U.S.: Killing the Earth?
-
-
- CJCollectiveWorks
- added this
This special features the work of Collective Journalism contributors around the country, from Missouri to California, from Florida to Minnesota.
Collective Journalism, Current's citizen journalism program, works by combining perspectives from contributors like you around the world. All month until Election Day, CJ will be airing special investigations into the most important issues of this election.
-
- groups:
- News and Politics, Green, Earth and Science, Science, 14 more
-
- credits:
- CJCollectiveWorks Producer, afitzgerald Producer, Mike Horn Editor
-
-
Agianker
-
Hello, and welcome to a world that is a bit different than what you’re familiar with.
Long ago, in the early 1940’s, the world was bedazzled by the invention of a new commercial product – carbonated soft drink bottles, also known as - Plastic Bottles.
Pretty quickly, plastic bottles replaced glass and invaded our everyday lives. Nowadays, everywhere you go - in every shop, in every house, in every fridge - you’ll find them, gazing back at you with big plastic smirks.
Little did we know, these plastic soft drink bottles only appear to be innocent. Transporting these bottles to stores requires millions of gallons of oil and causes the vast release of CO2, harmful to the environment.
They are the cause of the oblivious back damage resulting from consumers carrying these heavy bottles home from the store. These not-so-innocent bottles can then be found polluting water reservoirs and adding to the endless piles of plastic waste. After all, it only takes over 400 years for a single plastic bottle to decompose. Yes, you can actually leave your great-great-great-great-great-grandson a message in a plastic bottle, perhaps you can tell him that there really was once a thing called an ozone layer.But what if we told you that it doesn't have to be this way?
What if we told you that Soda Stream™ has all the solutions you need to stop using those plastic soft drink bottles once and for all? What if we also told you Soda Stream could save you hundreds of dollars each month?
Caught your attention? Let's go inside and have a look.
Try the link..
www.worldwithoutbottles.comtext 3
Hello, all
I am not one to shy away from soda, but I have been trying to cut down/cut it out completely this year. One alternative I love is carbonated water, or club soda or seltzer, or “bubbly water” as my kids put it. I feel like I’m getting that carbonated soda-y feeling without the caffeine, sugar, or sodium. What I don’t like is buying bottles and bottles of seltzer and, even though I recycled the bottles, just felt like there could be an alternative to all the liters of water.
Sodastream is doing just that - liberating people from plastic bottles and soda cans by allowing people to make their own sodas and carbonated water at home. If the average American consumes almost 600 cans or bottles of soda every year, more than bottled water - doesn’t it make sense to stop the cycle and make your own, avoiding the waste? Here are the amazing environmental benefits of a soda maker -
• No batteries or electricity
• Reduces energy used to manufacture bottles and cans
• Reduces gas and pollution from shipping packaged beverages
• Eliminates pollution from batteries
I have the Pure home soda system, and I LOVE it. It doesn’t use electricity or batteries to work - just the power of carbon dioxide injected into their special water container. It’s very easy to use - install the carbon dioxide canister, fill the bottle with cold water, attach it to the system, and inject the CO2. You can leave the carbonated water as is, or add Sodastream’s large variety of soda-flavored syrups or natural essence water enhancers to give it great flavor.
Try the link..
www.worldwithoutbottles.com - 2 years ago
-
Agianker
-
-
ras_menelik
-
Pollution conveyor "belt" stream.
- 3 years ago
-
ras_menelik
-
-
ras_menelik
-
When is someone going to study the dispersion of radiation from all the nuclear trash "WE" have dumped in The Ocean and it's streams
- 3 years ago
-
ras_menelik
-
-
beep
-
right, Kanut. it is not a concrete project, but it points the way. it calls on people to start thinking up concrete proposals, and such proposals are already being presented. the debate is open ! join in, everybody !
- 3 years ago
-
beep
-
-
beep
-
What is killing the ecosystem is our disproportionate consumption, and the fact that we demand that it grow indefinitely. if we insist on continuing to grow, we are bound to hit the roof - and hard!
LOWER consumption now, and change the economic system that demands our collective suicide by way of unlimited economic growth.
- 3 years ago
-
beep
-
-
darinK
-
I am still pissed at the dinosaurs for creating the ice age. It was probably overeating the forests. Our earth has been changing ever since its birth. That is the one fact no one can argue. I think it wil get to the point where not much of any animal or plant will survive. Kind of like mars. When? who knows. When politicians start pouring our money into an industry called global warming their b.s. reaches new levels. We better figure a way to build an environment so save our own species.
- 3 years ago
-
darinK
-
-
manfreddrake
-
What ever happened to love of country, loyalty, etc.? Put your efforts toward promoting the country's leadership in new, advanced technologies. You think Russia or China give two craps about changing technology at this point?
Be an Ameri-can not an Ameri-can't. - 3 years ago
-
manfreddrake
-
-
petarro
-
You can talk all the talk and all the crap.
The reality is that when you were told to Walk The Walk, you FAILED. Take a look at the Link, read a little, if you are too lame to do it, look at the video at THIS post.
Should you still FAIL to understand. Then, this is why we are at this point.
- 3 years ago
-
petarro
-
-
Kanut [removed]
- This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
Kanut [removed]
-
-
barbara3d
-
Kanut:
Don't you mean get "out " of the gutter? They can be up or down.
- 3 years ago
-
barbara3d
-
-
barbara3d
-
anyone who "blames everyone" for "everything" is just ignorant, uneducated or just plain brain dead. Every issue on the planet can be connected to MANY sources. But, no, its so easy to "blame the USA". People across the world have been jealous of our accomplishments but I agree that we have brought that on by our "chest-beating, chanting USA constantly , in-your-face attitudes". We need to back off the arrogance and put on a humble, grateful face and be a real leader for the free world. People will be less resentful
- 3 years ago
-
barbara3d
-
-
trackstaff
-
Petarro. It is so. The UK is an overcrowded little island, with a population of only 60,000,000. The rise on rise of the sale of gas guzzlers has to be seen to be believed.
- 3 years ago
-
trackstaff
-
-
dharmadogpictures
-
-
“Our Mother Earth Is A Living Being”
Sequoyah Trueblood
How long can one endure such torture?
We cannot keep taking from the planet without some kind of recourse.
What your watching is a preview into Dance With Destiny - a documentary about prophecy, earth changes, and the shift of consciousness that needs to take place on this planet. - 3 years ago
-
dharmadogpictures
-
-
carrolraypugh
-

-
dharmadogpictures:
May you be blessed my friend. You are so right. We humans are killing Mother Earth. We must stop now before it's too late. Mother Earth tries to heal Herself, but we humans come along and tear down what She has built up. We must help Her now.
- 3 years ago
-
carrolraypugh
-
-
barbara3d
-
Why is the USA blamed for everything? Yes we contribute but think about many other INDUSTRIAL countries like China, Russia, and many parts of the world. We need to clean it up together and stop the USA self hatred!
- 3 years ago
-
barbara3d
-
-
petarro
-
trackerstaff,
i don't think so.
- 3 years ago
-
petarro
-
-
trackstaff
-
Petarro, good comment. However, the same attitude prevails in Europe. There are plenty of buyers with more money than sense.
- 3 years ago
-
trackstaff
-
-
petarro
-
Heh, are US Citizens really making themselves this question? hehe... of course you are. Specially since you invented the "American Muscle" cars that eats the gas amount of 4 cars.
- 3 years ago
-
petarro
-
-
NO_BALLADS_MIKE
-
WHILE YOURE ALL HUGGING TREES THE MUSLIM RADICALS ARE PLOTTING TO KILL EVERYONE ON EARTH. THIER NUMBERS ARE GROWING FASTER THAN ANY OZONE HOLE. ISLAM IS A GLOBAL CRISIS!
CHECK OUT NO BALLADS' "KILL ALLAH" ON YOUTUBE - 3 years ago
-
NO_BALLADS_MIKE
-
-
stopnoise
-
Some points here to think about. There is no such a thing as clean coal. Wind power creates acoustic hums in the air affecting the personal health of the people so it needs to be faraway from the residential neighborhoods. No else, if you really want to be green, go solar!
- 3 years ago
-
stopnoise
-
-
trackstaff
-
Now here`s a chance for the high tech enviromentalist to develope state of the art living and use it, affordably.
Once proven, sell it to the aspiring nations in a trade encouragement basis.
- 3 years ago
-
trackstaff
-
-
3oc
-
McCain - Nuclear - budget unknown
Obama - Green - budget 150bn
Bank Bailout - cost 700bn and counting.
War fund - cost 600bnDoes anyone see misplaced priorities here?
- 3 years ago
-
3oc
-
-
plusaf [removed]
- This comment was removed by its owner.
-
plusaf [removed]
-
-
PolicyWonk
-
plusaf:
Why are you linking to an opinion piece, and one without any statistical analysis or references?
Can't find any credible scientific sources to back up your gut feelings?
I'll be waiting for a serious argument from you...
- 3 years ago
-
PolicyWonk
-
-
PolicyWonk
-
plusaf:
Still waiting, Alan....
- 3 years ago
-
PolicyWonk
-
-
Eternal_Wind
-
plusaf:
HAHA, lol at # 40 on the Falk's Laws link.
Hmm... I guess I'd have to agree with the article ( http://www.newsobserver.com/opinion/columns/story/12713... ) somewhat... The efficency of it and how much energy is generated for the same amount of area, though one's pollution would be less (refering to wind/solar/tidal energy, compared to nuclear.) Reading up on the part where the waste is more concentrated, it really does seem better than coal, until you consider how much it could possibly spread (that is assuming that it isn't stored properly, or something happens to the storage device.) Of course, if it is properly treated (minimal effort to the base standard), I suppose it would be better than coal... Also, that's considering how much more/stricter regulations they have (or should have) on what to do with the waste with nuclear as to coal.
Back to comparing nuclear to renewable energy sources. Nuclear is limited in getting resources. They'd probably have to go out of their way to find the fuel to use, though it would produce a lot of energy onec they find it. Renewable energy sources are more convenient to get energy from (after building), though it might not produce as much in terms of energy per a certain amount of area. As for solving the "area problem," "windmills" and solar panels could be installed INSIDE cities, so it would take up less space, in a way (if people would allow them to be build there.) Nuclear plants could probably be bunched up as well, though it wouldn't be very safe if one blew up since it might affect another one, causing a chain reaction... though the range that a chain reaction would occur wouldn't be THAT big. As for using the tides for power, it takes in water at high tide and then releases it at low tide, I think... It's supposed to generate quite a bit of power, but only see there being a "high tide" and a "low tide" twice a day (from the relation of the sun and the moon.) There's also geotermal energy, but the earth's core is cooling (according to some article), so I don't know how effective it'll be after a few year... If you're considering the maitainance aspect, don't ask me about it, because I don't know. If you really wanted to see which one is better, you'd probably have to figure out that stuff.
I think I'd go with the "stick it in wherever you can" approach for alternative energy... (ex: solar panel on a light post, windmills along the coast as long as they don't look out of place) I wonder why they don't look into video games for support... Like... Pokemon-Diamond/Pearl. They had a city which had the upper level streets made of solar panels for their "energy crisis." Probably possible, but doesn't seem likely here though... (and yes, I'm a game addict/freak, so what about it? XD)
- 3 years ago
-
Eternal_Wind
-
-
PolicyWonk
-
McCain is crazy to promote nuclear power. It is expensive, the waste is nasty AND it's a limited resource.
We have no time for such folly.
It is time to repower America by cutting energy waste, investing heavily in wind and solar, and modernizing our national power grid (connecting where clean, carbon-free energy is made to where it is used).
Obama is on the right path, but he, and McCain, need to give up on "clean coal." It's science fiction. Wind and solar are here, now.
- 3 years ago
-
PolicyWonk
-
-
GRIPEABOUTSTRIPES
-
It's amazing that now-2008 the "earth" is one of the biggest issues on the plate of politicians.In 1962 the year I was born the issues from what I have read and been told were for Cuban missiles, warfare, and other foreign policy's. Who could reach the Moon first. Who could be the country with the biggest military, and on, and on, and on.Back in the 80's the issue of "GLOBAL WARMING"hit the market yet not one politician cared.We now can feel the effects and can see the effects, so I guess we should now reverse it.This country needs to forsee into the future more and stop now what will effect us later.Do not procrastinate.
- 3 years ago
-
GRIPEABOUTSTRIPES
-
-
Eternal_Wind
-
GRIPEABOUTSTRIPES:
Kinda funny how they know the problem ahead of time, yet do nothing about it until it starts breathing down on their backs/necks.
- 3 years ago
-
Eternal_Wind
-
-
wordless
-
capitalism's polluting the world away... not just the US, everyone's working together on that better than they work together on anything ...
- 3 years ago
-
wordless
-
-
Eternal_Wind
-
Kinda... but there are still others contributing. We should still focus on ourselves first, then the others when we're done fixing our own problems (as in with our enviromental issues and stuff)
EDIT:: So they can't complain about us bossing them around for what they're not doing. We don't have to completely finish fixing our problems to start complaining about theirs though. We could start complaining to them about what they need to fix while we're fixing our issues, but they're not going to start taking action unless we actually start because they'll see us as hippocrates, thus our word would be meaningless to them.
- 3 years ago
-
Eternal_Wind
-
-
Egnatius212
-
So, uh, what's new?
- 3 years ago
-
Egnatius212
-
-
thenumbertoo
-
i think in last few decades CHINA has been a major contributor a lot of that.
but overall it is a combination of everyone not doing their part on the world stage.
- 3 years ago
-
thenumbertoo
-
-
idealist
-
its not just u.s. it every one! but its not like we are not to blame. and if so we should be the cure and not the syntom!!
- 3 years ago
-
idealist
-
-
aschneider
-
In addition to loving Derrick Shore I am loving the CJ specials. Hope there's more to come in 09. Keep it folksy, folks.
- 3 years ago
-
aschneider
-
-
hapa2303
-
I think right now the U.S. does play a big role in the environmental crisis, but the biggest issue is whether "booming" countries like China and India are willing to hinder economic growth, and in turn, help reduce carbon emissions. If this happens, more pressure will be put on the US to do the same.
- 3 years ago
-
hapa2303
