Green | February 27, 2009 | 6 comments

THE GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS by Michel Chossudovsky

Mobius2012
THE GLOBAL RESEARCH LECTURE

Montreal Lecture: The Great Depression of the 21st Century

Montreal, January 14, 2009

Causes and consequences of the financial meltdown;
The speculative onslaught;
Financial fraud and the "bank bailouts";
Bankruptcy of the real economy;
Impacts on employment, wages and social services;
Towards a spiraling public debt;
The economic crisis and its relationship to the Middle East war;
The centralization of corporate power;
The concentration of wealth;
The globalization of poverty.

What are the policy alternatives?
  1. groups:
    News and Politics,   Politics,   Green,   Culture,   4 more
  2. tags:
    News and Politics Politics Culture Green 6 more
  3.     
    |

6 comments // THE GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS by Michel Chossudovsky

  • kennymotown
    • 0
      kennymotown  
    • Run away unfettered, and unregulated capitalism always fails for the masses. At this point bringing back regulations may be too late, the derivative money game has an estimated 1,000 trillion dollars bet and thats right bet on things such as the weather. When the rich have been given tax cuts such as the tax cut in 2001 they have extra money they used to place bets and a few years later we all pay. It always happens.

    • 3 years ago
  • Highr0ller
    • 0
      Highr0ller [removed]  
    • Image
    • Casino Capitalism.
      How Credit Unions Survived the Crash
      By Ralph Nader
      Eighty five million Americans belong to credit unions which are not-for-profit cooperatives owned by their members who are depositors and borrowers. Your neighborhood or workplace credit union did not invest in these notorious speculative derivatives nor did they offer people "teaser rates" to sign on for a home mortgage they could not afford.

    • 3 years ago
  • Highr0ller
    • 0
      Highr0ller [removed]  
    • Image
    • Chapter One: WAR is a racket. It always has been.

      It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives.

      A racket is best described, I believe, as something that is not what it seems to the majority of the people. Only a small "inside" group knows what it is about. It is conducted for the benefit of the very few, at the expense of the very many. Out of war a few people make huge fortunes. [See War Industries Board -- ed]

      In the [first] World War, a mere handful garnered the profits of the conflict. At least 21,000 new millionaires and billionaires were made in the United States during the World War. That many admitted their huge blood gains in their income tax returns. How many other war millionaires falsified their tax returns no one knows.

      How many of these war millionaires shouldered a rifle? How many of them dug a trench? How many of them knew what it meant to go hungry in a rat-infested dug-out? How many of them spent sleepless, frightened nights, ducking shells and shrapnel and machine gun bullets? How many of them parried a bayonet thrust of an enemy? How many of them were wounded or killed in battle?

      Out of war nations acquire additional territory, if they are victorious. They just take it. This newly acquired territory promptly is exploited by the few -- the selfsame few who wrung dollars out of blood in the war. The general public shoulders the bill.

      And what is this bill?

      This bill renders a horrible accounting. Newly placed gravestones. Mangled bodies. Shattered minds. Broken hearts and homes. Economic instability. Depression and all its attendant miseries. Back-breaking taxation for generations and generations.

      For a great many years, as a soldier, I had a suspicion that war was a racket; not until I retired to civil life did I fully realize it. Now that I see the international war clouds gathering, as they are today, I must face it and speak out.

      Again they are choosing sides. France and Russia met and agreed to stand side by side. Italy and Austria hurried to make a similar agreement. Poland and Germany cast sheep's eyes at each other, forgetting for the nonce their dispute over the Polish Corridor.

      The assassination of King Alexander of Yugoslavia complicated matters. Yugoslavia and Hungary, long bitter enemies, were almost at each other's throats. Italy was ready to jump in. But France was waiting. So was Czechoslovakia. All of them are looking ahead to war. Not the people -- not those who fight and pay and die -- only those who foment wars and remain safely at home to profit.......................

    • 3 years ago
  • Highr0ller
    • 0
      Highr0ller [removed]  
    • "The rich will strive to establish their dominion and enslave the rest. They always did...they always will. They will have the same effect here as elsewhere, if we do not, by the power of government, keep them in their proper spheres." -- Gouverneur Morris - (1752-1816) represented Pennsylvania in the Constitutional Convention of 1787, author of large sections of the Constitution for the United States, credited as the author of its Preamble

    • 3 years ago
more from Green:

top videos