Green | July 17, 2009 | 3 comments

Exxon join with DNA pioneer to develop algae biofuels

Image
TommyTooThumbs
(CNN) -- ExxonMobil is teaming up with the biotech research company run by genomics pioneer Craig Venter to produce algae-based biofuels.

The world's second largest company announced on Tuesday that it will invest at least $300 million in biotechnology research with Venter's Synthetic Genomics Inc to help develop biofuels made from algae, as it looks to diversify its energy portfolio.

"We believe that biofuel produced by algae could be a meaningful part of the solution in the future if our efforts result in an economically viable, low net-carbon emission transportation fuel," said Dr. Emil Jacobs, vice president of research and development at ExxonMobil Research and Engineering in a press statement.

The total amount of investment over an unspecified period of years could total $600 million. ExxonMobil is looking toward algae-derived biofuel as part of its "ongoing efforts to reduce emissions in our operations and by consumers of our products, through both efficiency improvements and technology breakthroughs," said Michael Dolan, senior vice president of the company.

The biofuel industry is currently facing a shift from first-generation biofuels to so-called advanced biofuels as evidence mounts that corn-based ethanol and soybean biodiesel are not as ecologically, socially or economically sustainable as many first thought.


Many analysts blamed a large part of the food price hikes around the world in 2008 on the increase in crops and arable land being diverted to produce ethanol for biofuels.

"The real challenge to creating a viable next-generation biofuel is the ability to produce it in large volumes which will require significant advances in both science and engineering," said Venter, CEO of SGI in a press statement.

He hailed the agreement with ExxonMobil as bringing together "complementary capabilities and expertise ... that could lead to the large scale production of biofuel from algae."

Algae have been touted as a better organic material for producing biofuel by many researchers and entrepreneurs. It does not take up any arable land and can be grown in controlled conditions; at a basic level algae only needs water, sunlight, carbon dioxide and some nutrients to grow. Algae also photosynthesize to double its size in about a day.

Nevertheless, critics have questioned whether enough biomass can be produced on an industrial scale to meet future fuel demands.

The ExxonMobil announcement "eyebrow raising," said Gillian Madill of Friends of the Earth, who voiced skepticism about the company's commitment to non-polluting sources of energy.

However, it is part of a recognized trend for large oil companies to invest in synthetic biology for the development of biofuels; in 2007 BP invested $500 million over 10 years in biofuel research and other energy companies including Shell have followed suit.

"Will [ExxonMobil] spend the same amount of money advertising this investment as the investment itself? Are they investing in any truly 'green' technology such as wind or solar? The jury is out," Madill told CNN.

"Biofuels, if anything, are a short-term way to transition us from using fossil fuels to more long-term, truly sustainable sources of energy like wind and solar power.

"Many of these oil companies are making steep investments in synthetic biology because they can literally own the very microorganisms that aim to produce fuel because of the current patentability of DNA. If synthetic biology proves successful, 'Big Oil' will not only own the fuel itself, but own the very life form that produces it," Madill said.
  1. groups:
    Green,   Green Transportation,   biofuel
  2. tags:
    Biofuel Exxon Algae
  3.     
    |

3 comments // Exxon join with DNA pioneer to develop algae biofuels

  • Wetdog
    • 0
      Wetdog  
    • I have warned about this before too.

      It is the same basic strategy being used by Monsanto in an effort to monopolize the soybean market and control the source of your food.

      from the article:
      --------""Many of these oil companies are making steep investments in synthetic biology because they can literally own the very microorganisms that aim to produce fuel because of the current patentability of DNA. If synthetic biology proves successful, 'Big Oil' will not only own the fuel itself, but own the very life form that produces it," Madill said"---------

      Starting Oct. 1, the only diesel fuel you will be able to buy in the US is USLD. Ultra low sulphur diesel. It is petroleum that has much of the sulphur refined out. It is expensive to produce, and using a lot more water to refine, about 3-4 times as much----and creates a lot more polluted waste. It will be more expensive for that reason alone. Not to mention the fact that the industry is going to add every penny they possibly can to the price----warranted by increased cost or not. I notice that the oil industry is calling it S15(15 ppm/million sulphur or less)

      They are calling it S15 to hide the fact that it is actually a biofuel. When you take the sulphur out of petroleum diesel, it does not have enough lubrication to run an engine. It rapidly destroys the engine from excessive wear. Therefore, to make USLD S15, they have to add 2% biodiesel. Biodiesel contains no sulphur(which causes acid rain) and lubricates better than petroleum.

      When they tell you S15 low sulphur----what you ae actually getting is B2 biodiesel. Why not just use B100? Biodiesel needs no refining and contains no sulphur at all. It does not pollute when you make it, it does not pollute when you use it.

      The trouble for the Big Oil companies with biofuels is, there are no refineries needed. If you don't need refineries, you don't need Big Oil companies.

    • 2 years ago
  • 1Eco_Media
  • TommyTooThumbs
more from Green:

top videos