye_view  
    • How disturbing!

      Thanks for posting this and raising the issue.

      I am still baffled by the requirements applied to domestic growers v. international.

    • 3 years ago
  • SeaJade
    • 0
      SeaJade  
    • Image
    • When I was younger, I couldn't correlate how so many "intelligent" and "well educated" people could not put together that poison = poison. That is, put it in our food, our air, our water and put it in our bodies = health problems (to say the least). When I was a little older, I then thought the people pushing poison were blindly greedy and just couldn't see the connection. Now I realize, sadly, they are simply doing it on purpose.

      There is also a new international law called the Codex Alimentarius (a video has been posted on current several times), supposedly to take place at the end of next year that will take away our right to have our choice of "health" supplements and vitamins. (search "codex alimentarius").

      http://current.com/search/search.do?indexName=en_us&renderer=jsp&q=codex...

    • 3 years ago
  • oakside
  • think_free
    • 0
      think_free  
    • The USDA has so many issues. They allow foods with HFCS to be labeled as 'natural'.

      So many branches of our government make me sick and give me a huge desire to live in another country.

    • 3 years ago
  • synclaire
    • 0
      synclaire  
    • what the hell, something is seriously wrong here. Why is an administration, who is so against regulation of any kind and has totally gutted the USDA, always wanting to spray all kinds of chemicals and radiation into the food? Who is running this bureau and what are their ties to the chemical industry? I'm betting they worked for one before they got this gig.

    • 3 years ago
  • dontipo
  • JanforGore
    • 0
      JanforGore  
    • Well, it is obvious this current administration is against science, ergo you have these rulings from climate change to the food we eat to the water we drink. This is what happens when ideology reigns over logic and money means more than the health and safety of the citizens. And LuciousAsh, spraying a food with a known human carcinogen and not telling the publc that but telling them the food is "raw" as if to denote natural and untouched is just as bad as what pharmaceutical companies do. I hope these growers win their suit.

    • 3 years ago
  • JanforGore
    • 0
      JanforGore  
    • uroborus8: I would say the chemical companies and the pharmaceutical companies. Look at all the business pharmaceutical companies get from sick people who eat these poisons. Monsanto and Eli Lilly are great examples.

    • 3 years ago
  • LuciousAsh
    • 0
      LuciousAsh  
    • While I don't fully agree that this serious lapse in the USDA's judgment needs to be prosecuted to the extent of mislabeled pharmaceuticals, this is pretty insane. It's sad to see those who are actively vying for change be held down by the ignorant.

    • 3 years ago
  • wholefreespirit
    • 0
      wholefreespirit  
    • Is nothing sacred?! I think the government is just out to keep us "organites" form being the only healthy people in the country. It's their way of sacrificing the survival of the fittest to the survival of the wealthiest. I'm tired of being a guinea pig! What is left to eat?

    • 3 years ago
  • uroborus8
  • huntre
  • JanforGore
    • 0
      JanforGore  
    • Image
    • Propylene oxide.

      A human carcinogen as categorized by the EPA. This is what the FDA has approved to be sprayed on almonds, still calling them "raw." If you eat almonds or anything twith almonds in them, check to see where they are grown. If they are from California, chances are they were sprayed with this human carcinogen... of course, the USDA will not tell you that.

      From the wiki article:

      The United States Food & Drug Administration has approved its use to pasteurize raw almonds beginning on September 1, 2007 in response to several incidences of contamination by salmonella in commercial orchards.[5]

      It was once used as a racing fuel, but that usage is now prohibited under the US NHRA rules for safety reasons. It is also used in thermobaric weapons, and microbial fumigation.
      __________

      MMM, delicious.

    • 3 years ago
  • JanforGore
more from Green:

top videos