Green | May 16, 2009 | 2 comments

Dr. James Hansen: cap and trade not good enough to avoid climate catastrophe

Image
JanforGore
Refreshing to hear someone talk about the realities of the climate crisis we face. Refreshing to hear someone talk who is not so involved in the politics of it that they can talk about what we must do instead of what we must settle for. Of course, a carbon tax ( or as I would call it, a Co2 reduction fund) is just not "politically feasible" to those on Capitol Hill because it actually holds polluters accountable.

As always we must stroke them, massage them, cajole them, and basically kiss their as*** in order to get to the point where carbon emissions will hopefully be lessened to the point where we can avoid that tipping point. Unfortunately, instituting cap and trade now by issuing free pollution credits that will be abused along with insignificant emission caps won't get us to that point in the time we need to get there without other measures.

Now, if this were 1985 I would more than likely be for cap and trade. However, this isn't 1985, it is 2009, and the window leading up to the tipping points of irreversible consequences is closing more rapidly. It is actually a shame that politicians need to be looked upon now in order to give us policy regarding a crisis that scientists should be making since they are the ones with the knowledge. I have never seen such a disconnect between scientists and politicians on an issue, and in the case of this current crisis, it is a disconnect we cannot afford.

Some say we cannot allow this bill to fail because it would be bad. Well, my question is, how bad will it get even if it passes? If you cannot assure that we will reach even 70% emission cuts by 2040, then what good is an inadequate bill just for the sake of having a bill? I just sincerely hope that if this particular bill is passed, it does not cause other countries to state that their emissions targets can be as low as well, because when we had to chance to really lead, we followed.
  1. groups:
    News and Politics,   Green,   Earth and Science
  2. tags:
    News and Politics Green Earth and Science Environment 8 more
  3.     
    |

2 comments // Dr. James Hansen: cap and trade not good enough to avoid climate catastrophe

  • JanforGore
  • JanforGore
    • 0
      JanforGore  
    • From the article:

      NASA’s leading climate scientist says he hopes that climate legislation proposed by Democratic Reps. Henry Waxman (Calif.) and Edward Markey (Mass.) to introduce carbon emissions trading to the United States fails. He says lawmakers should abandon cap-and-trade initiatives altogether and implement a simple carbon tax instead.

      James Hansen, director of the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies and a vocal advocate for action on global warming, told an audience at a conference hosted by Columbia University climate policy students that cap and trade is a scheme devised by Wall Street that will do nothing to alleviate the global warming problem.

      “Trading of rights to pollute … introduces speculation and makes millionaires on Wall Street,” Hansen said in his keynote lecture at Columbia University’s 350 Climate Conference held here Saturday. “I hope cap and trade doesn’t pass, because we need a much more effective approach.”

      Hansen also stands opposed to so-called “cap and dividend” proposals that would introduce pollution trading and a near full auctioning of emissions, with proceeds from the auctions going back to the public. Instead, Hansen proposed a “tax and dividend” approach to tax fossil fuels at the point where they are extracted from the ground, to set a firm price on carbon. Proceeds from the tax, rather than from the auctioning of allowances, would then be distributed to consumers.

      “It could be implemented in one year, as opposed to decades with cap and trade,” he said. “The bureaucracy is very simple.”

      Public remains apathetic about climate Hansen also said climate activists need to be more vocal and strategic in getting the public to lobby harder for action to reduce emissions of CO2 and other greenhouse gases. He pointed to recent public opinion polls showing that among Americans’ concerns, climate change ranks nearly last in the order of priority, well behind the economy and the United States’ dependence on foreign oil.

      “It’s hard for people to realize that we have a crisis, because you don’t see much happening,” he said. “If people understood the implications for their children and grandchildren, they would care.”

      Hansen also urged conference participants to press the United States to negotiate a robust international agreement by the final negotiating round of U.N. climate change talks this year at Copenhagen. He said the new agreement has to be much more far reaching than the Kyoto Protocol, which he deems to have been entirely ineffective, and the Copenhagen talks should emphasize action by the United States and China.

    • 4 years ago
more from Green:

top videos