Green | September 24, 2008 | 19 comments

Al Gore calls for civil disobedience regarding coal plants at Clinton Global Initiative

Image
JanforGore
Al Gore, the former vice president and winner of the Nobel Peace Prize, is nothing if not passionate on the issue of global warming. But his usual fired-up remarks on the subject took a step into the Gandhian realm on Wednesday when he told an audience at the Clinton Global Initiative meeting in New York that the crisis was so severe and intractable that it was time for direct action.

If you are a young person looking at the future of this planet and looking at what is being done right now, and not done, I believe we have reached the stage where it is time for civil disobedience to prevent the construction of new coal plants that do not have carbon capture and sequestration, he said at the third annual meeting of former President Bill Clinton's initiative, which arranges partnerships between the very rich and the very needy.

Mr. Gore said the civil disobedience should focus on stopping the construction of new coal plants, which he said would add tons of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere despite half a billion dollars worth of advertising by the coal and gas industry claiming otherwise. He added, Clean coal does not exist.

The audience at the Sheraton New York Hotel and Towers, which was composed of hundreds of heads of state and chief executives, as well as representatives of philanthropic groups, reacted with scattered applause. There was a lot of shifting in seats.

Mr. Gore did not elaborate on his call for action. And almost as soon as the words civil disobedience were out of his mouth, Mr. Clinton, moderating a panel that Mr. Gore shared with the singer Bono, the president of Liberia, the chairman of Coca-Cola and Queen Rania of Jordan, turned to the queen to ask whether Middle Eastern countries might ever become models of clean energy usage. The discussion continued in a less-fiery vein from there.
_____________

I can just bet people at the Clinton Global Initiative were shifting in their seats. ;-) Mr. Gore, I love you for this and am with you 100%. The climate crisis is getting lost in all of the talk about this 'election' and the 'financial crisis' that is actually related to our current energy policy. We do need more young people out here peacefully protesting to save their environmental future which also means saving this economy. And we also need older people as well to set an example for younger people about how change is really made. It isn't made by going to a rally of someone who claims to have charisma and can talk us out of it and thinking you have done something. It's taking action ourselves. I hope his endorsee is listening.
  1. groups:
    News and Politics,   Green,   Earth and Science,   Election 2008
  2. tags:
    News and Politics Green Earth and Science Environment 16 more
  3. recommended by:
    goldenways
  4.     
    |

19 comments // Al Gore calls for civil disobedience regarding coal plants at Clinton Global Initiative

  • artemis6
  • csmonut
    • +1
      csmonut  
    • In the 60's, people changed things. It took time, but because of the protests, peaceful civil disobedience (and otherwise) things changed.
      I guess it's time for another 60's type movement.

    • 3 years ago
  • spunkycarol
  • MeganMcKenzie
  • darkhorsejim
    • +1
      darkhorsejim  
    • Civil obedience during this tyrannical administration's single-minded agenda of a small group of people reaping billions in profits at the expense of its citizens & the environment has resulted in gas prices doubling, an even greater dependence on foreign oil further depressing the economy, & still finding ways to keep us fossil fuel dependant, like this clean coal BS. We should be far better off & further along a sane energy path if just as much time, effort & energy were expended continuing to develop a variety of sustainable forms of energy from the elements surrounding us all-solar, wind, water & thermal-were given the same attention that special interest groups (oil companies) give our leaders & lawmakers (most politicians).

      Oil Co CEOs were called to testify & explain to Congress how they managed to reap their largest profits in history during such a precarious economy. Where’s the scathing findings of collusion, extortion & refund checks for everyone forced to pay up after being strong armed by an industry that has shown they’re more powerful than our elected officials & the agencies responsible for overseeing such matters?

      “If you’re not outraged, then you’re not paying attention“, as the bumper sticker goes.
      We’ve been left on a road to nowhere with America’s current financial status an economic wreck looking to get even worse before it gets any better. There is no better time than the present to recognize our leadership has failed us on many levels & that push has come to shove. It’s about time for some collective disobedience. The kind that has worked to accomplish goals “thought to be impossible” throughout Europe for decades.

      You can only push people around for so long by outsourcing their jobs, making health care prohibitively expensive, foreclosing on their home & then their car they’ve been forced to live out of & finally steal their life savings accumulated over years of dedicated service before there’s a strong backlash. After broken promises of a brighter future, people will be forced to become uncivil in order to retain what they’ve managed to hang onto & survive in a world where the rules change too quickly for anyone to really have a handle on what’s going to happen next. The time for a revolution at some level is becoming all too real with each passing day. After all, we tried to be civil & obedient & look where it got us.

    • 3 years ago
  • jjmaster
    • +1
      jjmaster  
    • It is a dilemma... no one running who will stop the ravishing of our human rights to have clean air, water, food, and land from our greedbreeding corporate-run earth rapists!

    • 3 years ago
  • onechance
  • JanforGore
    • 0
      JanforGore  
    • You just did sling criticism at me. You claimed that people don't care about global warming if they dont vote for Obama. It is constant campaigning on this site 24/7 and it is actually in all honesty getting tiresome to read. And true Democracy is all about making our own choices come election time without the constant nudging, pushing and guilt trips from others who think they know better. Republicans and Democrats have caused this situaiton. I don't have to support any of them to support solving this climate crisis, and I don't. I would expect that to be respected as well.

    • 3 years ago
  • MeganMcKenzie
    • 0
      MeganMcKenzie  
    • JanforGore:

      Hardly. I said that throwing your vote away will not help change things. Many believe the reason Gore did not win was because of the votes cast Nadar's way.

      I have no desire to argue with you. I believe in what you do in terms of environment, commitment, putting my time, money, and energy where my mouth is.

      I think doing anything to give McCain a chance of being elected is going to hurt us in the long run. I hear you that you believe differently. I disagree and respect your right to choose.

      I merely commented today on the comment you keep making to me about giving Obama a free pass. I never have. I wanted Hillary who actually had a better energy policy than either of the two running now. I didn't get what I wanted so I will do the next best thing and fight for our environment. I have a license for my employment that I risk if I am arrested yet I am willing to put that on the line.

      So Jan, let's not waste energy criticizing one another. I have nothing but respect for you and the work you do and the stories you bring to current.

      I have reached out to you for advice. It hurt that you ignored me but so be it. It hurt when you have said for the 3rd time that I am giving Obama a pass. So be it.

      I still respect your work and commitment. Megan

    • 3 years ago
  • MeganMcKenzie
    • 0
      MeganMcKenzie  
    • What is sad when someone is angry with part of a candidates plan is to shoot the country in the foot by not voting for either. Wow that makes such an impact.

      Whether you wish to believe we would not be worse off with McCain and Palin in office I wish you would think again. Not only will the environment suffer so will women, middle class families, and healthcare.

      McCain is not fit to be a president. No way will Nadar be elected. So that leaves us with Obama and civil disobedience and other campaigns to stand up for clean energy and fight coal and nuclear.

      Jan, I wish you would quit saying I am giving Obama a free pass. I am NOT. I am against part of his energy plan just as I am against nuclear. I see more hope with Obama listening than I do with McCain.

      Even Al Gore supports the democratic party over McCain. I am delighted he stood up and made world leaders uncomfortable. It was the right thing to do. I am delighted to give money, participate in WE and work towards healing our world.

      I don't sling criticism at you Jan and I would appreciate the same courtesy.

    • 3 years ago
  • rightbrain
  • lfm
  • JanforGore
    • +1
      JanforGore  
    • McCain isn't much worse than Obama when he calls for nuclear as well as coal as part of the solution. So while others have the right to vote for whomever they choose and give whomever they choose a free ride instead of looking at this fairly, I will not vote for either of them as both have ignored the urgency of this crisis. Neither of them have even bothered to acknowledge Mr. Gore's call for 100% renewable energy in 10 years...And I'm not waiting for them or for a coal plant to go up in my neighborhood to start, and actually am getting tired of people using this crisis as a political wedge issue to tell people who to vote for and imply that if they don't vote for Obama they don't care about global warming. Many of us were out here caring loooong before Obama even cared to say 'global warming' when he was running for president and this goes far beyond being president of this country. And as I stated before, if either he or McCain is coronated and do not embrace the 100 in 10 challenge within the first 100 days they should be protested to the hilt. So great, I hope you do stand fairly should it be Obama who continues this country's love affair with coal. Democrats (along with Republicans which is no surprise) in Congress just the day before yesterday as it was reported are allowing the moratorium on offshore drilling to expire...so until I see a bill that calls for 100 in 10, none of them are any better than the other.

    • 3 years ago
  • MeganMcKenzie
    • 0
      MeganMcKenzie  
    • I doubt that Clinton was squirming. I am very pleased to hear Gore call for civil disobedience and I am one that will stand up and count.

      I am voting Obama as McCain and his intractable policies are worse then Obama's misguided belief that "clean coal" is an answer. When it comes time to build a "clean coal plant" or a nuclear facility I intend to exercise my right to protest.

      I encourage everyone concerned with global warming to do the same.

      The time is now. We must take action or we will be living a nightmare and passing it on to our children.

    • 3 years ago
  • jefftego
  • JanforGore
    • 0
      JanforGore  
    • And of course, instead of discussing the importance of this in light of the total lack of political will we see, all we see here is the same bs spam and non committal to real action. Seems people love to talk but when asked to walk, they get silent. Don't then wonder why we are where we are now.

    • 3 years ago
  • JanforGore
    • 0
      JanforGore  
    • One thing to refute your rhetoric which you are spamming again simply because you are an Al Gore hater: The climate crisis is real and you would know that if you had a mind of your own and actually read scientific reports instead of spamming this garbage in all of my threads.

    • 3 years ago
  • RyanLYoungblood
    • -1
      RyanLYoungblood  
    • Image
    • Long before Global Warming became a well known issue Al Gore and his Club of Rome colleagues stated that they would use the threat of global warming to unite humanity and "set the scene for mankind's encounter with the planet." They decided to employ a natural phenomenon as their 'enemy' in order to terrify their followers and achieve their objectives. But then they state that although Global Warming would be presented as the initial enemy, with the real ultimate enemy being humanity, which would be portrayed as man himself. Are you not noticing how frequently the terms climate change and overpopulation are being uttered in the same breath. Quotes from the Club of Rome follow:

      “This is the way we are setting the scene for mankind’s encounter with the planet. The opposition between the two ideologies that have dominated the 20th century has collapsed, forming their own vacuum and leaving nothing but crass materialism.

      It is a law of Nature that any vacuum will be filled and therefore eliminated unless this is physically prevented. “Nature,” as the saying goes, “abhors a vacuum.” And people, as children of Nature, can only feel uncomfortable, even though they may not recognize that they are living in a vacuum. How then is the vacuum to be eliminated?

      It would seem that humans need a common motivation, namely a common adversary, to organize and act together in the vacuum; such a motivation must be found to bring the divided nations together to face an outside enemy, either a real one or else one invented for the purpose.

      New enemies therefore have to be identified.
      New strategies imagined, new weapons devised."

      http://green-agenda.com/globalrevolution.html

    • 3 years ago
  • rightbrain
more from Green:

top videos