Green | January 25, 2009 | 51 comments

Fighting GMO contamination around the world

Image
JanforGore
Ever since GMOs were first introduced in the mid-1990s, farmers’ groups and NGOs have warned that they would contaminate other crops. This has happened, just as predicted. In this article we look at how communities in different parts of the world that have experienced contamination are developing strategies to fight against it.

[Three videos accompany this article which can be viewed here: http://www.grain.org/videos/?id=195]

When GM crops are planted they contaminate other crops with transgenic material. In places where GM crops are grown on a large scale, it has already become almost impossible to find crops of the same species that are free of GM material. And the contamination spreads even to areas where GM crops are not officially permitted. [1] The GM Contamination Register, managed by GeneWatch UK and Greenpeace International, has documented more than 216 cases of GM contamination in 57 countries over the past 10 years, including 39 cases in 2007. [2]

Monsanto and the other biotech corporations have always known that their GM crops would contaminate other crops. Indeed, it was part of their strategy to force the world into accepting GMOs. But around the world people are refusing to lie down and accept genetic modification as a fact of life; instead they are struggling against it, even in places subject to contamination. In fact, some communities experiencing contamination are developing sophisticated forms of resistance to GM crops. These usually begin with short-term strategies to decontaminate their local seeds, but often seek over the long term to strengthen their traditional food and agricultural systems.

We look at the experiences of communities in different parts of the world in dealing with GM contamination to see what insights they can offer others faced with similar situations. Each situation is unique, and gives rise to different processes. Common to all of them is the primary importance of collective action – of communities working at the grassroots to identify their own solutions and not depending on courts or governments, which, without strong social pressure, tend to side with industry.
  1. groups:
    News and Politics,   Green,   Earth and Science,   Health,   1 more
  2. tags:
    News and Politics Green Earth and Science Environment 23 more
  3.     
    |

51 comments // Fighting GMO contamination around the world

  • ChewWawa
    • 0
      ChewWawa  
    • Many European countries have 'seed banks' to ensure that the advent of GMO's wouldn't completely 'knock out' varieties of produce due to their phytosteroidal qualities. I don't know if this was mentioned in the link; I didn't have time to peruse. And I believe Monsanto was trying to sue those countries for the illegality of seed banks. Crazy.

    • 3 years ago
  • AnemicElitist
  • judiestar
    • 0
      judiestar  
    • Here is the Responsible Technology's Non-GMO Shopping Guide. I suggest we all print it and take it to the store whenever we shop. I had no idea of the blatent proliferation of GMO products in our foods. I want to puke, especially because I just had some Rice-A-Roni. I have to go stick my fingers down my throat now....

    • 3 years ago
  • judiestar
    • 0
      judiestar  
    • Image
    • Go to the above link to send an email to 63 companies demanding that they reject the use of GMO sugar beets in their products. Then tell all your friends.

    • 3 years ago
  • cheezynuts
  • briannalau
  • Dmitri_Molotov
  • JanforGore
  • changeforbalance
  • JanforGore
  • Dmitri_Molotov
  • JanforGore
  • Dmitri_Molotov
  • judiestar
  • mykuh
  • Vierotchka
  • Dmitri_Molotov
  • judiestar
    • 0
      judiestar  
    • mykuh:

      @Vierotchka: THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU for posting this video! I have just joined the campaign.org and am currently perusing the seeds of deception website. I had no idea that aspartame was a product of genetic engineering! I dont care how much it costs me, I will only purchase foods from now on that are organic. I will travel any number of miles to go to Whole Foods. I cant thank you enough for this video. You have truly changed my life, and my children's lives!

    • 3 years ago
  • JanforGore
    • 0
      JanforGore  
    • Scientist: Gm food safety testing is"woefully inadequate."

      Excerpt from interview with Dr. Judy Carman, PhD:

      "GM food advocates often claim that “no one in the US has ever gotten sick from eating GM foods.”

      It’s rubbish to say that no one ever has ever gotten sick eating GM foods. The fact is that no one knows. Since GM foods have been introduced, millions of Americans have been hospitalized and millions have died, and no one has investigated to see if any of those cases have been due to eating GM foods. The HIV/AIDS epidemic went unnoticed for decades, and the relationship between smoking and lung cancer went undetected for generations.

      With the current level of safety testing, if GM foods do cause human health problems, it will be very difficult to determine this, even though there may be many cases of illness.

      What type of safety testing do you think should be done on GM crops?

      We need long-term safety tests that are relevant to human health done by people independent of GM vested interests. The safety testing done now is woefully inadequate. Biotechnology companies often don’t even use the whole GM grain in feeding studies. Instead they tend to only use a protein extract that doesn’t even come from the GM plant. The feeding tests are also only done for few days or a few weeks.

      Safety tests should involve comparing animals fed GM foods with animals fed the equivalent non-GM food. The animals should be fed long enough and involve tests that, at a minimum, measure risks of cancer and allergy and threats to reproduction and organ health.

      Do you believe that scientific research will conclusively show that GM foods pose significant health risks?

      You never know what will happen. Independent research is finally being done and is showing adverse affects. There’s been an avalanche of bad news for the GM industry lately.

      Copyright The Organic & Non-GMO Report January 2009

    • 3 years ago
  • judiestar
  • JanforGore
    • 0
      JanforGore  
    • Another ignorant question. And " shut the hell up?" Not bloody likely. How do we know that IF THEY DON'T TELL US that what an illness we may be going through is caused by eating GMOS in our food? Do you honestly think they would? And again, if they are safe, why won't they allow the source on labels in this country? Allergies? Rashes? Morgellon's Disease? Cancers? Infertility? Immunological defects? Increased Diabetes? Other ailments? How do we know? Don't hand me your usual mumbo jumbo with no back up. Transgenic contamination is also KILLING biodiversity, and that indeed does affect us. Also, no LONGTERM studies on the effects of these 'organisms' were conducted. If you have one then post it. And I am no "nature worshipping hippee" (does that then make you a nature destroying conservative freak? How do you like the labels?) but I am a world citizen who believes in MORALITY and in not screwing around with the natural processes of this planet that have sustained us for centuries. Again, if you have something substantial to prove a point, post it.

    • 3 years ago
  • Dmitri_Molotov
    • -1
      Dmitri_Molotov  
    • JanforGore:

      Unwilling to change the world around you I see.
      Again with the sweeping generalizations that you condemn so many for in your other posts. It is possible that not all GMOs are evil incarnate, that maybe some small startup biotech company might just be trying to put a little more food on the table while earning a living.
      One of the more disturbingly luddite-like things you have stated is that you believe that modification is a moral sin. So are you going to go crusading around telling folks not to buy home and garden GM kits when they're made available so that maybe, just once, they can actually grow some fucking tomatoes that they know have good genes because they made them themselves? I can tell you right now, the msot common response you're going to get is "Fuck you! You can't tell me what to do!"
      Let people do as they wish if they are not interfering with you. If your so worried about contamination, get some folks together and start engineering vaccines. If a corp can do it, the thousands of naturists here on current can do it.

    • 3 years ago
  • JanforGore
  • judiestar
    • 0
      judiestar  
    • JanforGore:

      @Dmitri: you can feel free to eat all the GMOs you like. You have that choice, and more power to you. I say go to Monsanto, get some seeds, and grow your own GMO garden. I'm sure you'll be very happy.

    • 3 years ago
  • Dmitri_Molotov
    • -1
      Dmitri_Molotov  
    • Yet anpther example of the sweeping generalization that all GMOs are inherently evil. Get a grip folks. While the copyright enforcement methods used by the biotech corps are nothing short of draconian, how the fuck has GMO food adversely affected you? Unless one of you nature-worshiping hipsters can tell me some story about how you were profoundly and horribly affected by an ear of corn designed to get through a tough winter or two, shut the hell up. Corp enforcement doesn't count, I'm well aware of the gestapo tactics they take but that has nothing to do with the actual genetic mods.

    • 3 years ago
  • kyackr
    • 0
      kyackr  
    • Dmitri_Molotov:

      attempts to marginalize those who appreciate nature are past. the days of dreaming that control, manipulation and alteration of nature are in human's best interests are so far off truth. Monsanto is a poster corporation for the corporatism that rules the US government.. the revolving door infiltration of government agencies such as the FDA and USDA that were supposed to lookout for the publics welfare is insane.. and Monsanto's track record of recent decades demands 'concern' or 'ignorance' .. those are the choices.

    • 3 years ago
  • Dmitri_Molotov
    • -1
      Dmitri_Molotov  
    • Dmitri_Molotov:

      Kyackr, while you appreciate nature, I appreciate technology. Manipulation of nature? It is what humans do. We shape our surroundings to fit our needs and wants.
      Anyone with half a brain knows that these days corps control everything. Money is power, and power is more money. Just the world we live in man.
      The "illusion" that man can control nature is truer than ever. We can make life as we see fit. The illusion that one day we'll be magically free from the evils of money is what is untrue.
      Also, you have posed no answer to my query about how this company has ever personally affected you.

    • 3 years ago
  • csmonut
    • 0
      csmonut  
    • Dmitri_Molotov:

      Yes, GM foods do affect me.
      How am I to know that after I eat that ear of corn, and don't feel well, it is NOT from an allergy due to a GM food?
      How am I to know that the reason the tomato I just ate made me feel, not ill, but left a bad after-taste? So to speak.
      Read Jan's post below. She has done much research into this.
      I suggest you do the same.

      I too, appreciate technology. I am a gadget freak when it comes to new technology and I applaude everytime a new breakthrough has been made in medicine.

      BTW...I have always tried to make it a point not to insult people with name calling just because I do not agree with their opinion.

    • 3 years ago
  • JanforGore
  • judiestar
    • 0
      judiestar  
    • JanforGore:

      Jan--they already are!!! The same companies that create GMOs are the same companies doing the "research" for human genetic engineering. They are not trying to "save" anyone from disease or suffering. They are trying to recreate the world in their image.

    • 3 years ago
  • judiestar
  • Bren589
  • ChewWawa
  • cheezynuts
  • judiestar
    • 0
      judiestar  
    • cheezynuts:

      All genetic modification is wrong, but every time there is an article about genetic engineering in or for humans the crowd cheers like monkeys. GM foods and GM humans is the same thing. The same companies who make GMOs create the genetic engineering that supposedly will "save us all from disease". What a bunch of crap. But we all fall for it. Except me that is.

    • 3 years ago
  • shade1012
  • kyackr
    • 0
      kyackr  
    • shade1012:

      the concept "we" need GM food to solve world hunger is marketing ploy of the likes of Monsanto in their quest for control of food.
      keep this in mind.. corporations like Monsanto are not concerned about the public's welfare

    • 3 years ago
  • JanforGore
    • 0
      JanforGore  
    • shade1012:

      Absolutely. Just dissolve the cartels of world organizations using political and economic bias in getting food to where it belongs and denying access to push GMOs on the world. This is just like the "clean coal" myth... it doesn't exist. It is just a way for Monsanto and other companies to get a foothold to use their fake corn to make ethanol. If there were really such a need for them as food, why would they use it to grow corn only to be used as ethanol, and raise their seed and pesticide prices? And why are there still so many starving people in the world? This isn't about feeding the world, it is about feeding their pockets.

    • 3 years ago
  • Vierotchka
  • Dmitri_Molotov
  • JanforGore
  • Dmitri_Molotov
  • Cynic2
  • JanforGore
    • 0
      JanforGore  
    • From the article:

      An invasion of illegal GMOs into Thai farms

      GM contamination was first reported in Thailand in 1999 after cotton samples from field research conducted by BIOTHAI and the Alternative Agriculture Network (AAN) were found to be contaminated with Bt cotton – a genetically engineered cotton variety produced by Monsanto. In 2004, tests made by Greenpeace revealed that a local farmer’s plantation in Khon Kaen province was contaminated by GM papaya. That farmer was one of 2,600 who had bought papaya seedlings from the Department of Agriculture’s research station where field trials of GM papaya were being conducted.

      At first, the government denied that GM crops were being grown in Thailand, but the contamination was so widespread that it reached another province, Ubol Ratchatani, where at least 90 farms had also received papaya seedlings. Most recently, in 2007, Chulalongkorn University’s Faculty of Science and BIOTHAI found GM contamination in maize, soya and cotton samples that they tested from provinces all over the country.

      The Thais believe that a two-pronged approach is necessary to address this situation. On the one hand, pressure should be put on the government to implement policies that protect the country from GM contamination. The Thai Working Group Against GMOs, which BIOTHAI coordinates, has organised numerous activities to keep the national moratorium on GMOs in place. They have sent petition letters, organised demonstrations in front of government offices, and pushed for a dialogue with top officials, including the deputy Prime Minister and Secretaries of Health and Agriculture. These efforts had an impact : on 25 December 2007, the Thai government announced its rules on GMOs which include, among other things, a mandatory public hearing prior to field testing, and a recommendation that approval from the local people in the field test area, as well as from independent NGOs and the academic community, should be obtained. From the perspective of BIOTHAI – which is currently running a campaign to develop a People’s Biosafety Law – this was an important victory.

      On the other hand, the Thais are working to increase local capacity to develop systems to detect contamination and deal with its impacts. The Khao Kwan Foundation (KKF), one of the founding organisations of AAN, has been mobilising farmers’ knowledge to identify contaminated seeds and to control or eliminate them. The KKF runs trainings and workshops on seed breeding and selection, which indirectly deal with contamination.

      KKF believes that farmers are able to notice anything abnormal in their crops, because of their in-depth knowledge of seeds and their skill in selection. Whether it is the colour, the hardness or the smell, every variety has peculiarities that farmers who have been working on seeds know in detail. So any alterations will be easily detected, even before the plant starts to flower.

      Daycha Siripatra, founder of KKF, says: “This is the principle of local adaptability. We’ve made our seeds recognise their environment and use that environment to express their potential. An alien seed, like a GMO, will not automatically thrive in our area and, even if it grows, farmers will be able to notice it right away, just from its appearance.”

    • 3 years ago
  • csmonut
    • 0
      csmonut  
    • It is worrisome that organic foods may/probably in some places, been contaminated by GM foods.
      Once again, thanks for keeping this in the limelight, where it belings.

    • 3 years ago
  • JanforGore
  • Dmitri_Molotov
  • JanforGore
  • Dmitri_Molotov
  • judiestar
    • 0
      judiestar  
    • csmonut:

      @Dmitri: the problem is, the mainstream media will not report on GMOs, because they are either threatened or bribed. So you will only find info in independent sources who are not "buyable". So maybe in your mind that is not credible, but I say a news agency that can be bought or bullied is not credible.

    • 3 years ago
  • JanforGore
    • 0
      JanforGore  
    • This was all planned by biotech companies in order to force people to eat their organisms whether they plant them or not. We do not even know how much of organic food that now makes it to market may be contaminated by this transgenic pollution. Again, this is one of the most important issues we face for our future. What we eat and what is in it; what we drink and what is in it; and who or what owns it all will run our lives if we allow corporations to grow our food, privitize our water, and lie to us about the quality of it all.

      This is a crucial issue that ties directly to the economy, environment, health, democracy, and eventually national security. This is why we need to be stronger in our voice to the Obama administration regarding changing food policy in America. Monsanto must no longer be allowed with other chemical companies to industrialize agriculture to the point where biodiversity and agriculture are dead.

      The good news is that people around the world are fighting this.

    • 3 years ago
more from Green:

top videos