NGOs draft their own global treaty to tackle climate change
-
-
- JanforGore
- added this
The Copenhagen Climate Treaty, as they call it, will be presented to bureaucrats from over 180 countries meeting here (June 1-12) in an attempt to draft the official version of the treaty.
Srinivas Krishnaswamy of Greenpeace India, one of the 47 authors of the NGO document, told IANS: “The treaty does not only tackle dangerous climate change. It will bring sustainable solutions to address the global recession, boost social justice and help eradicate poverty.
“It proposes institutional and political solutions as well as legal structures that governments should adopt to get an agreement all countries could sign up in Copenhagen.”
The authors of the NGO draft treaty have proposed a “global carbon budget that caps the world’s total emissions and breaks down which country can emit how much during the process of transforming the world into a zero carbon economy”.
Excess carbon dioxide emitted due to industrial activity is the main greenhouse gas that is causing climate change, which is already affecting farm output, making droughts, floods and storms more frequent and more damaging and raising the sea level.
India is among the countries worst affected by what UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon has called “the defining challenge of our age”.
India’s chief climate negotiator Shyam Saran told IANS that the government wants more emphasis on strengthening the existing UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and the 1997 Kyoto Protocol rather than a new treaty.
Reacting to this, Krishnaswamy said no existing agreement would be replaced but would be strengthened to “become broader and deeper, reflecting the need for industrialised countries to commit to much greater cuts in emissions”.
“The Copenhagen Protocol would be additional, setting targets for the US (which is not part of Kyoto), describing the actions that developing countries should take, and defining the financial and technological support industrialised countries must provide to them. It would also set out how adaptation and forest protection will be funded,” he explained.
Developing countries have been strongly against any attempt to cap their carbon emissions, arguing this would constrain their economic growth to handle a problem caused almost exclusively by industrialised countries over the last more than 200 years.
Krishnaswamy said: “Newly industrialised countries, such as Singapore and Saudi Arabia, should take on binding emission reduction targets. The criteria for designating a country as ‘newly industrialised’ should be agreed in Copenhagen.
end of excerpt
-
- groups:
- Green, Earth and Science
-
- tags:
- Green, Earth and Science, Environment, Climate Change, 6 more
-
-
JanforGore
-
40% emissions reductions by 2020, and 95% emissions reductions by 2050.
NOW you're talking. But of course, these are targets from NON governmental organziations, in other words, realistic and necessary goals based on science not "politics"
- 2 years ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
Regenerate70
-
JanforGore:
There are some cities that are setting goals close to or above the 40% 10 year timeline. Watch California and Brazil - see: http://www.worldforum.org/Join-Brazil.htm. I see a coalition of cities, business and NGO community coming together to establish a progressive agenda for Copenhagen.
- 2 years ago
-
Regenerate70
-
-
Regenerate70
-
If you are interested in the recommendations coming out of the NGO community for Copenhagen & what cities can do - see Newsom Environment questions here: http://current.com/items/90173126_can-san-francisco-take-a-leadership-position-f...
- 2 years ago
-
Regenerate70
-
-
JanforGore
-
This could get interesting. Did those governments meeting at Copenhagen think the rest of us would simply be silent and allow them to do as they please for their own benefit and profit?
- 2 years ago
-
JanforGore
